test1

AMD Phenom II X6 1100T testing with a ASUS SABERTOOTH 990FX and AMD Radeon HD 6970 2048MB on Ubuntu 17.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1710288-AL-TEST1170222
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

CPU Massive 2 Tests
Single-Threaded 2 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
test2
October 28 2017
 
test3
October 28 2017
 
test4
October 28 2017
 
Invert Hiding All Results Option
 

Only show results where is faster than
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

test1 AMD Phenom II X6 1100T testing with a ASUS SABERTOOTH 990FX and AMD Radeon HD 6970 2048MB on Ubuntu 17.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. test2: Processor: AMD Phenom II X6 1100T @ 3.30GHz (6 Cores), Motherboard: ASUS SABERTOOTH 990FX, Chipset: AMD RD9x0/RX980, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 3 x 1000GB Western Digital WD1002FAEX-0 + 500GB Samsung SSD 850, Graphics: AMD Radeon HD 6970 2048MB, Audio: Realtek ALC892, Monitor: PB328, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 OS: Ubuntu 17.04, Kernel: 4.10.0-37-generic (x86_64), Display Server: X Server 1.19.3, Display Driver: modesetting 1.19.3, OpenGL: 4.1 Mesa 17.0.7 Gallium 0.4 (LLVM 4.0.0), Compiler: GCC 6.3.0 20170406, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 2560x1440 test3: Processor: AMD Phenom II X6 1100T @ 3.30GHz (6 Cores), Motherboard: ASUS SABERTOOTH 990FX, Chipset: AMD RD9x0/RX980, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 3 x 1000GB Western Digital WD1002FAEX-0 + 500GB Samsung SSD 850, Graphics: AMD Radeon HD 6970 2048MB, Audio: Realtek ALC892, Monitor: PB328, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 OS: Ubuntu 17.04, Kernel: 4.10.0-37-generic (x86_64), Display Server: X Server 1.19.3, Display Driver: modesetting 1.19.3, OpenGL: 4.1 Mesa 17.0.7 Gallium 0.4 (LLVM 4.0.0), Compiler: GCC 6.3.0 20170406, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 2560x1440 test4: Processor: AMD Phenom II X6 1100T @ 3.30GHz (6 Cores), Motherboard: ASUS SABERTOOTH 990FX, Chipset: AMD RD9x0/RX980, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 3 x 1000GB Western Digital WD1002FAEX-0 + 500GB Samsung SSD 850, Graphics: AMD Radeon HD 6970 2048MB, Audio: Realtek ALC892, Monitor: PB328, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 OS: Ubuntu 17.04, Kernel: 4.10.0-37-generic (x86_64), Display Server: X Server 1.19.3, Display Driver: modesetting 1.19.3, OpenGL: 4.1 Mesa 17.0.7 Gallium 0.4 (LLVM 4.0.0), Compiler: GCC 6.3.0 20170406, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 2560x1440 Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride, 4 Threads ns < Lower Is Better test4 . 59.31 |================================================================ Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride, 2 Threads ns < Lower Is Better test4 . 54.32 |================================================================ Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 256MB Array, 256 Byte Stride ns < Lower Is Better test4 . 51.05 |================================================================ Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride ns < Lower Is Better test4 . 51.06 |================================================================ Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 4MB Array, 64 Byte Stride ns < Lower Is Better test4 . 15.87 |================================================================ SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better test3 . 728.81 |=============================================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better test3 . 368.29 |=============================================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better test3 . 248.23 |=============================================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better test3 . 72.69 |================================================================ SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better test3 . 97.37 |================================================================ SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better test3 . 303.07 |=============================================================== Java Graphics Basic Acceptance Test 2.0 test3 . FAIL asmFish 2017-09-19 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth Nodes/second > Higher Is Better test2 . 11675749 |=============================================================