AMD Phenom II X6 1090T testing with a Gigabyte GA-MA78G-DS3H and AMD Radeon HD 7970/8970 OEM / R9 280X 3072MB on Arch Linux via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1702233-RI-AMDPHENOM91
amd-phenom-ii-x6-1090t-overclocking,
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Composite",
Higher Results Are Better
"267x15_4005",757.18,756.6,745.64,757
"273x15_4095",795.31,780.45,778.45,780.16
"205x20_4100",756.29,753.24,752.92,774.59
"200x20_4000_dual-channel",722.45,751.05,717.55,752.14
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Monte Carlo",
Higher Results Are Better
"267x15_4005",457.47,456.41,456.44,456.25
"273x15_4095",467.77,467.19,467.22,467.19
"205x20_4100",467.72,468.34,468.33,468.34
"200x20_4000_dual-channel",459.14,459.15,459.13,446.37
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform",
Higher Results Are Better
"267x15_4005",93.52,93.3,93.58,93.32
"273x15_4095",99.15,99.39,99.36,98.64
"205x20_4100",92.95,93.13,92.77,92.13
"200x20_4000_dual-channel",93.44,93.44,93.8,93.75
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply",
Higher Results Are Better
"267x15_4005",933.07,941.5,883.51,934.28
"273x15_4095",1006.33,967.88,964.38,966.5
"205x20_4100",895.54,883.38,880.39,886.52
"200x20_4000_dual-channel",915.62,905.86,921.71,920.88
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization",
Higher Results Are Better
"267x15_4005",1414.26,1404.57,1408.55,1414.7
"273x15_4095",1493.7,1460.97,1454.43,1462.05
"205x20_4100",1425,1420.89,1421.63,1524.63
"200x20_4000_dual-channel",1258.71,1410.24,1227.49,1413.11
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation",
Higher Results Are Better
"267x15_4005",887.56,887.2,886.11,886.44
"273x15_4095",909.6,906.84,906.83,906.44
"205x20_4100",900.22,900.46,901.45,901.33
"200x20_4000_dual-channel",885.34,886.54,885.63,886.58
"RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Integer Add",
Higher Results Are Better
"267x15_4005",
"273x15_4095",
"205x20_4100",
"200x20_4000_dual-channel",
"RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Integer Copy",
Higher Results Are Better
"267x15_4005",
"273x15_4095",
"205x20_4100",
"200x20_4000_dual-channel",
"CacheBench - Test: Read",
Higher Results Are Better
"267x15_4005",2409.308371,2356.050822,2402.589756
"273x15_4095",2402.444472,2283.935845,2283.59346
"205x20_4100",2345.460493,2390.27406,2318.385794
"200x20_4000_dual-channel",2289.170601,2357.813487,2244.628341
"CacheBench - Test: Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"267x15_4005",12340.270297,12349.766298,12301.329661
"273x15_4095",12649.254726,12585.272315,12622.115799
"205x20_4100",12664.055368,12665.503146,12665.653521
"200x20_4000_dual-channel",12440.190496,12304.784016,12443.677718
"CacheBench - Test: Read / Modify / Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"267x15_4005",22967.848554,23016.141822,23003.047639
"273x15_4095",23528.97418,23499.689858,23534.650838
"205x20_4100",23558.248587,23565.302724,23565.405652
"200x20_4000_dual-channel",23139.958304,23134.076479,23040.501846
"7-Zip Compression 9.20.1 - Compress Speed Test",
Higher Results Are Better
"267x15_4005",18153,18278,18339
"273x15_4095",18878,18793,18745
"205x20_4100",18929,18757,18703
"200x20_4000_dual-channel",18231,18361,18157
"GraphicsMagick 1.3.19 - Operation: Blur",
Higher Results Are Better
"267x15_4005",108,107,107
"273x15_4095",111,111,110
"205x20_4100",114,114,114
"200x20_4000_dual-channel",110,112,111
"GraphicsMagick 1.3.19 - Operation: Sharpen",
Higher Results Are Better
"267x15_4005",102,103,103
"273x15_4095",105,105,104
"205x20_4100",106,105,106
"200x20_4000_dual-channel",104,104,103
"GraphicsMagick 1.3.19 - Operation: Resizing",
Higher Results Are Better
"267x15_4005",162,160,162
"273x15_4095",166,166,164
"205x20_4100",168,168,168
"200x20_4000_dual-channel",165,165,165
"GraphicsMagick 1.3.19 - Operation: HWB Color Space",
Higher Results Are Better
"267x15_4005",174,174,172
"273x15_4095",178,177,178
"205x20_4100",183,185,184
"200x20_4000_dual-channel",181,181,179
"GraphicsMagick 1.3.19 - Operation: Local Adaptive Thresholding",
Higher Results Are Better
"267x15_4005",79,79,79
"273x15_4095",81,81,81
"205x20_4100",81,81,81
"200x20_4000_dual-channel",80,79,79
"C-Ray 1.1 - Total Time",
Lower Results Are Better
"267x15_4005",22.027,22.027,22.052
"273x15_4095",21.537,21.553,21.52
"205x20_4100",21.547,21.577,21.546
"200x20_4000_dual-channel",21.97,21.986,21.895