Windows Server 2016

AMD EPYC 7551 32-Core testing with a GIGABYTE MZ31-AR0-00 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4096MB on Microsoft Windows Server 2016 Essentials Build 14393 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1806172-AR-WINDOWSSE91
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

Chess Test Suite 2 Tests
C/C++ Compiler Tests 3 Tests
CPU Massive 7 Tests
Database Test Suite 2 Tests
Disk Test Suite 3 Tests
Java 2 Tests
Common Kernel Benchmarks 2 Tests
Multi-Core 2 Tests
Programmer / Developer System Benchmarks 2 Tests
Server 5 Tests
Server CPU Tests 3 Tests
Single-Threaded 6 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Disable Color Branding
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Additional Graphs

Show Perf Per RAM Channel Calculation Graphs Where Applicable

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs
Condense Test Profiles With Multiple Version Results Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
Windows Server 2016
March 27 2018
 
466GB Samsung SSD 960 EVO
June 17 2018
  15 Minutes
Invert Hiding All Results Option
  8 Minutes
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

Windows Server 2016, "Diskspd 2.0.17 - Threads Per Target: 8 - Write Requests (Percent): 50 - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB", Higher Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",47.81,48.03,47.89 "Diskspd 2.0.17 - Threads Per Target: 2 - Write Requests (Percent): 50 - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB", Higher Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",13.84,13.85,13.82 "Diskspd 2.0.17 - Threads Per Target: 1 - Write Requests (Percent): 100 - All Writes - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB", Higher Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",3.79,3.79,3.79 "SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Composite", Higher Results Are Better "466GB Samsung SSD 960 EVO",162.62,161.26,161.26 "SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Monte Carlo", Higher Results Are Better "466GB Samsung SSD 960 EVO",39.59,44.96,37.51 "SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform", Higher Results Are Better "466GB Samsung SSD 960 EVO",100.66,79.11,93.13 "SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply", Higher Results Are Better "466GB Samsung SSD 960 EVO",180.09,187.27,186.18 "Diskspd 2.0.17 - Threads Per Target: 1 - Write Requests (Percent): 0 - Read Only - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB", Higher Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",139.47,139.54,140.25 "Diskspd 2.0.17 - Threads Per Target: 2 - Write Requests (Percent): 100 - All Writes - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB", Higher Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",7.41,7.47,7.53 "Diskspd 2.0.17 - Threads Per Target: 2 - Write Requests (Percent): 0 - Read Only - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB", Higher Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",211.17,212.65,213.36 "Diskspd 2.0.17 - Threads Per Target: 8 - Write Requests (Percent): 100 - All Writes - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB", Higher Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",27.4,27.49,27.49 "Diskspd 2.0.17 - Threads Per Target: 8 - Write Requests (Percent): 0 - Read Only - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB", Higher Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",818.88,819.95,817.67 "Diskspd 2.0.17 - Threads Per Target: 1 - Write Requests (Percent): 50 - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB", Higher Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",7.18,7.19,7.17 "SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization", Higher Results Are Better "466GB Samsung SSD 960 EVO",156.86,167.97,158.02 "WinSAT - Test: Memory", Higher Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",59956.771282443,60053.11996228,60057.413650481 "SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation", Higher Results Are Better "466GB Samsung SSD 960 EVO",335.87,326.99,331.44 "Go Benchmarks - Test: http", Lower Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",33404,33609,33515 "Go Benchmarks - Test: json", Lower Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",6274723,6369457,6365625 "Go Benchmarks - Test: build", Lower Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",87695365200,73909332900,74235252100,73448745300,73714569500,74484185900 "Go Benchmarks - Test: garbage", Lower Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",1588871,1567964,1564283 "Crafty 25.2 - Elapsed Time", Higher Results Are Better "466GB Samsung SSD 960 EVO",2400359,2930787,3092392,3224473,3080573,3110427 "Java SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Composite", Higher Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",1103.0951715052,1166.0941783328,889.26895487018,933.17553618142,1303.7366880665,1032.3917743865,1076.2898151452,926.806643535 "Java SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Monte Carlo", Higher Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",771.92084183369,771.92084183369,657.52713615423,608.00781669614 "Java SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform", Higher Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",938.0159142717,498.21213256499,575.27728886878,938.01597440626 "Java SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply", Higher Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",1251.8815059446,1270.6931876149,1271.3093859982,671.13160979118 "Java SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization", Higher Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",1801.5284070515,2533.0860804275,1539.2709085685,1696.5930915892 "Java SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation", Higher Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",752.12918842433,756.55864922306,402.96005476121,752.12918842433 "GIMP 2.9.8 - Test: resize", Lower Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",56.609632968903,47.427196979523,47.191895961761,48.426637887955,47.816895008087,48.129612207413 "GIMP 2.9.8 - Test: auto-levels", Lower Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",55.178282976151,48.957719087601,49.348268985748,49.754676103592,49.066959857941,50.879789113998 "GIMP 2.9.8 - Test: unsharp-mask", Lower Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",58.430439949036,58.398324966431,63.303121089935,62.803030967712,59.099673986435,59.552907943726 "Flexible IO Tester 3.1 - Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Windows AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory", Higher Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",163,193,171,178,186,176 "Flexible IO Tester 3.1 - Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Windows AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory", Higher Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",118,117,123 "Flexible IO Tester 3.1 - Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Windows AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory", Higher Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",119,124,123 "Flexible IO Tester 3.1 - Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Windows AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory", Higher Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",129,120,116,124,118,118 "IOzone 3.465 - Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance", Higher Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",264.2861328125,327.001953125,392.2607421875,269.5703125,260.3564453125,327 "Sunflow Rendering System 0.07.2 - Global Illumination + Image Synthesis", Lower Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",2.029,2.121,2.048 "Redis 3.2.1 - Test: SET", Higher Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",237000.52,427259.13,247212.67,427368.69,237428.17,426075.84 "WinSAT - Test: Disk", Higher Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",98.41,72.19,87.6,82.08,84.48,89.08 "Redis 3.2.1 - Test: LPUSH", Higher Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",199381.92,368731.56,203786.36,366448.03,306494.63,369494.53 "Redis 3.2.1 - Test: GET", Higher Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",336021.5,328073.22,336825.09 "Redis 3.2.1 - Test: SADD", Higher Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",246463.25,247347.2,247831.48 "Redis 3.2.1 - Test: LPOP", Higher Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",419216.91,455663.91,324548.88,578369,323614.13,579945.5 "OSBench - Test: Create Files", Lower Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",2609.282574,2590.306697,2563.753346 "OSBench - Test: Create Threads", Lower Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",74.59494,75.554179,74.600069 "OSBench - Test: Launch Programs", Lower Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",1218321.434324,1253473.358291,1261261.209503 "OSBench - Test: Memory Allocations", Lower Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",203.749547,223.126175,207.98251,220.649082,224.870246,227.506871 "m-queens 1.1 - Time To Solve", Lower Results Are Better "466GB Samsung SSD 960 EVO",45.477601051331,45.244199991226,45.676199913025 "Netperf 2.7.0 - Server: 192.168.1.55 - Test: TCP Request Response - Duration: 60 Seconds", Higher Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",770.97,769.16,774.77 "Netperf 2.7.0 - Server: 192.168.1.55 - Test: UDP Request Response - Duration: 60 Seconds", Higher Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",776.7,766.39,756.22 "Netperf 2.7.0 - Server: 192.168.1.55 - Test: TCP Stream - Client To Server - Duration: 60 Seconds", Higher Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",789.01,789.19,789.21 "Netperf 2.7.0 - Server: 192.168.1.55 - Test: TCP Stream - Server To Client - Duration: 60 Seconds", Higher Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",947.58,947.57,947.55 "Netperf 2.7.0 - Server: 192.168.1.55 - Test: UDP Stream - Server To Client - 10G - Duration: 60 Seconds", Higher Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",959.74,959.87,959.71 "BlogBench 1.0 - Test: Read", Higher Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",3690,3796,3868 "BlogBench 1.0 - Test: Write", Higher Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",102,106,103 "NGINX Benchmark 1.9.9 - Static Web Page Serving", Higher Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",638.07,618.56,699.04,634.86,694.46,634.44 "SQLite 3.22 - Timed SQLite Insertions", Lower Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",137.79927110672,134.56783509254,138.12739515305 "466GB Samsung SSD 960 EVO",87.319614171982,91.107102870941,86.538813114166 "PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 - Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Only", Higher Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",3071.539342,3051.178892,4904.889365,3050.977147,3079.10721,3141.235722 "PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 - Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Write", Higher Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",229.301985,229.472611,231.055904 "Perl Benchmarks - Test: Pod2html", Lower Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",1.1106074107143,0.47140233035714,0.98956733035714,0.16147444642857,0.86540825892857,0.89028032142857 "Perl Benchmarks - Test: Interpreter", Lower Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",0.06272137797619,0.063086354166667,0.0642563946662 "Git - Time To Complete Common Git Commands", Lower Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",32.121566057205,30.628487825394,28.815757989883,30.660056114197,31.440920114517,28.128219127655 "PyBench 2018-02-16 - Total For Average Test Times", Lower Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",3177,3179,3166 "Flexible IO Tester 3.1 - Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Windows AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory", Higher Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",41600,49500,43900,45700,47500,45100 "Flexible IO Tester 3.1 - Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Windows AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory", Higher Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",30200,29000,31600 "Flexible IO Tester 3.1 - Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Windows AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory", Higher Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",30500,31700,31600 "Flexible IO Tester 3.1 - Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Windows AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory", Higher Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",32900,30800,29700,31800,30300,30100 "Diskspd 2.0.17 - Threads Per Target: 1 - Write Requests (Percent): 100 - All Writes - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB", Higher Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",969.99,969.86,969.98 "Diskspd 2.0.17 - Threads Per Target: 2 - Write Requests (Percent): 100 - All Writes - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB", Higher Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",1898.07,1912.13,1926.6 "Diskspd 2.0.17 - Threads Per Target: 8 - Write Requests (Percent): 100 - All Writes - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB", Higher Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",7014.39,7037.39,7036.58 "Diskspd 2.0.17 - Threads Per Target: 1 - Write Requests (Percent): 50 - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB", Higher Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",1839.13,1840.94,1835.44 "Diskspd 2.0.17 - Threads Per Target: 2 - Write Requests (Percent): 50 - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB", Higher Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",3543.89,3545.25,3536.8 "Diskspd 2.0.17 - Threads Per Target: 8 - Write Requests (Percent): 50 - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB", Higher Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",12239.49,12296.19,12259.38 "Diskspd 2.0.17 - Threads Per Target: 1 - Write Requests (Percent): 0 - Read Only - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB", Higher Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",35703.41,35722.77,35903.38 "Diskspd 2.0.17 - Threads Per Target: 2 - Write Requests (Percent): 0 - Read Only - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB", Higher Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",54059.11,54438.46,54618.97 "Diskspd 2.0.17 - Threads Per Target: 8 - Write Requests (Percent): 0 - Read Only - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB", Higher Results Are Better "Windows Server 2016",209633.72,209908.27,209322.87