Tests for a future article.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1703037-RI-RYZENCPUG38 Ryzen CPU Governor Tests - Phoronix Test Suite Ryzen CPU Governor Tests Tests for a future article.
HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/1703037-RI-RYZENCPUG38&gru&sor .
Ryzen CPU Governor Tests Processor Motherboard Chipset Memory Disk Graphics Audio Monitor Network OS Kernel Desktop Display Server Display Driver OpenGL Vulkan Compiler File-System Screen Resolution Ondemand Performance Schedutil Powersave Conservative AMD Ryzen 7 1800X Eight-Core @ 3.60GHz (16 Cores) MSI X370 XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A31) v1.0 AMD Device 1450 16384MB 256GB INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 Sapphire AMD Radeon R9 FURY / NANO 4096MB AMD Fiji HDMI/DP DELL P2415Q Intel I211 Gigabit Connection Ubuntu 17.04 4.10.0-9-generic (x86_64) Unity 7.5.0 X Server 1.18.4 modesetting 1.18.4 4.5 Mesa 17.0.0- padoka PPA Gallium 0.4 (LLVM 4.0.0) 1.0.39 GCC 6.3.0 20161229 ext4 3840x2160 OpenBenchmarking.org Compiler Details - --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-browser-plugin --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-gtk-cairo --enable-java-awt=gtk --enable-java-home --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,java,go,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --enable-libmpx --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-arch-directory=amd64 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib --with-tune=generic -v Processor Details - Ondemand: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq ondemand - Performance: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq performance - Schedutil: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq schedutil - Powersave: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq powersave - Conservative: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq conservative Graphics Details - GLAMOR
Ryzen CPU Governor Tests portal: 3840 x 2160 csgo: 3840 x 2160 etlegacy: Renderer2 - 3840 x 2160 tesseract: 3840 x 2160 graphics-magick: Resizing graphics-magick: HWB Color Space fftw: Float + SSE - 2D FFT Size 2048 john-the-ripper: Blowfish build-linux-kernel: Time To Compile encode-mp3: WAV To MP3 tensorflow: Cifar10 darktable: Boat - CPU-only darktable: Masskrug - CPU-only darktable: Server Room - CPU-only build-apache: Time To Compile Ondemand Performance Schedutil Powersave Conservative 336.18 134.71 158.50 191.97 232 239 13392 12795 81.85 9.40 106.89 17.27 9.16 7.18 27.23 336.08 138.91 161.30 205.24 235 246 13739 12787 80.55 9.34 104.85 17.19 8.97 7.14 24.87 335.61 133.75 159.43 195.29 221 239 13554 12793 82.16 9.29 105.52 17.29 9.53 7.13 28.01 327.55 105.75 102.87 162.34 133 138 9309.30 7572 122.53 16.73 127.74 20.13 12.80 9.66 40.42 106.81 98.13 72.50 209 226 13609 12776 83.90 9.73 104.88 17.22 9.16 7.18 32.64 OpenBenchmarking.org
CPU Frequency (CPU0) Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring Min Avg Max Conservative 2200 2633 3600 Schedutil 2200 2657 3600 Ondemand 2200 2659 3600 Performance 3600 3600 3600 OpenBenchmarking.org Megahertz CPU Frequency (CPU0) Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring Min Avg Max Performance 0.0 31.3 100.0 Conservative 0.0 31.6 100.0 Ondemand 0.0 31.7 100.0 Schedutil 0.0 32.0 100.0 Powersave 0.0 32.6 100.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Percent CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring 20 40 60 80 100
System Power Consumption Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring Min Avg Max Powersave 58.9 87.8 346.0 Conservative 60.5 101.3 180.4 Schedutil 61.7 116.7 360.5 Ondemand 59.7 117.4 356.7 Performance 64.0 120.0 359.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts System Power Consumption Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring 100 200 300 400 500
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive Resolution: 3840 x 2160 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive Resolution: 3840 x 2160 Schedutil Powersave Performance Ondemand 0.1935 0.387 0.5805 0.774 0.9675 0.86 0.85 0.82 0.81
Portal Resolution: 3840 x 2160 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Portal Resolution: 3840 x 2160 Ondemand Performance Schedutil Powersave Conservative 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 SE +/- 0.28, N = 3 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 SE +/- 0.60, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 336.18 336.08 335.61 327.55 106.81
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive Resolution: 3840 x 2160 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive Resolution: 3840 x 2160 Performance Ondemand Schedutil Powersave 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.20, N = 3 SE +/- 0.31, N = 3 SE +/- 0.58, N = 3 SE +/- 0.62, N = 3 138.91 134.71 133.75 105.75
ET: Legacy Renderer: Renderer2 - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better ET: Legacy 2.75 Renderer: Renderer2 - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 Performance Schedutil Ondemand Powersave Conservative 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.58, N = 3 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 SE +/- 0.25, N = 3 SE +/- 1.33, N = 3 SE +/- 0.66, N = 3 161.30 159.43 158.50 102.87 98.13
Tesseract Resolution: 3840 x 2160 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Tesseract 2014-05-12 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 Performance Schedutil Ondemand Powersave Conservative 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 1.03, N = 3 SE +/- 2.64, N = 3 SE +/- 1.00, N = 3 SE +/- 1.65, N = 3 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 205.24 195.29 191.97 162.34 72.50
Portal Resolution: 3840 x 2160 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Portal Resolution: 3840 x 2160 Powersave Ondemand Schedutil Performance Conservative 0.4253 0.8506 1.2759 1.7012 2.1265 1.89 1.70 1.61 1.57 1.13
ET: Legacy Renderer: Renderer2 - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better ET: Legacy 2.75 Renderer: Renderer2 - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 Performance Schedutil Ondemand Conservative Powersave 0.252 0.504 0.756 1.008 1.26 1.12 1.10 1.10 1.05 0.99
Tesseract Resolution: 3840 x 2160 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Tesseract 2014-05-12 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 Conservative Schedutil Ondemand Powersave Performance 0.171 0.342 0.513 0.684 0.855 0.76 0.75 0.74 0.71 0.71
GraphicsMagick Operation: HWB Color Space OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute Per Watt, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.19 Operation: HWB Color Space Performance Schedutil Ondemand Conservative Powersave 0.6548 1.3096 1.9644 2.6192 3.274 2.91 2.88 2.85 2.71 2.09
GraphicsMagick Operation: Resizing OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.19 Operation: Resizing Performance Ondemand Schedutil Conservative Powersave 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 3.76, N = 3 235 232 221 209 133 1. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -O2 -pthread -ljbig -lwebp -ltiff -ljpeg -lXext -lSM -lICE -lX11 -llzma -lbz2 -lz -lm -lgomp -lpthread
GraphicsMagick Operation: Resizing OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute Per Watt, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.19 Operation: Resizing Ondemand Performance Schedutil Conservative Powersave 0.5963 1.1926 1.7889 2.3852 2.9815 2.65 2.64 2.52 2.44 1.97
GraphicsMagick Operation: HWB Color Space OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.19 Operation: HWB Color Space Performance Schedutil Ondemand Conservative Powersave 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.88, N = 3 246 239 239 226 138 1. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -O2 -pthread -ljbig -lwebp -ltiff -ljpeg -lXext -lSM -lICE -lX11 -llzma -lbz2 -lz -lm -lgomp -lpthread
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 2048 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops Per Watt, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.4 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 2048 Performance Ondemand Schedutil Conservative Powersave 40 80 120 160 200 168.93 166.65 166.36 165.35 139.49
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 2048 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.4 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 2048 Performance Conservative Schedutil Ondemand Powersave 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 75.22, N = 5 SE +/- 59.96, N = 5 SE +/- 52.93, N = 5 SE +/- 91.53, N = 5 SE +/- 22.16, N = 5 13739.00 13609.00 13554.00 13392.00 9309.30 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Performance Per Watt, More Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 4.9 Time To Compile Conservative Powersave Schedutil Performance Ondemand
LAME MP3 Encoding WAV To MP3 OpenBenchmarking.org Performance Per Watt, More Is Better LAME MP3 Encoding 3.99.3 WAV To MP3 Conservative Powersave Schedutil Performance Ondemand
Tensorflow Build: Cifar10 OpenBenchmarking.org Performance Per Watt, More Is Better Tensorflow 2017-02-03 Build: Cifar10 Conservative Powersave Schedutil Performance Ondemand
Darktable Test: Boat - Acceleration: CPU-only OpenBenchmarking.org Performance Per Watt, More Is Better Darktable 2.2.1 Test: Boat - Acceleration: CPU-only Conservative Powersave Schedutil Performance Ondemand
Darktable Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: CPU-only OpenBenchmarking.org Performance Per Watt, More Is Better Darktable 2.2.1 Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: CPU-only Conservative Powersave Schedutil Performance Ondemand
Darktable Test: Server Room - Acceleration: CPU-only OpenBenchmarking.org Performance Per Watt, More Is Better Darktable 2.2.1 Test: Server Room - Acceleration: CPU-only Conservative Powersave Schedutil Performance Ondemand
Timed Apache Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Performance Per Watt, More Is Better Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.7 Time To Compile Conservative Powersave Schedutil Performance Ondemand
Meta Performance Per Watt Performance Per Watt OpenBenchmarking.org Performance Per Watt, More Is Better Meta Performance Per Watt Performance Per Watt Conservative Performance Schedutil Ondemand Powersave 400 800 1200 1600 2000 1954.44 1873.43 1859.33 1849.22 1213.39
John The Ripper Test: Blowfish OpenBenchmarking.org Real C/S, More Is Better John The Ripper 1.8.0 Test: Blowfish Ondemand Schedutil Performance Conservative Powersave 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 7.86, N = 3 SE +/- 6.67, N = 3 SE +/- 29.35, N = 3 SE +/- 4.00, N = 3 SE +/- 21.87, N = 3 12795 12793 12787 12776 7572 1. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -lcrypt
John The Ripper Test: Blowfish OpenBenchmarking.org Real C/S Per Watt, More Is Better John The Ripper 1.8.0 Test: Blowfish Schedutil Ondemand Performance Conservative Powersave 20 40 60 80 100 96.60 95.91 95.11 93.02 91.52
Portal CPU Frequency (CPU0) Monitor Min Avg Max Schedutil 2200 2317 3600 Powersave 2200 2200 2200 Conservative 2200 2200 2200 Performance 3600 3600 3600 OpenBenchmarking.org Megahertz, Fewer Is Better Portal CPU Frequency (CPU0) Monitor 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive CPU Frequency (CPU0) Monitor Min Avg Max Ondemand 2200 2387 3600 Powersave 2200 2200 2200 Schedutil 2200 2450 3600 Performance 3600 3600 3600 OpenBenchmarking.org Megahertz, Fewer Is Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive CPU Frequency (CPU0) Monitor 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
ET: Legacy CPU Frequency (CPU0) Monitor Min Avg Max Schedutil 2200 2274 3600 Ondemand 2200 2278 3600 Conservative 2200 2350 3600 Performance 3600 3600 3600 OpenBenchmarking.org Megahertz, Fewer Is Better ET: Legacy 2.75 CPU Frequency (CPU0) Monitor 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
Tesseract CPU Frequency (CPU0) Monitor Min Avg Max Ondemand 2200 2350 3600 Powersave 2200 2200 2200 Conservative 2200 2200 2200 Performance 3600 3600 3600 OpenBenchmarking.org Megahertz, Fewer Is Better Tesseract 2014-05-12 CPU Frequency (CPU0) Monitor 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation CPU Frequency (CPU0) Monitor Min Avg Max Ondemand 2200 3259 3600 Schedutil 2200 3265 3600 Conservative 2200 3283 3600 Performance 3600 3600 3600 OpenBenchmarking.org Megahertz, Fewer Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 4.9 CPU Frequency (CPU0) Monitor 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
LAME MP3 Encoding CPU Frequency (CPU0) Monitor Min Avg Max Schedutil 2200 2550 3600 Powersave 2200 2200 2200 Conservative 2200 2200 2200 Performance 3600 3600 3600 OpenBenchmarking.org Megahertz, Fewer Is Better LAME MP3 Encoding 3.99.3 CPU Frequency (CPU0) Monitor 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
GraphicsMagick CPU Frequency (CPU0) Monitor Min Avg Max Conservative 2200 2248 3600 Schedutil 2200 2254 3600 Ondemand 2200 2559 3600 Performance 3600 3600 3600 OpenBenchmarking.org Megahertz, Fewer Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.19 CPU Frequency (CPU0) Monitor 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
GraphicsMagick CPU Frequency (CPU0) Monitor Min Avg Max Schedutil 2200 2300 3600 Conservative 2200 2519 3600 Ondemand 2200 2786 3600 Performance 3600 3600 3600 OpenBenchmarking.org Megahertz, Fewer Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.19 CPU Frequency (CPU0) Monitor 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
John The Ripper CPU Frequency (CPU0) Monitor Min Avg Max Ondemand 2200 3200 3600 Conservative 2200 3213 3600 Schedutil 2200 3374 3600 Performance 3600 3600 3600 OpenBenchmarking.org Megahertz, Fewer Is Better John The Ripper 1.8.0 CPU Frequency (CPU0) Monitor 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
Tensorflow CPU Frequency (CPU0) Monitor Min Avg Max Ondemand 2200 3432 3600 Schedutil 2200 3434 3600 Conservative 2200 3536 3600 Performance 3600 3600 3600 OpenBenchmarking.org Megahertz, Fewer Is Better Tensorflow 2017-02-03 CPU Frequency (CPU0) Monitor 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
Darktable CPU Frequency (CPU0) Monitor Min Avg Max Schedutil 2200 3250 3600 Ondemand 2200 3289 3600 Conservative 2200 3444 3600 Performance 3600 3600 3600 OpenBenchmarking.org Megahertz, Fewer Is Better Darktable 2.2.1 CPU Frequency (CPU0) Monitor 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
Darktable CPU Frequency (CPU0) Monitor Min Avg Max Conservative 2200 2960 3600 Schedutil 2200 3133 3600 Ondemand 2200 3320 3600 Performance 3600 3600 3600 OpenBenchmarking.org Megahertz, Fewer Is Better Darktable 2.2.1 CPU Frequency (CPU0) Monitor 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
Darktable CPU Frequency (CPU0) Monitor Min Avg Max Ondemand 2200 3040 3600 Conservative 2200 3250 3600 Schedutil 2200 3320 3600 Performance 3600 3600 3600 OpenBenchmarking.org Megahertz, Fewer Is Better Darktable 2.2.1 CPU Frequency (CPU0) Monitor 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
Timed Apache Compilation CPU Frequency (CPU0) Monitor Min Avg Max Schedutil 2200 2365 3600 Ondemand 2200 2529 3600 Conservative 2200 2540 3600 Performance 3600 3600 3600 OpenBenchmarking.org Megahertz, Fewer Is Better Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.7 CPU Frequency (CPU0) Monitor 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
FFTW CPU Frequency (CPU0) Monitor Min Avg Max Schedutil 2200 2297 3600 Powersave 2200 2200 2200 Conservative 2200 2200 2200 Performance 3600 3600 3600 OpenBenchmarking.org Megahertz, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.4 CPU Frequency (CPU0) Monitor 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
Portal CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor Min Avg Max Conservative 0.0 3.5 17.1 Performance 0.0 4.9 13.5 Schedutil 0.1 5.7 15.8 Ondemand 0.1 5.8 15.1 Powersave 0.0 7.5 16.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Percent, Fewer Is Better Portal CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor 5 10 15 20 25
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor Min Avg Max Conservative 0.1 0.2 0.3 Performance 0.0 10.5 23.4 Schedutil 0.0 10.9 24.2 Powersave 0.0 11.2 23.7 Ondemand 0.1 11.3 24.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Percent, Fewer Is Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
ET: Legacy CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor Min Avg Max Conservative 0.9 5.2 7.0 Performance 0.0 6.5 7.9 Schedutil 0.0 6.6 8.0 Powersave 0.6 6.8 7.8 Ondemand 0.3 7.1 8.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Percent, Fewer Is Better ET: Legacy 2.75 CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor 3 6 9 12 15
Tesseract CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor Min Avg Max Conservative 0.0 4.0 22.3 Schedutil 0.0 5.1 21.7 Performance 1.5 5.1 22.7 Ondemand 0.1 5.6 13.9 Powersave 2.4 6.5 25.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Percent, Fewer Is Better Tesseract 2014-05-12 CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor Min Avg Max Conservative 0.1 78.6 100.0 Schedutil 0.0 80.6 100.0 Ondemand 0.3 81.1 100.0 Performance 0.0 83.8 100.0 Powersave 0.1 84.6 100.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Percent, Fewer Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 4.9 CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
LAME MP3 Encoding CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor Min Avg Max Schedutil 0.0 5.2 6.4 Ondemand 0.1 5.6 6.8 Conservative 0.1 5.8 6.4 Performance 0.1 5.8 6.4 Powersave 0.0 6.0 6.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Percent, Fewer Is Better LAME MP3 Encoding 3.99.3 CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor 3 6 9 12 15
GraphicsMagick CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor Min Avg Max Powersave 0.1 10.6 14.8 Performance 0.1 10.9 13.7 Ondemand 0.5 11.8 14.7 Conservative 0.1 13.3 16.7 Schedutil 5.5 13.9 15.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Percent, Fewer Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.19 CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor 5 10 15 20 25
GraphicsMagick CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor Min Avg Max Powersave 0.1 14.8 22.7 Performance 0.3 15.6 19.0 Ondemand 2.3 16.5 21.7 Conservative 0.0 18.6 24.0 Schedutil 0.3 19.9 26.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Percent, Fewer Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.19 CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
John The Ripper CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor Min Avg Max Performance 0.0 73.2 100.0 Ondemand 0.4 73.5 100.0 Schedutil 0.5 73.6 100.0 Conservative 0.1 74.0 100.0 Powersave 0.1 74.3 100.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Percent, Fewer Is Better John The Ripper 1.8.0 CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Tensorflow CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor Min Avg Max Ondemand 0.1 80.8 88.1 Conservative 0.0 81.0 88.5 Performance 0.0 81.3 88.6 Schedutil 0.0 81.5 88.8 Powersave 0.0 81.6 89.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Percent, Fewer Is Better Tensorflow 2017-02-03 CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Darktable CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor Min Avg Max Performance 0.0 80.4 99.9 Conservative 1.6 86.6 99.8 Schedutil 0.3 87.9 99.8 Powersave 0.0 88.1 99.9 Ondemand 0.1 88.6 99.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Percent, Fewer Is Better Darktable 2.2.1 CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Darktable CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor Min Avg Max Powersave 0.0 64.9 99.8 Conservative 0.3 66.4 99.4 Ondemand 0.0 66.5 99.1 Performance 0.0 67.5 99.0 Schedutil 0.1 69.6 99.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Percent, Fewer Is Better Darktable 2.2.1 CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Darktable CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor Min Avg Max Powersave 0.1 61.7 100.0 Performance 0.1 65.8 99.3 Ondemand 0.3 66.6 99.0 Schedutil 0.1 70.5 99.9 Conservative 0.1 71.2 99.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Percent, Fewer Is Better Darktable 2.2.1 CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Timed Apache Compilation CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor Min Avg Max Performance 1.0 25.2 100.0 Powersave 0.3 25.3 99.5 Schedutil 2.6 26.1 100.0 Ondemand 0.1 26.2 100.0 Conservative 0.1 28.0 100.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Percent, Fewer Is Better Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.7 CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
FFTW CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor Min Avg Max Powersave 0.0 6.2 6.9 Performance 0.0 6.3 7.3 Schedutil 0.0 6.3 6.6 Conservative 0.1 6.3 6.6 Ondemand 0.0 6.3 6.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Percent, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.4 CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor 3 6 9 12 15
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 4.9 Time To Compile Performance Ondemand Schedutil Conservative Powersave 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.93, N = 3 SE +/- 1.07, N = 3 SE +/- 1.15, N = 3 SE +/- 1.23, N = 3 SE +/- 1.63, N = 3 80.55 81.85 82.16 83.90 122.53
LAME MP3 Encoding WAV To MP3 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better LAME MP3 Encoding 3.99.3 WAV To MP3 Schedutil Performance Ondemand Conservative Powersave 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.04, N = 5 SE +/- 0.02, N = 5 SE +/- 0.02, N = 5 SE +/- 0.17, N = 5 SE +/- 0.02, N = 5 9.29 9.34 9.40 9.73 16.73 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -ffast-math -funroll-loops -fschedule-insns2 -fbranch-count-reg -fforce-addr -pipe -lm
Tensorflow Build: Cifar10 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Tensorflow 2017-02-03 Build: Cifar10 Performance Conservative Schedutil Ondemand Powersave 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.48, N = 3 SE +/- 0.25, N = 3 SE +/- 0.27, N = 3 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 SE +/- 0.43, N = 3 104.85 104.88 105.52 106.89 127.74
Darktable Test: Boat - Acceleration: CPU-only OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Darktable 2.2.1 Test: Boat - Acceleration: CPU-only Performance Conservative Ondemand Schedutil Powersave 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 17.19 17.22 17.27 17.29 20.13
Darktable Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: CPU-only OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Darktable 2.2.1 Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: CPU-only Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 8.97 9.16 9.16 9.53 12.80
Darktable Test: Server Room - Acceleration: CPU-only OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Darktable 2.2.1 Test: Server Room - Acceleration: CPU-only Schedutil Performance Ondemand Conservative Powersave 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 7.13 7.14 7.18 7.18 9.66
Timed Apache Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.7 Time To Compile Performance Ondemand Schedutil Conservative Powersave 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.24, N = 3 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 SE +/- 0.28, N = 3 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 24.87 27.23 28.01 32.64 40.42
Portal System Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Conservative 61.3 94.4 103.8 Powersave 60.7 173.8 346.0 Ondemand 65.4 198.3 351.7 Schedutil 66.9 208.6 360.5 Performance 70.3 214.0 359.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Portal System Power Consumption Monitor 100 200 300 400 500
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive System Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Powersave 62.1 124.7 260.6 Schedutil 68.4 155.7 335.8 Ondemand 63.5 167.2 356.7 Conservative 63.7 63.7 63.7 Performance 69.7 168.8 357.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive System Power Consumption Monitor 100 200 300 400 500
ET: Legacy System Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Conservative 63.1 93.6 104.8 Powersave 62.1 103.5 145.2 Performance 70.6 144.2 222.2 Ondemand 62.9 144.4 202.4 Schedutil 70.5 145.6 203.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ET: Legacy 2.75 System Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
Tesseract System Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Conservative 62.9 95.3 100.7 Powersave 69.2 227.1 275.2 Ondemand 62.2 258.0 317.5 Schedutil 69.0 259.5 320.2 Performance 92.6 287.8 327.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Tesseract 2014-05-12 System Power Consumption Monitor 80 160 240 320 400
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation System Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Powersave 65.9 90.3 95.8 Conservative 63.5 143.5 169.1 Schedutil 68.1 147.1 167.3 Ondemand 67.7 148.9 167.8 Performance 71.3 151.4 168.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 4.9 System Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
LAME MP3 Encoding System Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Powersave 61.1 64.1 65.0 Ondemand 61.4 78.2 83.2 Performance 69.1 78.8 83.6 Schedutil 67.5 80.1 83.4 Conservative 82.9 84.1 84.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LAME MP3 Encoding 3.99.3 System Power Consumption Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
GraphicsMagick System Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Powersave 65.6 66.0 66.3 Schedutil 66.7 83.1 84.9 Conservative 62.9 83.5 87.5 Ondemand 60.9 83.9 85.3 Performance 77.4 84.6 85.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.19 System Power Consumption Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
GraphicsMagick System Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Powersave 60.8 67.4 69.0 Conservative 62.7 85.6 91.9 Ondemand 60.9 87.6 91.4 Schedutil 68.2 87.7 90.4 Performance 68.4 89.0 90.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.19 System Power Consumption Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
John The Ripper System Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Powersave 63.6 82.7 91.0 Schedutil 68.7 132.4 178.2 Ondemand 60.8 133.4 177.5 Performance 67.1 134.4 175.1 Conservative 79.9 137.4 180.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better John The Ripper 1.8.0 System Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Tensorflow System Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Powersave 61.0 86.4 88.3 Ondemand 77.8 129.5 133.2 Schedutil 66.8 130.7 135.8 Performance 64.0 132.7 136.5 Conservative 62.9 133.0 138.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Tensorflow 2017-02-03 System Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Timed Apache Compilation System Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Powersave 60.8 69.9 85.7 Schedutil 66.2 85.8 123.6 Conservative 62.4 88.0 133.0 Ondemand 67.5 90.5 133.2 Performance 71.7 103.9 140.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.7 System Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
FFTW System Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Powersave 61.2 66.7 67.3 Ondemand 60.5 80.4 85.8 Performance 69.1 81.3 86.9 Schedutil 72.1 81.5 86.1 Conservative 62.0 82.3 88.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.4 System Power Consumption Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Darktable System Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Powersave 60.9 85.0 96.6 Performance 67.7 121.6 153.5 Conservative 67.3 128.7 151.6 Ondemand 100.3 131.3 154.3 Schedutil 94.8 136.3 153.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Darktable 2.2.1 System Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Darktable System Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Powersave 60.8 76.7 88.3 Conservative 62.5 112.5 144.7 Ondemand 60.7 114.7 148.4 Schedutil 107.5 125.3 148.2 Performance 112.5 126.2 143.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Darktable 2.2.1 System Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Darktable System Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Powersave 60.7 76.0 89.0 Schedutil 72.5 110.5 150.4 Conservative 62.4 112.1 153.1 Performance 69.6 118.1 151.0 Ondemand 86.3 120.5 148.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Darktable 2.2.1 System Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.4