Benchmarks by Michael Larabel.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1808204-PTS-THREADRI92
Threadripper 2990WX CPU Frequency Scaling Governor Tests,
"TTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.3b - Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping",
Higher Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Conservative",527.065,505.459,515.544
"CPUFreq Ondemand",554.508,552.608,521.921
"CPUFreq Performance",600.637,558.753,561.798,576.868
"CPUFreq Powersave",475.67,488.663,487.924
"CPUFreq Schedutil",508.363,508.544,534.702
"VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.7.0 - vpxenc",
Higher Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Conservative",15.87,15.9,15.9
"CPUFreq Ondemand",15.86,15.85,15.82
"CPUFreq Performance",15.96,16.01,16.02
"CPUFreq Powersave",8.43,8.4,8.46
"CPUFreq Schedutil",16.01,16,15.86
"x264 2018-07-28 - H.264 Video Encoding",
Higher Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Conservative",134.64,144.71,146.88,140.28,141.56
"CPUFreq Ondemand",141.01,143.63,146.02
"CPUFreq Performance",154.53,159.69,159.43
"CPUFreq Powersave",99.68,105.5,105.76
"CPUFreq Schedutil",127.66,135.94,134.8
"x265 2.8 - H.265 Video Encoding",
Higher Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Conservative",11.62,11.71,11.73
"CPUFreq Ondemand",11.84,11.94,11.82
"CPUFreq Performance",12.55,12.49,12.52
"CPUFreq Powersave",7.62,7.59,7.6
"CPUFreq Schedutil",10.71,10.76,10.8
"GraphicsMagick 1.3.30 - Operation: Swirl",
Higher Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Conservative",241,238,242
"CPUFreq Ondemand",241,240,244
"CPUFreq Performance",
"CPUFreq Powersave",138,136,136
"CPUFreq Schedutil",
"GraphicsMagick 1.3.30 - Operation: Rotate",
Higher Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Conservative",
"CPUFreq Ondemand",247,248,248
"CPUFreq Performance",
"CPUFreq Powersave",
"CPUFreq Schedutil",
"GraphicsMagick 1.3.30 - Operation: HWB Color Space",
Higher Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Conservative",272,274,272
"CPUFreq Ondemand",270,271,271
"CPUFreq Performance",274,274,276
"CPUFreq Powersave",
"CPUFreq Schedutil",
"7-Zip Compression 16.02 - Compress Speed Test",
Higher Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Conservative",88674,86141,84530
"CPUFreq Ondemand",82505,76628,82301,78701,82312
"CPUFreq Performance",69427,92489,78966,81613,84565,82576,80498,82103,84685,78249
"CPUFreq Powersave",69760,67880,66504
"CPUFreq Schedutil",80891,80890,84778
"Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 4.13 - Time To Compile",
Lower Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Conservative",34.112313985825,31.320270061493,31.27757692337,31.642951965332,31.159735918045,31.220978021622,31.235781908035
"CPUFreq Ondemand",34.233752965927,31.287073135376,31.010520935059,31.205899953842,31.057969093323,31.169306993484,31.569179058075,31.002845048904
"CPUFreq Performance",33.016677856445,30.576685190201,30.642805099487,30.446915864944,30.570368051529,30.481114864349
"CPUFreq Powersave",47.184864997864,42.934528827667,43.316334009171,43.347586870193,42.908323049545,43.233306884766,43.316900014877
"CPUFreq Schedutil",33.869318962097,31.17816901207,31.394536972046,30.978624105453,31.459841966629,31.383140087128
"Timed LLVM Compilation 6.0.1 - Time To Compile",
Lower Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Conservative",221.75453996658
"CPUFreq Ondemand",230.34038591385
"CPUFreq Performance",214.06666588783
"CPUFreq Powersave",276.64456486702
"CPUFreq Schedutil",219.70523285866
"C-Ray 1.1 - Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel",
Lower Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Conservative",24.638,24.609,24.637
"CPUFreq Ondemand",24.514,24.568,24.544
"CPUFreq Performance",24.496,24.614,24.64
"CPUFreq Powersave",37.065,36.734,36.789
"CPUFreq Schedutil",24.629,24.554,24.588
"Zstd Compression 1.3.4 - Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 19",
Lower Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Conservative",124.40183877945,124.89750599861,124.83953309059
"CPUFreq Ondemand",124.65461921692,124.73325800896,124.45127010345
"CPUFreq Performance",124.67446899414,124.68631911278,125.11307215691
"CPUFreq Powersave",179.15620088577,179.70032811165,180.37498402596
"CPUFreq Schedutil",124.47592782974,124.64214682579,124.40812015533
"m-queens 1.1 - Time To Solve",
Lower Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Conservative",24.618890047073,24.55641412735,24.624781131744
"CPUFreq Ondemand",24.773772001266,24.784530878067,24.606027841568
"CPUFreq Performance",24.899083137512,24.509616136551,24.684242963791
"CPUFreq Powersave",38.219668865204,38.463841915131,38.50505900383
"CPUFreq Schedutil",24.523720979691,24.822849035263,24.638499975204
"Radiance Benchmark 5.0 - Test: Serial",
Lower Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Conservative",791.48940706253
"CPUFreq Ondemand",772.45686912537
"CPUFreq Performance",773.81600308418
"CPUFreq Powersave",1474.9663779736
"CPUFreq Schedutil",773.77335786819
"Radiance Benchmark 5.0 - Test: SMP Parallel",
Lower Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Conservative",255.26508903503
"CPUFreq Ondemand",242.21342086792
"CPUFreq Performance",244.75530099869
"CPUFreq Powersave",455.60368204117
"CPUFreq Schedutil",247.20227885246
"OpenSSL 1.1.0f - RSA 4096-bit Performance",
Higher Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Conservative",5863.5,5865.3,5870.1
"CPUFreq Ondemand",5852.4,5865.8,5872.6
"CPUFreq Performance",5875,5856.3,5870.3
"CPUFreq Powersave",3794.5,3798.2,3787.3
"CPUFreq Schedutil",5840.9,5865.4,5862.2
"Darktable 2.4.2 - Test: Boat - Acceleration: CPU-only",
Lower Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Conservative",8.793,8.882,8.758
"CPUFreq Ondemand",8.807,8.856,9.375
"CPUFreq Performance",8.712,8.611,8.582
"CPUFreq Powersave",9.569,9.735,9.86
"CPUFreq Schedutil",8.818,8.885,8.451
"Darktable 2.4.2 - Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: CPU-only",
Lower Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Conservative",5.776,5.761,5.597
"CPUFreq Ondemand",5.558,5.699,5.87
"CPUFreq Performance",5.764,5.839,5.457,5.847
"CPUFreq Powersave",7.211,7.488,7.49
"CPUFreq Schedutil",5.647,5.944,5.977
"Darktable 2.4.2 - Test: Server Rack - Acceleration: CPU-only",
Lower Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Conservative",0.164,0.158,0.143,0.151,0.156,0.163,0.15,0.15,0.148,0.147,0.169,0.149
"CPUFreq Ondemand",0.135,0.148,0.145,0.142,0.147,0.142
"CPUFreq Performance",0.149,0.172,0.142,0.15,0.171,0.146,0.145,0.148,0.171,0.146,0.149,0.179
"CPUFreq Powersave",0.177,0.182,0.177
"CPUFreq Schedutil",0.165,0.182,0.172,0.153,0.179,0.182,0.153,0.153,0.152
"Darktable 2.4.2 - Test: Server Room - Acceleration: CPU-only",
Lower Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Conservative",2.472,2.596,2.471
"CPUFreq Ondemand",2.528,2.558,2.605
"CPUFreq Performance",2.788,2.774,2.676
"CPUFreq Powersave",3.338,3.233,3.103,3.142
"CPUFreq Schedutil",2.66,2.528,2.487,2.84,3.363,2.515,2.596,2.801,2.5
"Sysbench 2018-07-28 - Test: CPU",
Higher Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Conservative",56572.4063,56745.5146,56764.3337
"CPUFreq Ondemand",56666.1289,56503.2088,56904.9303
"CPUFreq Performance",56676.1652,56757.5336,56725.7734
"CPUFreq Powersave",36635.3775,36558.7979,36588.5973
"CPUFreq Schedutil",56451.8321,56704.6487,56715.8408
"IndigoBench 4.0.64 - Scene: Bedroom",
Higher Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Conservative",3.403,2.964,3.231,3.368,2.818,3.338,3.41,3.055,3.329,2.797,2.905,2.921
"CPUFreq Ondemand",2.505,2.753,2.852,2.841,2.793,2.967,3.365,2.863,2.741,2.87,3.36,3.406
"CPUFreq Performance",3.244,2.891,2.99,2.823,3.402,2.769,2.878,2.94,3.404,3.423,2.684
"CPUFreq Powersave",2.725,2.797,2.645
"CPUFreq Schedutil",3.406,3.462,2.814,2.961,3.433,3.398,2.998,3.468,3.108,3.337,3.252,2.865
"IndigoBench 4.0.64 - Scene: Supercar",
Higher Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Conservative",6.714,7.236,6.135,6.272,6.434,6.252,7.11,7.206,7.09,7.13,7.136,7.165
"CPUFreq Ondemand",6.39,6.296,7.134,6.402,6.732,7.127,6.338,7.13,6.14,7.194,6.85,6.366
"CPUFreq Performance",6.651,7.303,6.354,6.72,6.971,7.328,7.132,6.247,7.12,7.155,6.423,6.236
"CPUFreq Powersave",5.654,5.543,5.554
"CPUFreq Schedutil",7.323,6.397,7.038,6.336,6.277,7.135,6.394,6.368,7.135,6.928,7.211,7.188
"Blender 2.79a - Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only",
Lower Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Conservative",
"CPUFreq Ondemand",
"CPUFreq Performance",
"CPUFreq Powersave",
"CPUFreq Schedutil",
"PyBench 2018-02-16 - Total For Average Test Times",
Lower Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Conservative",1586,1587,1581
"CPUFreq Ondemand",1581,1577,1587
"CPUFreq Performance",
"CPUFreq Powersave",3020,3021,3014
"CPUFreq Schedutil",
"Hierarchical INTegration 1.0 - Test: DOUBLE",
Higher Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Conservative",768983159.75598,822724176.34773,760964490.88421,814720397.92073,832898931.12516,767613219.14939,751087298.4156,758149075.23228,815776476.56775
"CPUFreq Ondemand",792390312.08157,789338617.23889,824255974.5686
"CPUFreq Performance",725909919.98323,744120435.9824,725022333.39403
"CPUFreq Powersave",402267880.54095,403708344.63458,401662249.45612
"CPUFreq Schedutil",746701500.10955,751067188.89988,751765237.38582
"PHPBench 0.8.1 - PHP Benchmark Suite",
Higher Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Conservative",521433,515292,511587
"CPUFreq Ondemand",513139,511028,515792
"CPUFreq Performance",512972,520648,516287
"CPUFreq Powersave",266797,268708,267836
"CPUFreq Schedutil",503167,518640,516104
"Scikit-Learn 0.17.1 - ",
Lower Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Conservative",25.911943912506,25.749268770218,25.730793952942
"CPUFreq Ondemand",25.822391033173,25.680546045303,25.715249061584
"CPUFreq Performance",25.835100889206,25.70160984993,25.740275859833
"CPUFreq Powersave",48.387458086014,48.252515077591,48.263015985489
"CPUFreq Schedutil",25.805992841721,26.585139036179,26.055523872375
"Aircrack-ng 1.3 - ",
Higher Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Conservative",51040,51114,51042
"CPUFreq Ondemand",51150,50957,51230
"CPUFreq Performance",51396,51323,50985
"CPUFreq Powersave",33394,33300,33394
"CPUFreq Schedutil",51266,50974,50959