NVIDIA and AMD GPU Linux compute benchmarks December 2018 by Michael Larabel for a future article, review of the NVIDIA TITAN RTX.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1812224-SP-GPUCOMPUT75
NVIDIA TITAN RTX Linux GPU Compute Benchmarks
NVIDIA and AMD GPU Linux compute benchmarks December 2018 by Michael Larabel for a future article, review of the NVIDIA TITAN RTX.
RX Vega 56:
Processor: Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z390-A (0602 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH Shared SRAM, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 2000GB SABRENT + Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX Vega 8GB (1590/800MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: Acer B286HK, Network: Intel Connection
OS: Ubuntu 18.04, Kernel: 4.19.5-041905-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.28.3, Display Server: X Server 1.19.6, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 19.0.0-devel padoka PPA (LLVM 8.0.0), OpenCL: OpenCL 2.1 AMD-APP (2679.0), Vulkan: 1.1.70, Compiler: GCC 7.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160
RX Vega 64:
Processor: Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z390-A (0602 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH Shared SRAM, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 2000GB SABRENT + Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX Vega 8GB (1630/945MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: Acer B286HK, Network: Intel Connection
OS: Ubuntu 18.04, Kernel: 4.19.5-041905-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.28.3, Display Server: X Server 1.19.6, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 19.0.0-devel padoka PPA (LLVM 8.0.0), OpenCL: OpenCL 2.1 AMD-APP (2679.0), Vulkan: 1.1.70, Compiler: GCC 7.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160
GTX 1080:
Processor: Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z390-A (0602 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH Shared SRAM, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 2000GB SABRENT + Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 8GB (1607/5005MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: Acer B286HK, Network: Intel Connection
OS: Ubuntu 18.04, Kernel: 4.19.5-041905-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.28.3, Display Server: X Server 1.19.6, Display Driver: NVIDIA 415.22, OpenGL: 4.6.0, OpenCL: OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 10.0.132, Vulkan: 1.1.84, Compiler: GCC 7.3.0 + CUDA 10.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160
RTX 2080 Ti:
Processor: Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z390-A (0602 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH Shared SRAM, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 2000GB SABRENT + Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB (1350/7000MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: Acer B286HK, Network: Intel Connection
OS: Ubuntu 18.04, Kernel: 4.19.5-041905-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.28.3, Display Server: X Server 1.19.6, Display Driver: NVIDIA 415.22, OpenGL: 4.6.0, OpenCL: OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 10.0.132, Vulkan: 1.1.84, Compiler: GCC 7.3.0 + CUDA 10.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160
RTX 2080:
Processor: Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z390-A (0602 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH Shared SRAM, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 2000GB SABRENT + Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB, Graphics: Zotac NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 8GB (1515/7000MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: Acer B286HK, Network: Intel Connection
OS: Ubuntu 18.04, Kernel: 4.19.5-041905-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.28.3, Display Server: X Server 1.19.6, Display Driver: NVIDIA 415.22, OpenGL: 4.6.0, OpenCL: OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 10.0.132, Vulkan: 1.1.84, Compiler: GCC 7.3.0 + CUDA 10.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160
RTX 2070:
Processor: Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z390-A (0602 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH Shared SRAM, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 2000GB SABRENT + Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB, Graphics: eVGA NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 8GB (1410/7000MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: Acer B286HK, Network: Intel Connection
OS: Ubuntu 18.04, Kernel: 4.19.5-041905-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.28.3, Display Server: X Server 1.19.6, Display Driver: NVIDIA 415.22, OpenGL: 4.6.0, OpenCL: OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 10.0.132, Vulkan: 1.1.84, Compiler: GCC 7.3.0 + CUDA 10.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160
GTX 1080 Ti:
Processor: Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z390-A (0602 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH Shared SRAM, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 2000GB SABRENT + Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB (1480/5508MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: Acer B286HK, Network: Intel Connection
OS: Ubuntu 18.04, Kernel: 4.19.5-041905-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.28.3, Display Server: X Server 1.19.6, Display Driver: NVIDIA 415.22, OpenGL: 4.6.0, OpenCL: OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 10.0.132, Vulkan: 1.1.84, Compiler: GCC 7.3.0 + CUDA 10.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160
GTX 1070 Ti:
Processor: Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z390-A (0602 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH Shared SRAM, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 2000GB SABRENT + Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB, Graphics: Zotac NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB (1607/4006MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: Acer B286HK, Network: Intel Connection
OS: Ubuntu 18.04, Kernel: 4.19.5-041905-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.28.3, Display Server: X Server 1.19.6, Display Driver: NVIDIA 415.22, OpenGL: 4.6.0, OpenCL: OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 10.0.132, Vulkan: 1.1.84, Compiler: GCC 7.3.0 + CUDA 10.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160
GTX 1070:
Processor: Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z390-A (0602 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH Shared SRAM, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 2000GB SABRENT + Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 8GB (1506/4006MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: Acer B286HK, Network: Intel Connection
OS: Ubuntu 18.04, Kernel: 4.19.5-041905-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.28.3, Display Server: X Server 1.19.6, Display Driver: NVIDIA 415.22, OpenGL: 4.6.0, OpenCL: OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 10.0.132, Vulkan: 1.1.84, Compiler: GCC 7.3.0 + CUDA 10.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160
TITAN RTX:
Processor: Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z390-A (0602 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH Shared SRAM, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 2000GB SABRENT + Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB, Graphics: NVIDIA TITAN RTX 24GB (1350/7000MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: Acer B286HK, Network: Intel Connection
OS: Ubuntu 18.04, Kernel: 4.19.5-041905-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.28.3, Display Server: X Server 1.19.6, Display Driver: NVIDIA 415.23, OpenGL: 4.6.0, OpenCL: OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 10.0.132, Vulkan: 1.1.84, Compiler: GCC 7.3.0 + CUDA 10.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160
GTX TITAN X GM200:
Processor: Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z390-A (0602 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH Shared SRAM, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 2000GB SABRENT + Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X 12GB (1001/3505MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: Acer B286HK, Network: Intel Connection
OS: Ubuntu 18.04, Kernel: 4.19.5-041905-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.28.3, Display Server: X Server 1.19.6, Display Driver: NVIDIA 415.23, OpenGL: 4.6.0, OpenCL: OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 10.0.132, Vulkan: 1.1.84, Compiler: GCC 7.3.0 + CUDA 10.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160
GTX 980 Ti:
Processor: Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z390-A (0602 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH Shared SRAM, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 2000GB SABRENT + Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB (999/3505MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: Acer B286HK, Network: Intel Connection
OS: Ubuntu 18.04, Kernel: 4.19.5-041905-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.28.3, Display Server: X Server 1.19.6, Display Driver: NVIDIA 415.23, OpenGL: 4.6.0, OpenCL: OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 10.0.132, Vulkan: 1.1.84, Compiler: GCC 7.3.0 + CUDA 10.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160
GTX 980:
Processor: Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z390-A (0602 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH Shared SRAM, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 2000GB SABRENT + Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 4GB (1126/3505MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: Acer B286HK, Network: Intel Connection
OS: Ubuntu 18.04, Kernel: 4.19.5-041905-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.28.3, Display Server: X Server 1.19.6, Display Driver: NVIDIA 415.23, OpenGL: 4.6.0, OpenCL: OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 10.0.132, Vulkan: 1.1.84, Compiler: GCC 7.3.0 + CUDA 10.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160
LuxMark 3.1
OpenCL Device: GPU - Scene: Luxball HDR
Score > Higher Is Better
RX Vega 56 ........ 31179 |===================================
RX Vega 64 ........ 32815 |=====================================
GTX 1080 .......... 13823 |================
RTX 2080 Ti ....... 42693 |================================================
RTX 2080 .......... 29641 |==================================
RTX 2070 .......... 30091 |==================================
GTX 1080 Ti ....... 21562 |========================
GTX 1070 Ti ....... 16886 |===================
GTX 1070 .......... 17288 |====================
TITAN RTX ......... 45932 |====================================================
GTX TITAN X GM200 . 17299 |====================
GTX 980 Ti ........ 16910 |===================
GTX 980 ........... 13242 |===============
NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09
Test: Inception v4, FP16
Images Per Second > Higher Is Better
GTX 1080 .......... 55.03 |==================
RTX 2080 Ti ....... 135.90 |=============================================
RTX 2080 .......... 102.77 |==================================
GTX 1080 Ti ....... 74.63 |=========================
GTX 1070 Ti ....... 49.23 |================
GTX 1070 .......... 44.77 |===============
TITAN RTX ......... 152.80 |===================================================
GTX TITAN X GM200 . 43.23 |==============
GTX 980 Ti ........ 40.90 |==============
Chaos Group V-RAY 1.1.0
Mode: CUDA GPU
Seconds < Lower Is Better
GTX 1080 .......... 102.07 |=================================================
RTX 2080 Ti ....... 56.09 |===========================
RTX 2080 .......... 72.07 |===================================
RTX 2070 .......... 66.02 |================================
GTX 1080 Ti ....... 66.41 |================================
GTX 1070 Ti ....... 86.30 |=========================================
GTX 1070 .......... 90.43 |===========================================
TITAN RTX ......... 50.08 |========================
GTX TITAN X GM200 . 80.62 |=======================================
GTX 980 Ti ........ 77.70 |=====================================
GTX 980 ........... 106.51 |===================================================
NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09
Test: Googlenet, FP16
Images Per Second > Higher Is Better
GTX 1080 .......... 458 |=====================
RTX 2080 Ti ....... 1015 |================================================
RTX 2080 .......... 738 |===================================
GTX 1080 Ti ....... 629 |=============================
GTX 1070 Ti ....... 413 |===================
GTX 1070 .......... 375 |==================
TITAN RTX ......... 1132 |=====================================================
GTX TITAN X GM200 . 372 |=================
GTX 980 Ti ........ 356 |=================
NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09
Test: ResNet-50, FP32
Images Per Second > Higher Is Better
GTX 1080 .......... 143 |==========================
RTX 2080 Ti ....... 285 |===================================================
RTX 2080 .......... 205 |=====================================
GTX 1080 Ti ....... 210 |======================================
GTX 1070 Ti ....... 133 |========================
GTX 1070 .......... 125 |=======================
TITAN RTX ......... 299 |======================================================
GTX TITAN X GM200 . 125 |=======================
NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09
Test: VGG-16, FP32
Images Per Second > Higher Is Better
GTX 1080 .......... 82.90 |==========================
RTX 2080 Ti ....... 152.40 |================================================
RTX 2080 .......... 108.57 |==================================
GTX 1080 Ti ....... 119.50 |======================================
GTX 1070 Ti ....... 76.40 |========================
GTX 1070 .......... 71.57 |======================
TITAN RTX ......... 162.33 |===================================================
GTX TITAN X GM200 . 72.77 |=======================
NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09
Test: ResNet-50, FP16
Images Per Second > Higher Is Better
GTX 1080 .......... 193 |====================
RTX 2080 Ti ....... 449 |===============================================
RTX 2080 .......... 335 |===================================
RTX 2070 .......... 309 |================================
GTX 1080 Ti ....... 271 |============================
GTX 1070 Ti ....... 175 |==================
GTX 1070 .......... 160 |=================
TITAN RTX ......... 520 |======================================================
GTX TITAN X GM200 . 156 |================
GTX 980 Ti ........ 150 |================
NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09
Test: VGG-16, FP16
Images Per Second > Higher Is Better
GTX 1080 .......... 93.13 |===================
RTX 2080 Ti ....... 206.97 |===========================================
RTX 2080 .......... 153.33 |================================
GTX 1080 Ti ....... 131.37 |===========================
GTX 1070 Ti ....... 84.43 |==================
GTX 1070 .......... 76.93 |================
TITAN RTX ......... 244.40 |===================================================
GTX TITAN X GM200 . 79.20 |=================
GTX 980 Ti ........ 77.57 |================
NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09
Test: AlexNet, FP32
Images Per Second > Higher Is Better
GTX 1080 .......... 1764 |==========================
RTX 2080 Ti ....... 3344 |==================================================
RTX 2080 .......... 2419 |====================================
RTX 2070 .......... 2174 |================================
GTX 1080 Ti ....... 2539 |======================================
GTX 1070 Ti ....... 1591 |========================
GTX 1070 .......... 1516 |======================
TITAN RTX ......... 3576 |=====================================================
GTX TITAN X GM200 . 1587 |========================
GTX 980 Ti ........ 1501 |======================
GTX 980 ........... 1154 |=================
NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09
Test: AlexNet, FP16
Images Per Second > Higher Is Better
GTX 1080 .......... 1875 |====================
RTX 2080 Ti ....... 4432 |===============================================
RTX 2080 .......... 3153 |=================================
GTX 1080 Ti ....... 2674 |============================
GTX 1070 Ti ....... 1683 |==================
GTX 1070 .......... 1563 |================
TITAN RTX ......... 5032 |=====================================================
GTX TITAN X GM200 . 1662 |==================
GTX 980 Ti ........ 1552 |================
GTX 980 ........... 1208 |=============
cl-mem 2017-01-13
Benchmark: Copy
GB/s > Higher Is Better
RX Vega 56 ........ 203 |=======================
RX Vega 64 ........ 221 |=========================
GTX 1080 .......... 209 |=======================
RTX 2080 Ti ....... 454 |===================================================
RTX 2080 .......... 328 |=====================================
RTX 2070 .......... 330 |=====================================
GTX 1080 Ti ....... 317 |===================================
GTX 1070 Ti ....... 188 |=====================
GTX 1070 .......... 187 |=====================
TITAN RTX ......... 484 |======================================================
GTX TITAN X GM200 . 218 |========================
GTX 980 Ti ........ 217 |========================
GTX 980 ........... 143 |================
SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: FFT SP
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
RX Vega 56 ........ 926 |================================
RX Vega 64 ........ 1070 |=====================================
GTX 1080 .......... 575 |====================
RTX 2080 Ti ....... 1443 |=================================================
RTX 2080 .......... 1083 |=====================================
RTX 2070 .......... 998 |==================================
GTX 1080 Ti ....... 972 |=================================
GTX 1070 Ti ....... 497 |=================
GTX 1070 .......... 452 |===============
TITAN RTX ......... 1548 |=====================================================
GTX TITAN X GM200 . 726 |=========================
GTX 980 Ti ........ 728 |=========================
GTX 980 ........... 468 |================
NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09
System Power Consumption Monitor
Watts < Lower Is Better
GTX 1080 .......... MIN: 46 AVG: 198 MAX: 236
RTX 2080 Ti ....... MIN: 50 AVG: 270 MAX: 342
RTX 2080 .......... MIN: 56 AVG: 239 MAX: 288
GTX 1080 Ti ....... MIN: 51 AVG: 242 MAX: 310
GTX 1070 Ti ....... MIN: 59 AVG: 162 MAX: 191
GTX 1070 .......... MIN: 54 AVG: 171 MAX: 204
TITAN RTX ......... MIN: 60 AVG: 282 MAX: 358
GTX TITAN X GM200 . MIN: 53 AVG: 262 MAX: 322
NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09
GPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
GTX 1080 .......... MIN: 60 AVG: 69 MAX: 74
RTX 2080 Ti ....... MIN: 56 AVG: 66 MAX: 71
RTX 2080 .......... MIN: 61 AVG: 74 MAX: 80
GTX 1080 Ti ....... MIN: 61 AVG: 71 MAX: 77
GTX 1070 Ti ....... MIN: 46 AVG: 52 MAX: 55
GTX 1070 .......... MIN: 58 AVG: 66 MAX: 70
TITAN RTX ......... MIN: 56 AVG: 67 MAX: 73
GTX TITAN X GM200 . MIN: 67 AVG: 80 MAX: 84
NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09
Test: VGG-16, FP32
Images Per Second Per Watt > Higher Is Better
GTX 1080 .......... 0.42 |======================================
RTX 2080 Ti ....... 0.56 |===================================================
RTX 2080 .......... 0.45 |=========================================
GTX 1080 Ti ....... 0.49 |=============================================
GTX 1070 Ti ....... 0.47 |===========================================
GTX 1070 .......... 0.42 |======================================
TITAN RTX ......... 0.58 |=====================================================
GTX TITAN X GM200 . 0.28 |==========================
NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09
System Power Consumption Monitor
Watts < Lower Is Better
GTX 1080 .......... MIN: 91 AVG: 195 MAX: 240
RTX 2080 Ti ....... MIN: 51 AVG: 220 MAX: 332
RTX 2080 .......... MIN: 48 AVG: 224 MAX: 283
GTX 1080 Ti ....... MIN: 52 AVG: 243 MAX: 313
GTX 1070 Ti ....... MIN: 47 AVG: 160 MAX: 192
GTX 1070 .......... MIN: 44 AVG: 169 MAX: 202
TITAN RTX ......... MIN: 49 AVG: 257 MAX: 355
GTX TITAN X GM200 . MIN: 82 AVG: 277 MAX: 328
GTX 980 Ti ........ MIN: 52 AVG: 254 MAX: 318
NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09
GPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
GTX 1080 .......... MIN: 50 AVG: 66 MAX: 74
RTX 2080 Ti ....... MIN: 54 AVG: 62 MAX: 68
RTX 2080 .......... MIN: 59 AVG: 70 MAX: 77
GTX 1080 Ti ....... MIN: 61 AVG: 70 MAX: 76
GTX 1070 Ti ....... MIN: 45 AVG: 52 MAX: 55
GTX 1070 .......... MIN: 59 AVG: 66 MAX: 70
TITAN RTX ......... MIN: 55 AVG: 63 MAX: 68
GTX TITAN X GM200 . MIN: 67 AVG: 79 MAX: 84
GTX 980 Ti ........ MIN: 67 AVG: 79 MAX: 84
NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09
Test: VGG-16, FP16
Images Per Second Per Watt > Higher Is Better
GTX 1080 .......... 0.48 |===========================
RTX 2080 Ti ....... 0.94 |====================================================
RTX 2080 .......... 0.69 |======================================
GTX 1080 Ti ....... 0.54 |==============================
GTX 1070 Ti ....... 0.53 |==============================
GTX 1070 .......... 0.46 |==========================
TITAN RTX ......... 0.95 |=====================================================
GTX TITAN X GM200 . 0.29 |================
GTX 980 Ti ........ 0.30 |=================
NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09
System Power Consumption Monitor
Watts < Lower Is Better
GTX 1080 .......... MIN: 71 AVG: 186 MAX: 250
RTX 2080 Ti ....... MIN: 50 AVG: 183 MAX: 341
RTX 2080 .......... MIN: 48 AVG: 177 MAX: 285
GTX 1080 Ti ....... MIN: 52 AVG: 212 MAX: 321
GTX 1070 Ti ....... MIN: 47 AVG: 146 MAX: 189
GTX 1070 .......... MIN: 44 AVG: 158 MAX: 210
TITAN RTX ......... MIN: 58 AVG: 196 MAX: 353
GTX TITAN X GM200 . MIN: 55 AVG: 233 MAX: 323
GTX 980 Ti ........ MIN: 53 AVG: 226 MAX: 305
NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09
GPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
GTX 1080 .......... MIN: 51 AVG: 64 MAX: 76
RTX 2080 Ti ....... MIN: 53 AVG: 58 MAX: 65
RTX 2080 .......... MIN: 57 AVG: 65 MAX: 74
GTX 1080 Ti ....... MIN: 56 AVG: 66 MAX: 77
GTX 1070 Ti ....... MIN: 43 AVG: 50 MAX: 55
GTX 1070 .......... MIN: 55 AVG: 64 MAX: 72
TITAN RTX ......... MIN: 54 AVG: 59 MAX: 66
GTX TITAN X GM200 . MIN: 62 AVG: 76 MAX: 85
GTX 980 Ti ........ MIN: 61 AVG: 75 MAX: 84
NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09
Test: Inception v4, FP16
Images Per Second Per Watt > Higher Is Better
GTX 1080 .......... 0.30 |====================
RTX 2080 Ti ....... 0.74 |==================================================
RTX 2080 .......... 0.58 |=======================================
GTX 1080 Ti ....... 0.35 |========================
GTX 1070 Ti ....... 0.34 |=======================
GTX 1070 .......... 0.28 |===================
TITAN RTX ......... 0.78 |=====================================================
GTX TITAN X GM200 . 0.19 |=============
GTX 980 Ti ........ 0.18 |============
NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09
System Power Consumption Monitor
Watts < Lower Is Better
GTX 1080 .......... MIN: 76 AVG: 215 MAX: 247
RTX 2080 Ti ....... MIN: 50 AVG: 249 MAX: 343
RTX 2080 .......... MIN: 48 AVG: 230 MAX: 285
GTX 1080 Ti ....... MIN: 64 AVG: 257 MAX: 319
GTX 1070 Ti ....... MIN: 47 AVG: 164 MAX: 188
GTX 1070 .......... MIN: 43 AVG: 182 MAX: 211
TITAN RTX ......... MIN: 51 AVG: 275 MAX: 360
GTX TITAN X GM200 . MIN: 102 AVG: 265 MAX: 320
GTX 980 Ti ........ MIN: 124 AVG: 261 MAX: 317
NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09
GPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
GTX 1080 .......... MIN: 58 AVG: 72 MAX: 79
RTX 2080 Ti ....... MIN: 55 AVG: 65 MAX: 71
RTX 2080 .......... MIN: 60 AVG: 73 MAX: 80
GTX 1080 Ti ....... MIN: 60 AVG: 73 MAX: 80
GTX 1070 Ti ....... MIN: 43 AVG: 53 MAX: 56
GTX 1070 .......... MIN: 56 AVG: 69 MAX: 74
TITAN RTX ......... MIN: 55 AVG: 65 MAX: 72
GTX TITAN X GM200 . MIN: 72 AVG: 81 MAX: 85
GTX 980 Ti ........ MIN: 70 AVG: 80 MAX: 84
NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09
Test: Googlenet, FP16
Images Per Second Per Watt > Higher Is Better
GTX 1080 .......... 2.13 |===========================
RTX 2080 Ti ....... 4.07 |====================================================
RTX 2080 .......... 3.21 |=========================================
GTX 1080 Ti ....... 2.45 |================================
GTX 1070 Ti ....... 2.53 |=================================
GTX 1070 .......... 2.06 |===========================
TITAN RTX ......... 4.11 |=====================================================
GTX TITAN X GM200 . 1.40 |==================
GTX 980 Ti ........ 1.36 |==================
NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09
System Power Consumption Monitor
Watts < Lower Is Better
GTX 1080 .......... MIN: 101 AVG: 178 MAX: 229
RTX 2080 Ti ....... MIN: 49 AVG: 257 MAX: 339
RTX 2080 .......... MIN: 48 AVG: 211 MAX: 284
RTX 2070 .......... MIN: 64 AVG: 185 MAX: 244
GTX 1080 Ti ....... MIN: 126 AVG: 208 MAX: 307
GTX 1070 Ti ....... MIN: 48 AVG: 145 MAX: 186
GTX 1070 .......... MIN: 87 AVG: 158 MAX: 202
TITAN RTX ......... MIN: 79 AVG: 244 MAX: 357
GTX TITAN X GM200 . MIN: 136 AVG: 252 MAX: 313
GTX 980 Ti ........ MIN: 123 AVG: 228 MAX: 319
GTX 980 ........... MIN: 102 AVG: 186 MAX: 233
NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09
GPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
GTX 1080 .......... MIN: 63 AVG: 67 MAX: 71
RTX 2080 Ti ....... MIN: 53 AVG: 61 MAX: 67
RTX 2080 .......... MIN: 59 AVG: 70 MAX: 76
RTX 2070 .......... MIN: 46 AVG: 56 MAX: 61
GTX 1080 Ti ....... MIN: 64 AVG: 68 MAX: 71
GTX 1070 Ti ....... MIN: 44 AVG: 49 MAX: 52
GTX 1070 .......... MIN: 61 AVG: 64 MAX: 68
TITAN RTX ......... MIN: 55 AVG: 62 MAX: 67
GTX TITAN X GM200 . MIN: 72 AVG: 79 MAX: 84
GTX 980 Ti ........ MIN: 71 AVG: 78 MAX: 82
GTX 980 ........... MIN: 63 AVG: 72 MAX: 77
NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09
Test: AlexNet, FP32
Images Per Second Per Watt > Higher Is Better
GTX 1080 .......... 9.90 |===================================
RTX 2080 Ti ....... 12.99 |==============================================
RTX 2080 .......... 11.44 |=========================================
RTX 2070 .......... 11.72 |==========================================
GTX 1080 Ti ....... 12.19 |===========================================
GTX 1070 Ti ....... 10.99 |=======================================
GTX 1070 .......... 9.61 |==================================
TITAN RTX ......... 14.66 |====================================================
GTX TITAN X GM200 . 6.29 |======================
GTX 980 Ti ........ 6.59 |=======================
GTX 980 ........... 6.20 |======================
NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09
System Power Consumption Monitor
Watts < Lower Is Better
GTX 1080 .......... MIN: 44 AVG: 168 MAX: 235
RTX 2080 Ti ....... MIN: 49 AVG: 178 MAX: 333
RTX 2080 .......... MIN: 47 AVG: 191 MAX: 270
GTX 1080 Ti ....... MIN: 51 AVG: 213 MAX: 303
GTX 1070 Ti ....... MIN: 47 AVG: 136 MAX: 175
GTX 1070 .......... MIN: 69 AVG: 158 MAX: 192
TITAN RTX ......... MIN: 51 AVG: 195 MAX: 353
GTX TITAN X GM200 . MIN: 55 AVG: 237 MAX: 321
GTX 980 Ti ........ MIN: 135 AVG: 237 MAX: 296
GTX 980 ........... MIN: 49 AVG: 187 MAX: 240
NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09
GPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
GTX 1080 .......... MIN: 62 AVG: 66 MAX: 70
RTX 2080 Ti ....... MIN: 57 AVG: 60 MAX: 64
RTX 2080 .......... MIN: 63 AVG: 68 MAX: 72
GTX 1080 Ti ....... MIN: 63 AVG: 67 MAX: 70
GTX 1070 Ti ....... MIN: 46 AVG: 50 MAX: 53
GTX 1070 .......... MIN: 59 AVG: 64 MAX: 67
TITAN RTX ......... MIN: 58 AVG: 61 MAX: 65
GTX TITAN X GM200 . MIN: 68 AVG: 77 MAX: 85
GTX 980 Ti ........ MIN: 62 AVG: 73 MAX: 81
GTX 980 ........... MIN: 51 AVG: 66 MAX: 74
NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09
Test: AlexNet, FP16
Images Per Second Per Watt > Higher Is Better
GTX 1080 .......... 11.19 |=======================
RTX 2080 Ti ....... 24.95 |==================================================
RTX 2080 .......... 16.53 |=================================
GTX 1080 Ti ....... 12.53 |=========================
GTX 1070 Ti ....... 12.39 |=========================
GTX 1070 .......... 9.86 |====================
TITAN RTX ......... 25.77 |====================================================
GTX TITAN X GM200 . 7.03 |==============
GTX 980 Ti ........ 6.54 |=============
GTX 980 ........... 6.45 |=============
NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09
System Power Consumption Monitor
Watts < Lower Is Better
GTX 1080 .......... MIN: 44 AVG: 196 MAX: 250
RTX 2080 Ti ....... MIN: 51 AVG: 248 MAX: 347
RTX 2080 .......... MIN: 48 AVG: 207 MAX: 285
GTX 1080 Ti ....... MIN: 80 AVG: 235 MAX: 319
GTX 1070 Ti ....... MIN: 48 AVG: 157 MAX: 188
GTX 1070 .......... MIN: 46 AVG: 172 MAX: 214
TITAN RTX ......... MIN: 51 AVG: 253 MAX: 365
GTX TITAN X GM200 . MIN: 56 AVG: 256 MAX: 321
NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09
GPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
GTX 1080 .......... MIN: 60 AVG: 69 MAX: 75
RTX 2080 Ti ....... MIN: 54 AVG: 61 MAX: 67
RTX 2080 .......... MIN: 59 AVG: 70 MAX: 77
GTX 1080 Ti ....... MIN: 62 AVG: 70 MAX: 77
GTX 1070 Ti ....... MIN: 44 AVG: 51 MAX: 54
GTX 1070 .......... MIN: 57 AVG: 66 MAX: 71
TITAN RTX ......... MIN: 54 AVG: 63 MAX: 70
GTX TITAN X GM200 . MIN: 65 AVG: 78 MAX: 84
NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09
Test: ResNet-50, FP32
Images Per Second Per Watt > Higher Is Better
GTX 1080 .......... 0.73 |=================================
RTX 2080 Ti ....... 1.15 |====================================================
RTX 2080 .......... 0.99 |============================================
GTX 1080 Ti ....... 0.89 |========================================
GTX 1070 Ti ....... 0.84 |======================================
GTX 1070 .......... 0.73 |=================================
TITAN RTX ......... 1.18 |=====================================================
GTX TITAN X GM200 . 0.49 |======================
NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09
System Power Consumption Monitor
Watts < Lower Is Better
GTX 1080 .......... MIN: 45 AVG: 190 MAX: 249
RTX 2080 Ti ....... MIN: 56 AVG: 214 MAX: 342
RTX 2080 .......... MIN: 47 AVG: 180 MAX: 285
RTX 2070 .......... MIN: 71 AVG: 162 MAX: 247
GTX 1080 Ti ....... MIN: 55 AVG: 222 MAX: 320
GTX 1070 Ti ....... MIN: 47 AVG: 154 MAX: 192
GTX 1070 .......... MIN: 43 AVG: 174 MAX: 213
TITAN RTX ......... MIN: 51 AVG: 204 MAX: 351
GTX TITAN X GM200 . MIN: 56 AVG: 252 MAX: 327
GTX 980 Ti ........ MIN: 53 AVG: 244 MAX: 311
NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09
GPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
GTX 1080 .......... MIN: 61 AVG: 68 MAX: 75
RTX 2080 Ti ....... MIN: 55 AVG: 60 MAX: 65
RTX 2080 .......... MIN: 60 AVG: 67 MAX: 75
RTX 2070 .......... MIN: 32 AVG: 45 MAX: 58
GTX 1080 Ti ....... MIN: 61 AVG: 68 MAX: 75
GTX 1070 Ti ....... MIN: 46 AVG: 51 MAX: 55
GTX 1070 .......... MIN: 58 AVG: 66 MAX: 70
TITAN RTX ......... MIN: 57 AVG: 61 MAX: 67
GTX TITAN X GM200 . MIN: 66 AVG: 77 MAX: 84
GTX 980 Ti ........ MIN: 65 AVG: 77 MAX: 83
NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09
Test: ResNet-50, FP16
Images Per Second Per Watt > Higher Is Better
GTX 1080 .......... 1.02 |=====================
RTX 2080 Ti ....... 2.10 |============================================
RTX 2080 .......... 1.86 |=======================================
RTX 2070 .......... 1.90 |=======================================
GTX 1080 Ti ....... 1.22 |=========================
GTX 1070 Ti ....... 1.14 |========================
GTX 1070 .......... 0.92 |===================
TITAN RTX ......... 2.55 |=====================================================
GTX TITAN X GM200 . 0.62 |=============
GTX 980 Ti ........ 0.61 |=============
Chaos Group V-RAY 1.1.0
System Power Consumption Monitor
Watts < Lower Is Better
GTX 1080 .......... MIN: 44 AVG: 153 MAX: 166
RTX 2080 Ti ....... MIN: 70 AVG: 243 MAX: 272
RTX 2080 .......... MIN: 63 AVG: 192 MAX: 203
RTX 2070 .......... MIN: 54 AVG: 186 MAX: 199
GTX 1080 Ti ....... MIN: 120 AVG: 219 MAX: 232
GTX 1070 Ti ....... MIN: 46 AVG: 131 MAX: 136
GTX 1070 .......... MIN: 43 AVG: 151 MAX: 164
TITAN RTX ......... MIN: 58 AVG: 262 MAX: 288
GTX TITAN X GM200 . MIN: 56 AVG: 230 MAX: 248
GTX 980 Ti ........ MIN: 52 AVG: 218 MAX: 232
GTX 980 ........... MIN: 48 AVG: 170 MAX: 175
Chaos Group V-RAY 1.1.0
GPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
GTX 1080 .......... MIN: 48 AVG: 63 MAX: 67
RTX 2080 Ti ....... MIN: 46 AVG: 60 MAX: 68
RTX 2080 .......... MIN: 50 AVG: 68 MAX: 74
RTX 2070 .......... MIN: 53 AVG: 61 MAX: 62
GTX 1080 Ti ....... MIN: 54 AVG: 68 MAX: 73
GTX 1070 Ti ....... MIN: 38 AVG: 48 MAX: 50
GTX 1070 .......... MIN: 46 AVG: 63 MAX: 68
TITAN RTX ......... MIN: 56 AVG: 68 MAX: 72
GTX TITAN X GM200 . MIN: 67 AVG: 78 MAX: 82
GTX 980 Ti ........ MIN: 69 AVG: 78 MAX: 81
GTX 980 ........... MIN: 64 AVG: 73 MAX: 75
System Power Consumption Monitor
Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring
Watts
RX Vega 56 ........ MIN: 49 AVG: 144 MAX: 284
RX Vega 64 ........ MIN: 48 AVG: 169 MAX: 359
GTX 1080 .......... MIN: 42 AVG: 155 MAX: 252
RTX 2080 Ti ....... MIN: 46 AVG: 208 MAX: 347
RTX 2080 .......... MIN: 44 AVG: 175 MAX: 288
RTX 2070 .......... MIN: 42 AVG: 146 MAX: 247
GTX 1080 Ti ....... MIN: 43 AVG: 201 MAX: 321
GTX 1070 Ti ....... MIN: 46 AVG: 128 MAX: 214
GTX 1070 .......... MIN: 42 AVG: 144 MAX: 214
TITAN RTX ......... MIN: 48 AVG: 242 MAX: 365
GTX TITAN X GM200 . MIN: 49 AVG: 240 MAX: 328
GTX 980 Ti ........ MIN: 52 AVG: 219 MAX: 321
GTX 980 ........... MIN: 45 AVG: 127 MAX: 240
GPU Temperature Monitor
Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring
Celsius
RX Vega 56 ........ MIN: 31.0 AVG: 51.0 MAX: 75.0
RX Vega 64 ........ MIN: 28.0 AVG: 53.0 MAX: 85.0
GTX 1080 .......... MIN: 45.0 AVG: 63.1 MAX: 79.0
RTX 2080 Ti ....... MIN: 34.0 AVG: 60.3 MAX: 76.0
RTX 2080 .......... MIN: 35.0 AVG: 66.5 MAX: 80.0
RTX 2070 .......... MIN: 33.0 AVG: 54.6 MAX: 64.0
GTX 1080 Ti ....... MIN: 33.0 AVG: 66.5 MAX: 80.0
GTX 1070 Ti ....... MIN: 36.0 AVG: 46.9 MAX: 60.0
GTX 1070 .......... MIN: 31.0 AVG: 61.1 MAX: 75.0
TITAN RTX ......... MIN: 38.0 AVG: 63.6 MAX: 77.0
GTX TITAN X GM200 . MIN: 35.0 AVG: 76.9 MAX: 85.0
GTX 980 Ti ........ MIN: 38.0 AVG: 74.7 MAX: 84.0
GTX 980 ........... MIN: 34.0 AVG: 58.4 MAX: 77.0
LuxMark 3.1
System Power Consumption Monitor
Watts < Lower Is Better
RX Vega 56 ........ MIN: 52 AVG: 251 MAX: 263
RX Vega 64 ........ MIN: 53 AVG: 323 MAX: 338
GTX 1080 .......... MIN: 91 AVG: 174 MAX: 176
RTX 2080 Ti ....... MIN: 111 AVG: 315 MAX: 328
RTX 2080 .......... MIN: 102 AVG: 241 MAX: 247
RTX 2070 .......... MIN: 78 AVG: 225 MAX: 233
GTX 1080 Ti ....... MIN: 123 AVG: 242 MAX: 248
GTX 1070 Ti ....... MIN: 147 AVG: 149 MAX: 149
GTX 1070 .......... MIN: 83 AVG: 177 MAX: 181
TITAN RTX ......... MIN: 49 AVG: 329 MAX: 344
GTX TITAN X GM200 . MIN: 126 AVG: 249 MAX: 257
GTX 980 Ti ........ MIN: 119 AVG: 234 MAX: 241
GTX 980 ........... MIN: 80 AVG: 190 MAX: 197
SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10
System Power Consumption Monitor
Watts < Lower Is Better
RX Vega 56 .. MIN: 49 AVG: 198 MAX: 234
RX Vega 64 .. MIN: 52 AVG: 223 MAX: 250
GTX 1080 .... MIN: 90 AVG: 145 MAX: 165
RTX 2080 Ti . MIN: 48 AVG: 223 MAX: 283
RTX 2080 .... MIN: 47 AVG: 170 MAX: 203
RTX 2070 .... MIN: 54 AVG: 163 MAX: 199
GTX 1080 Ti . MIN: 121 AVG: 190 MAX: 217
GTX 1070 Ti . MIN: 47 AVG: 123 MAX: 142
GTX 1070 .... MIN: 83 AVG: 135 MAX: 155
TITAN RTX ... MIN: 48 AVG: 233 MAX: 281