NVIDIA CUDA Linux 2016 compute benchmarks by Michael Larabel for a future article.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1702015-TA-1612261TA53
CUDA 2016 NVIDIA Linux Ubuntu,
"Caffe AlexNet 2016-06-11 - Build: CUDA Googlenet",
Lower Results Are Better
"GeForce GTX 1080",24028.7,24047.1,24042.9
"GeForce GTX 1070",27749.4,27527.8,27697.3
"GeForce GTX 1050",69619.8,69601.6,69628.2
"GeForce GTX 1050 Ti",60188,60278.4,60294.3
"GeForce GTX 950",68789.7,68767.2,68757
"GeForce GTX 960",59828.2,59781.3,59806.9
"GeForce GTX 970",40154.9,40118.2,40103.3
"GeForce GTX 980",35898.2,35860,36108.2
"GeForce GTX 780 Ti",65073.9,65143.3,65100.6
"GeForce GTX 760",164197,163919,163912
"GeForce GTX 680",133591,133594,133687
"GeForce GTX 1060",37478.1,37465.6,37462.6
"GeForce GTX 980 Ti",31294.4,31406.1,31620.7
"ubu_deep",25590.3,25626.7,25888.3
"Caffe AlexNet 2016-06-11 - Build: CUDA AlexNet",
Lower Results Are Better
"GeForce GTX 1080",9753.02,9748.05,9714.87
"GeForce GTX 1070",11454.7,11453.5,11447.5
"GeForce GTX 1050",30850.5,30842.4,30842.2
"GeForce GTX 1050 Ti",27000.4,26964.5,26992.8
"GeForce GTX 950",30526.1,30633,30627.3
"GeForce GTX 960",27351.8,27370.5,27359.9
"GeForce GTX 970",16995.1,17021.7,17000.2
"GeForce GTX 980",14978.9,14972.8,14979.9
"GeForce GTX 780 Ti",28600.7,28588.1,28596.5
"GeForce GTX 760",66435.7,66403.2,66396.6
"GeForce GTX 680",52477.7,52518.2,52725.4
"GeForce GTX 1060",16273.2,16251.7,16273.8
"GeForce GTX 980 Ti",11747.7,11709.7,11708.9
"ubu_deep",9716.99,9745,9742.84
"CUDA Mini-Nbody 2015-11-10 - Test: Original",
Lower Results Are Better
"GeForce GTX 1080",32.906495809555,33.061408042908,33.21465587616
"GeForce GTX 1070",39.661169052124,39.646368026733,39.796720981598
"GeForce GTX 1050",115.41767191887,115.17358398438,115.11424994469
"GeForce GTX 1050 Ti",102.12726402283,101.69246506691,101.73828196526
"GeForce GTX 950",104.95416712761,103.71644902229,103.78299999237
"GeForce GTX 960",83.322635173798,82.384634017944,82.384418010712
"GeForce GTX 970",52.725322961807,52.255894184113,52.542703151703
"GeForce GTX 980",46.141288042068,46.828413009644,46.816484928131
"GeForce GTX 780 Ti",61.231899023056,61.342071056366,61.754032850266
"GeForce GTX 1060",58.243453025818,58.60987496376,58.401625871658
"GeForce GTX 980 Ti",35.275302171707,36.935009002686,35.975697994232
"GeForce GTX 750",182.37094092369,181.94366192818,181.91916584969
"ASKAP tConvolveCuda 2015-11-10 - Processing: Degridding",
Higher Results Are Better
"GeForce GTX 1080",14792,14013.5,14013.5
"GeForce GTX 1070",13312.8,13312.8,13312.8
"GeForce GTX 1050",5916.8,5788.17,5916.8
"GeForce GTX 1050 Ti",6051.27,5916.8,5916.8
"GeForce GTX 950",5665.02,5547,5665.02
"GeForce GTX 960",5325.12,5325.12,5325.12
"GeForce GTX 970",9509.14,9181.24,9509.14
"GeForce GTX 980",11094,10650.2,10650.2
"GeForce GTX 1060",9861.33,9861.33,9861.33
"GeForce GTX 980 Ti",17750.4,16641,16641
"ASKAP tConvolveCuda 2015-11-10 - Processing: Gridding",
Higher Results Are Better
"GeForce GTX 1080",8320.5,8320.5,8068.36
"GeForce GTX 1070",7607.31,7607.31,7607.31
"GeForce GTX 1050",3698,3698,3698
"GeForce GTX 1050 Ti",3698,3698,3750.08
"GeForce GTX 950",3413.54,3413.54,3370.33
"GeForce GTX 960",3132.42,3132.42,3132.42
"GeForce GTX 970",5220.71,5220.71,5325.12
"GeForce GTX 980",6051.27,6051.27,5916.8
"GeForce GTX 1060",5547,5665.02,5665.02
"GeForce GTX 980 Ti",8320.5,8320.5,8320.5
"SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 - Target: CUDA - Benchmark: Texture Read Bandwidth",
Higher Results Are Better
"GeForce GTX 1080",524.014,526.356,528.257
"GeForce GTX 1070",504.382,499.512,499.346
"GeForce GTX 1050",431.224,434.484,433.933
"GeForce GTX 1050 Ti",455.214,453.086,451.151
"GeForce GTX 950",363.759,364.303,364.927
"GeForce GTX 960",379.609,379.346,379.345
"GeForce GTX 970",349.992,349.87,349.836
"GeForce GTX 980",334.817,336.309,334.684
"GeForce GTX 1060",502.941,503.263,503.112
"GeForce GTX 980 Ti",348.654,349.283,349.321
"GeForce GTX 750",161.505,160.149,160.078
"SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 - Target: CUDA - Benchmark: Max SP Flops",
Higher Results Are Better
"GeForce GTX 1080",9513.8,9323.46,9318.07
"GeForce GTX 1070",7197.34,7045.56,7046.41
"GeForce GTX 1050",2108.52,2109.41,2109.4
"GeForce GTX 1050 Ti",2699.08,2683.05,2682.55
"GeForce GTX 950",2224,2204.08,2204.24
"GeForce GTX 960",2958.57,2933.45,2933.63
"GeForce GTX 970",4327.23,4316.73,4316.89
"GeForce GTX 980",5021.84,4996.8,4989.69
"GeForce GTX 1060",4809.29,4743.88,4744.78
"GeForce GTX 980 Ti",6187.26,6127.35,6122.8
"GeForce GTX 750",1160.9,1161.15,1160.91
"SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 - Target: CUDA - Benchmark: MD5 Hash",
Higher Results Are Better
"GeForce GTX 1080",11.8984,11.8803,11.9134
"GeForce GTX 1070",8.3969,8.399,8.3897
"GeForce GTX 1050",2.4849,2.4862,2.4849
"GeForce GTX 1050 Ti",3.029,3.0309,3.0294
"GeForce GTX 950",2.6859,2.6849,2.6856
"GeForce GTX 960",3.8353,3.8332,3.8332
"GeForce GTX 970",5.4382,5.4407,5.4399
"GeForce GTX 980",6.4743,6.4721,6.4676
"GeForce GTX 1060",5.6418,5.6449,5.6383
"GeForce GTX 980 Ti",7.7237,7.73,7.7262
"GeForce GTX 750",1.2835,1.2834,1.2834
"SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 - Target: CUDA - Benchmark: FFT SP",
Higher Results Are Better
"GeForce GTX 1080",462.607,464.904,460.297
"GeForce GTX 1070",382.208,373.023,376.572
"GeForce GTX 1050",172.498,169.973,171.351
"GeForce GTX 1050 Ti",198.781,198.407,201.946
"GeForce GTX 950",179.109,179.011,177.551
"GeForce GTX 960",193.17,196.93,192.2
"GeForce GTX 970",269.093,265.926,265.173
"GeForce GTX 980",291.747,291.501,293.839
"GeForce GTX 1060",306.005,303.298,304.551
"GeForce GTX 980 Ti",308.614,309.019,307.841
"GeForce GTX 750",115.745,116.398,116.247