Intel Core i9-9900K testing with a Gigabyte Z390 DESIGNARE-CF (F6c BIOS) and Intel HD 3072MB on openSUSE Tumbleweed 20190205 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1902085-FO-I99900KDE44
i9-9900k-designare-opensuse-tw-hdg630-970evo,
"RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Integer Add",
Higher Results Are Better
"Intel Core i9-9900K",
"RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Integer Copy",
Higher Results Are Better
"Intel Core i9-9900K",
"RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Integer Scale",
Higher Results Are Better
"Intel Core i9-9900K",
"RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Floating-Point Add",
Higher Results Are Better
"Intel Core i9-9900K",
"Stream 2013-01-17 - Add",
Higher Results Are Better
"Intel Core i9-9900K",27164.1,27152.7,27118.6,27161.9,27161.7
"Stream 2013-01-17 - Copy",
Higher Results Are Better
"Intel Core i9-9900K",32262.6,32248.2,32266.5,32257.4,32299.7
"Stream 2013-01-17 - Scale",
Higher Results Are Better
"Intel Core i9-9900K",24725.3,24772,24735.7,24744.8,24747.4
"CacheBench - Read Cache",
Higher Results Are Better
"Intel Core i9-9900K",3388.7226753333,3388.9291740476,3388.8008239048
"CacheBench - Write Cache",
Higher Results Are Better
"Intel Core i9-9900K",28236.613459,28108.374083571,28183.622256333
"AIO-Stress 0.21 - Random Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"Samsung SSD 970 EVO 1TB",2541.03,2545.83,2552.61
"Dbench 4.0 - 12 Clients",
Higher Results Are Better
"Samsung SSD 970 EVO 1TB",604.6,606.18,607.182
"Dbench 4.0 - 48 Clients",
Higher Results Are Better
"Samsung SSD 970 EVO 1TB",1731.05,1789.59,1822.34
"Dbench 4.0 - 128 Clients",
Higher Results Are Better
"Samsung SSD 970 EVO 1TB",3974.34,3971.38,3985.49
"Dbench 4.0 - 1 Clients",
Higher Results Are Better
"Samsung SSD 970 EVO 1TB",79.2744,79.2173,79.6554
"Threaded I/O Tester 20170503 - 64MB Random Read - 32 Threads",
Higher Results Are Better
"Samsung SSD 970 EVO 1TB",182449.889,135190.442,134798.921,145402.911,139376.616,144612.343
"Threaded I/O Tester 20170503 - 64MB Random Write - 32 Threads",
Higher Results Are Better
"Samsung SSD 970 EVO 1TB",299.846,300.202,300.578
"Compile Bench 0.6 - Test: Compile",
Higher Results Are Better
"Samsung SSD 970 EVO 1TB",1308.78,1319.74,1327.64
"Compile Bench 0.6 - Test: Initial Create",
Higher Results Are Better
"Samsung SSD 970 EVO 1TB",279.02,281.5,282.23
"Compile Bench 0.6 - Test: Read Compiled Tree",
Higher Results Are Better
"Samsung SSD 970 EVO 1TB",1748.79,1748.79,1737.87
"FFTE 6.0 - Test: N=256, 1D Complex FFT Routine",
Higher Results Are Better
"Intel Core i9-9900K",8495.5541439605,8512.5303172653,8515.7950988495
"PostMark 1.51 - Disk Transaction Performance",
Higher Results Are Better
"Samsung SSD 970 EVO 1TB",4166,4032,4166
"SQLite 3.22 - Timed SQLite Insertions",
Lower Results Are Better
"Samsung SSD 970 EVO 1TB",45.602270841599,45.009680986404,45.370898962021
"Unpacking The Linux Kernel - linux-4.15.tar.xz",
Lower Results Are Better
"Samsung SSD 970 EVO 1TB",5.8805530071259,5.8575460910797,5.8764472007751,5.8664829730988
"Gzip Compression - Linux Source Tree Archiving To .tar.gz",
Lower Results Are Better
"Samsung SSD 970 EVO 1TB",37.484413862228,37.435194969177,37.457717895508