Windows Server 2016 AMD EPYC 7551 32-Core testing with a GIGABYTE MZ31-AR0-00 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4096MB on Microsoft Windows Server 2016 Essentials Build 14393 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/1806172-AR-WINDOWSSE91&rdt&grt .
Windows Server 2016 Processor Motherboard Memory Disk Graphics Network OS Kernel Display Driver Vulkan File-System Screen Resolution Compiler Windows Server 2016 466GB Samsung SSD 960 EVO AMD EPYC 7551 32-Core @ 2.00GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads) GIGABYTE MZ31-AR0-00 8 x 4096 MB 2666MHz 9ASF51272PZ-2G6E1 466GB Samsung SSD 960 EVO 500GB + 466GB Samsung SSD 960 EVO 500GB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4096MB (1506/3505MHz) Realtek PCIe GBE Family + Microsoft ISATAP Microsoft Windows Server 2016 Essentials Build 14393 10.0 (x86_64) 391.35 (23.21.13.9135) 1.0.65 NTFS 1920x1080 7 x 4096 MB 2667MHz 9ASF51272PZ-2G6E1 GCC 7.1.0 3840x2160 OpenBenchmarking.org Python Details - Windows Server 2016: Python 2.7.14
Windows Server 2016 blogbench: Read blogbench: Write crafty: Elapsed Time diskspd: 1 - 100 - All Writes - 1M - 4KB diskspd: 2 - 100 - All Writes - 1M - 4KB diskspd: 8 - 100 - All Writes - 1M - 4KB diskspd: 1 - 50 - 1M - 4KB diskspd: 2 - 50 - 1M - 4KB diskspd: 8 - 50 - 1M - 4KB diskspd: 1 - 0 - Read Only - 1M - 4KB diskspd: 2 - 0 - Read Only - 1M - 4KB diskspd: 8 - 0 - Read Only - 1M - 4KB fio: Rand Read - Windows AIO - No - Yes - 4KB - Default Test Directory fio: Rand Write - Windows AIO - No - Yes - 4KB - Default Test Directory fio: Seq Read - Windows AIO - No - Yes - 4KB - Default Test Directory fio: Seq Write - Windows AIO - No - Yes - 4KB - Default Test Directory gimp: resize gimp: auto-levels gimp: unsharp-mask git: Time To Complete Common Git Commands go-benchmark: http go-benchmark: json go-benchmark: build go-benchmark: garbage iozone: 4Kb - 8GB - Write Performance java-scimark2: Composite java-scimark2: Monte Carlo java-scimark2: Fast Fourier Transform java-scimark2: Sparse Matrix Multiply java-scimark2: Dense LU Matrix Factorization java-scimark2: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation m-queens: Time To Solve netperf: 192.168.1.55 - TCP Request Response - 60 Seconds netperf: 192.168.1.55 - UDP Request Response - 60 Seconds netperf: 192.168.1.55 - TCP Stream - Client To Server - 60 Seconds netperf: 192.168.1.55 - TCP Stream - Server To Client - 60 Seconds netperf: 192.168.1.55 - UDP Stream - Server To Client - 10G - 60 Seconds nginx: Static Web Page Serving osbench: Create Files osbench: Create Threads osbench: Launch Programs osbench: Memory Allocations perl-benchmark: Pod2html perl-benchmark: Interpreter pgbench: Buffer Test - Single Thread - Read Only pgbench: Buffer Test - Single Thread - Read Write pybench: Total For Average Test Times redis: LPOP redis: SADD redis: LPUSH redis: GET redis: SET scimark2: Composite scimark2: Monte Carlo scimark2: Fast Fourier Transform scimark2: Sparse Matrix Multiply scimark2: Dense LU Matrix Factorization scimark2: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation sqlite: Timed SQLite Insertions sunflow: Global Illumination + Image Synthesis winsat: Disk winsat: Memory Windows Server 2016 466GB Samsung SSD 960 EVO 3785 104 3.79 7.47 27.46 7.18 13.84 47.91 139.75 212.39 818.83 178 119 122 121 49.27 50.53 60.26 30.30 33509 6336602 76247908483 1573706 306.75 1053.86 702.34 737.38 1116.25 1892.62 665.94 771.63 766.44 789.14 947.57 959.77 653.24 2587.78 74.92 1244352.00 217.98 0.74812335 0.06335471 3383.15 229.94 3174 446893.06 247213.98 302389.51 333639.94 333724.17 136.83 2.07 85.64 60022.43 2973169 45.47 161.71 40.69 90.97 184.51 160.95 331.43 88.32 OpenBenchmarking.org
BlogBench Test: Read OpenBenchmarking.org Final Score, More Is Better BlogBench 1.0 Test: Read Windows Server 2016 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 51.70, N = 3 3785
BlogBench Test: Write OpenBenchmarking.org Final Score, More Is Better BlogBench 1.0 Test: Write Windows Server 2016 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.20, N = 3 104
Crafty Elapsed Time OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second, More Is Better Crafty 25.2 Elapsed Time 466GB Samsung SSD 960 EVO 600K 1200K 1800K 2400K 3000K SE +/- 120782.27, N = 6 2973169
Diskspd Threads Per Target: 1 - Write Requests (Percent): 100 - All Writes - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Diskspd 2.0.17 Threads Per Target: 1 - Write Requests (Percent): 100 - All Writes - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB Windows Server 2016 0.8528 1.7056 2.5584 3.4112 4.264 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 3.79
Diskspd Threads Per Target: 1 - Write Requests (Percent): 100 - All Writes - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Diskspd 2.0.17 Threads Per Target: 1 - Write Requests (Percent): 100 - All Writes - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB Windows Server 2016 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 969.94
Diskspd Threads Per Target: 2 - Write Requests (Percent): 100 - All Writes - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Diskspd 2.0.17 Threads Per Target: 2 - Write Requests (Percent): 100 - All Writes - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB Windows Server 2016 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 7.47
Diskspd Threads Per Target: 2 - Write Requests (Percent): 100 - All Writes - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Diskspd 2.0.17 Threads Per Target: 2 - Write Requests (Percent): 100 - All Writes - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB Windows Server 2016 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 8.24, N = 3 1912.27
Diskspd Threads Per Target: 8 - Write Requests (Percent): 100 - All Writes - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Diskspd 2.0.17 Threads Per Target: 8 - Write Requests (Percent): 100 - All Writes - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB Windows Server 2016 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 27.46
Diskspd Threads Per Target: 8 - Write Requests (Percent): 100 - All Writes - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Diskspd 2.0.17 Threads Per Target: 8 - Write Requests (Percent): 100 - All Writes - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB Windows Server 2016 1500 3000 4500 6000 7500 SE +/- 7.54, N = 3 7029.45
Diskspd Threads Per Target: 1 - Write Requests (Percent): 50 - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Diskspd 2.0.17 Threads Per Target: 1 - Write Requests (Percent): 50 - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB Windows Server 2016 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 7.18
Diskspd Threads Per Target: 1 - Write Requests (Percent): 50 - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Diskspd 2.0.17 Threads Per Target: 1 - Write Requests (Percent): 50 - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB Windows Server 2016 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 1.62, N = 3 1838.50
Diskspd Threads Per Target: 2 - Write Requests (Percent): 50 - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Diskspd 2.0.17 Threads Per Target: 2 - Write Requests (Percent): 50 - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB Windows Server 2016 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 13.84
Diskspd Threads Per Target: 2 - Write Requests (Percent): 50 - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Diskspd 2.0.17 Threads Per Target: 2 - Write Requests (Percent): 50 - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB Windows Server 2016 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 2.62, N = 3 3541.98
Diskspd Threads Per Target: 8 - Write Requests (Percent): 50 - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Diskspd 2.0.17 Threads Per Target: 8 - Write Requests (Percent): 50 - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB Windows Server 2016 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 47.91
Diskspd Threads Per Target: 8 - Write Requests (Percent): 50 - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Diskspd 2.0.17 Threads Per Target: 8 - Write Requests (Percent): 50 - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB Windows Server 2016 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 16.61, N = 3 12265.02
Diskspd Threads Per Target: 1 - Write Requests (Percent): 0 - Read Only - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Diskspd 2.0.17 Threads Per Target: 1 - Write Requests (Percent): 0 - Read Only - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB Windows Server 2016 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.25, N = 3 139.75
Diskspd Threads Per Target: 1 - Write Requests (Percent): 0 - Read Only - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Diskspd 2.0.17 Threads Per Target: 1 - Write Requests (Percent): 0 - Read Only - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB Windows Server 2016 8K 16K 24K 32K 40K SE +/- 63.68, N = 3 35776.52
Diskspd Threads Per Target: 2 - Write Requests (Percent): 0 - Read Only - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Diskspd 2.0.17 Threads Per Target: 2 - Write Requests (Percent): 0 - Read Only - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB Windows Server 2016 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.65, N = 3 212.39
Diskspd Threads Per Target: 2 - Write Requests (Percent): 0 - Read Only - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Diskspd 2.0.17 Threads Per Target: 2 - Write Requests (Percent): 0 - Read Only - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB Windows Server 2016 12K 24K 36K 48K 60K SE +/- 164.98, N = 3 54372.18
Diskspd Threads Per Target: 8 - Write Requests (Percent): 0 - Read Only - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Diskspd 2.0.17 Threads Per Target: 8 - Write Requests (Percent): 0 - Read Only - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB Windows Server 2016 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 0.66, N = 3 818.83
Diskspd Threads Per Target: 8 - Write Requests (Percent): 0 - Read Only - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Diskspd 2.0.17 Threads Per Target: 8 - Write Requests (Percent): 0 - Read Only - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB Windows Server 2016 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 169.10, N = 3 209621.62
Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Windows AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Windows AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory Windows Server 2016 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 4.35, N = 6 178
Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Windows AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Windows AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory Windows Server 2016 10K 20K 30K 40K 50K SE +/- 1124.80, N = 6 45550
Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Windows AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Windows AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory Windows Server 2016 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.86, N = 3 119
Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Windows AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Windows AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory Windows Server 2016 6K 12K 18K 24K 30K SE +/- 751.30, N = 3 30267
Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Windows AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Windows AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory Windows Server 2016 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.53, N = 3 122
Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Windows AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Windows AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory Windows Server 2016 7K 14K 21K 28K 35K SE +/- 384.42, N = 3 31267
Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Windows AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Windows AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory Windows Server 2016 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.97, N = 6 121
Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Windows AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Windows AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory Windows Server 2016 7K 14K 21K 28K 35K SE +/- 491.71, N = 6 30933
GIMP Test: resize OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better GIMP 2.9.8 Test: resize Windows Server 2016 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 1.48, N = 6 49.27
GIMP Test: auto-levels OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better GIMP 2.9.8 Test: auto-levels Windows Server 2016 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.97, N = 6 50.53
GIMP Test: unsharp-mask OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better GIMP 2.9.8 Test: unsharp-mask Windows Server 2016 13 26 39 52 65 SE +/- 0.90, N = 6 60.26
Git Time To Complete Common Git Commands OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Git Time To Complete Common Git Commands Windows Server 2016 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.63, N = 6 30.30 1. git version 2.16.2.windows.1
Go Benchmarks Test: http OpenBenchmarking.org Nanoseconds/Operation, Fewer Is Better Go Benchmarks Test: http Windows Server 2016 7K 14K 21K 28K 35K SE +/- 59.25, N = 3 33509
Go Benchmarks Test: json OpenBenchmarking.org Nanoseconds/Operation, Fewer Is Better Go Benchmarks Test: json Windows Server 2016 1.4M 2.8M 4.2M 5.6M 7M SE +/- 30959.10, N = 3 6336602
Go Benchmarks Test: build OpenBenchmarking.org Nanoseconds/Operation, Fewer Is Better Go Benchmarks Test: build Windows Server 2016 16000M 32000M 48000M 64000M 80000M SE +/- 2294397706.29, N = 6 76247908483
Go Benchmarks Test: garbage OpenBenchmarking.org Nanoseconds/Operation, Fewer Is Better Go Benchmarks Test: garbage Windows Server 2016 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 7656.60, N = 3 1573706
IOzone Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance Windows Server 2016 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 21.19, N = 6 306.75
Java SciMark Computational Test: Composite OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite Windows Server 2016 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 49.32, N = 8 1053.86
Java SciMark Computational Test: Monte Carlo OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo Windows Server 2016 150 300 450 600 750 SE +/- 41.42, N = 4 702.34
Java SciMark Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform Windows Server 2016 160 320 480 640 800 SE +/- 116.90, N = 4 737.38
Java SciMark Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Windows Server 2016 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 148.44, N = 4 1116.25
Java SciMark Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Windows Server 2016 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 220.18, N = 4 1892.62
Java SciMark Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Windows Server 2016 140 280 420 560 700 SE +/- 87.67, N = 4 665.94
m-queens Time To Solve OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better m-queens 1.1 Time To Solve 466GB Samsung SSD 960 EVO 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 45.47
Netperf Server: 192.168.1.55 - Test: TCP Request Response - Duration: 60 Seconds OpenBenchmarking.org Transaction Rate Per Second, More Is Better Netperf 2.7.0 Server: 192.168.1.55 - Test: TCP Request Response - Duration: 60 Seconds Windows Server 2016 170 340 510 680 850 SE +/- 1.65, N = 3 771.63
Netperf Server: 192.168.1.55 - Test: UDP Request Response - Duration: 60 Seconds OpenBenchmarking.org Transaction Rate Per Second, More Is Better Netperf 2.7.0 Server: 192.168.1.55 - Test: UDP Request Response - Duration: 60 Seconds Windows Server 2016 170 340 510 680 850 SE +/- 5.91, N = 3 766.44
Netperf Server: 192.168.1.55 - Test: TCP Stream - Client To Server - Duration: 60 Seconds OpenBenchmarking.org Megabits/sec Throughput, More Is Better Netperf 2.7.0 Server: 192.168.1.55 - Test: TCP Stream - Client To Server - Duration: 60 Seconds Windows Server 2016 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 789.14
Netperf Server: 192.168.1.55 - Test: TCP Stream - Server To Client - Duration: 60 Seconds OpenBenchmarking.org Megabits/sec Throughput, More Is Better Netperf 2.7.0 Server: 192.168.1.55 - Test: TCP Stream - Server To Client - Duration: 60 Seconds Windows Server 2016 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 947.57
Netperf Server: 192.168.1.55 - Test: UDP Stream - Server To Client - 10G - Duration: 60 Seconds OpenBenchmarking.org Megabits/sec Throughput, More Is Better Netperf 2.7.0 Server: 192.168.1.55 - Test: UDP Stream - Server To Client - 10G - Duration: 60 Seconds Windows Server 2016 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 959.77
NGINX Benchmark Static Web Page Serving OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better NGINX Benchmark 1.9.9 Static Web Page Serving Windows Server 2016 140 280 420 560 700 SE +/- 14.05, N = 6 653.24
OSBench Test: Create Files OpenBenchmarking.org us Per Event, Fewer Is Better OSBench Test: Create Files Windows Server 2016 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 13.20, N = 3 2587.78
OSBench Test: Create Threads OpenBenchmarking.org us Per Event, Fewer Is Better OSBench Test: Create Threads Windows Server 2016 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.32, N = 3 74.92
OSBench Test: Launch Programs OpenBenchmarking.org us Per Event, Fewer Is Better OSBench Test: Launch Programs Windows Server 2016 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 13208.02, N = 3 1244352.00
OSBench Test: Memory Allocations OpenBenchmarking.org Ns Per Event, Fewer Is Better OSBench Test: Memory Allocations Windows Server 2016 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 3.98, N = 6 217.98
Perl Benchmarks Test: Pod2html OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Perl Benchmarks Test: Pod2html Windows Server 2016 0.1683 0.3366 0.5049 0.6732 0.8415 SE +/- 0.14655894, N = 6 0.74812335
Perl Benchmarks Test: Interpreter OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Perl Benchmarks Test: Interpreter Windows Server 2016 0.0143 0.0286 0.0429 0.0572 0.0715 SE +/- 0.00046299, N = 3 0.06335471
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Only Windows Server 2016 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 304.65, N = 6 3383.15
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Write Windows Server 2016 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.56, N = 3 229.94
PyBench Total For Average Test Times OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyBench 2018-02-16 Total For Average Test Times Windows Server 2016 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 4.04, N = 3 3174
Redis Test: LPOP OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Redis 3.2.1 Test: LPOP Windows Server 2016 100K 200K 300K 400K 500K SE +/- 46903.29, N = 6 446893.06
Redis Test: SADD OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Redis 3.2.1 Test: SADD Windows Server 2016 50K 100K 150K 200K 250K SE +/- 400.55, N = 3 247213.98
Redis Test: LPUSH OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Redis 3.2.1 Test: LPUSH Windows Server 2016 60K 120K 180K 240K 300K SE +/- 33345.59, N = 6 302389.51
Redis Test: GET OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Redis 3.2.1 Test: GET Windows Server 2016 70K 140K 210K 280K 350K SE +/- 2793.01, N = 3 333639.94
Redis Test: SET OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Redis 3.2.1 Test: SET Windows Server 2016 70K 140K 210K 280K 350K SE +/- 41697.14, N = 6 333724.17
SciMark Computational Test: Composite OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite 466GB Samsung SSD 960 EVO 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.45, N = 3 161.71
SciMark Computational Test: Monte Carlo OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo 466GB Samsung SSD 960 EVO 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 2.22, N = 3 40.69
SciMark Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform 466GB Samsung SSD 960 EVO 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 6.31, N = 3 90.97
SciMark Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply 466GB Samsung SSD 960 EVO 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 2.23, N = 3 184.51
SciMark Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization 466GB Samsung SSD 960 EVO 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 3.53, N = 3 160.95
SciMark Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation 466GB Samsung SSD 960 EVO 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 2.56, N = 3 331.43
SQLite Timed SQLite Insertions OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better SQLite 3.22 Timed SQLite Insertions Windows Server 2016 466GB Samsung SSD 960 EVO 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.14, N = 3 SE +/- 1.41, N = 3 136.83 88.32
Sunflow Rendering System Global Illumination + Image Synthesis OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Sunflow Rendering System 0.07.2 Global Illumination + Image Synthesis Windows Server 2016 0.4658 0.9316 1.3974 1.8632 2.329 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 2.07
WinSAT Test: Disk OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better WinSAT Test: Disk Windows Server 2016 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 3.53, N = 6 85.64 MIN: 72.19 / MAX: 98.41
WinSAT Test: Memory OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better WinSAT Test: Memory Windows Server 2016 13K 26K 39K 52K 65K SE +/- 32.86, N = 3 60022.43 MIN: 59956.77 / MAX: 60057.41
Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.5