Running pts/aio-stress-1.1.1, pts/fs-mark-1.0.1, pts/network-loopback-1.0.1, pts/scimark2-1.2.0 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1612140-KH-HUKMAN29171
hukman,
"FS-Mark 3.3 - Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size",
Higher Results Are Better
"HUKMAN",218.4,216.6,220.7
"HUKMAN",181.7,195.5,197.3,200.8,202.7,201.9
"hukman-wed",183.8,197.3,195.6,189.4
"FS-Mark 3.3 - Test: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threads",
Higher Results Are Better
"HUKMAN",217.2,211,217.5
"HUKMAN",157.1,160.6,166.9
"hukman-wed",153.2,151.6,154.8
"FS-Mark 3.3 - Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size",
Higher Results Are Better
"HUKMAN",209.9,214.6,211.1
"HUKMAN",197.8,195.6,191.8
"hukman-wed",190.9,197.7,196.1
"FS-Mark 3.3 - Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSync",
Higher Results Are Better
"HUKMAN",374.3,352.6,377.8,363.5
"HUKMAN",347.4,366,352.6
"hukman-wed",323.7,366.3,368.9,371,354.7,373.9
"AIO-Stress 0.21 - Test: Random Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"HUKMAN",377.63,370.36,372.35
"HUKMAN",317.89,358.8,326.8,339.65,333.95,345.07
"hukman-wed",336.8,359.69,336.05,352.25
"Stream 2013-01-17 - Type: Copy",
Higher Results Are Better
"HUKMAN",66.9,67.2,68.7,70,68.6
"Stream 2013-01-17 - Type: Scale",
Higher Results Are Better
"HUKMAN",64.5,64.7,66.4,68.7,67.2
"Stream 2013-01-17 - Type: Triad",
Higher Results Are Better
"HUKMAN",61.8,61.8,64.3,66.6,64.6
"Stream 2013-01-17 - Type: Add",
Higher Results Are Better
"HUKMAN",59.9,60.2,62.1,65.2,62.6
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Composite",
Higher Results Are Better
"HUKMAN",1085.35,1019.1,1053.18,1007.49
"HUKMAN",1123.57,1130.54,1106.39,1124.05
"hukman-wed",1082.25,1079.68,1109.01,1097.64
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Monte Carlo",
Higher Results Are Better
"HUKMAN",436.39,442.66,436.25,402.47
"HUKMAN",454.07,434.58,438.21,416.06
"hukman-wed",433.29,446.97,445.92,446.26
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform",
Higher Results Are Better
"HUKMAN",282.58,271.04,268.97,265.1
"HUKMAN",294.13,320.51,280.37,310.56
"hukman-wed",299.95,273.4,301.82,272.88
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply",
Higher Results Are Better
"HUKMAN",1684.08,1481.78,1621.1,1602.37
"HUKMAN",1851.07,1914.61,1833.34,1870.3
"hukman-wed",1619.93,1651.05,1733.45,1731.89
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization",
Higher Results Are Better
"HUKMAN",2177.68,2065.3,2114.29,1930.79
"HUKMAN",2176.23,2144.73,2146.19,2180.77
"hukman-wed",2191.4,2167.09,2199.4,2183.58
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation",
Higher Results Are Better
"HUKMAN",846.01,834.72,825.27,836.75
"HUKMAN",842.36,838.28,833.86,842.56
"hukman-wed",866.69,859.9,864.48,853.58
"Loopback TCP Network Performance - Time To Transfer 10GB Via Loopback",
Lower Results Are Better
"HUKMAN",51.426989078522,51.810448884964,51.935281038284
"HUKMAN",50.991146087646,51.551060914993,51.867917060852
"hukman-wed",51.211246013641,51.952949047089,50.549687147141