Intel Core i5-6200U testing with a HP 8079 (N75 Ver. 01.18 BIOS) and Intel HD 520 3072MB on Ubuntu 18.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1906204-FO-INTELCORE27

Jump To Table - Results

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Disable Color Branding
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs
No Box Plots
On Line Graphs With Missing Data, Connect The Line Gaps

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs
Condense Test Profiles With Multiple Version Results Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Only show results where is faster than

Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

intel-core-i5-6200u-280ghz, "SVT-HEVC 2019-02-03 - 1080p 8-bit YUV To HEVC Video Encode", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",32.62,34.64,34.65 "SVT-AV1 0.5 - 1080p 8-bit YUV To AV1 Video Encode", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",6.255,6.326,6.235 "Sunflow Rendering System 0.07.2 - Global Illumination + Image Synthesis", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",6.245,6.225,6.26 "Sudokut 0.4 - Total Time", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",15.336228132248,15.200546979904,15.204891204834 "Stress-NG 0.07.26 - Test: System V Message Passing", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",1313540.91,1175408.59,1135035.1,1420941.5,1435055.21,1407040.73 "Stress-NG 0.07.26 - Test: Glibc Qsort Data Sorting", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",25,25.07,24.83 "Stress-NG 0.07.26 - Test: Glibc C String Functions", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",120185.1,116249.71,118036.11 "Stress-NG 0.07.26 - Test: Context Switching", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",653981.76,655457.07,653308 "Stress-NG 0.07.26 - Test: Socket Activity", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",1081.77,1075.05,1073.51 "Stress-NG 0.07.26 - Test: Memory Copying", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",981.62,981.02,970.22 "Stress-NG 0.07.26 - Test: Vector Math", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",3568.73,3571.55,3565.67 "Stress-NG 0.07.26 - Test: Matrix Math", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",10521.39,10671.42,10561.09 "Stress-NG 0.07.26 - Test: Semaphores", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",3506885.52,3499740.4,3468309.79 "Stress-NG 0.07.26 - Test: CPU Stress", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",667.23,667.58,667.9 "Stress-NG 0.07.26 - Test: Tsearch", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",25.98,26.09,26.02 "Stress-NG 0.07.26 - Test: Lsearch", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",20,20,20.03 "Stress-NG 0.07.26 - Test: Hsearch", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",8726.07,8731.87,8754.38 "Stress-NG 0.07.26 - Test: Forking", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",16232.7,16513.7,16236.81 "Stress-NG 0.07.26 - Test: Bsearch", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",860.66,858.03,873.91 "Stress-NG 0.07.26 - Test: Crypto", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",308.3,309.01,309.21 "Stream 2013-01-17 - Type: Add", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",18630.1,18623.8,18612.2,18630.5,18618.2 "Stream 2013-01-17 - Type: Triad", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",18586.7,18597,18605.5,18600,18601.5 "Stream 2013-01-17 - Type: Scale", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",17092.2,17084,17094.8,17084.7,17093.3 "Stream 2013-01-17 - Type: Copy", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",24904.3,24923.7,24898.8,24897.4,24902.4 "Stockfish 9 - Total Time", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",4017335,3959932,4043269 "Application Start-up Time 3.4.0 - Background I/O Mix: Only Sequential Reads - Application To Start: LibreOffice Writer - Disk Target: Default Test Directory", Lower Results Are Better "SAMSUNG MZNLN256",6.02067,6.00633,5.983 "Application Start-up Time 3.4.0 - Background I/O Mix: Only Sequential Reads - Application To Start: GNOME Terminal - Disk Target: Default Test Directory", Lower Results Are Better "SAMSUNG MZNLN256",7.662,7.93133,7.96167 "Application Start-up Time 3.4.0 - Background I/O Mix: Only Sequential Reads - Application To Start: xterm - Disk Target: Default Test Directory", Lower Results Are Better "SAMSUNG MZNLN256",1.87367,1.86133,1.85933 "SQLite 3.22 - Timed SQLite Insertions", Lower Results Are Better "SAMSUNG MZNLN256",122.33542895317,122.66217207909,122.67259097099 "Sockperf 3.4 - Test: Latency Under Load", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Connection I219-V",8.841,16.649,6.856,7.276,13.532,17.584,19.096,12.518,18.487,15.727 "Sockperf 3.4 - Test: Latency Ping Pong", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Connection I219-V",4.971,5.04,4.982,5.118,5.055 "Sockperf 3.4 - Test: Throughput", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Connection I219-V",360569,244543,273180,375393,372219,299988,374832,340608,380189,359172 "Smallpt 1.0 - Global Illumination Renderer; 128 Samples", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",73.803821086884,73.656848907471,73.629842996597 "SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 - Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Texture Read Bandwidth", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",2.1408,2.137,2.1474 "SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 - Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Bus Speed Readback", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",13.7126,14.5446,14.207 "SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 - Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Bus Speed Download", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",15.3759,15.4575,13.9747,13.7807,15.2569,14.7226 "SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 - Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Max SP Flops", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",71.5268,75.2648,75.2123 "SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 - Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: MD5 Hash", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",0.024,0.024,0.024 "SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 - Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: FFT SP", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",0.9939,0.9931,0.9937 "SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 - Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Triad", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",7.1396,7.1343,7.166 "SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",779.66,786.5,782.26 "SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",601.37,607.31,603.67 "SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",497.7,501.82,496.63 "SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",120.67,120.49,121 "SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Monte Carlo", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",94.84,96.02,95.33 "SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Composite", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",418.85,422.43,419.78 "Scikit-Learn 0.17.1 - ", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",42.466188907623,42.466992855072,42.135987997055 "Schbench - Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 32", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",3158016,2134016,2584576,2789376,2510848,2953216 "Schbench - Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 24", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",1984512,1841152,2772992,2101248,1705984,2009088 "Schbench - Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 16", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",1308672,1423360,1234944,1333248,1345536,1234944 "Schbench - Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 32", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",1325056,1419264,1378304 "Schbench - Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 24", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",1031168,1014784,1075200 "Schbench - Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 16", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",740352,689152,664576,656384,711680,832512 "Schbench - Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 32", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",691200,654336,699392,728064,721920,713728 "Schbench - Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 24", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",562176,531456,531456 "Schbench - Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 16", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",350720,366080,347648 "Schbench - Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 32", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",590848,558080,556032 "Schbench - Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 24", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",408064,398848,406016 "Schbench - Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 16", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",251648,243968,232704,247040 "Schbench - Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 32", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",350720,370176,363008 "Schbench - Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 24", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",239360,259840,246016,236288,233728,245504 "Schbench - Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 16", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",175872,187648,157952,164096,163072,171776 "Schbench - Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 8", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",730112,633856,734208,676864,748544,695296 "Schbench - Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 6", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",533504,560128,564224 "Schbench - Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",335360,320000,329216 "Schbench - Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 2", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",156416,148224,146688 "Schbench - Message Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 32", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",171776,171776,156928,165120,186112,165120 "Schbench - Message Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 24", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",125824,124032,137472,125568,128128,128128 "Schbench - Message Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 16", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",102272,87168,95360,94848,92032,90240 "Schbench - Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 8", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",323072,313856,312832 "Schbench - Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 6", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",232704,225536,271872,239872,242432,249088 "Schbench - Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",173312,168192,171776 "Schbench - Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 2", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",56000,55744,54336 "Schbench - Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 8", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",160000,180992,156928,182528,161536,171776 "Schbench - Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 6", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",139008,125312,128128,127104,130688,129408 "Schbench - Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",89472,87424,67968,85376,87936,76928 "Schbench - Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 2", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",40768,39616,38592 "Schbench - Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 8", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",137984,135936,130944 "Schbench - Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 6", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",104064,102528,104064 "Schbench - Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",53824,56128,54592 "Schbench - Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 2", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",34240,34752,35776 "Schbench - Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 8", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",92032,90752,92032 "Schbench - Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 6", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",59840,58944,51904,60992,56000,53184 "Schbench - Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",42304,40512,43072 "Schbench - Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 2", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",18592,17056,17440,14800,16672,16416 "Schbench - Message Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 8", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",46400,45376,45632 "Schbench - Message Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 6", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",40768,37568,37440,38464,37568,37952 "Schbench - Message Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",12944,16416,14832,14512,15856,13488 "Schbench - Message Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 2", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",7992,170,199,207,3996,2452 "Rust Prime Benchmark - Prime Number Test To 200,000,000", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",72.252862930298,72.1399269104,72.162437915802 "Rust Mandelbrot - Time To Complete Serial/Parallel Mandelbrot", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",147.30650782585,147.1580760479,146.97941017151 "GROMACS 2018.3 - Water Benchmark", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",0.244,0.244,0.244 "CP2K Molecular Dynamics 6.1 - Fayalite-FIST Data", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",866.153 "Rodinia 2.4 - Test: OpenMP Streamcluster", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",55.45043182373,55.212176799774,55.273330926895 "Rodinia 2.4 - Test: OpenMP CFD Solver", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",114.18877983093,113.91091489792,113.96523499489 "Rodinia 2.4 - Test: OpenMP LavaMD", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",471.79916095734,471.45572209358,470.77401208878 "Render Bench - ", Lower Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",17.207177877426,17.176305055618,17.139656066895 "Renaissance 0.9.0 - Test: Akka Unbalanced Cobwebbed Tree", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",25483.322,24848.103,25152.861,26585.455,24261.899,24696.355,25931.189,23650.354,25283.707 "Renaissance 0.9.0 - Test: In-Memory Database Shootout", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",11164.825,11156.264,11777.14,11008.006,12158.645,11544.501,10736.087,11445.365,11646.351,10416.096,11809.883,11028.72,12129.63,12364.035,11811.404,10870.959 "Renaissance 0.9.0 - Test: Apache Spark PageRank", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",56188.932,54885.002,54686.485,54809.719,54188.89,54480.351,54968.367,55977.181 "Renaissance 0.9.0 - Test: Savina Reactors.IO", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",24425.062,24820.471,25101.982,25202.976,25110.754,24738.273,24182.166,24458.183 "Renaissance 0.9.0 - Test: Apache Spark Bayes", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",20653.764,18809.964,20694.952,20062.21,20006.698,19145.339,17888.513,17255.193,20155.278,18531.675,18488.563,19636.918,19595.346,19065.906,19919.635,18749.928 "Renaissance 0.9.0 - Test: Apache Spark ALS", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",13130.456,12085.617,12703.689,13256.664,12583.783,12630.437,12604.055,11981.424,12696.226 "Renaissance 0.9.0 - Test: Twitter Finagle", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",11648.175,10990.657,11211.933,11465.284,10816.181,10573.288,10737.752,10780.318 "Renaissance 0.9.0 - Test: Scala Dotty", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",14118.393,13614.519,13759.763,13795.163,12918.149,13704.467,13753.903,13834.841 "Redis 4.0.8 - Test: SET", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",1081081.12,1196172.25,1240694.75,1347708.88,1314060.5,1204819.25 "Redis 4.0.8 - Test: GET", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",1904762,1945525.25,1538461.62,1908397,1517450.75,1851851.75 "Redis 4.0.8 - Test: LPUSH", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",1254705.12,1256281.38,1043841.31,1231527.12,1254705.12,1207729.5 "Redis 4.0.8 - Test: SADD", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",1543209.88,1517450.75,1569858.62 "Redis 4.0.8 - Test: LPOP", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",1865671.62,1996008,2016129.12,2028397.62,1824817.62,1490313 "R Benchmark - ", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",0.59991094662684,0.59167285184295,0.59332119019364 "RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Type: Average - Benchmark: Floating Point", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079", "RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Type: Triad - Benchmark: Floating Point", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079", "RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Type: Scale - Benchmark: Floating Point", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079", "RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Type: Copy - Benchmark: Floating Point", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079", "RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Type: Add - Benchmark: Floating Point", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079", "RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Type: Average - Benchmark: Integer", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079", "RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Type: Triad - Benchmark: Integer", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079", "RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Type: Scale - Benchmark: Integer", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079", "RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Type: Copy - Benchmark: Integer", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079", "RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Type: Add - Benchmark: Integer", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079", "Radiance Benchmark 5.0 - Test: SMP Parallel", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",594.1303191185 "Radiance Benchmark 5.0 - Test: Serial", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",1132.8836829662 "Qmlbench 2 - Test: Moving Images Animations", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079", "Qmlbench 2 - Test: Creation Delegates Flow", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079", "Qmlbench 2 - Test: Canvas Text Simple", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079", "Qmlbench 2 - Test: Fib10", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079", "QGears2 - Rendering: XRender Extension - Test: Image Scaling", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",1635.8981578947,1631.3460263158,1650.2104736842 "QGears2 - Rendering: CPU-based Raster - Test: Image Scaling", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",1322.1985789474,1332.2109736842,1328.8572105263 "QGears2 - Rendering: XRender Extension - Test: Gears", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",186.56668421053,186.34236842105,186.58194736842 "QGears2 - Rendering: XRender Extension - Test: Text", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",280.31257894737,280.36376315789,279.78702631579 "QGears2 - Rendering: CPU-based Raster - Test: Gears", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",179.42839473684,179.50373684211,179.19321052632 "QGears2 - Rendering: CPU-based Raster - Test: Text", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",293.56618421053,296.33026315789,291.283 "QGears2 - Rendering: OpenGL - Test: Image Scaling", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",2380.6641842105,2407.0598684211,2381.5008421053 "QGears2 - Rendering: OpenGL - Test: Gears", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",598.68373684211,602.92715789474,620.32373684211 "QGears2 - Rendering: OpenGL - Test: Text", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",532.99315789474,532.72057894737,530.65105263158 "PyBench 2018-02-16 - Total For Average Test Times", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",1519,1531,1512 "Primesieve 7.4 - 1e12 Prime Number Generation", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",151.154,152.868,152.772 "POV-Ray 3.7.0.7 - Trace Time", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",299.777,298.648,299.08 "PostMark 1.51 - Disk Transaction Performance", Higher Results Are Better "SAMSUNG MZNLN256",4237,4166,4166 "PolyBench-C 4.2 - Test: 3 Matrix Multiplications", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",5.7287502288818,5.7836220264435,5.69602394104 "PolyBench-C 4.2 - Test: Correlation Computation", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",8.2719719409943,8.2332730293274,8.1882410049438 "PolyBench-C 4.2 - Test: Covariance Computation", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",8.4107360839844,8.2218561172485,8.2849540710449 "Pjdfstest - ", Lower Results Are Better "SAMSUNG MZNLN256", "PHPBench 0.8.1 - PHP Benchmark Suite", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",446171,446395,443023 "PHP Micro Benchmarks - Test: Zend micro_bench", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",2.942,2.954,2.905 "PHP Micro Benchmarks - Test: Zend bench", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",0.584,0.589,0.589 "PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 - Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Write", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",1228.398604,1291.586398,1094.242625,1128.747692,1126.765597,1269.09191 "PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 - Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Write", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",0.037992,0.039396,0.038013 "PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 - Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Only", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",35130.561062,35103.861499,34805.911254 "PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 - Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Only", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",0.073175,0.073753,0.07267 "PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 - Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Write", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",131.31666,136.216115,160.236058,143.799428,159.718919,162.332814 "PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 - Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Write", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",308.939305,310.194633,308.715891 "PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 - Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Only", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",14418.803934,14387.23952,14477.062565 "PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 - Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Only", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",51015.735069,51418.583318,50735.778643 "PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 - Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Only", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",0.008164,0.008175,0.008167 "PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 - Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",873.554333,871.967909,864.761626 "PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 - Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",0.038559,0.038447,0.038644 "PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 - Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Only", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",37795.666394,37978.512049,38407.465845 "PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 - Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Write", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",91.629999,92.313919,91.129299 "PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 - Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Only", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",0.072492,0.072556,0.072654 "PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 - Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Only", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",20742.017915,20621.340088,21309.266323 "PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 - Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",312.916493,312.159832,313.268657 "PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 - Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Only", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",54825.841791,54816.90677,56385.248716 "Perl Benchmarks - Test: Interpreter", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",0.0013819701939381,0.0013887570759905,0.001379461266885 "Perl Benchmarks - Test: Pod2html", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",0.17377966326531,0.17088802327806,0.17054457748724 "Parboil 2.5 - Test: OpenMP MRI Gridding", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",30.982107,31.260078,29.968834 "Parboil 2.5 - Test: OpenMP Stencil", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",33.302898,33.56572,33.765694 "Parboil 2.5 - Test: OpenMP CUTCP", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",23.061838,23.120825,23.056009 "Parboil 2.5 - Test: OpenMP LBM", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",180.235199,180.916519,183.489609 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",150.587,150.364,150.326 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",14.45,14.43,14.42 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1680 x 1050", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",150.682,150.388,150.251 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1680 x 1050", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",14.46,14.43,14.42 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1600 x 1024", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",150.68,150.416,150.629 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1600 x 1024", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",14.46,14.43,14.45 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1400 x 1050", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",152.048,151.789,151.903 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1400 x 1050", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",14.59,14.57,14.58 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1280 x 1024", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",152.658,152.526,152.399 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1280 x 1024", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",14.65,14.64,14.62 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",335.231,336.041,335.56 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",20.95,21,20.97 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1680 x 1050", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",336.147,336.593,334.681 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1680 x 1050", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",21.01,21.04,20.92 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1600 x 1024", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",334.529,332.514,337.751 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1600 x 1024", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",20.91,20.78,21.11 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1400 x 1050", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",342.128,340.901,342.459 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1400 x 1050", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",21.38,21.31,21.4 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1280 x 1024", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",346.39,344.908,346.559 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1280 x 1024", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",21.65,21.56,21.66 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1600 x 900", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",175.156,175.343,174.521 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1600 x 900", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",16.81,16.83,16.75 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1440 x 900", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",175.289,174.907,175.284 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1440 x 900", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",16.82,16.78,16.82 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1440 x 810", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",199.416,198.988,199.244 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1440 x 810", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",19.14,19.09,19.12 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1400 x 900", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",175.618,175.871,175.111 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1400 x 900", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",16.85,16.88,16.8 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1368 x 768", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",214.384,214.489,213.67 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1368 x 768", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",20.57,20.58,20.5 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1280 x 960", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",163.921,163.666,163.889 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1280 x 960", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",15.73,15.71,15.73 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1280 x 800", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",203.237,203.32,203.245 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1280 x 800", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",19.5,19.51,19.5 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1024 x 768", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",215.33,215.315,214.474 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1024 x 768", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",20.66,20.66,20.58 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1024 x 576", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",335.75,334.224,335.499 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1024 x 576", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",32.22,32.07,32.19 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1600 x 900", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",385.76,385.886,381.715 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1600 x 900", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",24.11,24.12,23.86 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1440 x 900", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",385.6,383.866,389.493 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1440 x 900", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",24.1,23.99,24.34 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1440 x 810", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",427.227,430.098,427.134 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1440 x 810", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",26.7,26.88,26.7 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1400 x 900", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",388.991,386.996,386.987 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1400 x 900", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",24.31,24.19,24.19 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1368 x 768", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",450.389,453.204,453.484 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1368 x 768", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",28.15,28.33,28.34 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1280 x 960", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",365.096,369.161,366.984 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1280 x 960", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",22.82,23.07,22.94 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1280 x 800", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",432.84,434.844,433.291 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1280 x 800", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",27.05,27.18,27.08 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1024 x 768", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",461.499,456.772,454.723 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1024 x 768", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",28.84,28.55,28.42 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1024 x 576", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",609.123,602.911,609.918 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1024 x 576", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",38.07,37.68,38.12 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 800 x 600", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",323.159,321.256,317.561 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 800 x 600", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",31.01,30.83,30.47 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 800 x 600", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",586.329,589.144,585.038 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 800 x 600", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",36.65,36.82,36.56 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",489.402,489.803,489.416 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",4.88,4.89,4.88 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1680 x 1050", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",488.746,489.443,490.092 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1680 x 1050", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",4.88,4.88,4.89 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1600 x 1024", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",490.727,490.555,491.109 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1600 x 1024", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",4.89,4.89,4.9 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1400 x 1050", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",491.79,491.261,492.179 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1400 x 1050", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",4.91,4.9,4.91 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1280 x 1024", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",491.931,492.89,492.575 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1280 x 1024", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",4.91,4.92,4.91 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1600 x 900", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",495.626,494.939,495.104 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1600 x 900", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",4.94,4.94,4.94 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1440 x 900", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",497.009,495.384,495.9 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1440 x 900", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",4.96,4.94,4.95 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1440 x 810", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",498.091,499.623,498.497 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1440 x 810", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",4.97,4.98,4.97 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1400 x 900", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",497.011,488.452,497.488 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1400 x 900", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",4.96,4.87,4.96 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1368 x 768", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",503.06,500.237,502.579 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1368 x 768", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",5.02,4.99,5.01 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1280 x 960", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",496.06,495.933,495.916 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1280 x 960", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",4.95,4.95,4.95 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1280 x 800", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",500.054,499.284,500.45 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1280 x 800", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",4.99,4.98,4.99 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1024 x 768", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",501.046,501.45,500.523 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1024 x 768", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",5,5,4.99 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1024 x 576", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",505.416,504.852,499.36 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1024 x 576", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",5.04,5.04,4.98 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 800 x 600", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",503.747,506.181,503.839 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 800 x 600", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",5.02,5.05,5.03 "OSBench - Test: Memory Allocations", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",106.440067,106.636047,106.726885 "OSBench - Test: Create Processes", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",35.040379,34.69944,35.009384 "OSBench - Test: Launch Programs", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",118.200779,119.140148,118.560791 "OSBench - Test: Create Threads", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",19.01865,19.030571,20.22028,18.968582 "OSBench - Test: Create Files", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",20.311365,20.311674,20.666922 "Optcarrot - Optimized Benchmark", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",83.408574047633,82.48401529172,82.836541113969,82.251358590524 "OpenSSL 1.1.1 - RSA 4096-bit Performance", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",411.1,410.6,411.2 "OpenArena 0.8.8 - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Total Frame Time", Lower Results Are Better "Intel HD 520", "OpenArena 0.8.8 - Resolution: 2560 x 1440", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",197.4,195.2,198.4 "OpenArena 0.8.8 - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Total Frame Time", Lower Results Are Better "Intel HD 520", "OpenArena 0.8.8 - Resolution: 1920 x 1080", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",49.1,49,49.1 "OpenArena 0.8.8 - Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Total Frame Time", Lower Results Are Better "Intel HD 520", "OpenArena 0.8.8 - Resolution: 1024 x 768", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",126.2,126.2,126.3 "OpenArena 0.8.8 - Resolution: 800 x 600 - Total Frame Time", Lower Results Are Better "Intel HD 520", "OpenArena 0.8.8 - Resolution: 800 x 600", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",178.2,178.9,179.5 "Nuttcp 8.1.4 - Test: TCP Transfer - Default - Server Address: 5.20.0.41", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Connection I219-V",139.2082,127.1391,122.0953,120.9655,135.3057,119.5694 "Nuttcp 8.1.4 - Test: 10G+ UDP - Server Address: 5.20.0.41", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Connection I219-V",178.3482,177.2694,156.7633,164.5548,157.9952,161.4935 "Numpy Benchmark - ", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U", "Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 2018-11-09 - Time To Completion", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",960.43897414207,964.66334915161,957.957873106 "NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3.1 - Test / Class: SP.A", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",1868.06,1835.07,1864.26 "NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3.1 - Test / Class: LU.C", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",5889.6,5891.52,5897.07 "NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3.1 - Test / Class: LU.A", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",6906.75,6921.2,6949.97 "NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3.1 - Test / Class: FT.B", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",3859.85,3818.47,3831.93 "NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3.1 - Test / Class: FT.A", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",3799.86,3817.31,3784.2 "NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3.1 - Test / Class: EP.C", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",128.32,127.52,127.53 "NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3.1 - Test / Class: BT.A", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",2115.64,2098.81,2067.55 "Node.js Octane Benchmark - ", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",27201,27325,26925 "NGINX Benchmark 1.9.9 - Static Web Page Serving", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",22395.21,22295.83,22383.68 "Loopback TCP Network Performance - Time To Transfer 10GB Via Loopback", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Connection I219-V",12.390553951263,12.435307979584,12.356047153473 "Open FMM Nero2D 2.0.2 - Total Time", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",240.23739600182,243.01569199562,240.2276160717 "NAMD 2.13b1 - ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",10.4831,10.4565,10.4471 "N-Queens 1.0 - Elapsed Time", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",96.945,96.616,96.649 "Multichase Pointer Chaser - Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride, 4 Threads", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",182.5,190.3,190.8 "Multichase Pointer Chaser - Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride, 2 Threads", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",98.927,100.2,100.4 "Multichase Pointer Chaser - Test: 256MB Array, 256 Byte Stride", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",92.157,91.488,91.245 "Multichase Pointer Chaser - Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",91.478,88.672,91.021 "Multichase Pointer Chaser - Test: 4MB Array, 64 Byte Stride", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",9.77,9.567,9.257 "Timed MrBayes Analysis 3.1.2 - Primate Phylogeny Analysis", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",576.69721484184,576.15086984634,576.32967305183 "GNU MPC 1.1.0 - Multi-Precision Benchmark", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",6430,6440,6470 "MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 - Harness: Convolution Batch conv_googlenet_v3 - Data Type: u8s8f32s32", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",1612.7,1609.31,1606.54 "MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 - Harness: Convolution Batch conv_googlenet_v3 - Data Type: u8s8u8s32", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",1856.7,1863.27,1849.49 "MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 - Harness: Convolution Batch conv_alexnet - Data Type: u8s8f32s32", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",2887.17,2894.67,2893.42 "MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 - Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_all - Data Type: u8s8u8s32", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",111949,112122,112076 "MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 - Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - Data Type: u8s8f32s32", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",63903.6,63919.7,63894.6 "MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 - Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: u8s8f32s32", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",38995.3,39017.1,38931.3 "MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 - Harness: Convolution Batch conv_alexnet - Data Type: u8s8u8s32", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",3164.32,3143.37,3147.09 "MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 - Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - Data Type: u8s8u8s32", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",63683.1,63732.1,63684 "MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 - Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: u8s8u8s32", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",39190.4,39186.4,39199.9 "MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 - Harness: Convolution Batch conv_googlenet_v3 - Data Type: f32", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",931.057,932.088,930.215 "MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 - Harness: Convolution Batch conv_all - Data Type: u8s8f32s32", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",91404.3,91179,91212.7 "MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 - Harness: Convolution Batch conv_all - Data Type: u8s8u8s32", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",93478,93499.9,93684.4 "MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 - Harness: Convolution Batch conv_3d - Data Type: u8s8f32s32", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",79600,79464.9,79532.7 "MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 - Harness: Convolution Batch conv_3d - Data Type: u8s8u8s32", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",77583,77658.3,77610.6 "MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 - Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_all - Data Type: f32", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",13413.5,13417.4,13452.7 "MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 - Harness: Convolution Batch conv_alexnet - Data Type: f32", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",2248.52,2251.54,2253.2 "MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 - Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - Data Type: f32", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",35.8517,36.234,36.176 "MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 - Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: f32", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",34.5049,34.8229,34.7038 "MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 - Harness: Convolution Batch conv_all - Data Type: f32", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",16761.3,16774.3,16769.1 "MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 - Harness: Convolution Batch conv_3d - Data Type: f32", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",95.3003,95.4092,95.5394 "MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 - Harness: IP Batch All - Data Type: u8s8f32s32", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",285.282,279.303,273.108 "MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 - Harness: IP Batch All - Data Type: u8s8u8s32", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",277.995,282.055,282.302 "MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 - Harness: IP Batch 1D - Data Type: u8s8f32s32", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",21.9863,22.1408,22.4397 "MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 - Harness: IP Batch 1D - Data Type: u8s8u8s32", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",22.9185,23.3079,22.919 "MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 - Harness: IP Batch All - Data Type: f32", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",435.241,444.033,433.461 "MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 - Harness: IP Batch 1D - Data Type: f32", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",37.9492,37.365,36.9466 "Mixbench 2016-06-06 - Benchmark: Single Precision", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",0.12,0.12,0.12 "Mixbench 2016-06-06 - Benchmark: Double Precision", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",5.81,5.82,5.82 "Mixbench 2016-06-06 - Benchmark: Integer", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",5.18,5.35,5.36 "Minion 1.8 - Benchmark: Quasigroup", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",175.81404,173.937482,173.784745 "Minion 1.8 - Benchmark: Solitaire", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",102.761598,103.163671,102.528214 "Minion 1.8 - Benchmark: Graceful", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",78.55506,78.896428,78.149474 "Mencoder 1.3.0 - AVI To LAVC", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",25.678578853607,25.498944044113,25.49433016777 "Memcached mcperf 1.5.10 - Method: Replace", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",54679.7,51460.3,53724.6 "Memcached mcperf 1.5.10 - Method: Prepend", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",54533.1,54189.4,54425.4 "Memcached mcperf 1.5.10 - Method: Delete", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",80534.1,79225.8,79220.1 "Memcached mcperf 1.5.10 - Method: Append", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",54472.2,54274.2,53152.1 "Memcached mcperf 1.5.10 - Method: Set", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",51386.7,50960.8,51568 "Memcached mcperf 1.5.10 - Method: Get", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",78838.4,79455,79574.6 "Memcached mcperf 1.5.10 - Method: Add", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",51684.5,51183.8,50785.2 "MBW 2018-09-08 - Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 4096 MiB", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",6464.284,6682.806,6737.569 "MBW 2018-09-08 - Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 1024 MiB", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",6495.13,6502.226,6514.631 "MBW 2018-09-08 - Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 512 MiB", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",6572.801,6603.812,6605.406 "MBW 2018-09-08 - Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 128 MiB", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",6672.077,6670.961,6575.703 "MBW 2018-09-08 - Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 4096 MiB", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",10408.695,11561.822,11476.128,11559.394,11548.017,9474.914 "MBW 2018-09-08 - Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 1024 MiB", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",11658.569,9789.766,10273.341,9908.727,9961.142,9973.981 "MBW 2018-09-08 - Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 512 MiB", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",10703.981,10709.865,10741.99 "MBW 2018-09-08 - Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 128 MiB", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",11189.476,11177.975,11357.617 "MandelGPU 1.3pts1 - OpenCL Device: CPU+GPU", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",1649053.4,1652595.8,1650099.3 "MandelGPU 1.3pts1 - OpenCL Device: CPU", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",1649292,1650897.9,1650348.6 "MandelbulbGPU 1.0pts1 - OpenCL Device: CPU+GPU", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",601902.4,601582.9,602551.5 "MandelbulbGPU 1.0pts1 - OpenCL Device: CPU", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",602937.7,601952,602024 "Timed MAFFT Alignment 7.392 - Multiple Sequence Alignment", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",9.7656960487366,9.7998239994049,9.6041359901428 "m-queens 1.2 - Time To Solve", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",547.34645414352,547.2118999958,547.36770391464 "lzbench 2017-08-08 - Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",733,733,738 "lzbench 2017-08-08 - Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U", "lzbench 2017-08-08 - Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",379,375,378 "lzbench 2017-08-08 - Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",289,289,285 "lzbench 2017-08-08 - Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U", "lzbench 2017-08-08 - Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U", "lzbench 2017-08-08 - Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U", "lzbench 2017-08-08 - Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U", "LuaJIT 2.1-git - Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",1044.09,1043.98,1036.15 "LuaJIT 2.1-git - Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",2117.72,2087.02,2105.29 "LuaJIT 2.1-git - Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",891.14,887.65,881.84 "LuaJIT 2.1-git - Test: Fast Fourier Transform", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",212.92,213.17,214.63 "LuaJIT 2.1-git - Test: Monte Carlo", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",348.57,348.01,344.77 "LuaJIT 2.1-git - Test: Composite", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",922.89,915.97,916.54 "LLVM Test Suite 6.0.0 - Time To Run", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",294.11,293.5,293 "LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 1.0 - Test: Rhodopsin Protein", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",44.6592,44.3701,44.3467 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Transformed Texture Paint - Size: 1024x1024", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",5388.180765,6250.490363,4827.095038,4899.803421,5223.573271,5171.000843,5235.263702,6099.055191,6143.211165,5193.243317,5893.03584,4968.791523 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Transformed Blit Bilinear - Size: 1024x1024", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",5673.555129,5260.300884,5497.722009,4343.779088,4809.215589,4884.55765,5388.872706,5348.615091,4519.572581,5350.469174,4573.90467,4170.785671 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Transformed Texture Paint - Size: 512x512", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",9845.673518,9086.677809,8730.407049,8438.438438,9604.360899,9034.299146,9637.043402,10575.064727,9939.825646,9727.729877,9728.096677,10607.979734 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Transformed Texture Paint - Size: 256x256", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",19376.03047,19043.383863,20793.665186,17953.912383,19136.781285,18073.544008,16526.056679,17891.946203,19184.18522,18539.597966,17213.22382,19723.953695 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Transformed Texture Paint - Size: 128x128", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",45520.388209,49243.761996,48451.489051,46336.905534,46810.039522,45214.953271 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Transformed Blit Linear - Size: 1024x1024", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",7563.084846,191777.387816,8492.569002,7718.117866,11829.566039,6357.368237,161827.332559,6407.717775,207024.557396,5306.108742,8421.841563,206571.505521 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Transformed Blit Bilinear - Size: 512x512", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",8714.320341,9737.396502,8090.186975,9925.527717,9432.437425,8710.305217,9733.309999,8904.750761,8715.971492,8025.356062,7875.810373,8455.514828 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Transformed Blit Bilinear - Size: 256x256", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",24585.211693,29100.442405,28000.123621,23690.832834,26211.839061,24468.506705,23992.840315,24522.260622,25209.38422,25440.182098,28300.609343,27701.223641 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Transformed Blit Bilinear - Size: 128x128", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",43073.128397,40501.123006,44651.162791,40026.048698,44692.155433,40817.198786,42059.463379,43460.380648,43064.141881,42364.961685,40576.648232,44553.359217 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Transformed Texture Paint - Size: 32x32", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",51229.660846,46294.351249,47434.885556,50219.258725,50096.106321,50141.855726,49583.145803,50532.757773 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Transformed Blit Linear - Size: 512x512", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",12442.641991,15866.383594,12514.669209,12329.931973,18158.645231,17871.509022,20520.404862,13780.809342,11939.632326,11234.862118,21033.449671,17390.668422 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Transformed Blit Linear - Size: 256x256", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",60120.11563,55890.052356,50314.058747,53065.767228,50056.181812,65359.843181,49030.575922,59006.347122,55295.327316,51988.980404,53354.196051,57892.399442 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Transformed Blit Linear - Size: 128x128", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",198365.101043,199041.794882,178894.272491,186582.21145,187608.381503,200172.171628,174764.724111,197941.724394,197674.162984,187225.959917,197003.315799,213110.238931 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Transformed Blit Bilinear - Size: 32x32", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",46790.721387,47027.627315,45751.01116,48347.931662,46159.539384,47137.871764 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Radial Gradient Paint - Size: 1024x1024", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",2200.842608,2357.019797,2311.182127,2122.597706,2585.020777,2330.635565,2262.525559,2259.104739,2196.193265,2572.696375,2649.163267,2322.053676 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Linear Gradient Blend - Size: 1024x1024", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",1760.208538,1704.976004,1713.556133,1920.183946,2454.535312,1523.14979,1740.341107,1760.617444,1744.939141,1725.790988,2155.023553,1741.525252 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Gradient+Temp Texture - Size: 1024x1024", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",2319.41223,1995.784902,2198.65819,2116.449768,2186.927306,2032.421578,2324.702874,2367.777961,1997.326997,2059.363821,2804.049958,2197.277887 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Transformed Blit Linear - Size: 32x32", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",201036.771474,206608.007428,208702.915556,206267.559518,204268.51251,203777.762264 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Radial Gradient Paint - Size: 512x512", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",5187.984372,5076.577426,5177.948842,4794.922212,4794.114571,4832.620186,5109.157302,5817.7117,5207.431997,6852.368995,4665.278383,4517.009363 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Radial Gradient Paint - Size: 256x256", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",12659.626525,11773.553945,11662.084005,11898.386773,11908.755451,12751.601098,11795.862665,11235.478674,12244.695618,11924.78446,12200.01486,12132.273996 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Radial Gradient Paint - Size: 128x128", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",16878.6402,17135.111092,17175.452234,16927.630029,16367.659501,17224.576054 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Linear Gradient Blend - Size: 512x512", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",3681.21707,4290.982233,4483.021747,3550.191798,3990.53197,4121.603272,3885.772096,3703.178024,3940.663572,4489.550729,4278.659782,4024.367149 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Linear Gradient Blend - Size: 256x256", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",11129.899301,9250.837721,10328.580856,11870.008927,11160.318866,10658.897515,9722.965927,11695.906433,9636.042358,11391.292591,10724.215543,10082.179864 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Linear Gradient Blend - Size: 128x128", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",16370.210593,16367.513954,15994.668444,15864.482533,17432.345395,17123.586677,15938.284633,17522.293749,16934.758717,16711.264746,17579.29792,17052.560603 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Gradient+Temp Texture - Size: 512x512", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",3651.690849,3100.694625,2903.647963,3150.587706,3032.914581,3282.634862,3397.726936,3508.77193,3411.777774,2784.268881,3399.079352,2889.348648 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Gradient+Temp Texture - Size: 256x256", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",9241.148058,8576.926226,8861.795501,8176.425071,9684.988268,8045.344043,8825.877732,9277.827975,8357.839344,8810.765791,9273.989442,9638.054771 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Gradient+Temp Texture - Size: 128x128", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",14584.750246,14823.162275,14225.661869,13713.897528,13939.944925,13142.001256,14176.334882,14289.821048,14459.030942,14693.494262,13745.951781,14279.407301 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: 12pt Text Grayscale - Size: 1024x1024", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",31681.168721,31972.454501,33103.17452,31818.458974,32082.544033,31171.849869 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Rects Composition - Size: 1024x1024", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",4986.400725,6159.702656,4846.102094,8004.117874,4781.009696,5041.353034,6536.88329,4792.646898,5171.074447,6281.107383,5078.750869,4586.227828 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Radial Gradient Paint - Size: 32x32", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",18457.830783,17152.768172,16997.629249,18397.194097,17067.644838,17758.65204,17808.604368 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Linear Gradient Blend - Size: 32x32", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",18091.485352,18364.261726,18198.237932,18475.594662,17288.955338,17252.596864 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Gradient+Temp Texture - Size: 32x32", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",14971.254759,14865.51891,13967.460422,15281.473015,15970.476887,15759.611058,15014.152248,15325.382059,15490.03089,15949.661884,15238.319608,15127.168517 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: 12pt Text Grayscale - Size: 512x512", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",50988.803728,55858.325687,48788.224099,56223.993866,51874.029034,53379.478827,50410.561266,52760.359489,56848.793157,55683.939205,51875.995223,56228.59589 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: 12pt Text Grayscale - Size: 256x256", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",83322.127668,85627.59751,84374.937101,82241.000732,79084.150936,80676.941939 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: 12pt Text Grayscale - Size: 128x128", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",101849.936303,109652.220883,109652.388193,114753.917579,113728.528734,110489.52405,109816.478098,113207.182481,110434.533434 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Rects Composition - Size: 512x512", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",8775.502161,10549.19665,11079.812207,10731.722064,9282.149354,10917.197258,11271.91323,8694.503753,8730.041143,9311.124214,9110.271215,10766.806723 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Rects Composition - Size: 256x256", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",18247.836836,19245.686186,18534.282619,17925.342776,16162.844868,15911.436575,17568.498238,18494.307749,18292.006435,18097.414655,17604.126907,17586.844439 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Rects Composition - Size: 128x128", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",36418.412387,35016.952099,34333.257271,36755.886623,31344.245015,33030.15797,33558.496037,36575.071316,35751.811838,35283.075895,38165.764739,36661.677457 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Put Composition - Size: 1024x1024", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",3661.709125,3669.231286,2525.71545,3672.3452,3134.333257,3724.073298,3450.108923,3268.422015,3468.852396,3019.456837,3237.595132,3326.376207 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: 12pt Text Grayscale - Size: 32x32", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",145255.677086,160112.969802,149750.868819,153984.21451,159371.015725,154414.091341,157884.364044 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Rects Composition - Size: 32x32", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",44388.972209,41858.670948,42870.518257,45211.080446,45566.275758,47036.210591,47220.688777,45812.896979,45235.126111,46869.894954,46417.668336,45762.080326 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Put Composition - Size: 512x512", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",4902.361304,5516.693952,4930.676296,5550.783057,5455.962588,5489.533091,5579.923919,5178.920691,5694.121421,5466.524729,5298.942843,5650.149619 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Put Composition - Size: 256x256", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",8580.484949,7973.083774,8933.27866,8287.615268,8646.351597,9356.393536,8203.287399,8130.157102,8784.05856,8319.051012,8336.4302,8493.079342 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Put Composition - Size: 128x128", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",11605.887108,11516.698625,11455.09932,11283.8354,11518.168243,11620.400258 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: 12pt Text LCD - Size: 1024x1024", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",32900.415108,30960.795744,29974.559241,34347.452745,34980.185516,32157.801468,33162.660843,31105.966537,33324.594366,32820.162392,32029.418524,32554.648654 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Simple Blit - Size: 1024x1024", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",8828.080738,8023.920366,12593.899014,7054.771472,7889.644575,9352.596813,9386.222658,6666.704654,9332.565842,10117.080733,8639.510948,9067.405017 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Put Composition - Size: 32x32", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",15258.888453,14720.588824,15224.09672,15132.669983,15362.429736,15344.548462 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: 12pt Text LCD - Size: 512x512", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",57056.646518,53605.635867,51360.268941,54911.180773,54761.792786,52977.893682,55943.817155 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: 12pt Text LCD - Size: 256x256", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",81559.22039,78513.987287,84320.338053,83286.710678,87354.045948,83128.478436,85306.797734 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: 12pt Text LCD - Size: 128x128", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",113628.670776,116389.066512,115427.713141,107062.883353,114424.410541,106168.178774,101924.648085,113054.116292,113962.699235,114465.005497,106305.855884,109300.068095 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Simple Blit - Size: 512x512", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",18964.224953,18429.53992,18968.053804,18758.93223,18890.75182,20549.934647,19342.789359,22795.782392,22457.100224,19496.410981,18823.986028,16922.645066 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Simple Blit - Size: 256x256", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",90182.425544,106593.88019,89649.861382,95194.813874,93902.98716,86380.923809,101510.730887,91194.929317,100254.004458,94175.573762,111441.133038,90264.878756 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Simple Blit - Size: 128x128", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",244550.47938,266886.587754,257760.814249,272110.378341,255355.46508,230420.232962,272070.407174,263867.037124,267225.917345,277148.831843,231114.663566,244918.160286 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: 12pt Text LCD - Size: 32x32", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",156122.75904,155102.40113,157287.986789,156353.474639,145961.733051,160035.522145 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Simple Blit - Size: 32x32", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",268964.056958,286971.492325,271484.915583,283146.829434,289421.561528,277536.465545 "JuliaGPU 1.2pts1 - OpenCL Device: CPU+GPU", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",2211798.6,2210672.9,2210521.7 "JuliaGPU 1.2pts1 - OpenCL Device: CPU", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",2210715.7,2210773.5,2212050.2 "John The Ripper 1.8.0-jumbo-1 - Test: MD5", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",80419,80321,80342 "John The Ripper 1.8.0-jumbo-1 - Test: Traditional DES", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",9646000,9614000,9601000 "John The Ripper 1.8.0-jumbo-1 - Test: Blowfish", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",2500,2500,2503 "Java SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",1009.9344946044,1013.3868112176,1012.3220633478,1009.4054313942 "Java SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",4173.7356655656,4145.2245564321,4196.183625954,4241.812219185 "Java SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",1577.2803280594,1589.2330889949,1589.7149318862,1592.6123669221 "Java SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",1050.7473191648,1069.1024418526,1050.1147657914,1110.2741325497 "Java SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Monte Carlo", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",680.01382304879,686.75527583979,686.53568848974,683.04191296804 "Java SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Composite", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",1698.3423260886,1700.7404348674,1706.9742150938,1727.4292126038 "Java Gradle Build 1.0 - Gradle Build: Reactor", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",30.728,30.56,31.14,30.624 "Java 2D Microbenchmark 1.0 - Rendering Test: Vector Graphics Rendering", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",888523.87042108,887831.95484916,902580.96794317,901681.82930768 "Java 2D Microbenchmark 1.0 - Rendering Test: All Rendering Tests", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",1062693.8030857,1018696.1479846,1029137.0258821,1059682.3272726 "Java 2D Microbenchmark 1.0 - Rendering Test: Image Rendering", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",1551878.203946,1551475.3788281,1556281.069358,1561844.9175858 "Java 2D Microbenchmark 1.0 - Rendering Test: Text Rendering", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",12170.211175456,11084.599555685,11413.610230697,12099.472203902,11745.023662329,11233.516682884,11939.11246884,11963.791421534 "IOzone 3.465 - Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance", Higher Results Are Better "SAMSUNG MZNLN256",212.619140625,171.310546875,170.595703125,235.85546875,209.5791015625,235.6982421875 "IOzone 3.465 - Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance", Higher Results Are Better "SAMSUNG MZNLN256",3973.4228515625,4974.1025390625,3929.15625,4262.08203125,4159.6552734375,5044.0859375 "IOzone 3.465 - Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance", Higher Results Are Better "SAMSUNG MZNLN256",233.1708984375,223.857421875,235.6162109375 "IOzone 3.465 - Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance", Higher Results Are Better "SAMSUNG MZNLN256",223.1875,237.537109375,242.87109375,230.9755859375,234.3994140625 "IOzone 3.465 - Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance", Higher Results Are Better "SAMSUNG MZNLN256",285.470703125,285.8955078125,284.779296875 "IOzone 3.465 - Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance", Higher Results Are Better "SAMSUNG MZNLN256",278.8603515625,277.4501953125,277.7265625 "IOzone 3.465 - Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance", Higher Results Are Better "SAMSUNG MZNLN256",247.611328125,266.5146484375,265.455078125,264.7880859375 "IOzone 3.465 - Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance", Higher Results Are Better "SAMSUNG MZNLN256",2798.8525390625,2818.59375,2787.8173828125 "IOzone 3.465 - Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance", Higher Results Are Better "SAMSUNG MZNLN256",4116.123046875,3971.9755859375,4140.2470703125 "IOzone 3.465 - Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance", Higher Results Are Better "SAMSUNG MZNLN256",7099.3466796875,7277.82421875,7225.896484375 "IOzone 3.465 - Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance", Higher Results Are Better "SAMSUNG MZNLN256",6470.599609375,6826.7900390625,6367.6240234375,6444.5380859375 "IOzone 3.465 - Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance", Higher Results Are Better "SAMSUNG MZNLN256",6237.5087890625,6183.8173828125,6203.2255859375 "IOzone 3.465 - Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance", Higher Results Are Better "SAMSUNG MZNLN256",280.8330078125,279.283203125,279.779296875 "IOzone 3.465 - Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance", Higher Results Are Better "SAMSUNG MZNLN256",270.9775390625,272.8154296875,269.916015625 "IOzone 3.465 - Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance", Higher Results Are Better "SAMSUNG MZNLN256",258.2978515625,257.556640625,249.875 "IOzone 3.465 - Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance", Higher Results Are Better "SAMSUNG MZNLN256",285.619140625,286.07421875,284.0322265625 "IOzone 3.465 - Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance", Higher Results Are Better "SAMSUNG MZNLN256",272.892578125,271.3203125,249.240234375,261.4521484375,256.740234375,275.9873046875 "IOzone 3.465 - Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance", Higher Results Are Better "SAMSUNG MZNLN256",243.8232421875,260.3779296875,266.1669921875,259.2685546875,241.0810546875,259.1513671875 "IOzone 3.465 - Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance", Higher Results Are Better "SAMSUNG MZNLN256",3781.255859375,3701.2431640625,3696.0263671875 "IOzone 3.465 - Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance", Higher Results Are Better "SAMSUNG MZNLN256",3687.345703125,3658.7294921875,3686.1181640625 "IOzone 3.465 - Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance", Higher Results Are Better "SAMSUNG MZNLN256",3519.208984375,3353.3642578125,3309.0908203125 "IOzone 3.465 - Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance", Higher Results Are Better "SAMSUNG MZNLN256",6873.958984375,7167.0908203125,6922.361328125 "IOzone 3.465 - Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance", Higher Results Are Better "SAMSUNG MZNLN256",6226.9951171875,6086.109375,6450.5751953125 "IOzone 3.465 - Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance", Higher Results Are Better "SAMSUNG MZNLN256",6821.8486328125,7085.966796875,6891.7470703125 "Interbench 0.31 - Benchmark: Gaming - Background Load: Memload", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079", "Interbench 0.31 - Benchmark: Gaming - Background Load: Compile", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",232,230.8,363.4,270.9,269.1,241.6 "Interbench 0.31 - Benchmark: Video - Background Load: Memload", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",0.5,0.2,0.3,1.1,0.1,0.1 "Interbench 0.31 - Benchmark: Video - Background Load: Compile", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",140.4,155.9,136.9,83.3,138.5,201.1 "Interbench 0.31 - Benchmark: Audio - Background Load: Memload", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",0.2,1.1,0.5,1,0.2,1.1 "Interbench 0.31 - Benchmark: Audio - Background Load: Compile", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",124.7,128.4,129.2 "Interbench 0.31 - Benchmark: Gaming - Background Load: Write", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",42.7,65.7,66.3,30.4,45.4,56.7 "Interbench 0.31 - Benchmark: Video - Background Load: Write", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",142.9,109,41.9,145.3,81.9,213.9 "Interbench 0.31 - Benchmark: Gaming - Background Load: Burn", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",95.9,112.7,100,96,96,99.9 "Interbench 0.31 - Benchmark: Audio - Background Load: Write", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",218.5,138.6,117.1,50.1,109.3,110.5 "Interbench 0.31 - Benchmark: Audio - Background Load: Video", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",0.2,0.2,0.2 "Interbench 0.31 - Benchmark: Video - Background Load: Read", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",16.7,16.7,1.5,0.5,0.3,0.2 "Interbench 0.31 - Benchmark: Video - Background Load: Burn", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",49.6,46.3,49,47.9 "Interbench 0.31 - Benchmark: Audio - Background Load: Read", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",0.2,2,0.3,0.1,0.9,0.1 "Interbench 0.31 - Benchmark: Audio - Background Load: Burn", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",0.2,0.5,13.8,12,0.2,0.5 "Interbench 0.31 - Benchmark: X - Background Load: Memload", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",3,34,4,36,7,5 "Interbench 0.31 - Benchmark: X - Background Load: Compile", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",480,360,454,368,432,581 "Interbench 0.31 - Benchmark: Gaming - Background Load: X", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079", "Interbench 0.31 - Benchmark: X - Background Load: Write", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",132,102,78,72,54,75 "Interbench 0.31 - Benchmark: X - Background Load: Video", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",30,44,36,34,44,17 "Interbench 0.31 - Benchmark: Video - Background Load: X", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",16.8,16.9,16.8 "Interbench 0.31 - Benchmark: Audio - Background Load: X", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",0.3,0.2,0.2,0.3,0.2,0.3 "Interbench 0.31 - Benchmark: X - Background Load: Read", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",43,58,48,56,36,45 "Interbench 0.31 - Benchmark: X - Background Load: Burn", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",252,243,243 "High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.0 - ", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",1.08837,1.08876,1.0884 "HPC Challenge 1.5.0 - Test / Class: Max Ping Pong Bandwidth", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",7413.764,7787.237,7453.787 "HPC Challenge 1.5.0 - Test / Class: Random Ring Bandwidth", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",2.71475,2.70762,2.68115 "HPC Challenge 1.5.0 - Test / Class: Random Ring Latency", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",0.660876,0.66821,0.662149 "HPC Challenge 1.5.0 - Test / Class: G-Random Access", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",0.0020573,0.00203341,0.00203473 "HPC Challenge 1.5.0 - Test / Class: EP-STREAM Triad", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",4.72391,4.72191,4.71722 "HPC Challenge 1.5.0 - Test / Class: G-Ptrans", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",0.317831,0.314416,0.317195 "HPC Challenge 1.5.0 - Test / Class: EP-DGEMM", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",5.22812,5.22933,5.22299 "HPC Challenge 1.5.0 - Test / Class: G-Ffte", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",3.1737,3.25135,3.22113 "HPC Challenge 1.5.0 - Test / Class: G-Ffte", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",3.1737,3.25135,3.22113 "HPC Challenge 1.5.0 - Test / Class: G-HPL", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",20.1856,20.13,20.1292 "Timed HMMer Search 2.3.2 - Pfam Database Search", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",19.475633859634,19.150593042374,19.099376916885 "Hierarchical INTegration 1.0 - Test: DOUBLE", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",655662309.57778,652309267.10843,653687942.64592 "Hierarchical INTegration 1.0 - Test: FLOAT", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",282003205.28843,280770878.59406,281479236.1007 "Himeno Benchmark 3.0 - Poisson Pressure Solver", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",1845.133527,1811.128073,1865.237918 "hdparm Timed Disk Reads - Disk To Read: /dev/sda", Higher Results Are Better "SAMSUNG MZNLN256",520.25,525.26,524.47,527.19,525.4

intel-core-i5-6200u-280ghz

View

Limit displaying results to tests within:

Statistics

Graph Settings

Multi-Way Comparison

Table

Run Management