2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 testing with a Supermicro X9DAi v0123456789 and NVIDIA Quadro 2000 on Fedora 20 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1709187-TR-EALIN211621
ealin2116
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 testing with a Supermicro X9DAi v0123456789 and NVIDIA Quadro 2000 on Fedora 20 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
ealin21_16:
Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 @ 2.80GHz (24 Cores), Motherboard: Supermicro X9DAi v0123456789, Chipset: Intel Xeon E5/Core, Memory: 129024MB, Disk: 6001GB eSATA-2 External + 500GB MR9260-8i + 9000GB MR9260-8i + 3001GB EZRX-00MMMB0, Graphics: NVIDIA Quadro 2000, Audio: Intel C600/X79, Monitor: Idek Iiyama PLX2472HD, Network: Intel I350 Gigabit Connection
OS: Fedora 20, Kernel: 3.18.9-100.fc20.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 4.9.2 + Clang 3.4.2 + LLVM 3.4.2, File-System: nfs
ealin21_16_scimark:
Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 @ 2.80GHz (24 Cores), Motherboard: Supermicro X9DAi v0123456789, Chipset: Intel Xeon E5/Core, Memory: 129024MB, Disk: 6001GB eSATA-2 External + 500GB MR9260-8i + 9000GB MR9260-8i + 3001GB EZRX-00MMMB0, Graphics: NVIDIA Quadro 2000 (706/891MHz), Audio: Intel C600/X79, Monitor: Idek Iiyama PLX2472HD, Network: Intel I350 Gigabit Connection
OS: Fedora 20, Kernel: 3.18.9-100.fc20.x86_64 (x86_64), Display Driver: NVIDIA 375.66, Compiler: Clang 3.4.2 + LLVM 3.4.2, File-System: nfs, Screen Resolution: 3200x1200
ealin21_16_numpy:
Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 @ 2.80GHz (24 Cores), Motherboard: Supermicro X9DAi v0123456789, Chipset: Intel Xeon E5/Core, Memory: 129024MB, Disk: 6001GB eSATA-2 External + 500GB MR9260-8i + 9000GB MR9260-8i + 3001GB EZRX-00MMMB0, Graphics: NVIDIA Quadro 2000, Audio: Intel C600/X79, Monitor: Idek Iiyama PLX2472HD, Network: Intel I350 Gigabit Connection
OS: Fedora 20, Kernel: 3.18.9-100.fc20.x86_64 (x86_64), Display Driver: NVIDIA 375.66, Compiler: Clang 3.4.2 + LLVM 3.4.2, File-System: nfs
GMPbench 0.2
Total Time
GMPbench Score > Higher Is Better
ealin21_16_numpy . 2539.10 |===================================================
HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: G-HPL
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
ealin21_16 . 15.52 |===========================================================
HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: G-Ffte
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
ealin21_16 . 6.86642 |=========================================================
HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: G-Ffte
GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better
ealin21_16 . 6.86642 |=========================================================
HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: EP-DGEMM
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
ealin21_16 . 0.68450 |=========================================================
HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: G-Ptrans
GB/s > Higher Is Better
ealin21_16 . 4.14215 |=========================================================
HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: EP-STREAM Triad
GB/s > Higher Is Better
ealin21_16 . 2.08241 |=========================================================
HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: G-Random Access
GUP/s > Higher Is Better
ealin21_16 . 0.02855 |=========================================================
HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: Random Ring Latency
usecs < Lower Is Better
ealin21_16 . 1.94562 |=========================================================
HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: Random Ring Bandwidth
GB/s > Higher Is Better
ealin21_16 . 0.73592 |=========================================================
HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: Max Ping Pong Bandwidth
MB/s > Higher Is Better
ealin21_16 . 7443.35 |=========================================================
Numpy Benchmark
Phoronix Test Suite v7.2.1
Nanoseconds < Lower Is Better
ealin21_16_numpy . 20199622 |==================================================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Composite
Mflops > Higher Is Better
ealin21_16_scimark . 385.07 |==================================================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Monte Carlo
Mflops > Higher Is Better
ealin21_16_scimark . 80.63 |===================================================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform
Mflops > Higher Is Better
ealin21_16_scimark . 144.61 |==================================================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply
Mflops > Higher Is Better
ealin21_16_scimark . 418.60 |==================================================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization
Mflops > Higher Is Better
ealin21_16_scimark . 508.36 |==================================================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation
Mflops > Higher Is Better
ealin21_16_scimark . 773.14 |==================================================