SkySilk EPYC Gigantic

lxc testing on Ubuntu 18.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1809104-RA-1809098RA34
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

Timed Code Compilation 2 Tests
C/C++ Compiler Tests 8 Tests
CPU Massive 19 Tests
Creator Workloads 6 Tests
Database Test Suite 3 Tests
Encoding 2 Tests
Common Kernel Benchmarks 4 Tests
Multi-Core 11 Tests
Programmer / Developer System Benchmarks 3 Tests
Renderers 3 Tests
Server 7 Tests
Server CPU Tests 13 Tests
Single-Threaded 4 Tests
Video Encoding 2 Tests
Common Workstation Benchmarks 3 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Disable Color Branding
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs
Condense Test Profiles With Multiple Version Results Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
SkySilk EPYC Gigantic
September 09 2018
  1 Hour, 39 Minutes
SkySilk EPYC Super
September 09 2018
  1 Hour, 28 Minutes
SkySilk EPYC Power
September 09 2018
  3 Hours, 9 Minutes
Invert Hiding All Results Option
  2 Hours, 5 Minutes

Only show results where is faster than
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


SkySilk EPYC Gigantic, "OpenSSL 1.1.0f - RSA 4096-bit Performance", Higher Results Are Better "SkySilk EPYC Gigantic",2226.1,2319.5,2342 "SkySilk EPYC Super",1563.1,1448.1,1406.8 "SkySilk EPYC Power",1107.5,1205.2,1125.7,1200.1,1068.3,1108.8,1159.6,1160.3,1185.4,1167.1,1165,1118.3 "Blender 2.79a - Performance / Cost - Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only", Lower Results Are Better "SkySilk EPYC Gigantic", "SkySilk EPYC Super", "Blender 2.79a - Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only", Lower Results Are Better "SkySilk EPYC Gigantic", "SkySilk EPYC Super", "SkySilk EPYC Power", "7-Zip Compression 16.02 - Compress Speed Test", Higher Results Are Better "SkySilk EPYC Gigantic",37998,39301,40342 "SkySilk EPYC Super",26334,26414,26108 "SkySilk EPYC Power",19952,21245,21570,21942,22182,21866,22313,21976 "Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 4.18 - Time To Compile", Lower Results Are Better "SkySilk EPYC Gigantic",100.30419015884,92.242722988129,92.235382080078 "SkySilk EPYC Super",155.25002813339,152.40268611908,151.48160386086 "SkySilk EPYC Power",171.04280591011,168.76708197594,168.87660908699 "Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 4.18 - Performance / Cost - Time To Compile", Lower Results Are Better "SkySilk EPYC Gigantic", "SkySilk EPYC Super", "Stockfish 9 - Performance / Cost - Total Time", Higher Results Are Better "SkySilk EPYC Gigantic", "SkySilk EPYC Super", "Darktable 2.4.2 - Performance / Cost - Test: Boat - Acceleration: CPU-only", Lower Results Are Better "SkySilk EPYC Gigantic", "SkySilk EPYC Super", "Go Benchmarks - Test: json", Lower Results Are Better "SkySilk EPYC Gigantic",9327778,9525393,9461268 "SkySilk EPYC Super",13689784,13180097,13428663 "SkySilk EPYC Power",15421378,15976443,15144121 "Sysbench 2018-07-28 - Performance / Cost - Test: CPU", Higher Results Are Better "SkySilk EPYC Gigantic", "SkySilk EPYC Super", "Darktable 2.4.2 - Test: Boat - Acceleration: CPU-only", Lower Results Are Better "SkySilk EPYC Gigantic",9.325,8.899,9.294 "SkySilk EPYC Super",13.963,14.89,14.889 "SkySilk EPYC Power",15.448,13.464,14.971,15.475,14.648,15.707,14.933,14.138,14.475,13.771,14.639,14.094 "OpenSSL 1.1.0f - Performance / Cost - RSA 4096-bit Performance", Higher Results Are Better "SkySilk EPYC Gigantic", "SkySilk EPYC Super", "7-Zip Compression 16.02 - Performance / Cost - Compress Speed Test", Higher Results Are Better "SkySilk EPYC Gigantic", "SkySilk EPYC Super", "TTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.3b - Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping", Higher Results Are Better "SkySilk EPYC Gigantic",217.188,215.452,216.291 "SkySilk EPYC Super",163.956,158.589,161.025 "SkySilk EPYC Power",137.741,142.114,139.796 "Go Benchmarks - Test: garbage", Lower Results Are Better "SkySilk EPYC Gigantic",2784890,2705089,2776179 "SkySilk EPYC Super",3400829,3565876,3712741 "SkySilk EPYC Power",4165049,4347809,4063677 "Cost To Run Tests - Cost / Price Per Hour", Lower Results Are Better "SkySilk EPYC Gigantic", "SkySilk EPYC Super", "PHPBench 0.8.1 - Performance / Cost - PHP Benchmark Suite", Higher Results Are Better "SkySilk EPYC Gigantic", "SkySilk EPYC Super", "x265 2.8 - H.265 Video Encoding", Higher Results Are Better "SkySilk EPYC Gigantic",8.72,8.49,8.22 "SkySilk EPYC Super",6.29,6.53,6.51 "SkySilk EPYC Power",5.88,5.92,5.9 "Go Benchmarks - Performance / Cost - Test: json", Lower Results Are Better "SkySilk EPYC Gigantic", "SkySilk EPYC Super", "Darktable 2.4.2 - Performance / Cost - Test: Server Room - Acceleration: CPU-only", Lower Results Are Better "SkySilk EPYC Gigantic", "SkySilk EPYC Super", "PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 - Performance / Cost - Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write", Higher Results Are Better "SkySilk EPYC Gigantic", "SkySilk EPYC Super", "TTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.3b - Performance / Cost - Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping", Higher Results Are Better "SkySilk EPYC Gigantic", "SkySilk EPYC Super", "Go Benchmarks - Performance / Cost - Test: build", Lower Results Are Better "SkySilk EPYC Gigantic", "SkySilk EPYC Super", "x264 2018-07-28 - Performance / Cost - H.264 Video Encoding", Higher Results Are Better "SkySilk EPYC Gigantic", "SkySilk EPYC Super", "Go Benchmarks - Performance / Cost - Test: garbage", Lower Results Are Better "SkySilk EPYC Gigantic", "SkySilk EPYC Super", "Darktable 2.4.2 - Performance / Cost - Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: CPU-only", Lower Results Are Better "SkySilk EPYC Gigantic", "SkySilk EPYC Super", "Radiance Benchmark 5.0 - Test: SMP Parallel", Lower Results Are Better "SkySilk EPYC Gigantic",327.55209302902 "SkySilk EPYC Super",412.41091394424 "SkySilk EPYC Power",344.39273381233 "Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.7 - Performance / Cost - Time To Compile", Lower Results Are Better "SkySilk EPYC Gigantic", "SkySilk EPYC Super", "PyBench 2018-02-16 - Performance / Cost - Total For Average Test Times", Lower Results Are Better "SkySilk EPYC Gigantic", "SkySilk EPYC Super", "SQLite 3.22 - Timed SQLite Insertions", Lower Results Are Better "SkySilk EPYC Gigantic",62.097560882568,64.396469116211,62.66858792305 "SkySilk EPYC Super",67.275619983673,67.364786148071,69.054739952087 "SkySilk EPYC Power",55.94242310524,59.308884143829,54.264667987823,55.282325983047,54.133192062378,59.814803123474,54.144209861755,57.631753921509,54.892092943192,53.680108070374,54.314673900604,50.346001148224 "Redis 4.0.8 - Performance / Cost - Test: SET", Higher Results Are Better "SkySilk EPYC Gigantic", "SkySilk EPYC Super", "Radiance Benchmark 5.0 - Performance / Cost - Test: SMP Parallel", Lower Results Are Better "SkySilk EPYC Gigantic", "SkySilk EPYC Super", "x265 2.8 - Performance / Cost - H.265 Video Encoding", Higher Results Are Better "SkySilk EPYC Gigantic", "SkySilk EPYC Super", "Apache Benchmark 2.4.29 - Performance / Cost - Static Web Page Serving", Higher Results Are Better "SkySilk EPYC Gigantic", "SkySilk EPYC Super", "SQLite 3.22 - Performance / Cost - Timed SQLite Insertions", Lower Results Are Better "SkySilk EPYC Gigantic", "SkySilk EPYC Super", "MBW 2018-09-08 - Performance / Cost - Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 512 MiB", Higher Results Are Better "SkySilk EPYC Gigantic", "SkySilk EPYC Super", "PHPBench 0.8.1 - PHP Benchmark Suite", Higher Results Are Better "SkySilk EPYC Gigantic",355213,357675,358892 "SkySilk EPYC Super",348811,350080,344718 "SkySilk EPYC Power",345015,356135,358903 "Redis 4.0.8 - Performance / Cost - Test: GET", Higher Results Are Better "SkySilk EPYC Gigantic", "SkySilk EPYC Super", "PyBench 2018-02-16 - Total For Average Test Times", Lower Results Are Better "SkySilk EPYC Gigantic",2550,2531,2546 "SkySilk EPYC Super",2546,2546,2538 "SkySilk EPYC Power",2548,2559,2566 "Apache Siege 2.4.29 - Performance / Cost - Concurrent Users: 200", Higher Results Are Better "SkySilk EPYC Gigantic", "PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 - Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write", Higher Results Are Better "SkySilk EPYC Gigantic",2442.545408,2438.377282,2394.204974 "SkySilk EPYC Super",1899.87248,1971.760468,2449.466545 "SkySilk EPYC Power",2759.487883,2926.097332,2662.092381,2673.602707,2614.570877,2989.501653,2863.808591,2938.025633,2829.053307,2779.868268,2752.928208,2826.240858 "Sysbench 2018-07-28 - Test: CPU", Higher Results Are Better "SkySilk EPYC Gigantic",22880.8971,22429.5417,22668.4862 "SkySilk EPYC Super",15200.6138,13302.6654,13146.1735 "SkySilk EPYC Power",10750.1667,10666.3396,10561.2624 "Redis 4.0.8 - Test: GET", Higher Results Are Better "SkySilk EPYC Gigantic",1406469.75,919963.19,1291989.62 "SkySilk EPYC Super",1362397.75,1165501.25,1009081.75 "SkySilk EPYC Power",1183431.88,1584786.12,1355013.62,1353179.88,1367989,1191895.12,896861,1428571.5,1398601.5,934579.38,1342281.88,1557632.38 "Redis 4.0.8 - Test: SET", Higher Results Are Better "SkySilk EPYC Gigantic",1114827.12,1046025.12,1010101 "SkySilk EPYC Super",758150.12,1104972.38,741289.88 "SkySilk EPYC Power",1118568.25,1054852.25,1183431.88,1138952.12,1218026.88,1079913.62,1066098,780031.25,1074113.88 "Stockfish 9 - Total Time", Higher Results Are Better "SkySilk EPYC Gigantic",20051560,20133988,19888235 "SkySilk EPYC Super",10610985,12746287,11932215 "SkySilk EPYC Power",11171065,11024005,10928103 "x264 2018-07-28 - H.264 Video Encoding", Higher Results Are Better "SkySilk EPYC Gigantic",42.3,50.48,54.01 "SkySilk EPYC Super",29,40.06,41.4 "SkySilk EPYC Power",10.42,16.04,21.12,12.9,34.13,33.56,14.6,33.6,31.89,15.75,33.41,22.57 "Go Benchmarks - Test: build", Lower Results Are Better "SkySilk EPYC Gigantic",28358726063,24044697769,23740764967 "SkySilk EPYC Super",30641101710,26280133266,28487019552 "SkySilk EPYC Power",22121687472,21798942157,21811997281 "Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.7 - Time To Compile", Lower Results Are Better "SkySilk EPYC Gigantic",32.509119987488,32.723012924194,32.736087083817 "SkySilk EPYC Super",45.819663047791,38.652814865112,38.050617218018 "SkySilk EPYC Power",32.654709100723,33.611789941788,32.761307954788 "Darktable 2.4.2 - Test: Server Rack - Acceleration: CPU-only", Lower Results Are Better "SkySilk EPYC Gigantic",0.258,0.245,0.264 "SkySilk EPYC Super",0.318,0.316,0.289 "SkySilk EPYC Power",0.333,0.369,0.342,0.295,0.265,0.286,0.376,0.352,0.397 "Darktable 2.4.2 - Test: Server Room - Acceleration: CPU-only", Lower Results Are Better "SkySilk EPYC Gigantic",4.889,5.35,4.968 "SkySilk EPYC Super",7.082,7.057,7.59 "SkySilk EPYC Power",6.784,5.736,6.536,7.169,6.203,6.751,7.695,6.616,6.232,6.911,5.805,6.291 "Darktable 2.4.2 - Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: CPU-only", Lower Results Are Better "SkySilk EPYC Gigantic",12.217,10.68,10.976 "SkySilk EPYC Super",14.051,13.826,14.793 "SkySilk EPYC Power",15.691,17.417,14.229,14.805,15.485,15.211,15.741,15.336,15.661,14.877,16.244,15.197 "MBW 2018-09-08 - Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 512 MiB", Higher Results Are Better "SkySilk EPYC Gigantic",6721.516,6511.934,6592.295 "SkySilk EPYC Super",7094.575,7184.101,7154.517 "SkySilk EPYC Power",10680.48,8063.268,8978.572,8076.585,11145.404,11091.321,8065.62,8104.139,11116.737,8077.813,11146.592,8075.739 "Apache Siege 2.4.29 - Concurrent Users: 200", Higher Results Are Better "SkySilk EPYC Gigantic",2959.72,3611.35,4102.06 "Apache Benchmark 2.4.29 - Static Web Page Serving", Higher Results Are Better "SkySilk EPYC Gigantic",15614.75,14399.64,14180.01 "SkySilk EPYC Super",14454.04,14978.22,13285.32 "SkySilk EPYC Power",13012.01,15289.64,15095.46,15745.48,15795.24,15196.89,14984.45,14981.52,15579.65,15318.23,15442.48,14756.35