SSD NVMe Disk Tests Linux 4.9 Comparison

Samsung 850 EVO 6700K

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1701078-TA-1612143TA37
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

CPU Massive 3 Tests
Database Test Suite 2 Tests
Disk Test Suite 4 Tests
Server 3 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Disable Color Branding
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Additional Graphs

Show Perf Per Clock Calculation Graphs Where Applicable

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB
December 13 2016
 
PNY CS1211 120GB
December 13 2016
 
Samsung 850 EVO 120GB
December 13 2016
 
Toshiba TR150 120GB
December 13 2016
 
VisionTek 240GB
December 13 2016
 
Samsung 950 PRO 256GB
December 13 2016
 
Samsung 850 EVO
January 06 2017
 
Invert Hiding All Results Option
 

Only show results where is faster than
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

SSD NVMe Disk Tests Linux 4.9 Comparison, "FS-Mark 3.3 - Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size", Higher Results Are Better "INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB",205.2,213.9,213.3 "PNY CS1211 120GB",93.2,93.4,93.9 "Samsung 850 EVO 120GB",143.3,144.4,113.8,68.9,68.5,68.8 "Toshiba TR150 120GB",114.8,55,45.1,48.2,45.1,45.2 "VisionTek 240GB",97.7,96.3,45.4,42.9,44.6,44.8 "Samsung 950 PRO 256GB",121.7,119.2,121 "FS-Mark 3.3 - Test: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threads", Higher Results Are Better "INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB",101.6,80,81.6,83.6,83.6,83.2 "PNY CS1211 120GB",193.9,194,194 "Samsung 850 EVO 120GB",114.4,110.4,108.4 "Toshiba TR150 120GB",52,50.8,50.8 "VisionTek 240GB",51.6,50,50 "Samsung 950 PRO 256GB",303.9,300.8,302.4 "FS-Mark 3.3 - Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size", Higher Results Are Better "INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB",91.1,68.6,77.4,78,78.6,83.8 "PNY CS1211 120GB",93,92.9,93.1 "Samsung 850 EVO 120GB",73.2,62,60.9,57,54.8,74.7 "Toshiba TR150 120GB",44.4,41.7,41.1,41.1,41.7 "VisionTek 240GB",43,41.5,41.5 "Samsung 950 PRO 256GB",120.9,119.3,119.9 "BlogBench 1.0 - Test: Write", Higher Results Are Better "INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB",6692,6938,6952 "PNY CS1211 120GB",8488,8749,8598 "Samsung 850 EVO 120GB",6482,5552,6202 "Toshiba TR150 120GB",5698,5695,5763 "VisionTek 240GB",5074,5129,5202 "Samsung 950 PRO 256GB",14528,18526,19628,19063,19409,19782 "Samsung 850 EVO",11380,11330,11390 "Flexible IO Tester 2.1.13 - Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Libaio - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory - Result: MB/s", Higher Results Are Better "INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB",287.281,287.429,287.53 "PNY CS1211 120GB",270.82,271.249,270.999 "Samsung 850 EVO 120GB",392.571,391.83,392.005 "Toshiba TR150 120GB",207.036,216.084,216.131 "VisionTek 240GB",300.977,295.292,290.327 "Samsung 950 PRO 256GB",788.897,788.405,787.819 "Samsung 850 EVO",391.96,392.761,391.992 "Flexible IO Tester 2.1.13 - Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Libaio - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory - Result: MB/s", Higher Results Are Better "INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB",550.336,516.631,382.41,549.228,503.234,381.918 "PNY CS1211 120GB",298.616,298.25,298.333 "Samsung 850 EVO 120GB",353.698,353.785,353.847 "Toshiba TR150 120GB",287.132,288.11,288.456 "VisionTek 240GB",338.582,338.405,338.61 "Samsung 950 PRO 256GB",323.915,323.424,321.388 "Samsung 850 EVO",355.009,354.876,354.83 "Flexible IO Tester 2.1.13 - Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Libaio - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory - Result: MB/s", Higher Results Are Better "INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB",265.653,265.763,265.751 "PNY CS1211 120GB",49.346,49.31,49.245 "Samsung 850 EVO 120GB",456.899,456.656,458.336 "Toshiba TR150 120GB",187.129,184.932,191.772 "VisionTek 240GB",274.95,273.632,262.465 "Samsung 950 PRO 256GB",1115.3,1115.6,1115.3 "Samsung 850 EVO",457.978,458.453,458.573 "Flexible IO Tester 2.1.13 - Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Libaio - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory - Result: MB/s", Higher Results Are Better "INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB",565.994,509.804,399.606,561.073,494.965,384.488 "PNY CS1211 120GB",117.328,117.915,117.884 "Samsung 850 EVO 120GB",423.768,423.554,423.287 "Toshiba TR150 120GB",430.205,429.91,430.306 "VisionTek 240GB",408.039,404.25,407.015 "Samsung 950 PRO 256GB",921.228,920.376,919.199 "Samsung 850 EVO",426.89,426.235,426.573 "Compile Bench 0.6 - Test: Initial Create", Higher Results Are Better "INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB",543.3,549.01,547.69 "PNY CS1211 120GB",514.98,531.98,529.11 "Samsung 850 EVO 120GB",423.44,482.02,528.54,509.41,485.46,537.07 "Toshiba TR150 120GB",380.29,436.78,464.01,366.22,440.57,492.98 "VisionTek 240GB",407.08,448.49,446.73,461.99,439.75,464.05 "Samsung 950 PRO 256GB",511.86,522.61,516.4 "Samsung 850 EVO",401.43,402.52,391.18 "PostgreSQL pgbench 9.4.3 - Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung 950 PRO 256GB",2849.901632,2864.946852,2697.689912 "INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB",1213.010507,1279.487229,1276.724146 "Samsung 850 EVO",1606.003164,1532.747725,1569.196344 "PostgreSQL pgbench 9.4.3 - Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Write", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung 950 PRO 256GB",252.339271,251.30584,250.423216 "INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB",272.511636,259.200886,251.624451,262.386373 "Samsung 850 EVO",166.539809,168.282099,169.029857 "PostgreSQL pgbench 9.4.3 - Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Write", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung 950 PRO 256GB",5268.963623,5148.316468,5265.736556 "INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB",1209.44238,1214.176654,1215.151165 "Samsung 850 EVO",3040.411657,2888.112097,3149.717399,3151.173828,2747.693851,3152.318054 "SQLite 3.8.10.2 - Test Target: Default Test Directory", Lower Results Are Better "INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB",17.999998092651,17.969813108444,18.142232894897 "PNY CS1211 120GB",56.597896814346,56.346992969513,56.182569026947 "Samsung 850 EVO 120GB",28.451795816422,28.4682700634,29.275139093399 "Toshiba TR150 120GB",35.609029054642,38.519741773605,36.849836111069,36.533185958862 "VisionTek 240GB",46.366847991943,33.974690914154,30.969451904297,31.222127914429,21.897865056992,21.847705125809 "Samsung 950 PRO 256GB",65.511888980865,65.245289087296,65.310128211975 "Samsung 850 EVO",32.459800004959,32.882725000381,32.743264913559