2 x Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 (on Intel P4304CR2) testing with a Intel W2600CR and AMD FirePro W8000 on CentOS 7.3.1611 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1704177-LO-70417RKP475
70417-rk-p4304cr2
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 (on Intel P4304CR2) testing with a Intel W2600CR and AMD FirePro W8000 on CentOS 7.3.1611 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Computational:
Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 @ 3.40GHz (32 Cores), Motherboard: Intel W2600CR, Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v2/Xeon, Memory: 32768MB, Disk: 2 x 1000GB Hitachi HDS72101 + 2 x 1000GB TOSHIBA DT01ACA1 + 1000GB Seagate ST1000DM003-1CH1 + 1000GB Elements 25A2 + 256GB SAMSUNG SSD 830, Graphics: AMD FirePro 4096MB, Audio: Realtek ALC889, Monitor: DELL U2713H, Network: Intel I350 Gigabit Connection
OS: CentOS 7.3.1611, Kernel: 3.10.0-514.10.2.el7.x86_64 (x86_64), Desktop: KDE 4.14.8, Display Server: X Server 1.17.2, Display Driver: radeon 7.6.99, OpenGL: 4.1 Mesa 11.2.2 Gallium 0.4, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 2560x1440
ray-trace:
Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 @ 3.40GHz (32 Cores), Motherboard: Intel W2600CR, Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v2/Xeon, Memory: 32768MB, Disk: 2 x 1000GB Hitachi HDS72101 + 2 x 1000GB TOSHIBA DT01ACA1 + 1000GB Seagate ST1000DM003-1CH1 + 1000GB Elements 25A2 + 256GB SAMSUNG SSD 830, Graphics: AMD FirePro 4096MB, Audio: Realtek ALC889, Monitor: DELL U2713H, Network: Intel I350 Gigabit Connection
OS: CentOS 7.3.1611, Kernel: 3.10.0-514.10.2.el7.x86_64 (x86_64), Desktop: KDE 4.14.8, Display Server: X Server 1.17.2, Display Driver: radeon 7.6.99, OpenGL: 4.1 Mesa 11.2.2 Gallium 0.4, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 2560x1440
GMPbench 0.2
Total Time
GMPbench Score > Higher Is Better
Computational . 3112.30 |======================================================
Fhourstones 3.1
Complex Connect-4 Solving
Kpos / sec > Higher Is Better
Computational . 11449.07 |=====================================================
BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6
Dhrystone 2
LPS > Higher Is Better
Computational . 24125256.50 |==================================================
SciMark 2.0
Composite
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Computational . 1182.60 |======================================================
TSCP 1.81
AI Chess Performance
Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better
Computational . 811442 |=======================================================
Timed HMMer Search 2.3.2
Pfam Database Search
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Computational . 8.98 |=========================================================
Crafty 23.4
Elapsed Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Computational . 83.67 |========================================================
dcraw
RAW To PPM Image Conversion
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Computational . 62.37 |========================================================
Sudokut 0.4
Total Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Computational . 31.96 |========================================================
C-Ray 1.1
Total Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
ray-trace . 8.77 |=============================================================
Smallpt 1.0
Global Illumination Renderer; 100 Samples
Seconds < Lower Is Better
ray-trace . 27 |===============================================================
POV-Ray 3.7.0
Total Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
ray-trace . 51.44 |============================================================
Sunflow Rendering System 0.07.2
Global Illumination + Image Synthesis
Seconds < Lower Is Better
ray-trace . 1.88 |=============================================================