Samsung 960 EVO - SSD NVMe Disk Tests Linux 4.9

Some fresh SSD Linux benchmarks on Linux 4.9 atop Ubuntu 16.04 LTS. Tests by Michael Larabel for a future article.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1706078-RI-1612151TA80

Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

CPU Massive ^{3 Tests}
Database Test Suite ^{2 Tests}
Disk Test Suite ^{4 Tests}
Server ^{3 Tests}

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Disable Color Branding
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Additional Graphs

Show Perf Per Core/Thread Calculation Graphs Where Applicable
Show Perf Per Clock Calculation Graphs Where Applicable

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Only show results where is faster than

Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

Samsung 960 EVO - SSD NVMe Disk Tests Linux 4.9, "Flexible IO Tester 2.1.13 - Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Libaio - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory - Result: MB/s", Higher Results Are Better "INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB",550.336,516.631,382.41,549.228,503.234,381.918 "PNY CS1211 120GB",298.616,298.25,298.333 "Samsung 850 EVO 120GB",353.698,353.785,353.847 "Toshiba TR150 120GB",287.132,288.11,288.456 "VisionTek 240GB",338.582,338.405,338.61 "Samsung 950 PRO 256GB",323.915,323.424,321.388 "Samsung 960 EVO 250GB",1320.2,1321.2,1315.9 "600P Test",500.996,502.378,504.812 "Flexible IO Tester 2.1.13 - Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Libaio - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory - Result: MB/s", Higher Results Are Better "INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB",287.281,287.429,287.53 "PNY CS1211 120GB",270.82,271.249,270.999 "Samsung 850 EVO 120GB",392.571,391.83,392.005 "Toshiba TR150 120GB",207.036,216.084,216.131 "VisionTek 240GB",300.977,295.292,290.327 "Samsung 950 PRO 256GB",788.897,788.405,787.819 "Samsung 960 EVO 250GB",704.321,704.815,704.956 "600P Test",282.52,251.05,251.027,250.951,250.855,251.142 "SQLite 3.8.10.2 - Test Target: Default Test Directory", Lower Results Are Better "INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB",17.999998092651,17.969813108444,18.142232894897 "PNY CS1211 120GB",56.597896814346,56.346992969513,56.182569026947 "Samsung 850 EVO 120GB",28.451795816422,28.4682700634,29.275139093399 "Toshiba TR150 120GB",35.609029054642,38.519741773605,36.849836111069,36.533185958862 "VisionTek 240GB",46.366847991943,33.974690914154,30.969451904297,31.222127914429,21.897865056992,21.847705125809 "Samsung 950 PRO 256GB",65.511888980865,65.245289087296,65.310128211975 "Samsung 960 EVO 250GB",36.473243951797,36.576273918152,36.504096031189 "600P Test",20.430696964264,23.822072029114,27.978707075119,23.292541980743,23.030931949615,23.050071954727 "Flexible IO Tester 2.1.13 - Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Libaio - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory - Result: MB/s", Higher Results Are Better "INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB",265.653,265.763,265.751 "PNY CS1211 120GB",49.346,49.31,49.245 "Samsung 850 EVO 120GB",456.899,456.656,458.336 "Toshiba TR150 120GB",187.129,184.932,191.772 "VisionTek 240GB",274.95,273.632,262.465 "Samsung 950 PRO 256GB",1115.3,1115.6,1115.3 "Samsung 960 EVO 250GB",969.423,963.824,995.153 "600P Test",262.167,262.632,262.598 "PostgreSQL pgbench 9.4.3 - Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Write", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung 950 PRO 256GB",252.339271,251.30584,250.423216 "INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB",272.511636,259.200886,251.624451,262.386373 "Samsung 960 EVO 250GB",190.795399,188.218514,188.473144 "600P Test",502.239293,506.634583,497.501501 "Flexible IO Tester 2.1.13 - Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Libaio - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory - Result: MB/s", Higher Results Are Better "INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB",565.994,509.804,399.606,561.073,494.965,384.488 "PNY CS1211 120GB",117.328,117.915,117.884 "Samsung 850 EVO 120GB",423.768,423.554,423.287 "Toshiba TR150 120GB",430.205,429.91,430.306 "VisionTek 240GB",408.039,404.25,407.015 "Samsung 950 PRO 256GB",921.228,920.376,919.199 "Samsung 960 EVO 250GB",1405.4,1401.2,1398.4 "600P Test",535.666,510.125,527.394 "Compile Bench 0.6 - Test: Initial Create", Higher Results Are Better "INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB",543.3,549.01,547.69 "PNY CS1211 120GB",514.98,531.98,529.11 "Samsung 850 EVO 120GB",423.44,482.02,528.54,509.41,485.46,537.07 "Toshiba TR150 120GB",380.29,436.78,464.01,366.22,440.57,492.98 "VisionTek 240GB",407.08,448.49,446.73,461.99,439.75,464.05 "Samsung 950 PRO 256GB",511.86,522.61,516.4 "Samsung 960 EVO 250GB",566.47,558.17,551.62 "PostgreSQL pgbench 9.4.3 - Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Write", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung 950 PRO 256GB",5268.963623,5148.316468,5265.736556 "INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB",1209.44238,1214.176654,1215.151165 "Samsung 960 EVO 250GB",3509.658978,3496.64475,3584.747265 "600P Test",1937.340281,1718.385903,2070.351522,2015.885388,2171.861216,2229.530762 "PostgreSQL pgbench 9.4.3 - Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung 950 PRO 256GB",2849.901632,2864.946852,2697.689912 "INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB",1213.010507,1279.487229,1276.724146 "Samsung 960 EVO 250GB",1467.140486,2047.40229,1992.526958,2050.062357,2046.129039,1995.894002 "600P Test",1757.287626,1597.1023,1702.927079,1708.416336,1704.448081 "BlogBench 1.0 - Test: Write", Higher Results Are Better "INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB",6692,6938,6952 "PNY CS1211 120GB",8488,8749,8598 "Samsung 850 EVO 120GB",6482,5552,6202 "Toshiba TR150 120GB",5698,5695,5763 "VisionTek 240GB",5074,5129,5202 "Samsung 950 PRO 256GB",14528,18526,19628,19063,19409,19782 "Samsung 960 EVO 250GB",8902,10877,11707,11993,12107,11356 "600P Test",4988,5281,5064 "FS-Mark 3.3 - Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size", Higher Results Are Better "INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB",91.1,68.6,77.4,78,78.6,83.8 "PNY CS1211 120GB",93,92.9,93.1 "Samsung 850 EVO 120GB",73.2,62,60.9,57,54.8,74.7 "Toshiba TR150 120GB",44.4,41.7,41.1,41.1,41.7 "VisionTek 240GB",43,41.5,41.5 "Samsung 950 PRO 256GB",120.9,119.3,119.9 "Samsung 960 EVO 250GB",107.9,78.1,77.7,86.4,79,78.3 "600P Test",98.7,76.9,84.5,84.5,84.3,84.8 "FS-Mark 3.3 - Test: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threads", Higher Results Are Better "INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB",101.6,80,81.6,83.6,83.6,83.2 "PNY CS1211 120GB",193.9,194,194 "Samsung 850 EVO 120GB",114.4,110.4,108.4 "Toshiba TR150 120GB",52,50.8,50.8 "VisionTek 240GB",51.6,50,50 "Samsung 950 PRO 256GB",303.9,300.8,302.4 "Samsung 960 EVO 250GB",265.3,161.6,161.2,160,157.2,161.2 "600P Test",112.4,92.9,94.2,94.6,93.9,94.4 "FS-Mark 3.3 - Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size", Higher Results Are Better "INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB",205.2,213.9,213.3 "PNY CS1211 120GB",93.2,93.4,93.9 "Samsung 850 EVO 120GB",143.3,144.4,113.8,68.9,68.5,68.8 "Toshiba TR150 120GB",114.8,55,45.1,48.2,45.1,45.2 "VisionTek 240GB",97.7,96.3,45.4,42.9,44.6,44.8 "Samsung 950 PRO 256GB",121.7,119.2,121 "Samsung 960 EVO 250GB",173.9,174.2,172.8 "600P Test",222.3,239.3,225.6,223.9