NVIDIA TITAN RTX Linux GPU Compute Benchmarks

NVIDIA and AMD GPU Linux compute benchmarks December 2018 by Michael Larabel for a future article, review of the NVIDIA TITAN RTX.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1812224-SP-GPUCOMPUT75
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

NVIDIA GPU Compute 3 Tests
OpenCL 3 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Disable Color Branding
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs
No Box Plots
On Line Graphs With Missing Data, Connect The Line Gaps

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs
Condense Test Profiles With Multiple Version Results Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
GTX 980
December 21 2018
  16 Minutes
GTX 980 Ti
December 21 2018
  30 Minutes
GTX TITAN X GM200
December 21 2018
  35 Minutes
GTX 1070
December 08 2018
  36 Minutes
GTX 1070 Ti
December 08 2018
  34 Minutes
GTX 1080
December 07 2018
  34 Minutes
GTX 1080 Ti
December 08 2018
  28 Minutes
RTX 2070
December 07 2018
  11 Minutes
RTX 2080
December 07 2018
  30 Minutes
RTX 2080 Ti
December 07 2018
  26 Minutes
TITAN RTX
December 21 2018
  25 Minutes
RX Vega 56
December 07 2018
  7 Minutes
RX Vega 64
December 07 2018
  7 Minutes
Invert Hiding All Results Option
  25 Minutes

Only show results where is faster than
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


NVIDIA TITAN RTX Linux GPU Compute Benchmarks NVIDIA and AMD GPU Linux compute benchmarks December 2018 by Michael Larabel for a future article, review of the NVIDIA TITAN RTX. RX Vega 56: Processor: Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z390-A (0602 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH Shared SRAM, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 2000GB SABRENT + Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX Vega 8GB (1590/800MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: Acer B286HK, Network: Intel Connection OS: Ubuntu 18.04, Kernel: 4.19.5-041905-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.28.3, Display Server: X Server 1.19.6, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 19.0.0-devel padoka PPA (LLVM 8.0.0), OpenCL: OpenCL 2.1 AMD-APP (2679.0), Vulkan: 1.1.70, Compiler: GCC 7.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 RX Vega 64: Processor: Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z390-A (0602 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH Shared SRAM, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 2000GB SABRENT + Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX Vega 8GB (1630/945MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: Acer B286HK, Network: Intel Connection OS: Ubuntu 18.04, Kernel: 4.19.5-041905-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.28.3, Display Server: X Server 1.19.6, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 19.0.0-devel padoka PPA (LLVM 8.0.0), OpenCL: OpenCL 2.1 AMD-APP (2679.0), Vulkan: 1.1.70, Compiler: GCC 7.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 GTX 1080: Processor: Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z390-A (0602 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH Shared SRAM, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 2000GB SABRENT + Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 8GB (1607/5005MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: Acer B286HK, Network: Intel Connection OS: Ubuntu 18.04, Kernel: 4.19.5-041905-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.28.3, Display Server: X Server 1.19.6, Display Driver: NVIDIA 415.22, OpenGL: 4.6.0, OpenCL: OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 10.0.132, Vulkan: 1.1.84, Compiler: GCC 7.3.0 + CUDA 10.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 RTX 2080 Ti: Processor: Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z390-A (0602 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH Shared SRAM, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 2000GB SABRENT + Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB (1350/7000MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: Acer B286HK, Network: Intel Connection OS: Ubuntu 18.04, Kernel: 4.19.5-041905-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.28.3, Display Server: X Server 1.19.6, Display Driver: NVIDIA 415.22, OpenGL: 4.6.0, OpenCL: OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 10.0.132, Vulkan: 1.1.84, Compiler: GCC 7.3.0 + CUDA 10.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 RTX 2080: Processor: Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z390-A (0602 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH Shared SRAM, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 2000GB SABRENT + Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB, Graphics: Zotac NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 8GB (1515/7000MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: Acer B286HK, Network: Intel Connection OS: Ubuntu 18.04, Kernel: 4.19.5-041905-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.28.3, Display Server: X Server 1.19.6, Display Driver: NVIDIA 415.22, OpenGL: 4.6.0, OpenCL: OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 10.0.132, Vulkan: 1.1.84, Compiler: GCC 7.3.0 + CUDA 10.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 RTX 2070: Processor: Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z390-A (0602 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH Shared SRAM, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 2000GB SABRENT + Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB, Graphics: eVGA NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 8GB (1410/7000MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: Acer B286HK, Network: Intel Connection OS: Ubuntu 18.04, Kernel: 4.19.5-041905-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.28.3, Display Server: X Server 1.19.6, Display Driver: NVIDIA 415.22, OpenGL: 4.6.0, OpenCL: OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 10.0.132, Vulkan: 1.1.84, Compiler: GCC 7.3.0 + CUDA 10.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 GTX 1080 Ti: Processor: Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z390-A (0602 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH Shared SRAM, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 2000GB SABRENT + Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB (1480/5508MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: Acer B286HK, Network: Intel Connection OS: Ubuntu 18.04, Kernel: 4.19.5-041905-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.28.3, Display Server: X Server 1.19.6, Display Driver: NVIDIA 415.22, OpenGL: 4.6.0, OpenCL: OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 10.0.132, Vulkan: 1.1.84, Compiler: GCC 7.3.0 + CUDA 10.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 GTX 1070 Ti: Processor: Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z390-A (0602 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH Shared SRAM, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 2000GB SABRENT + Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB, Graphics: Zotac NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB (1607/4006MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: Acer B286HK, Network: Intel Connection OS: Ubuntu 18.04, Kernel: 4.19.5-041905-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.28.3, Display Server: X Server 1.19.6, Display Driver: NVIDIA 415.22, OpenGL: 4.6.0, OpenCL: OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 10.0.132, Vulkan: 1.1.84, Compiler: GCC 7.3.0 + CUDA 10.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 GTX 1070: Processor: Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z390-A (0602 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH Shared SRAM, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 2000GB SABRENT + Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 8GB (1506/4006MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: Acer B286HK, Network: Intel Connection OS: Ubuntu 18.04, Kernel: 4.19.5-041905-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.28.3, Display Server: X Server 1.19.6, Display Driver: NVIDIA 415.22, OpenGL: 4.6.0, OpenCL: OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 10.0.132, Vulkan: 1.1.84, Compiler: GCC 7.3.0 + CUDA 10.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 TITAN RTX: Processor: Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z390-A (0602 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH Shared SRAM, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 2000GB SABRENT + Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB, Graphics: NVIDIA TITAN RTX 24GB (1350/7000MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: Acer B286HK, Network: Intel Connection OS: Ubuntu 18.04, Kernel: 4.19.5-041905-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.28.3, Display Server: X Server 1.19.6, Display Driver: NVIDIA 415.23, OpenGL: 4.6.0, OpenCL: OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 10.0.132, Vulkan: 1.1.84, Compiler: GCC 7.3.0 + CUDA 10.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 GTX TITAN X GM200: Processor: Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z390-A (0602 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH Shared SRAM, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 2000GB SABRENT + Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X 12GB (1001/3505MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: Acer B286HK, Network: Intel Connection OS: Ubuntu 18.04, Kernel: 4.19.5-041905-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.28.3, Display Server: X Server 1.19.6, Display Driver: NVIDIA 415.23, OpenGL: 4.6.0, OpenCL: OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 10.0.132, Vulkan: 1.1.84, Compiler: GCC 7.3.0 + CUDA 10.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 GTX 980 Ti: Processor: Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z390-A (0602 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH Shared SRAM, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 2000GB SABRENT + Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB (999/3505MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: Acer B286HK, Network: Intel Connection OS: Ubuntu 18.04, Kernel: 4.19.5-041905-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.28.3, Display Server: X Server 1.19.6, Display Driver: NVIDIA 415.23, OpenGL: 4.6.0, OpenCL: OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 10.0.132, Vulkan: 1.1.84, Compiler: GCC 7.3.0 + CUDA 10.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 GTX 980: Processor: Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z390-A (0602 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH Shared SRAM, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 2000GB SABRENT + Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 4GB (1126/3505MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: Acer B286HK, Network: Intel Connection OS: Ubuntu 18.04, Kernel: 4.19.5-041905-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.28.3, Display Server: X Server 1.19.6, Display Driver: NVIDIA 415.23, OpenGL: 4.6.0, OpenCL: OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 10.0.132, Vulkan: 1.1.84, Compiler: GCC 7.3.0 + CUDA 10.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 LuxMark 3.1 OpenCL Device: GPU - Scene: Luxball HDR Score > Higher Is Better RX Vega 56 ........ 31179 |=================================== RX Vega 64 ........ 32815 |===================================== GTX 1080 .......... 13823 |================ RTX 2080 Ti ....... 42693 |================================================ RTX 2080 .......... 29641 |================================== RTX 2070 .......... 30091 |================================== GTX 1080 Ti ....... 21562 |======================== GTX 1070 Ti ....... 16886 |=================== GTX 1070 .......... 17288 |==================== TITAN RTX ......... 45932 |==================================================== GTX TITAN X GM200 . 17299 |==================== GTX 980 Ti ........ 16910 |=================== GTX 980 ........... 13242 |=============== NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09 Test: Inception v4, FP16 Images Per Second > Higher Is Better GTX 1080 .......... 55.03 |================== RTX 2080 Ti ....... 135.90 |============================================= RTX 2080 .......... 102.77 |================================== GTX 1080 Ti ....... 74.63 |========================= GTX 1070 Ti ....... 49.23 |================ GTX 1070 .......... 44.77 |=============== TITAN RTX ......... 152.80 |=================================================== GTX TITAN X GM200 . 43.23 |============== GTX 980 Ti ........ 40.90 |============== Chaos Group V-RAY 1.1.0 Mode: CUDA GPU Seconds < Lower Is Better GTX 1080 .......... 102.07 |================================================= RTX 2080 Ti ....... 56.09 |=========================== RTX 2080 .......... 72.07 |=================================== RTX 2070 .......... 66.02 |================================ GTX 1080 Ti ....... 66.41 |================================ GTX 1070 Ti ....... 86.30 |========================================= GTX 1070 .......... 90.43 |=========================================== TITAN RTX ......... 50.08 |======================== GTX TITAN X GM200 . 80.62 |======================================= GTX 980 Ti ........ 77.70 |===================================== GTX 980 ........... 106.51 |=================================================== NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09 Test: Googlenet, FP16 Images Per Second > Higher Is Better GTX 1080 .......... 458 |===================== RTX 2080 Ti ....... 1015 |================================================ RTX 2080 .......... 738 |=================================== GTX 1080 Ti ....... 629 |============================= GTX 1070 Ti ....... 413 |=================== GTX 1070 .......... 375 |================== TITAN RTX ......... 1132 |===================================================== GTX TITAN X GM200 . 372 |================= GTX 980 Ti ........ 356 |================= NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09 Test: ResNet-50, FP32 Images Per Second > Higher Is Better GTX 1080 .......... 143 |========================== RTX 2080 Ti ....... 285 |=================================================== RTX 2080 .......... 205 |===================================== GTX 1080 Ti ....... 210 |====================================== GTX 1070 Ti ....... 133 |======================== GTX 1070 .......... 125 |======================= TITAN RTX ......... 299 |====================================================== GTX TITAN X GM200 . 125 |======================= NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09 Test: VGG-16, FP32 Images Per Second > Higher Is Better GTX 1080 .......... 82.90 |========================== RTX 2080 Ti ....... 152.40 |================================================ RTX 2080 .......... 108.57 |================================== GTX 1080 Ti ....... 119.50 |====================================== GTX 1070 Ti ....... 76.40 |======================== GTX 1070 .......... 71.57 |====================== TITAN RTX ......... 162.33 |=================================================== GTX TITAN X GM200 . 72.77 |======================= NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09 Test: ResNet-50, FP16 Images Per Second > Higher Is Better GTX 1080 .......... 193 |==================== RTX 2080 Ti ....... 449 |=============================================== RTX 2080 .......... 335 |=================================== RTX 2070 .......... 309 |================================ GTX 1080 Ti ....... 271 |============================ GTX 1070 Ti ....... 175 |================== GTX 1070 .......... 160 |================= TITAN RTX ......... 520 |====================================================== GTX TITAN X GM200 . 156 |================ GTX 980 Ti ........ 150 |================ NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09 Test: VGG-16, FP16 Images Per Second > Higher Is Better GTX 1080 .......... 93.13 |=================== RTX 2080 Ti ....... 206.97 |=========================================== RTX 2080 .......... 153.33 |================================ GTX 1080 Ti ....... 131.37 |=========================== GTX 1070 Ti ....... 84.43 |================== GTX 1070 .......... 76.93 |================ TITAN RTX ......... 244.40 |=================================================== GTX TITAN X GM200 . 79.20 |================= GTX 980 Ti ........ 77.57 |================ NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09 Test: AlexNet, FP32 Images Per Second > Higher Is Better GTX 1080 .......... 1764 |========================== RTX 2080 Ti ....... 3344 |================================================== RTX 2080 .......... 2419 |==================================== RTX 2070 .......... 2174 |================================ GTX 1080 Ti ....... 2539 |====================================== GTX 1070 Ti ....... 1591 |======================== GTX 1070 .......... 1516 |====================== TITAN RTX ......... 3576 |===================================================== GTX TITAN X GM200 . 1587 |======================== GTX 980 Ti ........ 1501 |====================== GTX 980 ........... 1154 |================= NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09 Test: AlexNet, FP16 Images Per Second > Higher Is Better GTX 1080 .......... 1875 |==================== RTX 2080 Ti ....... 4432 |=============================================== RTX 2080 .......... 3153 |================================= GTX 1080 Ti ....... 2674 |============================ GTX 1070 Ti ....... 1683 |================== GTX 1070 .......... 1563 |================ TITAN RTX ......... 5032 |===================================================== GTX TITAN X GM200 . 1662 |================== GTX 980 Ti ........ 1552 |================ GTX 980 ........... 1208 |============= cl-mem 2017-01-13 Benchmark: Copy GB/s > Higher Is Better RX Vega 56 ........ 203 |======================= RX Vega 64 ........ 221 |========================= GTX 1080 .......... 209 |======================= RTX 2080 Ti ....... 454 |=================================================== RTX 2080 .......... 328 |===================================== RTX 2070 .......... 330 |===================================== GTX 1080 Ti ....... 317 |=================================== GTX 1070 Ti ....... 188 |===================== GTX 1070 .......... 187 |===================== TITAN RTX ......... 484 |====================================================== GTX TITAN X GM200 . 218 |======================== GTX 980 Ti ........ 217 |======================== GTX 980 ........... 143 |================ SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: FFT SP GFLOPS > Higher Is Better RX Vega 56 ........ 926 |================================ RX Vega 64 ........ 1070 |===================================== GTX 1080 .......... 575 |==================== RTX 2080 Ti ....... 1443 |================================================= RTX 2080 .......... 1083 |===================================== RTX 2070 .......... 998 |================================== GTX 1080 Ti ....... 972 |================================= GTX 1070 Ti ....... 497 |================= GTX 1070 .......... 452 |=============== TITAN RTX ......... 1548 |===================================================== GTX TITAN X GM200 . 726 |========================= GTX 980 Ti ........ 728 |========================= GTX 980 ........... 468 |================ NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better GTX 1080 .......... MIN: 46 AVG: 198 MAX: 236 RTX 2080 Ti ....... MIN: 50 AVG: 270 MAX: 342 RTX 2080 .......... MIN: 56 AVG: 239 MAX: 288 GTX 1080 Ti ....... MIN: 51 AVG: 242 MAX: 310 GTX 1070 Ti ....... MIN: 59 AVG: 162 MAX: 191 GTX 1070 .......... MIN: 54 AVG: 171 MAX: 204 TITAN RTX ......... MIN: 60 AVG: 282 MAX: 358 GTX TITAN X GM200 . MIN: 53 AVG: 262 MAX: 322 NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09 GPU Temperature Monitor Celsius < Lower Is Better GTX 1080 .......... MIN: 60 AVG: 69 MAX: 74 RTX 2080 Ti ....... MIN: 56 AVG: 66 MAX: 71 RTX 2080 .......... MIN: 61 AVG: 74 MAX: 80 GTX 1080 Ti ....... MIN: 61 AVG: 71 MAX: 77 GTX 1070 Ti ....... MIN: 46 AVG: 52 MAX: 55 GTX 1070 .......... MIN: 58 AVG: 66 MAX: 70 TITAN RTX ......... MIN: 56 AVG: 67 MAX: 73 GTX TITAN X GM200 . MIN: 67 AVG: 80 MAX: 84 NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09 Test: VGG-16, FP32 Images Per Second Per Watt > Higher Is Better GTX 1080 .......... 0.42 |====================================== RTX 2080 Ti ....... 0.56 |=================================================== RTX 2080 .......... 0.45 |========================================= GTX 1080 Ti ....... 0.49 |============================================= GTX 1070 Ti ....... 0.47 |=========================================== GTX 1070 .......... 0.42 |====================================== TITAN RTX ......... 0.58 |===================================================== GTX TITAN X GM200 . 0.28 |========================== NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better GTX 1080 .......... MIN: 91 AVG: 195 MAX: 240 RTX 2080 Ti ....... MIN: 51 AVG: 220 MAX: 332 RTX 2080 .......... MIN: 48 AVG: 224 MAX: 283 GTX 1080 Ti ....... MIN: 52 AVG: 243 MAX: 313 GTX 1070 Ti ....... MIN: 47 AVG: 160 MAX: 192 GTX 1070 .......... MIN: 44 AVG: 169 MAX: 202 TITAN RTX ......... MIN: 49 AVG: 257 MAX: 355 GTX TITAN X GM200 . MIN: 82 AVG: 277 MAX: 328 GTX 980 Ti ........ MIN: 52 AVG: 254 MAX: 318 NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09 GPU Temperature Monitor Celsius < Lower Is Better GTX 1080 .......... MIN: 50 AVG: 66 MAX: 74 RTX 2080 Ti ....... MIN: 54 AVG: 62 MAX: 68 RTX 2080 .......... MIN: 59 AVG: 70 MAX: 77 GTX 1080 Ti ....... MIN: 61 AVG: 70 MAX: 76 GTX 1070 Ti ....... MIN: 45 AVG: 52 MAX: 55 GTX 1070 .......... MIN: 59 AVG: 66 MAX: 70 TITAN RTX ......... MIN: 55 AVG: 63 MAX: 68 GTX TITAN X GM200 . MIN: 67 AVG: 79 MAX: 84 GTX 980 Ti ........ MIN: 67 AVG: 79 MAX: 84 NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09 Test: VGG-16, FP16 Images Per Second Per Watt > Higher Is Better GTX 1080 .......... 0.48 |=========================== RTX 2080 Ti ....... 0.94 |==================================================== RTX 2080 .......... 0.69 |====================================== GTX 1080 Ti ....... 0.54 |============================== GTX 1070 Ti ....... 0.53 |============================== GTX 1070 .......... 0.46 |========================== TITAN RTX ......... 0.95 |===================================================== GTX TITAN X GM200 . 0.29 |================ GTX 980 Ti ........ 0.30 |================= NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better GTX 1080 .......... MIN: 71 AVG: 186 MAX: 250 RTX 2080 Ti ....... MIN: 50 AVG: 183 MAX: 341 RTX 2080 .......... MIN: 48 AVG: 177 MAX: 285 GTX 1080 Ti ....... MIN: 52 AVG: 212 MAX: 321 GTX 1070 Ti ....... MIN: 47 AVG: 146 MAX: 189 GTX 1070 .......... MIN: 44 AVG: 158 MAX: 210 TITAN RTX ......... MIN: 58 AVG: 196 MAX: 353 GTX TITAN X GM200 . MIN: 55 AVG: 233 MAX: 323 GTX 980 Ti ........ MIN: 53 AVG: 226 MAX: 305 NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09 GPU Temperature Monitor Celsius < Lower Is Better GTX 1080 .......... MIN: 51 AVG: 64 MAX: 76 RTX 2080 Ti ....... MIN: 53 AVG: 58 MAX: 65 RTX 2080 .......... MIN: 57 AVG: 65 MAX: 74 GTX 1080 Ti ....... MIN: 56 AVG: 66 MAX: 77 GTX 1070 Ti ....... MIN: 43 AVG: 50 MAX: 55 GTX 1070 .......... MIN: 55 AVG: 64 MAX: 72 TITAN RTX ......... MIN: 54 AVG: 59 MAX: 66 GTX TITAN X GM200 . MIN: 62 AVG: 76 MAX: 85 GTX 980 Ti ........ MIN: 61 AVG: 75 MAX: 84 NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09 Test: Inception v4, FP16 Images Per Second Per Watt > Higher Is Better GTX 1080 .......... 0.30 |==================== RTX 2080 Ti ....... 0.74 |================================================== RTX 2080 .......... 0.58 |======================================= GTX 1080 Ti ....... 0.35 |======================== GTX 1070 Ti ....... 0.34 |======================= GTX 1070 .......... 0.28 |=================== TITAN RTX ......... 0.78 |===================================================== GTX TITAN X GM200 . 0.19 |============= GTX 980 Ti ........ 0.18 |============ NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better GTX 1080 .......... MIN: 76 AVG: 215 MAX: 247 RTX 2080 Ti ....... MIN: 50 AVG: 249 MAX: 343 RTX 2080 .......... MIN: 48 AVG: 230 MAX: 285 GTX 1080 Ti ....... MIN: 64 AVG: 257 MAX: 319 GTX 1070 Ti ....... MIN: 47 AVG: 164 MAX: 188 GTX 1070 .......... MIN: 43 AVG: 182 MAX: 211 TITAN RTX ......... MIN: 51 AVG: 275 MAX: 360 GTX TITAN X GM200 . MIN: 102 AVG: 265 MAX: 320 GTX 980 Ti ........ MIN: 124 AVG: 261 MAX: 317 NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09 GPU Temperature Monitor Celsius < Lower Is Better GTX 1080 .......... MIN: 58 AVG: 72 MAX: 79 RTX 2080 Ti ....... MIN: 55 AVG: 65 MAX: 71 RTX 2080 .......... MIN: 60 AVG: 73 MAX: 80 GTX 1080 Ti ....... MIN: 60 AVG: 73 MAX: 80 GTX 1070 Ti ....... MIN: 43 AVG: 53 MAX: 56 GTX 1070 .......... MIN: 56 AVG: 69 MAX: 74 TITAN RTX ......... MIN: 55 AVG: 65 MAX: 72 GTX TITAN X GM200 . MIN: 72 AVG: 81 MAX: 85 GTX 980 Ti ........ MIN: 70 AVG: 80 MAX: 84 NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09 Test: Googlenet, FP16 Images Per Second Per Watt > Higher Is Better GTX 1080 .......... 2.13 |=========================== RTX 2080 Ti ....... 4.07 |==================================================== RTX 2080 .......... 3.21 |========================================= GTX 1080 Ti ....... 2.45 |================================ GTX 1070 Ti ....... 2.53 |================================= GTX 1070 .......... 2.06 |=========================== TITAN RTX ......... 4.11 |===================================================== GTX TITAN X GM200 . 1.40 |================== GTX 980 Ti ........ 1.36 |================== NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better GTX 1080 .......... MIN: 101 AVG: 178 MAX: 229 RTX 2080 Ti ....... MIN: 49 AVG: 257 MAX: 339 RTX 2080 .......... MIN: 48 AVG: 211 MAX: 284 RTX 2070 .......... MIN: 64 AVG: 185 MAX: 244 GTX 1080 Ti ....... MIN: 126 AVG: 208 MAX: 307 GTX 1070 Ti ....... MIN: 48 AVG: 145 MAX: 186 GTX 1070 .......... MIN: 87 AVG: 158 MAX: 202 TITAN RTX ......... MIN: 79 AVG: 244 MAX: 357 GTX TITAN X GM200 . MIN: 136 AVG: 252 MAX: 313 GTX 980 Ti ........ MIN: 123 AVG: 228 MAX: 319 GTX 980 ........... MIN: 102 AVG: 186 MAX: 233 NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09 GPU Temperature Monitor Celsius < Lower Is Better GTX 1080 .......... MIN: 63 AVG: 67 MAX: 71 RTX 2080 Ti ....... MIN: 53 AVG: 61 MAX: 67 RTX 2080 .......... MIN: 59 AVG: 70 MAX: 76 RTX 2070 .......... MIN: 46 AVG: 56 MAX: 61 GTX 1080 Ti ....... MIN: 64 AVG: 68 MAX: 71 GTX 1070 Ti ....... MIN: 44 AVG: 49 MAX: 52 GTX 1070 .......... MIN: 61 AVG: 64 MAX: 68 TITAN RTX ......... MIN: 55 AVG: 62 MAX: 67 GTX TITAN X GM200 . MIN: 72 AVG: 79 MAX: 84 GTX 980 Ti ........ MIN: 71 AVG: 78 MAX: 82 GTX 980 ........... MIN: 63 AVG: 72 MAX: 77 NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09 Test: AlexNet, FP32 Images Per Second Per Watt > Higher Is Better GTX 1080 .......... 9.90 |=================================== RTX 2080 Ti ....... 12.99 |============================================== RTX 2080 .......... 11.44 |========================================= RTX 2070 .......... 11.72 |========================================== GTX 1080 Ti ....... 12.19 |=========================================== GTX 1070 Ti ....... 10.99 |======================================= GTX 1070 .......... 9.61 |================================== TITAN RTX ......... 14.66 |==================================================== GTX TITAN X GM200 . 6.29 |====================== GTX 980 Ti ........ 6.59 |======================= GTX 980 ........... 6.20 |====================== NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better GTX 1080 .......... MIN: 44 AVG: 168 MAX: 235 RTX 2080 Ti ....... MIN: 49 AVG: 178 MAX: 333 RTX 2080 .......... MIN: 47 AVG: 191 MAX: 270 GTX 1080 Ti ....... MIN: 51 AVG: 213 MAX: 303 GTX 1070 Ti ....... MIN: 47 AVG: 136 MAX: 175 GTX 1070 .......... MIN: 69 AVG: 158 MAX: 192 TITAN RTX ......... MIN: 51 AVG: 195 MAX: 353 GTX TITAN X GM200 . MIN: 55 AVG: 237 MAX: 321 GTX 980 Ti ........ MIN: 135 AVG: 237 MAX: 296 GTX 980 ........... MIN: 49 AVG: 187 MAX: 240 NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09 GPU Temperature Monitor Celsius < Lower Is Better GTX 1080 .......... MIN: 62 AVG: 66 MAX: 70 RTX 2080 Ti ....... MIN: 57 AVG: 60 MAX: 64 RTX 2080 .......... MIN: 63 AVG: 68 MAX: 72 GTX 1080 Ti ....... MIN: 63 AVG: 67 MAX: 70 GTX 1070 Ti ....... MIN: 46 AVG: 50 MAX: 53 GTX 1070 .......... MIN: 59 AVG: 64 MAX: 67 TITAN RTX ......... MIN: 58 AVG: 61 MAX: 65 GTX TITAN X GM200 . MIN: 68 AVG: 77 MAX: 85 GTX 980 Ti ........ MIN: 62 AVG: 73 MAX: 81 GTX 980 ........... MIN: 51 AVG: 66 MAX: 74 NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09 Test: AlexNet, FP16 Images Per Second Per Watt > Higher Is Better GTX 1080 .......... 11.19 |======================= RTX 2080 Ti ....... 24.95 |================================================== RTX 2080 .......... 16.53 |================================= GTX 1080 Ti ....... 12.53 |========================= GTX 1070 Ti ....... 12.39 |========================= GTX 1070 .......... 9.86 |==================== TITAN RTX ......... 25.77 |==================================================== GTX TITAN X GM200 . 7.03 |============== GTX 980 Ti ........ 6.54 |============= GTX 980 ........... 6.45 |============= NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better GTX 1080 .......... MIN: 44 AVG: 196 MAX: 250 RTX 2080 Ti ....... MIN: 51 AVG: 248 MAX: 347 RTX 2080 .......... MIN: 48 AVG: 207 MAX: 285 GTX 1080 Ti ....... MIN: 80 AVG: 235 MAX: 319 GTX 1070 Ti ....... MIN: 48 AVG: 157 MAX: 188 GTX 1070 .......... MIN: 46 AVG: 172 MAX: 214 TITAN RTX ......... MIN: 51 AVG: 253 MAX: 365 GTX TITAN X GM200 . MIN: 56 AVG: 256 MAX: 321 NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09 GPU Temperature Monitor Celsius < Lower Is Better GTX 1080 .......... MIN: 60 AVG: 69 MAX: 75 RTX 2080 Ti ....... MIN: 54 AVG: 61 MAX: 67 RTX 2080 .......... MIN: 59 AVG: 70 MAX: 77 GTX 1080 Ti ....... MIN: 62 AVG: 70 MAX: 77 GTX 1070 Ti ....... MIN: 44 AVG: 51 MAX: 54 GTX 1070 .......... MIN: 57 AVG: 66 MAX: 71 TITAN RTX ......... MIN: 54 AVG: 63 MAX: 70 GTX TITAN X GM200 . MIN: 65 AVG: 78 MAX: 84 NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09 Test: ResNet-50, FP32 Images Per Second Per Watt > Higher Is Better GTX 1080 .......... 0.73 |================================= RTX 2080 Ti ....... 1.15 |==================================================== RTX 2080 .......... 0.99 |============================================ GTX 1080 Ti ....... 0.89 |======================================== GTX 1070 Ti ....... 0.84 |====================================== GTX 1070 .......... 0.73 |================================= TITAN RTX ......... 1.18 |===================================================== GTX TITAN X GM200 . 0.49 |====================== NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better GTX 1080 .......... MIN: 45 AVG: 190 MAX: 249 RTX 2080 Ti ....... MIN: 56 AVG: 214 MAX: 342 RTX 2080 .......... MIN: 47 AVG: 180 MAX: 285 RTX 2070 .......... MIN: 71 AVG: 162 MAX: 247 GTX 1080 Ti ....... MIN: 55 AVG: 222 MAX: 320 GTX 1070 Ti ....... MIN: 47 AVG: 154 MAX: 192 GTX 1070 .......... MIN: 43 AVG: 174 MAX: 213 TITAN RTX ......... MIN: 51 AVG: 204 MAX: 351 GTX TITAN X GM200 . MIN: 56 AVG: 252 MAX: 327 GTX 980 Ti ........ MIN: 53 AVG: 244 MAX: 311 NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09 GPU Temperature Monitor Celsius < Lower Is Better GTX 1080 .......... MIN: 61 AVG: 68 MAX: 75 RTX 2080 Ti ....... MIN: 55 AVG: 60 MAX: 65 RTX 2080 .......... MIN: 60 AVG: 67 MAX: 75 RTX 2070 .......... MIN: 32 AVG: 45 MAX: 58 GTX 1080 Ti ....... MIN: 61 AVG: 68 MAX: 75 GTX 1070 Ti ....... MIN: 46 AVG: 51 MAX: 55 GTX 1070 .......... MIN: 58 AVG: 66 MAX: 70 TITAN RTX ......... MIN: 57 AVG: 61 MAX: 67 GTX TITAN X GM200 . MIN: 66 AVG: 77 MAX: 84 GTX 980 Ti ........ MIN: 65 AVG: 77 MAX: 83 NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09 Test: ResNet-50, FP16 Images Per Second Per Watt > Higher Is Better GTX 1080 .......... 1.02 |===================== RTX 2080 Ti ....... 2.10 |============================================ RTX 2080 .......... 1.86 |======================================= RTX 2070 .......... 1.90 |======================================= GTX 1080 Ti ....... 1.22 |========================= GTX 1070 Ti ....... 1.14 |======================== GTX 1070 .......... 0.92 |=================== TITAN RTX ......... 2.55 |===================================================== GTX TITAN X GM200 . 0.62 |============= GTX 980 Ti ........ 0.61 |============= Chaos Group V-RAY 1.1.0 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better GTX 1080 .......... MIN: 44 AVG: 153 MAX: 166 RTX 2080 Ti ....... MIN: 70 AVG: 243 MAX: 272 RTX 2080 .......... MIN: 63 AVG: 192 MAX: 203 RTX 2070 .......... MIN: 54 AVG: 186 MAX: 199 GTX 1080 Ti ....... MIN: 120 AVG: 219 MAX: 232 GTX 1070 Ti ....... MIN: 46 AVG: 131 MAX: 136 GTX 1070 .......... MIN: 43 AVG: 151 MAX: 164 TITAN RTX ......... MIN: 58 AVG: 262 MAX: 288 GTX TITAN X GM200 . MIN: 56 AVG: 230 MAX: 248 GTX 980 Ti ........ MIN: 52 AVG: 218 MAX: 232 GTX 980 ........... MIN: 48 AVG: 170 MAX: 175 Chaos Group V-RAY 1.1.0 GPU Temperature Monitor Celsius < Lower Is Better GTX 1080 .......... MIN: 48 AVG: 63 MAX: 67 RTX 2080 Ti ....... MIN: 46 AVG: 60 MAX: 68 RTX 2080 .......... MIN: 50 AVG: 68 MAX: 74 RTX 2070 .......... MIN: 53 AVG: 61 MAX: 62 GTX 1080 Ti ....... MIN: 54 AVG: 68 MAX: 73 GTX 1070 Ti ....... MIN: 38 AVG: 48 MAX: 50 GTX 1070 .......... MIN: 46 AVG: 63 MAX: 68 TITAN RTX ......... MIN: 56 AVG: 68 MAX: 72 GTX TITAN X GM200 . MIN: 67 AVG: 78 MAX: 82 GTX 980 Ti ........ MIN: 69 AVG: 78 MAX: 81 GTX 980 ........... MIN: 64 AVG: 73 MAX: 75 System Power Consumption Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring Watts RX Vega 56 ........ MIN: 49 AVG: 144 MAX: 284 RX Vega 64 ........ MIN: 48 AVG: 169 MAX: 359 GTX 1080 .......... MIN: 42 AVG: 155 MAX: 252 RTX 2080 Ti ....... MIN: 46 AVG: 208 MAX: 347 RTX 2080 .......... MIN: 44 AVG: 175 MAX: 288 RTX 2070 .......... MIN: 42 AVG: 146 MAX: 247 GTX 1080 Ti ....... MIN: 43 AVG: 201 MAX: 321 GTX 1070 Ti ....... MIN: 46 AVG: 128 MAX: 214 GTX 1070 .......... MIN: 42 AVG: 144 MAX: 214 TITAN RTX ......... MIN: 48 AVG: 242 MAX: 365 GTX TITAN X GM200 . MIN: 49 AVG: 240 MAX: 328 GTX 980 Ti ........ MIN: 52 AVG: 219 MAX: 321 GTX 980 ........... MIN: 45 AVG: 127 MAX: 240 GPU Temperature Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring Celsius RX Vega 56 ........ MIN: 31.0 AVG: 51.0 MAX: 75.0 RX Vega 64 ........ MIN: 28.0 AVG: 53.0 MAX: 85.0 GTX 1080 .......... MIN: 45.0 AVG: 63.1 MAX: 79.0 RTX 2080 Ti ....... MIN: 34.0 AVG: 60.3 MAX: 76.0 RTX 2080 .......... MIN: 35.0 AVG: 66.5 MAX: 80.0 RTX 2070 .......... MIN: 33.0 AVG: 54.6 MAX: 64.0 GTX 1080 Ti ....... MIN: 33.0 AVG: 66.5 MAX: 80.0 GTX 1070 Ti ....... MIN: 36.0 AVG: 46.9 MAX: 60.0 GTX 1070 .......... MIN: 31.0 AVG: 61.1 MAX: 75.0 TITAN RTX ......... MIN: 38.0 AVG: 63.6 MAX: 77.0 GTX TITAN X GM200 . MIN: 35.0 AVG: 76.9 MAX: 85.0 GTX 980 Ti ........ MIN: 38.0 AVG: 74.7 MAX: 84.0 GTX 980 ........... MIN: 34.0 AVG: 58.4 MAX: 77.0 LuxMark 3.1 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better RX Vega 56 ........ MIN: 52 AVG: 251 MAX: 263 RX Vega 64 ........ MIN: 53 AVG: 323 MAX: 338 GTX 1080 .......... MIN: 91 AVG: 174 MAX: 176 RTX 2080 Ti ....... MIN: 111 AVG: 315 MAX: 328 RTX 2080 .......... MIN: 102 AVG: 241 MAX: 247 RTX 2070 .......... MIN: 78 AVG: 225 MAX: 233 GTX 1080 Ti ....... MIN: 123 AVG: 242 MAX: 248 GTX 1070 Ti ....... MIN: 147 AVG: 149 MAX: 149 GTX 1070 .......... MIN: 83 AVG: 177 MAX: 181 TITAN RTX ......... MIN: 49 AVG: 329 MAX: 344 GTX TITAN X GM200 . MIN: 126 AVG: 249 MAX: 257 GTX 980 Ti ........ MIN: 119 AVG: 234 MAX: 241 GTX 980 ........... MIN: 80 AVG: 190 MAX: 197 SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better RX Vega 56 .. MIN: 49 AVG: 198 MAX: 234 RX Vega 64 .. MIN: 52 AVG: 223 MAX: 250 GTX 1080 .... MIN: 90 AVG: 145 MAX: 165 RTX 2080 Ti . MIN: 48 AVG: 223 MAX: 283 RTX 2080 .... MIN: 47 AVG: 170 MAX: 203 RTX 2070 .... MIN: 54 AVG: 163 MAX: 199 GTX 1080 Ti . MIN: 121 AVG: 190 MAX: 217 GTX 1070 Ti . MIN: 47 AVG: 123 MAX: 142 GTX 1070 .... MIN: 83 AVG: 135 MAX: 155 TITAN RTX ... MIN: 48 AVG: 233 MAX: 281