Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1908208-CJCO-190818705
AMD Ryzen 3000 vs. Intel On Linux Ubuntu 19.04,
"Blender 2.80 - Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",772.57,774.88,776.72
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",848.24,848.52,849.53
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",655.88,654.37,655.98
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",458.88,462.19,459.2
"Intel Core i5 9400F",1281.88,1286.85,1280.19
"Intel Core i9 9900K",675.47,676.07,673.63
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3",612.43,609.62,609.22
"Appleseed 2.0 Beta - Scene: Emily",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",422.689408
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",481.783851
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",378.973835
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",271.994391
"Intel Core i5 9400F",774.798094
"Intel Core i9 9900K",421.185319
"CP2K Molecular Dynamics 6.1 - Fayalite-FIST Data",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",530.331
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",321.563
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",318.342
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",325.732
"Intel Core i5 9400F",780.322
"Intel Core i9 9900K",638.043
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3",2512.348
"GROMACS 2018.3 - Water Benchmark",
Higher Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",0.726,0.724,0.723
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",0.667,0.664,0.663
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",0.756,0.757,0.755
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",0.98,0.976,0.974
"Intel Core i5 9400F",0.745,0.741,0.738
"Intel Core i9 9900K",0.841,0.838,0.832
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3",1.25,1.27,1.241
"Selenium - Benchmark: Jetstream - Browser: Firefox",
Higher Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",197.6,197.84,196.37
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",223.8,223.58,221.61
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",226.61,224.51,224.29
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",225.71,226.53,227.19
"Intel Core i5 9400F",206.2,204.97,205.27
"Intel Core i9 9900K",232.13,229.92,231.37
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3",153.82,153.18,155.76
"NAMD 2.13b1 - ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",2.29798,2.29966,2.29717,2.30053,2.29696,2.29792,2.29457,2.3056
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",2.70575,2.69976,2.70215,2.70454,2.70112,2.704,2.70689,2.70047,2.70359,2.71101,2.71236
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",2.06857,2.06838,2.06956,2.06971,2.06873,2.06692,2.07357
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",1.44344,1.4571,1.45833
"Intel Core i5 9400F",2.72835,2.70796,2.7046
"Intel Core i9 9900K",1.76339,1.7537,1.75022
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3",1.39502,1.4013,1.39788
"Blender 2.80 - Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",193.87,195.66,194.63
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",211.52,213.03,212.17
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",162.16,164.1,162.52
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",113.74,113.65,113.82
"Intel Core i5 9400F",305.74,307.28,306.53
"Intel Core i9 9900K",171.05,171.95,171.85
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3",145.18,145.7,146.16
"Selenium - Benchmark: Jetstream - Browser: Google Chrome",
Higher Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",194.3,194.67,194.63
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",220.95,219.83,225.34
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",224.51,221.78,225.59
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",222.63,229.01,220.94
"Intel Core i5 9400F",209.85,215.54,216.08
"Intel Core i9 9900K",204.65,208.21,210.48
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3",170.21,169.45,168.72
"Appleseed 2.0 Beta - Scene: Disney Material",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",242.125459
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",309.832266
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",238.118044
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",168.731186
"Intel Core i5 9400F",406.819354
"Intel Core i9 9900K",245.339219
"Selenium - Benchmark: ARES-6 - Browser: Firefox",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",59.46,59.63,60.09
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",51.76,51.5,51.46
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",50.98,51.19,50.66
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",51.63,50.98,51.9
"Intel Core i5 9400F",51.97,51.75,51.65
"Intel Core i9 9900K",52.01,51.12,50.5
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3",70.59,70.18,69.57
"Appleseed 2.0 Beta - Scene: Material Tester",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",225.596013
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",272.972773
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",213.660357
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",162.521354
"Intel Core i5 9400F",421.09869
"Intel Core i9 9900K",232.074826
"VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.8.0 - vpxenc VP9 1080p Video Encode",
Higher Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",138.43,132.35,133.22
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",109.32,143.33,141.28,143.62,146.28,144.17,145.29,141.16,146.96,141.99,140.53,147.43
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",128.31,137.56,136.25,138.05,138.23,135.98
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",176.63,180.27,178.95
"Intel Core i5 9400F",127.34,126.78,128.42
"Intel Core i9 9900K",193.19,190.36,190.45
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3",175.24,172.78,176.18
"asmFish 2018-07-23 - 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth",
Higher Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",24109441,24192788,24314060
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",21632337,21969735,21091714
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",28049820,27902009,28707847
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",39995197,39284561,38756384
"Intel Core i5 9400F",15022378,15902705,15030961,14898547,15567439
"Intel Core i9 9900K",28128067,28420110,27592041
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3",34991168,33933984,33215431
"Timed LLVM Compilation 6.0.1 - Time To Compile",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",473.29860496521
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",411.99581003189
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",333.56118798256
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",243.59415793419
"Intel Core i5 9400F",629.47225999832
"Intel Core i9 9900K",370.37232613564
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3",348.81567597389
"SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 6 - Scene: Candela City",
Higher Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",72.930115,73.002151,73.035561
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",73.311531,73.175888,73.665771
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",73.800903,73.721092,73.283806
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",74.103127,73.394218,73.119514
"Intel Core i5 9400F",73.60524,73.604553,73.935646
"Intel Core i9 9900K",74.214912,75.065353,73.860802
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3",34.195473,50.866673,51.444782,36.087536,51.378201,36.017612,50.178299,36.170654,36.130379,50.968548,50.912514,51.309227,50.971958,51.569473,51.025131
"Stockfish 9 - Total Time",
Higher Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",23235804,23393762,23357606
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",20657939,20565907,20136103
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",26575365,26030052,26371081
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",37523394,37548703,37629285
"Intel Core i5 9400F",13904643,14145923,14163723
"Intel Core i9 9900K",25270690,25385314,24862465
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3",31667074,31407658,31618320
"Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 4.18 - Time To Compile",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",77.760344982147,75.220127105713,75.27844119072
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",73.349999904633,71.426601886749,71.353417873383
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",59.579854011536,57.455647945404,57.457781076431
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",43.717366933823,41.235512018204,41.2599401474,41.273448944092
"Intel Core i5 9400F",113.96146392822,111.55167007446,110.99979305267
"Intel Core i9 9900K",67.566170930862,65.067333936691,65.314145088196
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3",64.03684091568,61.651287078857,61.374403953552
"Tesseract 2014-05-12 - Resolution: 3840 x 2160",
Higher Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",335.6986,347.1852,345.9892
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",370.8902,374.9723,368.2437
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",367.3451,377.3654,361.5997
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",380.7439,372.2604,375.5635
"Intel Core i5 9400F",276.4156,286.0896,274.6057
"Intel Core i9 9900K",426.42,344.1966,341.6053,354.088,412.9913,376.5309,357.254,265.0308,301.4779,346.2075,384.0555,394.4551,350.4634,310.9758,336.865
"Selenium - Benchmark: ARES-6 - Browser: Google Chrome",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",23.35,23.16,23.31
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",19.42,19.4,19.57
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",19.16,19.26,19.22
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",19.26,19.3,19.19
"Intel Core i5 9400F",20.01,19.91,19.93
"Intel Core i9 9900K",23.37,23.14,23.37
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3",25.16,24.96,25.12
"Rust Mandelbrot - Time To Complete Serial/Parallel Mandelbrot",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",45.924433231354,45.86801815033,45.680017948151
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",45.024277210236,44.671403169632,44.660839080811
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",40.716665029526,40.683224916458,40.712460041046
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",36.86684513092,35.855651855469,35.735599994659
"Intel Core i5 9400F",76.813189029694,76.799434900284,75.651228904724
"Intel Core i9 9900K",44.069983959198,44.032628059387,44.013174057007
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3",58.854748010635,58.759703874588,58.714796066284
"Selenium - Benchmark: Octane - Browser: Firefox",
Higher Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",32455,33336,32830
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",36881,37306,37136
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",36716,37251,36972
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",37621,37343,38623
"Intel Core i5 9400F",34757,35104,35240
"Intel Core i9 9900K",39527,39809,40022
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3",25704,25651,25870
"Xonotic 0.8.2 - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultimate",
Higher Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",235.6459441,232.5180562,234.6532632
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",288.9132572,288.7171197,290.1963365
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",293.8845216,291.5113527,294.0815809
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",288.7352138,294.2016448,293.1044617
"Intel Core i5 9400F",241.518447,238.6925478,239.2889825
"Intel Core i9 9900K",287.5791391,290.2518691,287.5950694
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3",224.3825887,224.8941173,224.2832512
"GIMP 2.8.22 - Test: unsharp-mask",
Lower Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3",45.786179065704,45.636913061142,45.570842027664
"Selenium - Benchmark: Octane - Browser: Google Chrome",
Higher Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",42779,42760,42471
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",48885,49633,49146
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",49388,49525,49585
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",50424,50162,49693
"Intel Core i5 9400F",45696,45313,45473
"Intel Core i9 9900K",45426,45558,45461
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3",34747,34695,34528
"Xonotic 0.8.2 - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultra",
Higher Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",290.9723136,297.6672299,293.981174
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",370.0996381,369.7728186,366.9243882
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",374.598782,378.3124445,378.5097581
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",376.6345342,368.8064401,374.5392098
"Intel Core i5 9400F",283.9292162,286.3753296,294.5375624
"Intel Core i9 9900K",356.0477988,352.773698,352.7384186
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3",290.3164006,293.6612485,293.5144076
"Tensorflow 2017-02-03 - Build: Cifar10",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",36.16,36.12,36.09
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",27.48,27.62,27.6
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",25.97,25.87,25.96
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",21.89,21.84,21.92
"Intel Core i5 9400F",33.59,33.6,33.42
"Intel Core i9 9900K",23.83,23.85,23.89
"Zstd Compression 1.3.4 - Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 19",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",29.250957012177,29.19412612915,28.38769197464
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",27.224924087524,27.311987161636,27.224670886993
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",22.232784032822,22.307193994522,22.474153995514
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",18.056303977966,17.839730978012,17.969477891922
"Intel Core i5 9400F",28.791076183319,28.77361702919,28.819519996643
"Intel Core i9 9900K",24.12505698204,24.274194955826,24.187905073166
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3",17.815766096115,16.155571937561,15.698971033096,17.666682004929,15.92995595932,18.998799085617,19.892148017883,18.607547044754,16.688081979752,16.040796041489,16.728859901428,16.120799064636,17.094028949738,15.954339027405,16.85862994194
"XZ Compression 5.2.4 - Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",39.530575990677,39.285021066666,39.442748069763
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",38.809343099594,38.856918096542,38.811597824097
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",31.452105045319,31.426753997803,31.653342008591
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",25.489053010941,25.655745029449,25.338165044785
"Intel Core i5 9400F",45.990641117096,45.985795974731,45.563333034515
"Intel Core i9 9900K",28.425310134888,28.454514980316,28.500374078751
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3",24.093426942825,24.143086910248,24.146764993668
"Coremark 1.0 - CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second",
Higher Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",263663.828619,271616.11589,271908.457486
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",280726.379507,279769.190418,278721.365735
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",374824.301109,371939.249923,367525.07593
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",540581.124709,533649.570116,521569.053569
"Intel Core i5 9400F",185110.198415,187315.245705,187025.131502
"Intel Core i9 9900K",401673.640167,384492.149952,397877.984085
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3",386333.454063,379596.678529,394915.463409
"dav1d 0.3 - Video Input: Summer Nature 4K",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",34.500859022141,34.191857814789,34.150330066681
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",30.922874927521,30.573754787445,30.624910831451
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",26.276826858521,25.997174978256,25.953329086304
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",22.078701972961,21.723363876343,21.795926094055
"Intel Core i5 9400F",42.693693161011,42.538555860519,42.587769985199
"Intel Core i9 9900K",26.717046976089,26.455154180527,26.508512020111
"Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 - Scene: Water Caustic",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",30.9384,30.9442,30.7936
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",30.6199,30.3554,30.7576
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",26.4941,26.9332,26.9228
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",24.042,23.9517,23.9563
"Intel Core i5 9400F",39.4894,39.2531,39.3614
"Intel Core i9 9900K",25.1291,24.9811,25.028
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3",30.4256,30.1286,30.8674
"John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 - Test: Blowfish",
Higher Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",17888,17965,17904
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",14608,14600,14589
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",19635,19577,19574
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",28380,28286,28207
"Intel Core i5 9400F",9774,9774,9768
"Intel Core i9 9900K",16737,16660,16636
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3",20097,20092,19990
"Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 - Scene: Hair",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",27.6259,27.623,27.7247
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",32.5529,32.6015,32.572
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",24.8552,24.958,24.9159
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",17.5156,17.5539,17.5085
"Intel Core i5 9400F",52.8007,52.8484,52.8294
"Intel Core i9 9900K",27.9101,28.1228,28.05
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3",23.9808,24.0313,24.0162
"Darktable 2.6.2 - Test: Server Room - Acceleration: CPU-only",
Lower Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3",3.817,4.036,3.392,4.112,4.023,3.575,3.921,3.589,3.98,4.009,3.593,3.99,4.042,3.856,3.959
"PyBench 2018-02-16 - Total For Average Test Times",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",1111,1104,1101
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",948,962,967
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",937,937,948
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",911,917,928
"Intel Core i5 9400F",953,956,954
"Intel Core i9 9900K",800,801,802
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3",1630,1621,1626
"GIMP 2.8.22 - Test: rotate",
Lower Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3",23.363780021667,23.309206962585,23.456427097321
"GIMP 2.8.22 - Test: auto-levels",
Lower Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3",22.72608590126,22.7766289711,22.883745193481
"x265 3.0 - H.265 1080p Video Encoding",
Higher Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",30.24,30.28,30.29
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",39.15,38.76,38.74
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",43.3,43.69,43.44
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",52.26,51.92,52.55
"Intel Core i5 9400F",33.55,33.69,33.5
"Intel Core i9 9900K",44.67,45.02,45.13
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3",10.97,10.87,10.82
"Darktable 2.6.2 - Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: CPU-only",
Lower Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3",5.87,6.455,6.087,6.132,5.938,5.991,6.155,6.091
"GIMP 2.10.8 - Test: rotate",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",13.25239610672,13.244467020035,13.269540071487
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",13.142416000366,11.729719877243,11.775879144669,11.813481807709,11.80353808403,11.750285863876,11.73131108284,11.77284693718,11.753779888153,11.729129076004,11.786494016647,11.814184904099,11.823745965958
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",11.825984954834,11.784305095673,11.7946600914
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",11.726403951645,11.856651067734,11.82966709137
"Intel Core i5 9400F",13.110873937607,13.112385034561,13.162716150284
"Intel Core i9 9900K",11.118270874023,11.170294046402,11.121990919113
"Go Benchmarks - Test: build",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",16419103520,15785393066,15799072297
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",13916014687,13384470541,13470832506
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",14055339249,13587373776,13608303967
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",14095503704,13616481123,13648674202
"Intel Core i5 9400F",13054200720,12752864886,12670503751
"Intel Core i9 9900K",11721246031,10889092152,10892495417,10966813141,10874399573,10913097228,10850976687
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3",20014013044,19952025846,19822348718
"GIMP 2.10.8 - Test: unsharp-mask",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",17.788566112518,17.559977054596,17.559601783752
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",15.374572992325,15.211957931519,15.148901939392
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",15.846419095993,15.830655813217,15.764048099518
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",17.285039901733,17.137424945831,17.056230068207
"Intel Core i5 9400F",15.763101100922,15.549705982208,15.547146081924
"Intel Core i9 9900K",15.255314826965,14.916195869446,14.903137922287
"Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 - Scene: Non-Exponential",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",9.30114,9.19202,9.28492
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",11.6905,11.6465,11.6998
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",8.30852,8.30822,8.2729
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",7.06806,5.73053,7.04839,7.06242,7.02247,7.02582,7.02353,5.75701,7.06583,7.0656,7.04299,7.04792,7.07158,7.04076,7.06204
"Intel Core i5 9400F",15.4997,15.5306,15.4868
"Intel Core i9 9900K",7.70461,7.68143,7.73341
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3",14.7155,14.5855,14.6038
"GIMP 2.10.8 - Test: auto-levels",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",15.41323018074,15.270328998566,15.384971857071
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",13.577939033508,13.369161128998,13.350687026978
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",13.551452159882,13.678937911987,13.59060382843
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",14.322371959686,14.454297065735,14.238106012344
"Intel Core i5 9400F",14.132414102554,14.170668125153,13.898725986481
"Intel Core i9 9900K",12.668509960175,12.633152961731,12.712111234665
"Darktable 2.6.0 - Test: Boat - Acceleration: CPU-only",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",12.488,12.457,12.513
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",11.142,11.097,11.069
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",11.359,11.46,11.416
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",11.168,11.171,11.172,11.163
"Intel Core i5 9400F",13.181,13.18,13.204
"Intel Core i9 9900K",13.772,13.776,13.788
"Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 - Scene: Volumetric Caustic",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",11.7731,11.7454,11.7207
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",13.4872,13.4841,13.5073
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",10.2316,10.2632,10.2764
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",7.51997,7.53209,7.49844
"Intel Core i5 9400F",19.2128,19.2164,19.2847
"Intel Core i9 9900K",9.97758,10.0563,9.97513
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3",11.7091,11.7875,11.8286
"Go Benchmarks - Test: json",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",6548259,6495855,6544679
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",7592858,7552940,7604723
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",5787270,5852071,5810630
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",4054468,4082090,4056137
"Intel Core i5 9400F",8098166,8120060,8123806
"Intel Core i9 9900K",5749446,5721631,5743304
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3",4450159,4435787,4456655
"Go Benchmarks - Test: garbage",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",1374098,1376457,1380404
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",1568151,1563805,1560024
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",1167537,1175793,1176464
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",859338,861700,858387
"Intel Core i5 9400F",2044360,2062982,2062480
"Intel Core i9 9900K",1150668,1151277,1152748
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3",1447116,1438928,1454927
"dav1d 0.3 - Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",11.891383886337,11.747679948807,11.701771020889
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",10.690854072571,10.504254817963,10.550482034683
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",9.88827085495,9.7320001125336,9.7485721111298
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",8.109885931015,8.0147998332977,8.0063619613647
"Intel Core i5 9400F",12.714995861053,12.660551071167,12.656814098358
"Intel Core i9 9900K",7.7469010353088,7.6201889514923,7.6644411087036
"Go Benchmarks - Test: http",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",5800,5798,5792
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",6571,6569,6565
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",4880,4905,4949
"Intel Core i5 9400F",7814,7986,7948
"Intel Core i9 9900K",4352,4357,4350
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3",6502,6517,6524
"GIMP 2.8.22 - Test: resize",
Lower Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3",9.6766400337219,9.6032109260559,9.5934820175171
"Darktable 2.6.2 - Test: Boat - Acceleration: CPU-only",
Lower Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3",8.166,7.981,7.968
"GIMP 2.10.8 - Test: resize",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",8.7725739479065,8.6911311149597,8.513769865036
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",7.8142211437225,7.8385231494904,7.8013110160828
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",7.428836107254,7.512619972229,7.6212389469147
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",7.5184760093689,7.4385979175568,7.5276339054108
"Intel Core i5 9400F",8.2318830490112,8.2574081420898,8.2199430465698
"Intel Core i9 9900K",6.8438529968262,6.825306892395,6.6301369667053
"SVT-AV1 0.5 - 1080p 8-bit YUV To AV1 Video Encode",
Higher Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",25.917,26.181,25.85
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",26.008,26.161,26.093
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",35.379,35.329,35.492
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",45.767,46.361,45.977
"Intel Core i5 9400F",22.401,22.525,22.439
"Intel Core i9 9900K",35.094,35.125,35.398
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3",31.591,31.481,30.941
"x264 2018-09-25 - H.264 Video Encoding",
Higher Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",77.22,79.14,79.46
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",75.43,77.3,77.96
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",91.15,93.98,93.68
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",135.51,141.63,140.62
"Intel Core i5 9400F",56.45,59.24,59.18
"Intel Core i9 9900K",92.89,95.3,95.41
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3",89.37,91.33,90.96
"Darktable 2.6.0 - Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: CPU-only",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",6.201,6.254,6.221
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",6.061,6.079,6.144
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",5.354,5.307,5.371
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",4.552,4.499,4.556
"Intel Core i5 9400F",7.676,7.655,7.648
"Intel Core i9 9900K",5.408,5.38,5.386
"Darktable 2.6.0 - Test: Server Room - Acceleration: CPU-only",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",4.114,4.107,4.13
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",4.373,4.373,4.372,4.371,4.357
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",3.87,3.867,3.867
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",3.567,3.571,3.567,3.567,3.572
"Intel Core i5 9400F",5.368,5.354,5.341
"Intel Core i9 9900K",4.206,4.196,4.201
"libjpeg-turbo tjbench 2.0.2 - Test: Decompression Throughput",
Higher Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",180.57251,180.780592,181.678512
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",217.984814,218.757588,219.099186
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",219.09015,221.025899,221.103474
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",226.105278,227.329064,227.095324
"Intel Core i5 9400F",198.57306,201.052255,201.330388
"Intel Core i9 9900K",239.924785,239.985655,240.302467
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3",155.946901,156.054497,152.435622
"SVT-HEVC 2019-02-03 - 1080p 8-bit YUV To HEVC Video Encode",
Higher Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",145.91,150.15,150.23
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",153.41,156.94,156.86
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",189.33,194.3,194.43
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",243.61,250.1,249.17
"Intel Core i5 9400F",119,121.24,120.51
"Intel Core i9 9900K",191.02,192.86,193.11
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3",155.56,156.41,156.05
"Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 - Performance / Cost - Scene: Volumetric Caustic",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 - Performance / Cost - Scene: Non-Exponential",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 - Performance / Cost - Scene: Water Caustic",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 - Performance / Cost - Scene: Hair",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Tensorflow 2017-02-03 - Performance / Cost - Build: Cifar10",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Rust Mandelbrot - Performance / Cost - Time To Complete Serial/Parallel Mandelbrot",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Go Benchmarks - Performance / Cost - Test: garbage",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Go Benchmarks - Performance / Cost - Test: json",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Go Benchmarks - Performance / Cost - Test: http",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Go Benchmarks - Performance / Cost - Test: build",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"NAMD 2.13b1 - Performance / Cost - ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"PyBench 2018-02-16 - Performance / Cost - Total For Average Test Times",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"asmFish 2018-07-23 - Performance / Cost - 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth",
Higher Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Stockfish 9 - Performance / Cost - Total Time",
Higher Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"XZ Compression 5.2.4 - Performance / Cost - Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Zstd Compression 1.3.4 - Performance / Cost - Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 19",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"dav1d 0.3 - Performance / Cost - Video Input: Summer Nature 4K",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"dav1d 0.3 - Performance / Cost - Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"x265 3.0 - Performance / Cost - H.265 1080p Video Encoding",
Higher Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"x264 2018-09-25 - Performance / Cost - H.264 Video Encoding",
Higher Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.8.0 - Performance / Cost - vpxenc VP9 1080p Video Encode",
Higher Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"SVT-HEVC 2019-02-03 - Performance / Cost - 1080p 8-bit YUV To HEVC Video Encode",
Higher Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"SVT-AV1 0.5 - Performance / Cost - 1080p 8-bit YUV To AV1 Video Encode",
Higher Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"CP2K Molecular Dynamics 6.1 - Performance / Cost - Fayalite-FIST Data",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 - Performance / Cost - Test: Blowfish",
Higher Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"libjpeg-turbo tjbench 2.0.2 - Performance / Cost - Test: Decompression Throughput",
Higher Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Selenium - Performance / Cost - Benchmark: Jetstream - Browser: Google Chrome",
Higher Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Selenium - Performance / Cost - Benchmark: Jetstream - Browser: Firefox",
Higher Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Selenium - Performance / Cost - Benchmark: Octane - Browser: Google Chrome",
Higher Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Selenium - Performance / Cost - Benchmark: Octane - Browser: Firefox",
Higher Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Selenium - Performance / Cost - Benchmark: ARES-6 - Browser: Google Chrome",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Selenium - Performance / Cost - Benchmark: ARES-6 - Browser: Firefox",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Coremark 1.0 - Performance / Cost - CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second",
Higher Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 4.18 - Performance / Cost - Time To Compile",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Timed LLVM Compilation 6.0.1 - Performance / Cost - Time To Compile",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Appleseed 2.0 Beta - Performance / Cost - Scene: Material Tester",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Appleseed 2.0 Beta - Performance / Cost - Scene: Disney Material",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Appleseed 2.0 Beta - Performance / Cost - Scene: Emily",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"GIMP 2.10.8 - Performance / Cost - Test: auto-levels",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"GIMP 2.10.8 - Performance / Cost - Test: rotate",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"GIMP 2.10.8 - Performance / Cost - Test: resize",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"GIMP 2.10.8 - Performance / Cost - Test: unsharp-mask",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Darktable 2.6.0 - Performance / Cost - Test: Server Room - Acceleration: CPU-only",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Darktable 2.6.0 - Performance / Cost - Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: CPU-only",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Darktable 2.6.0 - Performance / Cost - Test: Boat - Acceleration: CPU-only",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Blender 2.80 - Performance / Cost - Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Blender 2.80 - Performance / Cost - Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 - Performance / Cost - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 6 - Scene: Candela City",
Higher Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Xonotic 0.8.2 - Performance / Cost - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultimate",
Higher Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Xonotic 0.8.2 - Performance / Cost - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultra",
Higher Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Tesseract 2014-05-12 - Performance / Cost - Resolution: 3840 x 2160",
Higher Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"x264 2018-09-25 - System Power Consumption Monitor",
Lower Results Are Better
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Darktable 2.6.0 - System Power Consumption Monitor",
Lower Results Are Better
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Darktable 2.6.0 - System Power Consumption Monitor",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 - System Power Consumption Monitor",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"dav1d 0.3 - System Power Consumption Monitor",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"SVT-AV1 0.5 - System Power Consumption Monitor",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"GIMP 2.10.8 - System Power Consumption Monitor",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"System Power Consumption Monitor - Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring",
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Meta Performance Per Watt - Performance Per Watt",
Higher Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 - System Power Consumption Monitor",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 - System Power Consumption Monitor",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 - System Power Consumption Monitor",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Tensorflow 2017-02-03 - System Power Consumption Monitor",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Rust Mandelbrot - System Power Consumption Monitor",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Go Benchmarks - System Power Consumption Monitor",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Go Benchmarks - System Power Consumption Monitor",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Go Benchmarks - System Power Consumption Monitor",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Go Benchmarks - System Power Consumption Monitor",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"NAMD 2.13b1 - System Power Consumption Monitor",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"PyBench 2018-02-16 - System Power Consumption Monitor",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"asmFish 2018-07-23 - System Power Consumption Monitor",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"asmFish 2018-07-23 - 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth",
Higher Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Stockfish 9 - System Power Consumption Monitor",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Stockfish 9 - Total Time",
Higher Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"XZ Compression 5.2.4 - System Power Consumption Monitor",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Zstd Compression 1.3.4 - System Power Consumption Monitor",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"dav1d 0.3 - System Power Consumption Monitor",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"x265 3.0 - System Power Consumption Monitor",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"x265 3.0 - H.265 1080p Video Encoding",
Higher Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"x264 2018-09-25 - H.264 Video Encoding",
Higher Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.8.0 - System Power Consumption Monitor",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.8.0 - vpxenc VP9 1080p Video Encode",
Higher Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"SVT-HEVC 2019-02-03 - System Power Consumption Monitor",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"SVT-HEVC 2019-02-03 - 1080p 8-bit YUV To HEVC Video Encode",
Higher Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"SVT-AV1 0.5 - 1080p 8-bit YUV To AV1 Video Encode",
Higher Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"CP2K Molecular Dynamics 6.1 - System Power Consumption Monitor",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"GROMACS 2018.3 - System Power Consumption Monitor",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"GROMACS 2018.3 - Water Benchmark",
Higher Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 - System Power Consumption Monitor",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 - Test: Blowfish",
Higher Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"libjpeg-turbo tjbench 2.0.2 - Test: Decompression Throughput",
Higher Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Selenium - System Power Consumption Monitor",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Selenium - Benchmark: Jetstream - Browser: Google Chrome",
Higher Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Selenium - System Power Consumption Monitor",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Selenium - Benchmark: Jetstream - Browser: Firefox",
Higher Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Selenium - System Power Consumption Monitor",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Selenium - Benchmark: Octane - Browser: Google Chrome",
Higher Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Selenium - System Power Consumption Monitor",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Selenium - Benchmark: Octane - Browser: Firefox",
Higher Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Selenium - System Power Consumption Monitor",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Selenium - System Power Consumption Monitor",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Coremark 1.0 - System Power Consumption Monitor",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Coremark 1.0 - CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second",
Higher Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 4.18 - System Power Consumption Monitor",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Timed LLVM Compilation 6.0.1 - System Power Consumption Monitor",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Appleseed 2.0 Beta - System Power Consumption Monitor",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Appleseed 2.0 Beta - System Power Consumption Monitor",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Appleseed 2.0 Beta - System Power Consumption Monitor",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"GIMP 2.10.8 - System Power Consumption Monitor",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"GIMP 2.10.8 - System Power Consumption Monitor",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"GIMP 2.10.8 - System Power Consumption Monitor",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Darktable 2.6.0 - System Power Consumption Monitor",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Darktable 2.6.0 - System Power Consumption Monitor",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Blender 2.80 - System Power Consumption Monitor",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Blender 2.80 - System Power Consumption Monitor",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 - System Power Consumption Monitor",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 6 - Scene: Candela City",
Higher Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Xonotic 0.8.2 - System Power Consumption Monitor",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Xonotic 0.8.2 - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultimate",
Higher Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Xonotic 0.8.2 - System Power Consumption Monitor",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Xonotic 0.8.2 - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultra",
Higher Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Tesseract 2014-05-12 - System Power Consumption Monitor",
Lower Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",
"Tesseract 2014-05-12 - Resolution: 3840 x 2160",
Higher Results Are Better
"AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
"AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
"AMD Ryzen 7 3700X",
"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X",
"Intel Core i5 9400F",
"Intel Core i9 9900K",