intel-core-i5-6200u-280ghz

Intel Core i5-6200U testing with a HP 8079 (N75 Ver. 01.18 BIOS) and Intel HD 520 3072MB on Ubuntu 18.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1906159-FO-INTELCORE86
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

Bioinformatics 4 Tests
BLAS (Basic Linear Algebra Sub-Routine) Tests 2 Tests
Chess Test Suite 2 Tests
C/C++ Compiler Tests 9 Tests
CPU Massive 24 Tests
Cryptography 2 Tests
Fortran Tests 5 Tests
HPC - High Performance Computing 11 Tests
Java 2 Tests
Common Kernel Benchmarks 2 Tests
LAPACK (Linear Algebra Pack) Tests 2 Tests
Machine Learning 2 Tests
Molecular Dynamics 2 Tests
MPI Benchmarks 6 Tests
Multi-Core 8 Tests
NVIDIA GPU Compute 2 Tests
OpenCL 3 Tests
OpenMPI Tests 4 Tests
Python 2 Tests
Scientific Computing 7 Tests
Server 3 Tests
Server CPU Tests 8 Tests
Single-Threaded 9 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Disable Color Branding
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs
No Box Plots
On Line Graphs With Missing Data, Connect The Line Gaps

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs
Condense Test Profiles With Multiple Version Results Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
SAMSUNG MZNLN256
June 11 2019
 
Intel Core i5-6200U
June 11 2019
 
Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079
June 11 2019
 
Intel HD 520
June 11 2019
 
Intel Connection I219-V
June 13 2019
 
Invert Hiding All Results Option
 

Only show results where is faster than
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

intel-core-i5-6200u-280ghz Intel Core i5-6200U testing with a HP 8079 (N75 Ver. 01.18 BIOS) and Intel HD 520 3072MB on Ubuntu 18.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. SAMSUNG MZNLN256: Processor: Intel Core i5-6200U @ 2.80GHz (2 Cores / 4 Threads), Motherboard: HP 8079 (N75 Ver. 01.18 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v5/E3-1500, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 256GB SAMSUNG MZNLN256, Graphics: Intel HD 520 3072MB (1000MHz), Audio: Conexant CX20724, Network: Intel Connection I219-V + Intel Wireless 8260 OS: Ubuntu 18.04, Kernel: 4.18.0-21-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.28.4, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.1, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 18.2.8, Compiler: GCC 7.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 Intel Core i5-6200U: Processor: Intel Core i5-6200U @ 2.80GHz (2 Cores / 4 Threads), Motherboard: HP 8079 (N75 Ver. 01.18 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v5/E3-1500, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 256GB SAMSUNG MZNLN256, Graphics: Intel HD 520 3072MB (1000MHz), Audio: Conexant CX20724, Network: Intel Connection I219-V + Intel Wireless 8260 OS: Ubuntu 18.04, Kernel: 4.18.0-21-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.28.4, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.1, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 18.2.8, Compiler: GCC 7.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079: Processor: Intel Core i5-6200U @ 2.80GHz (2 Cores / 4 Threads), Motherboard: HP 8079 (N75 Ver. 01.18 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v5/E3-1500, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 256GB SAMSUNG MZNLN256, Graphics: Intel HD 520 3072MB (1000MHz), Audio: Conexant CX20724, Network: Intel Connection I219-V + Intel Wireless 8260 OS: Ubuntu 18.04, Kernel: 4.18.0-21-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.28.4, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.1, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 18.2.8, Compiler: GCC 7.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 Intel HD 520: Processor: Intel Core i5-6200U @ 2.80GHz (2 Cores / 4 Threads), Motherboard: HP 8079 (N75 Ver. 01.18 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v5/E3-1500, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 256GB SAMSUNG MZNLN256, Graphics: Intel HD 520 3072MB (1000MHz), Audio: Conexant CX20724, Network: Intel Connection I219-V + Intel Wireless 8260 OS: Ubuntu 18.04, Kernel: 4.18.0-21-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.28.4, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.1, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 18.2.8, Compiler: GCC 7.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 Intel Connection I219-V: Processor: Intel Core i5-6200U @ 2.80GHz (2 Cores / 4 Threads), Motherboard: HP 8079 (N75 Ver. 01.18 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v5/E3-1500, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 256GB SAMSUNG MZNLN256, Graphics: Intel HD 520 3072MB (1000MHz), Audio: Conexant CX20724, Network: Intel Connection I219-V + Intel Wireless 8260 OS: Ubuntu 18.04, Kernel: 4.18.0-21-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.28.4, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.1, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 18.2.8, Compiler: GCC 7.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 OpenSSL 1.1.1 RSA 4096-bit Performance Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 410.97 |================================================= OpenArena 0.8.8 Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Total Frame Time Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Intel HD 520 . MIN: 1.0 AVG: 5.0 MAX: 13.0 OpenArena 0.8.8 Resolution: 2560 x 1440 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 197.00 |======================================================== OpenArena 0.8.8 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Total Frame Time Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Intel HD 520 . MIN: 3.0 AVG: 20.3 MAX: 46.0 OpenArena 0.8.8 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 49.07 |========================================================= OpenArena 0.8.8 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Total Frame Time Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Intel HD 520 . MIN: 1.0 AVG: 7.8 MAX: 16.0 OpenArena 0.8.8 Resolution: 1024 x 768 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 126.23 |======================================================== OpenArena 0.8.8 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Total Frame Time Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Intel HD 520 . MIN: 1.0 AVG: 5.5 MAX: 14.0 OpenArena 0.8.8 Resolution: 800 x 600 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 178.87 |======================================================== Nuttcp 8.1.4 Test: TCP Transfer - Default - Server Address: 5.20.0.41 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Intel Connection I219-V . 127.38 |============================================= Nuttcp 8.1.4 Test: 10G+ UDP - Server Address: 5.20.0.41 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Intel Connection I219-V . 166.07 |============================================= Numpy Benchmark Nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 7139022 |================================================ Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 2018-11-09 Time To Completion Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 . 961.02 |================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3.1 Test / Class: SP.A Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 1855.80 |================================================ NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3.1 Test / Class: LU.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 5892.73 |================================================ NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3.1 Test / Class: LU.A Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 6925.97 |================================================ NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3.1 Test / Class: FT.B Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 3836.75 |================================================ NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3.1 Test / Class: FT.A Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 3800.46 |================================================ NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3.1 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 127.79 |================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3.1 Test / Class: BT.A Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 2094.00 |================================================ Node.js Octane Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 27150 |================================================== NGINX Benchmark 1.9.9 Static Web Page Serving Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 . 22358.24 |=============== Loopback TCP Network Performance Time To Transfer 10GB Via Loopback Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Connection I219-V . 12.39 |============================================== Open FMM Nero2D 2.0.2 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 241.16 |================================================= NAMD 2.13b1 ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms days/ns < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 10.46 |================================================== N-Queens 1.0 Elapsed Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 96.74 |================================================== Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride, 4 Threads ns < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 187.87 |================================================= Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride, 2 Threads ns < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 99.84 |================================================== Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 256MB Array, 256 Byte Stride ns < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 91.63 |================================================== Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride ns < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 90.39 |================================================== Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 4MB Array, 64 Byte Stride ns < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 9.53 |=================================================== Timed MrBayes Analysis 3.1.2 Primate Phylogeny Analysis Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 576.39 |================================================= GNU MPC 1.1.0 Multi-Precision Benchmark Global Score > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 6447 |=================================================== MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_googlenet_v3 - Data Type: u8s8f32s32 ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 1609.52 |================================================ MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_googlenet_v3 - Data Type: u8s8u8s32 ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 1856.49 |================================================ MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_alexnet - Data Type: u8s8f32s32 ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 2891.75 |================================================ MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_all - Data Type: u8s8u8s32 ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 112049 |================================================= MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - Data Type: u8s8f32s32 ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 63905.97 |=============================================== MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: u8s8f32s32 ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 38981.23 |=============================================== MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_alexnet - Data Type: u8s8u8s32 ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 3151.59 |================================================ MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - Data Type: u8s8u8s32 ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 63699.73 |=============================================== MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: u8s8u8s32 ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 39192.23 |=============================================== MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_googlenet_v3 - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 931.12 |================================================= MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_all - Data Type: u8s8f32s32 ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 91265.33 |=============================================== MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_all - Data Type: u8s8u8s32 ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 93554.10 |=============================================== MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_3d - Data Type: u8s8f32s32 ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 79532.53 |=============================================== MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_3d - Data Type: u8s8u8s32 ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 77617.30 |=============================================== MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_all - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 13427.87 |=============================================== MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_alexnet - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 2251.09 |================================================ MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 36.09 |================================================== MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 34.68 |================================================== MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_all - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 16768.23 |=============================================== MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_3d - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 95.42 |================================================== MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: IP Batch All - Data Type: u8s8f32s32 ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 279.23 |================================================= MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: IP Batch All - Data Type: u8s8u8s32 ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 280.78 |================================================= MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: IP Batch 1D - Data Type: u8s8f32s32 ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 22.19 |================================================== MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: IP Batch 1D - Data Type: u8s8u8s32 ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 23.05 |================================================== MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: IP Batch All - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 437.58 |================================================= MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: IP Batch 1D - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 37.42 |================================================== Mixbench 2016-06-06 Benchmark: Single Precision GFLOPS > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 0.12 |========================================================== Mixbench 2016-06-06 Benchmark: Double Precision GFLOPS > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 5.82 |========================================================== Mixbench 2016-06-06 Benchmark: Integer GIOPS > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 5.30 |========================================================== Minion 1.8 Benchmark: Quasigroup Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 174.51 |================================================= Minion 1.8 Benchmark: Solitaire Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 102.82 |================================================= Minion 1.8 Benchmark: Graceful Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 78.53 |================================================== Mencoder 1.3.0 AVI To LAVC Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 25.56 |================================================== Memcached mcperf 1.5.10 Method: Replace Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 . 53288.20 |=============== Memcached mcperf 1.5.10 Method: Prepend Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 . 54382.63 |=============== Memcached mcperf 1.5.10 Method: Delete Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 . 79660.00 |=============== Memcached mcperf 1.5.10 Method: Append Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 . 53966.17 |=============== Memcached mcperf 1.5.10 Method: Set Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 . 51305.17 |=============== Memcached mcperf 1.5.10 Method: Get Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 . 79289.33 |=============== Memcached mcperf 1.5.10 Method: Add Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 . 51217.83 |=============== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 4096 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 . 6628.22 |================ MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 1024 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 . 6504.00 |================ MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 512 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 . 6594.01 |================ MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 128 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 . 6639.58 |================ MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 4096 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 . 11004.83 |=============== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 1024 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 . 10260.92 |=============== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 512 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 . 10718.61 |=============== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 128 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 . 11241.69 |=============== MandelGPU 1.3pts1 OpenCL Device: CPU+GPU Samples/sec > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 . 1650582.83 |============= MandelGPU 1.3pts1 OpenCL Device: CPU Samples/sec > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 . 1650179.50 |============= MandelbulbGPU 1.0pts1 OpenCL Device: CPU+GPU Samples/sec > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 . 602012.27 |============== MandelbulbGPU 1.0pts1 OpenCL Device: CPU Samples/sec > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 . 602304.57 |============== Timed MAFFT Alignment 7.392 Multiple Sequence Alignment Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 9.72 |=================================================== m-queens 1.2 Time To Solve Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 547.31 |================================================= lzbench 2017-08-08 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 735 |==================================================== lzbench 2017-08-08 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 145 |==================================================== lzbench 2017-08-08 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 377 |==================================================== lzbench 2017-08-08 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 288 |==================================================== lzbench 2017-08-08 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 749 |==================================================== lzbench 2017-08-08 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 279 |==================================================== lzbench 2017-08-08 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 69 |===================================================== lzbench 2017-08-08 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 25 |===================================================== LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 1041.41 |================================================ LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 2103.34 |================================================ LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 886.88 |================================================= LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 213.57 |================================================= LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 347.12 |================================================= LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 918.47 |================================================= LLVM Test Suite 6.0.0 Time To Run Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 293.54 |================================================= LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 1.0 Test: Rhodopsin Protein Loop Time < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 44.46 |================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Texture Paint - Size: 1024x1024 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 5441.06 |======================================================= JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Blit Bilinear - Size: 1024x1024 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 4985.11 |======================================================= JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Texture Paint - Size: 512x512 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 9579.63 |======================================================= JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Texture Paint - Size: 256x256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 18621.36 |====================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Texture Paint - Size: 128x128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 46929.59 |====================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Blit Linear - Size: 1024x1024 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 69108.10 |====================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Blit Bilinear - Size: 512x512 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 8860.07 |======================================================= JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Blit Bilinear - Size: 256x256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 25935.29 |====================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Blit Bilinear - Size: 128x128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 42486.65 |====================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Texture Paint - Size: 32x32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 49441.50 |====================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Blit Linear - Size: 512x512 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 15423.63 |====================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Blit Linear - Size: 256x256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 55114.49 |====================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Blit Linear - Size: 128x128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 193198.67 |===================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Blit Bilinear - Size: 32x32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 46869.12 |====================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Radial Gradient Paint - Size: 1024x1024 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 2347.42 |======================================================= JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Linear Gradient Blend - Size: 1024x1024 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 1828.74 |======================================================= JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Gradient+Temp Texture - Size: 1024x1024 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 2216.68 |======================================================= JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Blit Linear - Size: 32x32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 205110.25 |===================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Radial Gradient Paint - Size: 512x512 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 5169.43 |======================================================= JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Radial Gradient Paint - Size: 256x256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 12015.59 |====================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Radial Gradient Paint - Size: 128x128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 16951.51 |====================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Linear Gradient Blend - Size: 512x512 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 4036.64 |======================================================= JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Linear Gradient Blend - Size: 256x256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 10637.60 |====================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Linear Gradient Blend - Size: 128x128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 16740.94 |====================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Gradient+Temp Texture - Size: 512x512 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 3209.43 |======================================================= JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Gradient+Temp Texture - Size: 256x256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 8897.58 |======================================================= JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Gradient+Temp Texture - Size: 128x128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 14172.79 |====================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: 12pt Text Grayscale - Size: 1024x1024 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 31971.61 |====================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Rects Composition - Size: 1024x1024 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 5522.11 |======================================================= JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Radial Gradient Paint - Size: 32x32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 17662.90 |====================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Linear Gradient Blend - Size: 32x32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 17945.19 |====================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Gradient+Temp Texture - Size: 32x32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 15246.71 |====================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: 12pt Text Grayscale - Size: 512x512 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 53410.09 |====================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: 12pt Text Grayscale - Size: 256x256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 82554.46 |====================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: 12pt Text Grayscale - Size: 128x128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 110398.30 |===================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Rects Composition - Size: 512x512 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 9935.02 |======================================================= JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Rects Composition - Size: 256x256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 17805.89 |====================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Rects Composition - Size: 128x128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 35241.23 |====================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Put Composition - Size: 1024x1024 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 3346.52 |======================================================= JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: 12pt Text Grayscale - Size: 32x32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 154396.17 |===================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Rects Composition - Size: 32x32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 45354.17 |====================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Put Composition - Size: 512x512 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 5392.88 |======================================================= JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Put Composition - Size: 256x256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 8503.61 |======================================================= JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Put Composition - Size: 128x128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 11500.01 |====================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: 12pt Text LCD - Size: 1024x1024 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 32526.56 |====================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Simple Blit - Size: 1024x1024 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 8912.70 |======================================================= JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Put Composition - Size: 32x32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 15173.87 |====================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: 12pt Text LCD - Size: 512x512 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 54373.89 |====================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: 12pt Text LCD - Size: 256x256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 83352.80 |====================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: 12pt Text LCD - Size: 128x128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 111009.44 |===================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Simple Blit - Size: 512x512 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 19533.35 |====================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Simple Blit - Size: 256x256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 95895.51 |====================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Simple Blit - Size: 128x128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 256952.41 |===================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: 12pt Text LCD - Size: 32x32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 155143.98 |===================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Simple Blit - Size: 32x32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 279587.55 |===================================================== JuliaGPU 1.2pts1 OpenCL Device: CPU+GPU Samples/sec > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 . 2210997.73 |============= JuliaGPU 1.2pts1 OpenCL Device: CPU Samples/sec > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 . 2211179.80 |============= John The Ripper 1.8.0-jumbo-1 Test: MD5 Real C/S > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 80361 |================================================== John The Ripper 1.8.0-jumbo-1 Test: Traditional DES Real C/S > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 9620333 |================================================ John The Ripper 1.8.0-jumbo-1 Test: Blowfish Real C/S > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 2501 |=================================================== Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 1011.26 |================================================ Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 4189.24 |================================================ Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 1587.21 |================================================ Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 1070.06 |================================================ Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 684.09 |================================================= Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 1708.37 |================================================ Java Gradle Build 1.0 Gradle Build: Reactor Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 30.76 |================================================== Java 2D Microbenchmark 1.0 Rendering Test: Vector Graphics Rendering Units Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 895154.66 |===================================================== Java 2D Microbenchmark 1.0 Rendering Test: All Rendering Tests Units Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 1042552.33 |==================================================== Java 2D Microbenchmark 1.0 Rendering Test: Image Rendering Units Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 1555369.89 |==================================================== Java 2D Microbenchmark 1.0 Rendering Test: Text Rendering Units Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel HD 520 . 11706.17 |====================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better SAMSUNG MZNLN256 . 205.94 |==================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better SAMSUNG MZNLN256 . 4390.42 |=================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better SAMSUNG MZNLN256 . 230.88 |==================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better SAMSUNG MZNLN256 . 233.79 |==================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better SAMSUNG MZNLN256 . 285.38 |==================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better SAMSUNG MZNLN256 . 278.01 |==================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better SAMSUNG MZNLN256 . 261.09 |==================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better SAMSUNG MZNLN256 . 2801.75 |=================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better SAMSUNG MZNLN256 . 4076.12 |=================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better SAMSUNG MZNLN256 . 7201.02 |=================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better SAMSUNG MZNLN256 . 6527.39 |=================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better SAMSUNG MZNLN256 . 6208.18 |=================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better SAMSUNG MZNLN256 . 279.97 |==================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better SAMSUNG MZNLN256 . 271.24 |==================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better SAMSUNG MZNLN256 . 255.24 |==================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better SAMSUNG MZNLN256 . 285.24 |==================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better SAMSUNG MZNLN256 . 264.61 |==================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better SAMSUNG MZNLN256 . 254.98 |==================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better SAMSUNG MZNLN256 . 3726.18 |=================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better SAMSUNG MZNLN256 . 3677.40 |=================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better SAMSUNG MZNLN256 . 3393.89 |=================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better SAMSUNG MZNLN256 . 6987.80 |=================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better SAMSUNG MZNLN256 . 6254.56 |=================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better SAMSUNG MZNLN256 . 6933.19 |=================================================== Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: Gaming - Background Load: Memload Max Latency ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 . 2.80 |=================== Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: Gaming - Background Load: Compile Max Latency ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 . 267.97 |================= Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: Video - Background Load: Memload Max Latency ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 . 0.38 |=================== Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: Video - Background Load: Compile Max Latency ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 . 142.68 |================= Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: Audio - Background Load: Memload Max Latency ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 . 0.68 |=================== Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: Audio - Background Load: Compile Max Latency ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 . 127.43 |================= Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: Gaming - Background Load: Write Max Latency ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 . 51.20 |================== Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: Video - Background Load: Write Max Latency ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 . 122.48 |================= Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: Gaming - Background Load: Burn Max Latency ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 . 100.08 |================= Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: Audio - Background Load: Write Max Latency ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 . 124.02 |================= Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: Audio - Background Load: Video Max Latency ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 . 0.20 |=================== Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: Video - Background Load: Read Max Latency ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 . 5.98 |=================== Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: Video - Background Load: Burn Max Latency ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 . 48.20 |================== Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: Audio - Background Load: Read Max Latency ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 . 0.60 |=================== Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: Audio - Background Load: Burn Max Latency ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 . 4.53 |=================== Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: X - Background Load: Memload Max Latency ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 . 15 |===================== Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: X - Background Load: Compile Max Latency ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 . 446 |==================== Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: Gaming - Background Load: X Max Latency ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 . 2.10 |=================== Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: X - Background Load: Write Max Latency ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 . 86 |===================== Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: X - Background Load: Video Max Latency ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 . 34 |===================== Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: Video - Background Load: X Max Latency ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 . 16.83 |================== Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: Audio - Background Load: X Max Latency ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 . 0.25 |=================== Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: X - Background Load: Read Max Latency ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 . 48 |===================== Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: X - Background Load: Burn Max Latency ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 . 246 |==================== High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.0 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 1.09 |=================================================== HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: Max Ping Pong Bandwidth MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 7551.60 |================================================ HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: Random Ring Bandwidth GB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 2.70117 |================================================ HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: Random Ring Latency usecs < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 0.66375 |================================================ HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-Random Access GUP/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 0.00204 |================================================ HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: EP-STREAM Triad GB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 4.72101 |================================================ HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-Ptrans GB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 0.31648 |================================================ HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: EP-DGEMM GFLOPS > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 5.22681 |================================================ HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-Ffte GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 3.21539 |================================================ HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-Ffte GFLOPS > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 3.21539 |================================================ HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-HPL GFLOPS > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 20.15 |================================================== Timed HMMer Search 2.3.2 Pfam Database Search Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 19.24 |================================================== Hierarchical INTegration 1.0 Test: DOUBLE QUIPs > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 . 653886506.44 |=========== Hierarchical INTegration 1.0 Test: FLOAT QUIPs > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 . 281417773.33 |=========== Himeno Benchmark 3.0 Poisson Pressure Solver MFLOPS > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-6200U . 1840.50 |================================================ hdparm Timed Disk Reads Disk To Read: /dev/sda MB/s > Higher Is Better SAMSUNG MZNLN256 . 524.51 |====================================================