2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8167M testing on Oracle Linux Server 7.4 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1803296-FO-1803299FO06
X5-2,
"Bork File Encrypter 1.4 - File Encryption Time",
Lower Results Are Better
"X5-2",9.2474980354309,8.888965845108,8.8716349601746
"X6-2",8.6804809570312,8.9191150665283,8.6315989494324
"X7-2",10.449069023132,10.448188066483,10.411057949066
"Intel Xeon Platinum 8167M",11.154500007629,11.226040124893,15.377301931381,11.138688087463,11.241899013519,11.289614915848
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Composite",
Higher Results Are Better
"X5-2",565.88,560.17,568.85
"X6-2",592.54,596.88,590.24
"X7-2",397.89,397.33,398.08
"Intel Xeon Platinum 8167M",397.52,396.64,397.52
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform",
Higher Results Are Better
"X5-2",256.95,276.91,256.95,275.12,256.18,276.91
"X6-2",295.05,267.39,279.62
"X7-2",201.8,198.99,202.76
"Intel Xeon Platinum 8167M",199.92,195.35,199.92
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation",
Higher Results Are Better
"X5-2",1068.24,1071.98,1071.98
"X6-2",1179.18,1188.32,1179.18
"X7-2",684.34,684.34,684.34
"Intel Xeon Platinum 8167M",684.34,684.34,684.34
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Monte Carlo",
Higher Results Are Better
"X5-2",108.24,108.68,108.24
"X6-2",110.01,110.47,109.57
"X7-2",74.98,74.98,74.98
"Intel Xeon Platinum 8167M",74.98,75.19,74.98
"Sunflow Rendering System 0.07.2 - Global Illumination + Image Synthesis",
Lower Results Are Better
"X5-2",0.797,0.816,0.877,0.873,0.814,0.812
"X6-2",0.807,0.749,0.814,0.829,0.764,0.792
"X7-2",1.027,0.982,0.912,0.87,0.953,0.916
"Intel Xeon Platinum 8167M",0.962,0.959,0.901,1.056,0.915,0.903