NVIDIA vs. Radeon OpenCL compute testing on ubuntu Linux. Tests by Michael Larabel for a future article.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1707112-TR-1707100PT51
OpenCL ROCm 1.6 Radeon Compute vs. NVIDIA Linux,
"LuxMark 3.0 - OpenCL Device: GPU - Scene: Hotel",
Higher Results Are Better
"Radeon RX 460",431,429,430
"Radeon RX 480",1072,1058,1059
"Radeon RX 560",513,504,504
"Radeon RX 580",1214,1203,1201
"Radeon R9 Fury",1364,1372,1371
"GeForce GTX 780 Ti",1212,1193,1195
"GeForce GTX 960",1137,1120,1119
"GeForce GTX 970",
"GeForce GTX 980",1859,1865,1864
"GeForce GTX 980 Ti",2041,2030,2030
"GeForce GTX 1050",1020,1024,1024
"GeForce GTX 1060",1778,1785,1783
"GeForce GTX 1070",2530,2512,2477
"GeForce GTX 1080",2665,2631,2632
"GeForce GTX 1080 Ti",3753,3731,3732
"ViennaCL 1.4.2 - OpenCL LU Factorization",
Higher Results Are Better
"Radeon RX 460",7.44784,7.7294,6.81124
"Radeon RX 480",11.9708,12.0102,13.0863
"Radeon RX 560",11.8494,5.16599,11.5961
"Radeon RX 580",13.1244,11.5964,14.3067
"Radeon R9 Fury",20.5436,20.6153,20.6427
"GeForce GTX 780 Ti",56.5406,56.9885,57.1392
"GeForce GTX 960",47.3237,47.413,47.511
"GeForce GTX 970",52.8428,52.8203,52.9596
"GeForce GTX 980",54.8718,54.7398,54.6557
"GeForce GTX 980 Ti",57.1616,56.8208,56.9598
"GeForce GTX 1050",42.1194,42.1492,42.0985
"GeForce GTX 1060",54.2719,54.1781,54.3146
"GeForce GTX 1070",58.7159,58.7107,58.6496
"GeForce GTX 1080",61.1492,61.124,60.8926
"GeForce GTX 1080 Ti",63.3656,63.3799,63.3448
"clpeak - OpenCL Test: Integer Compute INT",
Higher Results Are Better
"Radeon RX 460",413.92,414.44,414.28
"Radeon RX 480",1162.14,1161.4,1161.38
"Radeon RX 560",525.45,525.58,525.83
"Radeon RX 580",1252.47,1252.48,1252.48
"Radeon R9 Fury",1429.18,1429.21,1429.18
"GeForce GTX 780 Ti",917.14,979.44,979.83
"GeForce GTX 960",775.5,785.81,784.17
"GeForce GTX 970",1110.65,1147.09,1145.17
"GeForce GTX 980",1288.75,1295.37,1296.92
"GeForce GTX 980 Ti",1565.33,1622.83,1627.87
"GeForce GTX 1050",513.72,586.92,586.74
"GeForce GTX 1060",1141.53,1277.5,1263.53
"GeForce GTX 1070",1628.51,1672.82,1671.9
"GeForce GTX 1080",2324.07,2395.45,2398.36
"GeForce GTX 1080 Ti",3185.51,3336.65,3308.33
"SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 - Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Texture Read Bandwidth",
Higher Results Are Better
"Radeon RX 460",83.3748,84.4099,83.2293
"Radeon RX 480",179.819,169.05,181.495
"Radeon RX 560",102.033,106.016,107.523
"Radeon RX 580",191.655,190.203,188.538
"Radeon R9 Fury",238.848,238.557,239.694
"GeForce GTX 780 Ti",286.851,286.81,286.935
"GeForce GTX 960",278.58,279.174,280.368
"GeForce GTX 970",289.588,288.412,287.827
"GeForce GTX 980",335.383,330.573,333.199
"GeForce GTX 980 Ti",350.929,350.844,350.119
"GeForce GTX 1050",274.439,277.225,277.695
"GeForce GTX 1060",379.699,381.911,384.15
"GeForce GTX 1070",456.141,457.175,456.776
"GeForce GTX 1080",528.516,527.665,527.878
"GeForce GTX 1080 Ti",601.395,599.651,600.313
"clpeak - System Power Consumption Monitor",
Lower Results Are Better
"Radeon RX 460",
"Radeon RX 480",
"Radeon RX 560",
"Radeon RX 580",
"Radeon R9 Fury",
"GeForce GTX 780 Ti",
"GeForce GTX 960",
"GeForce GTX 970",
"GeForce GTX 980",
"GeForce GTX 980 Ti",
"GeForce GTX 1050",
"GeForce GTX 1060",
"GeForce GTX 1070",
"GeForce GTX 1080",
"GeForce GTX 1080 Ti",
"clpeak - OpenCL Test: Double-Precision Double",
Higher Results Are Better
"Radeon RX 460",135.17,135.17,135.17
"Radeon RX 480",364.11,364.11,364.11
"Radeon RX 560",164.56,164.56,164.58
"Radeon RX 580",391.92,391.92,391.92
"Radeon R9 Fury",447.25,447.25,447.24
"GeForce GTX 780 Ti",246.97,246.94,246.86
"GeForce GTX 960",93.16,93.1,92.38
"GeForce GTX 970",137.36,137.45,137.46
"GeForce GTX 980",159.97,159.9,159.82
"GeForce GTX 980 Ti",197.56,197.41,197.11
"GeForce GTX 1050",66.63,66.77,66.76
"GeForce GTX 1060",152.15,150.91,150.91
"GeForce GTX 1070",223.76,226.19,226.3
"GeForce GTX 1080",298.77,299.37,297.27
"GeForce GTX 1080 Ti",415.69,419.66,418.25
"Mixbench 2016-06-06 - Benchmark: Double Precision",
Higher Results Are Better
"Radeon RX 460",134.58,133.54,134.22
"Radeon RX 480",362.24,362.14,362.15
"Radeon RX 560",120.49,164.01,164.02
"Radeon RX 580",389.85,389.85,389.94
"Radeon R9 Fury",440.77,440.81,440.8
"GeForce GTX 780 Ti",245.03,245.02,245.06
"GeForce GTX 960",93.16,92.57,92.45
"GeForce GTX 970",137.56,137.56,137.51
"GeForce GTX 980",159.91,159.85,159.9
"GeForce GTX 980 Ti",197.09,196.88,197.14
"GeForce GTX 1050",66.53,66.72,66.72
"GeForce GTX 1060",152.65,152.28,152.28
"GeForce GTX 1070",221.57,222.37,222.37
"GeForce GTX 1080",295.57,290.75,295.47
"Darktable 2.0.3 - Test: Boat - Acceleration: OpenCL",
Lower Results Are Better
"Radeon RX 460",8.139,7.877,7.911
"Radeon RX 480",4.238,4.226,4.293
"Radeon RX 560",6.994,6.94,6.951
"Radeon RX 580",4.301,4.181,4.192
"Radeon R9 Fury",3.532,3.473,3.488
"GeForce GTX 780 Ti",15.116,15.127,15.093
"GeForce GTX 960",19.123,19.121,19.142
"GeForce GTX 970",15.472,15.455,15.449
"GeForce GTX 980",15.025,15.018,15.02
"GeForce GTX 980 Ti",4.051,4.053,4.039
"GeForce GTX 1050",17.769,17.731,17.78
"GeForce GTX 1060",4.527,4.498,4.501
"GeForce GTX 1070",3.718,3.701,3.708
"GeForce GTX 1080",3.541,3.557,3.554
"GeForce GTX 1080 Ti",3.036,3.039,3.025
"Mixbench 2016-06-06 - Benchmark: Integer",
Higher Results Are Better
"Radeon RX 460",422.39,422.37,422.39
"Radeon RX 480",1139.88,1139.9,1139.82
"Radeon RX 560",480.79,473.29,509.38
"Radeon RX 580",1226.95,1226.61,1226.96
"Radeon R9 Fury",1385.87,1385.87,1385.92
"GeForce GTX 780 Ti",967.85,967.86,966.87
"GeForce GTX 960",836.39,837.1,831.57
"GeForce GTX 970",1220.74,1220.51,1221.61
"GeForce GTX 980",1401.39,1406.48,1404.76
"GeForce GTX 980 Ti",1721.22,1715.43,1716.42
"GeForce GTX 1050",614.85,615.3,616.16
"GeForce GTX 1060",1369.45,1369.79,1371.8
"GeForce GTX 1070",2027.13,2028.48,2027.5
"GeForce GTX 1080",2649.75,2665.07,2655.2
"LuxMark 3.0 - System Power Consumption Monitor",
Lower Results Are Better
"Radeon RX 460",
"Radeon RX 480",
"Radeon RX 560",
"Radeon RX 580",
"Radeon R9 Fury",
"GeForce GTX 780 Ti",
"GeForce GTX 960",
"GeForce GTX 970",
"GeForce GTX 980",
"GeForce GTX 980 Ti",
"GeForce GTX 1050",
"GeForce GTX 1060",
"GeForce GTX 1070",
"GeForce GTX 1080",
"GeForce GTX 1080 Ti",
"FAHBench 2.3.2 - System Power Consumption Monitor",
Lower Results Are Better
"Radeon RX 580",
"GeForce GTX 780 Ti",
"GeForce GTX 960",
"GeForce GTX 970",
"GeForce GTX 980",
"GeForce GTX 980 Ti",
"GeForce GTX 1050",
"GeForce GTX 1060",
"GeForce GTX 1070",
"GeForce GTX 1080",
"GeForce GTX 1080 Ti",
"SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 - Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: MD5 Hash",
Higher Results Are Better
"GeForce GTX 780 Ti",4.633,4.7003,4.6955
"GeForce GTX 960",4.4955,4.4881,4.4861
"GeForce GTX 970",6.5433,6.5419,6.5416
"GeForce GTX 980",7.5627,7.5644,7.5614
"GeForce GTX 980 Ti",9.2917,9.2879,9.2853
"GeForce GTX 1050",3.2367,3.2368,3.2268
"GeForce GTX 1060",7.3846,7.3845,7.3157
"GeForce GTX 1070",10.6888,10.6867,10.6884
"GeForce GTX 1080",14.431,14.3735,14.2638
"GeForce GTX 1080 Ti",20.047,19.8254,20.1022
"clpeak - OpenCL Test: Single-Precision Float",
Higher Results Are Better
"Radeon RX 460",2134.92,2135.22,2135.56
"Radeon RX 480",5755.66,5755.48,5755.64
"Radeon RX 560",2599.92,2600.13,2599.47
"Radeon RX 580",6195.04,6195.19,6195.04
"Radeon R9 Fury",7063.87,7065.18,7063.66
"GeForce GTX 780 Ti",3289.57,3849.14,3846.33
"GeForce GTX 960",2515.82,2494.02,2487.12
"GeForce GTX 970",3726.09,3725.28,3726.17
"GeForce GTX 980",4284.35,4287.68,4288.3
"GeForce GTX 980 Ti",5305.27,5303.14,5302.43
"GeForce GTX 1050",1941.17,1941.08,1940.95
"GeForce GTX 1060",4264.86,4264.9,4263.52
"GeForce GTX 1070",6342.09,6343.65,6312.72
"GeForce GTX 1080",8397.15,8397.56,8399.96
"GeForce GTX 1080 Ti",11828.2,11830.37,11828.06
"SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 - System Power Consumption Monitor",
Lower Results Are Better
"Radeon RX 460",
"Radeon RX 480",
"Radeon RX 560",
"Radeon RX 580",
"Radeon R9 Fury",
"GeForce GTX 780 Ti",
"GeForce GTX 960",
"GeForce GTX 970",
"GeForce GTX 980",
"GeForce GTX 980 Ti",
"GeForce GTX 1050",
"GeForce GTX 1060",
"GeForce GTX 1070",
"GeForce GTX 1080",
"GeForce GTX 1080 Ti",
"LuxMark 3.0 - System Power Consumption Monitor",
Lower Results Are Better
"Radeon RX 460",
"Radeon RX 480",
"Radeon RX 560",
"Radeon RX 580",
"Radeon R9 Fury",
"GeForce GTX 780 Ti",
"GeForce GTX 960",
"GeForce GTX 970",
"GeForce GTX 980",
"GeForce GTX 980 Ti",
"GeForce GTX 1050",
"GeForce GTX 1060",
"GeForce GTX 1070",
"GeForce GTX 1080",
"GeForce GTX 1080 Ti",
"SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 - Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: FFT SP",
Higher Results Are Better
"Radeon RX 460",173.089,173.147,173.137
"Radeon RX 480",461.067,460.289,461.167
"Radeon RX 560",208.815,208.682,208.753
"Radeon RX 580",496.808,496.583,496.875
"Radeon R9 Fury",550.942,550.953,550.968
"GeForce GTX 780 Ti",387.287,450.445,451.164
"GeForce GTX 960",206.023,207.443,207.794
"GeForce GTX 970",380.118,387.589,386.735
"GeForce GTX 980",438.943,450.6,452.189
"GeForce GTX 980 Ti",654.614,715.469,713.619
"GeForce GTX 1050",232.931,263.516,263.525
"GeForce GTX 1060",396.994,408.01,408.766
"GeForce GTX 1070",545.647,557.253,556.215
"GeForce GTX 1080",656.893,652.271,648.746
"GeForce GTX 1080 Ti",990.801,974.875,977.076
"Ethereum Ethminer 1.2.9 - System Power Consumption Monitor",
Lower Results Are Better
"Radeon RX 460",
"Radeon RX 480",
"Radeon RX 560",
"Radeon RX 580",
"Radeon R9 Fury",
"GeForce GTX 780 Ti",
"GeForce GTX 960",
"GeForce GTX 970",
"GeForce GTX 980",
"GeForce GTX 980 Ti",
"GeForce GTX 1050",
"GeForce GTX 1060",
"GeForce GTX 1070",
"GeForce GTX 1080",
"GeForce GTX 1080 Ti",
"Rodinia 2.4 - Test: OpenCL Particle Filter",
Lower Results Are Better
"Radeon RX 580",6.3225080966949,6.7737860679626,6.7491369247437
"GeForce GTX 780 Ti",15.348871946335,15.210884094238,15.344855070114
"GeForce GTX 960",18.542234182358,18.40943479538,18.458555936813
"GeForce GTX 970",13.140123128891,13.088427066803,13.090656042099
"GeForce GTX 980",11.907075166702,11.840749979019,11.852380037308
"GeForce GTX 980 Ti",9.9944958686829,10.296413898468,10.114419937134
"GeForce GTX 1050",26.131697893143,26.028867006302,26.117835044861
"GeForce GTX 1060",12.293760061264,12.090243816376,12.051688909531
"GeForce GTX 1070",8.3072440624237,8.2319588661194,8.2567420005798
"GeForce GTX 1080",6.5652902126312,6.5372190475464,6.5770149230957
"GeForce GTX 1080 Ti",5.1007699966431,4.9869029521942,5.0129308700562
"Intel Core i7-4790",13.632209062576,13.429929018021,13.489837884903
"LuxMark 3.0 - OpenCL Device: GPU - Scene: Luxball HDR",
Higher Results Are Better
"Radeon RX 460",3892,3862,3862
"Radeon RX 480",9783,9704,9705
"Radeon RX 560",4493,4482,4467
"Radeon RX 580",10130,10225,10124
"Radeon R9 Fury",12852,12922,12909
"GeForce GTX 780 Ti",9557,9498,9493
"GeForce GTX 960",6106,6169,6067
"GeForce GTX 970",10736,10729,10728
"GeForce GTX 980",12010,11927,11927
"GeForce GTX 980 Ti",14868,15027,14988
"GeForce GTX 1050",6606,6558,6563
"GeForce GTX 1060",11678,11602,11601
"GeForce GTX 1070",16186,16183,16183
"GeForce GTX 1080",12948,12931,12889
"GeForce GTX 1080 Ti",19859,19855,19811
"clpeak - OpenCL Test: Global Memory Bandwidth",
Higher Results Are Better
"Radeon RX 460",88.98,88.97,89.8
"Radeon RX 480",202.38,203.41,203.44
"Radeon RX 560",88.47,89.14,88.46
"Radeon RX 580",201.79,202.09,200.47
"Radeon R9 Fury",389.13,389.04,388.03
"GeForce GTX 780 Ti",231.35,263.09,262.95
"GeForce GTX 960",81.1,81.14,81.14
"GeForce GTX 970",143.35,143.44,143.45
"GeForce GTX 980",163.88,164.13,164.13
"GeForce GTX 980 Ti",263.1,261.75,261.53
"GeForce GTX 1050",92.79,92.19,92.27
"GeForce GTX 1060",146.76,146.63,146.53
"GeForce GTX 1070",196.27,196.25,196.2
"GeForce GTX 1080",223.61,221.85,221.82
"GeForce GTX 1080 Ti",328.09,330.22,329.9
"Mixbench 2016-06-06 - Benchmark: Single Precision",
Higher Results Are Better
"Radeon RX 460",2028.57,1759.94,1766.73
"Radeon RX 480",5446.93,5438.4,5443.35
"Radeon RX 560",2466.74,1976.5,2468.33
"Radeon RX 580",5854.1,5854.41,5856.32
"Radeon R9 Fury",6502.5,6497.39,6503.68
"GeForce GTX 780 Ti",4262.3,4257.58,4261.93
"GeForce GTX 960",2766.82,2765.01,2646.62
"GeForce GTX 970",4122.05,4124.07,4118.3
"GeForce GTX 980",4685.14,4694.17,4699.59
"GeForce GTX 980 Ti",5805.74,5808.44,5834.71
"GeForce GTX 1050",2036.34,2037.86,2037.71
"GeForce GTX 1060",4402.82,4404.05,4403.98
"GeForce GTX 1070",6292.34,6420.93,6411.13
"GeForce GTX 1080",8489.89,8498.48,8481.32
"cl-mem 2017-01-13 - Benchmark: Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"Radeon RX 460",78.7,78.4,78.6
"Radeon RX 480",156.1,126.4,156.4
"Radeon RX 560",74.4,74.5,74.6
"Radeon RX 580",158,157.9,158.3
"Radeon R9 Fury",298.4,298.4,304.1
"GeForce GTX 780 Ti",248.8,251.7,251.9
"GeForce GTX 970",129.2,129.2,129.2
"GeForce GTX 980",151.8,151.8,151.8
"GeForce GTX 980 Ti",238,238.1,238.1
"GeForce GTX 1050",85.7,85.7,85.7
"GeForce GTX 1060",139.3,139.4,139.4
"GeForce GTX 1070",191.1,191.4,191.1
"GeForce GTX 1080",215,215,214.9
"GeForce GTX 1080 Ti",335.2,334.8,334.4
"Ethereum Ethminer 1.2.9 - Device: GPU OpenCL",
Higher Results Are Better
"Radeon RX 460",7191483,7165269,7174007
"Radeon RX 480",12486792,12565435,12578542
"Radeon RX 560",7125947,7195852,7287603
"Radeon RX 580",12338243,12425625,13670809
"Radeon R9 Fury",16501964,16646143,16615560
"GeForce GTX 780 Ti",15636889,15702425,15728639
"GeForce GTX 960",10297889,10363425,10363425
"GeForce GTX 970",17900065,18013661,18009292
"GeForce GTX 980",19534096,19844300,19844300
"GeForce GTX 980 Ti",18013661,18026769,18013661
"GeForce GTX 1050",11355203,11420739,11420739
"GeForce GTX 1060",18463675,18747664,18747664
"GeForce GTX 1070",25213883,25362431,25358062
"GeForce GTX 1080",20630732,20766173,20766173
"GeForce GTX 1080 Ti",31439803,31636411,31632042
"cl-mem 2017-01-13 - Benchmark: Copy",
Higher Results Are Better
"Radeon RX 460",77.9,78.1,77.6
"Radeon RX 480",171.7,175.5,172.2
"Radeon RX 560",77.2,77.3,77.1
"Radeon RX 580",172.5,172,172.1
"Radeon R9 Fury",199.5,198.5,197.3
"GeForce GTX 780 Ti",236.9,237.5,236.6
"GeForce GTX 970",125.3,125.3,125.3
"GeForce GTX 980",142.5,142.5,142.5
"GeForce GTX 980 Ti",216.4,216.4,216.4
"GeForce GTX 1050",86.7,86.7,86.7
"GeForce GTX 1060",138.9,139,139
"GeForce GTX 1070",186.5,186.7,186.5
"GeForce GTX 1080",208.8,209,208.7
"GeForce GTX 1080 Ti",316.4,316.8,316.6
"Mixbench 2016-06-06 - System Power Consumption Monitor",
Lower Results Are Better
"Radeon RX 460",
"Radeon RX 480",
"Radeon RX 560",
"Radeon RX 580",
"Radeon R9 Fury",
"GeForce GTX 780 Ti",
"GeForce GTX 960",
"GeForce GTX 970",
"GeForce GTX 980",
"GeForce GTX 980 Ti",
"GeForce GTX 1050",
"GeForce GTX 1060",
"GeForce GTX 1070",
"GeForce GTX 1080",
"SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 - Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Texture Read Bandwidth",
Higher Results Are Better
"Radeon RX 460",
"Radeon RX 480",
"Radeon RX 560",
"Radeon RX 580",
"Radeon R9 Fury",
"GeForce GTX 780 Ti",
"GeForce GTX 960",
"GeForce GTX 970",
"GeForce GTX 980",
"GeForce GTX 980 Ti",
"GeForce GTX 1050",
"GeForce GTX 1060",
"GeForce GTX 1070",
"GeForce GTX 1080",
"GeForce GTX 1080 Ti",
"cl-mem 2017-01-13 - Benchmark: Read",
Higher Results Are Better
"Radeon RX 460",91.5,91.6,91.4
"Radeon RX 480",150.8,151.2,151.4
"Radeon RX 560",89.4,89.8,89.2
"Radeon RX 580",154.6,158.2,158
"Radeon R9 Fury",121,121.1,121
"GeForce GTX 780 Ti",271.7,271.6,271.8
"GeForce GTX 970",143.7,143.6,143.7
"GeForce GTX 980",164.6,164.5,164.4
"GeForce GTX 980 Ti",266.1,266,266.1
"GeForce GTX 1050",94.9,94.9,94.9
"GeForce GTX 1060",153.4,153.4,153.4
"GeForce GTX 1070",205.3,205.5,205.3
"GeForce GTX 1080",228.6,229,228.6
"GeForce GTX 1080 Ti",337.9,338.6,337.2
"FAHBench 2.3.2 - Phoronix Test Suite v7.2.1",
Higher Results Are Better
"GeForce GTX 780 Ti",72.6519,72.8172,72.825
"GeForce GTX 960",58.5627,58.5849,58.6182
"GeForce GTX 970",86.0701,86.061,86.0711
"GeForce GTX 980",97.5998,97.524,97.5464
"GeForce GTX 980 Ti",109.2549,109.0489,109.0489
"GeForce GTX 1050",49.7257,49.7352,49.7026
"GeForce GTX 1060",97.9801,97.7997,97.8644
"GeForce GTX 1070",132.848,132.8171,132.8199
"GeForce GTX 1080",146.3751,146.2899,146.2195
"GeForce GTX 1080 Ti",186.3869,186.3015,186.2872
"Intel Core i7-4790",84.1001,83.8118,83.9858
"LuxMark 3.0 - OpenCL Device: GPU - Scene: Hotel",
Higher Results Are Better
"Radeon RX 460",
"Radeon RX 480",
"Radeon RX 560",
"Radeon RX 580",
"Radeon R9 Fury",
"GeForce GTX 780 Ti",
"GeForce GTX 960",
"GeForce GTX 970",
"GeForce GTX 980",
"GeForce GTX 980 Ti",
"GeForce GTX 1050",
"GeForce GTX 1060",
"GeForce GTX 1070",
"GeForce GTX 1080",
"GeForce GTX 1080 Ti",
"SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 - System Power Consumption Monitor",
Lower Results Are Better
"Radeon RX 460",
"Radeon RX 480",
"Radeon RX 560",
"Radeon RX 580",
"Radeon R9 Fury",
"GeForce GTX 780 Ti",
"GeForce GTX 960",
"GeForce GTX 970",
"GeForce GTX 980",
"GeForce GTX 980 Ti",
"GeForce GTX 1050",
"GeForce GTX 1060",
"GeForce GTX 1070",
"GeForce GTX 1080",
"GeForce GTX 1080 Ti",
"FAHBench 2.3.2 - Phoronix Test Suite v7.2.1",
Higher Results Are Better
"GeForce GTX 780 Ti",
"GeForce GTX 960",
"GeForce GTX 970",
"GeForce GTX 980",
"GeForce GTX 980 Ti",
"GeForce GTX 1050",
"GeForce GTX 1060",
"GeForce GTX 1070",
"GeForce GTX 1080",
"GeForce GTX 1080 Ti",
"LuxMark 3.0 - OpenCL Device: GPU - Scene: Luxball HDR",
Higher Results Are Better
"Radeon RX 460",
"Radeon RX 480",
"Radeon RX 560",
"Radeon RX 580",
"Radeon R9 Fury",
"GeForce GTX 780 Ti",
"GeForce GTX 960",
"GeForce GTX 970",
"GeForce GTX 980",
"GeForce GTX 980 Ti",
"GeForce GTX 1050",
"GeForce GTX 1060",
"GeForce GTX 1070",
"GeForce GTX 1080",
"GeForce GTX 1080 Ti",
"SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 - Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Bus Speed Readback",
Higher Results Are Better
"Radeon RX 460",5.19,5.2236,5.2013
"Radeon RX 480",10.4283,10.4203,10.4118
"Radeon RX 560",5.2202,5.306,5.1957
"Radeon RX 580",10.4251,9.8493,10.347
"Radeon R9 Fury",10.5594,10.7261,10.554
"GeForce GTX 780 Ti",13.2038,13.2034,13.2035
"GeForce GTX 960",13.1941,13.1939,13.1941
"GeForce GTX 970",13.2014,13.2014,13.2015
"GeForce GTX 980",13.2012,13.2012,13.2013
"GeForce GTX 980 Ti",13.1997,13.1998,13.1998
"GeForce GTX 1050",13.2017,13.2016,13.2017
"GeForce GTX 1060",13.2029,13.2029,13.2029
"GeForce GTX 1070",13.2032,13.2032,13.2031
"GeForce GTX 1080",13.2032,13.2032,13.2032
"GeForce GTX 1080 Ti",13.2033,13.2031,13.2031
"cl-mem 2017-01-13 - Benchmark: Read",
Higher Results Are Better
"Radeon RX 460",
"Radeon RX 480",
"Radeon RX 560",
"Radeon RX 580",
"Radeon R9 Fury",
"GeForce GTX 780 Ti",
"GeForce GTX 970",
"GeForce GTX 980",
"GeForce GTX 980 Ti",
"GeForce GTX 1050",
"GeForce GTX 1060",
"GeForce GTX 1070",
"GeForce GTX 1080",
"GeForce GTX 1080 Ti",
"clpeak - OpenCL Test: Transfer Bandwidth enqueueWriteBuffer",
Higher Results Are Better
"Radeon RX 460",30.11,29.98,30
"Radeon RX 480",30.19,30.15,30.06
"Radeon RX 560",30.04,30.04,30.04
"Radeon RX 580",30.17,30.11,31.13
"Radeon R9 Fury",30.19,30.2,31.17
"GeForce GTX 780 Ti",12.26,12.4,12.43
"GeForce GTX 960",12.42,12.46,12.45
"GeForce GTX 970",12.47,12.46,12.47
"GeForce GTX 980",12.44,12.45,12.48
"GeForce GTX 980 Ti",12.44,12.48,12.46
"GeForce GTX 1050",12.55,12.52,12.53
"GeForce GTX 1060",12.61,12.67,12.56
"GeForce GTX 1070",12.62,12.58,12.61
"GeForce GTX 1080",12.63,12.61,12.64
"GeForce GTX 1080 Ti",12.62,12.6,12.63
"LuxMark 3.0 - System Power Consumption Monitor",
Lower Results Are Better
"Radeon RX 460",
"Radeon RX 480",
"Radeon RX 560",
"Radeon R9 Fury",
"GeForce GTX 1060",
"GeForce GTX 1080",
"Darktable 2.0.3 - Test: Server Room - Acceleration: OpenCL",
Lower Results Are Better
"Radeon RX 460",0.275,0.276,0.284
"Radeon RX 480",0.161,0.156,0.192
"Radeon RX 560",0.305,0.305,0.31
"Radeon RX 580",0.156,0.156,0.154
"Radeon R9 Fury",0.163,0.133,0.144
"GeForce GTX 780 Ti",0.209,0.21,0.21
"GeForce GTX 960",0.209,0.198,0.192
"GeForce GTX 970",0.166,0.166,0.166
"GeForce GTX 980",0.171,0.164,0.164
"GeForce GTX 980 Ti",0.172,0.167,0.164
"GeForce GTX 1050",0.182,0.185,0.177
"GeForce GTX 1060",0.14,0.14,0.141
"GeForce GTX 1070",0.139,0.141,0.134
"GeForce GTX 1080",0.134,0.135,0.134
"GeForce GTX 1080 Ti",0.129,0.132,0.13
"Xsbench OpenCL 2017-07-06 - Phoronix Test Suite v7.2.1",
Higher Results Are Better
"Radeon RX 460",36894012,37151283,36902432
"Radeon RX 480",74636333,74723707,74546823
"Radeon RX 560",38566980,38644042,38606990
"Radeon RX 580",74699758,74272310,74335053
"Radeon R9 Fury",85347107,85064688,85207825
"SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 - Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Bus Speed Download",
Higher Results Are Better
"Radeon RX 460",5.7224,5.6834,5.7131
"Radeon RX 480",11.4777,11.4639,11.467
"Radeon RX 560",5.7241,5.7173,5.7172
"Radeon RX 580",11.4937,11.4973,11.4874
"Radeon R9 Fury",11.5009,11.3383,11.2978
"GeForce GTX 780 Ti",12.997,12.9976,12.9976
"GeForce GTX 960",13.0017,13.002,13.0015
"GeForce GTX 970",13.0011,13.0014,13.0011
"GeForce GTX 980",12.9995,12.9992,12.9994
"GeForce GTX 980 Ti",12.9953,12.9955,12.9954
"GeForce GTX 1050",12.9955,12.9959,12.9961
"GeForce GTX 1060",12.9947,12.9942,12.9942
"GeForce GTX 1070",12.9981,12.9986,12.9983
"GeForce GTX 1080",12.9983,12.9978,12.9983
"GeForce GTX 1080 Ti",12.9975,12.9982,12.9979
"Ethereum Ethminer 1.2.9 - Device: GPU OpenCL",
Higher Results Are Better
"Radeon RX 460",
"Radeon RX 480",
"Radeon RX 560",
"Radeon RX 580",
"Radeon R9 Fury",
"GeForce GTX 780 Ti",
"GeForce GTX 960",
"GeForce GTX 970",
"GeForce GTX 980",
"GeForce GTX 980 Ti",
"GeForce GTX 1050",
"GeForce GTX 1060",
"GeForce GTX 1070",
"GeForce GTX 1080",
"GeForce GTX 1080 Ti",
"Darktable 2.0.3 - Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: OpenCL",
Lower Results Are Better
"Radeon RX 460",0.303,0.281,0.297
"Radeon RX 480",0.194,0.149,0.168
"Radeon RX 560",0.261,0.308,0.303
"Radeon RX 580",0.193,0.155,0.157
"Radeon R9 Fury",0.127,0.134,0.14
"GeForce GTX 780 Ti",0.23,0.216,0.209
"GeForce GTX 960",0.191,0.197,0.208
"GeForce GTX 970",0.173,0.166,0.165
"GeForce GTX 980",0.165,0.164,0.165
"GeForce GTX 980 Ti",0.165,0.166,0.164
"GeForce GTX 1050",0.175,0.17,0.179
"GeForce GTX 1060",0.147,0.143,0.141
"GeForce GTX 1070",0.129,0.133,0.132
"GeForce GTX 1080",0.13,0.128,0.131
"GeForce GTX 1080 Ti",0.136,0.132,0.132
"clpeak - OpenCL Test: Integer Compute INT",
Higher Results Are Better
"Radeon RX 460",
"Radeon RX 480",
"Radeon RX 560",
"Radeon RX 580",
"Radeon R9 Fury",
"GeForce GTX 960",
"GeForce GTX 980",
"clpeak - OpenCL Test: Kernel Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"Radeon RX 460",39.02,40.36,48.09
"Radeon RX 480",41.41,39.22,38.99
"Radeon RX 560",42.32,40.34,40.51
"Radeon RX 580",39.39,40.33,38.89
"Radeon R9 Fury",40.84,41.87,42.15
"GeForce GTX 780 Ti",5.73,5.62,5.67
"GeForce GTX 960",4,3.97,3.86
"GeForce GTX 970",4.17,4.07,3.99
"GeForce GTX 980",4.2,4.07,4.1
"GeForce GTX 980 Ti",4.52,4.17,4.28
"GeForce GTX 1050",3.59,3.68,3.78
"GeForce GTX 1060",3.59,3.62,3.59
"GeForce GTX 1070",3.58,3.62,3.59
"GeForce GTX 1080",3.57,3.62,3.59
"GeForce GTX 1080 Ti",3.59,3.66,3.56
"CoMD OpenCL 2017-07-06 - Average Atom Update Rate",
Higher Results Are Better
"Radeon RX 460",4.86,4.86,4.84
"Radeon RX 480",4.85,4.84,4.84
"Radeon RX 560",4.84,4.85,4.84
"Radeon RX 580",4.85,4.85,4.85
"Radeon R9 Fury",4.85,4.85,4.84
"GeForce GTX 780 Ti",4.84,4.85,4.84
"GeForce GTX 960",4.84,4.84,4.84
"GeForce GTX 970",4.84,4.85,4.84
"GeForce GTX 980",4.85,4.84,4.84
"GeForce GTX 980 Ti",4.85,4.85,4.84
"GeForce GTX 1050",4.84,4.84,4.84
"GeForce GTX 1060",4.85,4.85,4.84
"GeForce GTX 1070",4.84,4.84,4.84
"GeForce GTX 1080",4.84,4.84,4.84
"GeForce GTX 1080 Ti",4.84,4.84,4.84
"Intel Core i7-4790",3.46,3.56,3.48
"clpeak - OpenCL Test: Transfer Bandwidth enqueueReadBuffer",
Higher Results Are Better
"Radeon RX 460",12.24,12.24,12.23
"Radeon RX 480",12.25,12.25,12.25
"Radeon RX 560",12.25,12.24,12.27
"Radeon RX 580",12.29,12.25,12.25
"Radeon R9 Fury",12.25,12.25,12.24
"GeForce GTX 780 Ti",11.25,11.2,11.27
"GeForce GTX 960",11.31,11.34,11.32
"GeForce GTX 970",11.32,11.3,11.37
"GeForce GTX 980",11.26,11.29,11.2
"GeForce GTX 980 Ti",11.36,11.4,11.36
"GeForce GTX 1050",11.38,11.31,11.26
"GeForce GTX 1060",11.34,11.29,11.32
"GeForce GTX 1070",11.39,11.38,11.32
"GeForce GTX 1080",11.36,11.33,11.26
"GeForce GTX 1080 Ti",11.37,11.39,11.33
"Lulesh OpenCL 2017-07-06 - Phoronix Test Suite v7.2.1",
Higher Results Are Better
"Radeon RX 460",839.67004,841.99405,840.51125
"Radeon RX 480",869.84807,888.19815,877.19812
"Radeon RX 560",851.96519,857.41161,849.54358
"Radeon RX 580",865.67532,871.35652,863.95189
"Radeon R9 Fury",845.4673,851.00794,839.32402
"Darktable 2.2.5 - Test: Server Room - Acceleration: OpenCL",
Lower Results Are Better
"Intel Core i7-4790",7.802,7.811,7.814
"Darktable 2.2.5 - Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: OpenCL",
Lower Results Are Better
"Intel Core i7-4790",12.899,12.876,12.777
"Darktable 2.2.5 - Test: Boat - Acceleration: OpenCL",
Lower Results Are Better
"Intel Core i7-4790",5.1,4.897,4.889
"System Power Consumption Monitor - Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring",
"Radeon RX 460",
"Radeon RX 480",
"Radeon RX 560",
"Radeon RX 580",
"Radeon R9 Fury",
"GeForce GTX 780 Ti",
"GeForce GTX 960",
"GeForce GTX 970",
"GeForce GTX 980",
"GeForce GTX 980 Ti",
"GeForce GTX 1050",
"GeForce GTX 1060",
"GeForce GTX 1070",
"GeForce GTX 1080",
"GeForce GTX 1080 Ti",