1609261-FOYF-IOZONEN97

Intel Xeon X3440 testing on CentOS Linux 7 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1609274-FOYF-160927368
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
Gluster - RAID1/1m/6b - Disperse
September 27 2016
 
Gluster - RAID10/10m/6b - Distributed + Replicated
September 27 2016
 
BackupStorage
September 27 2016
 
Nasha - 2.4T
September 27 2016
 
Linux - RAID10¯4m - LV1 - zfs
September 26 2016
 
Nasha - 1.2T
September 27 2016
 
Invert Hiding All Results Option
 

Only show results where is faster than
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


1609261-FOYF-IOZONEN97, "IOzone 3.405 - Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance", Higher Results Are Better "Gluster - RAID1/1m/6b - Disperse",163.341796875,168.8046875,166.6943359375 "Gluster - RAID10/10m/6b - Distributed + Replicated",581.06640625,595.0498046875,607.3662109375 "BackupStorage",112.2275390625,112.228515625,112.1982421875 "Nasha - 2.4T",270.603515625,261.1962890625,316.958984375,380.23046875,367.9892578125,311.5595703125 "Linux - RAID10¯4m - LV1 - zfs",701.98046875,839.6142578125,889.0244140625,614.9873046875,784.2041015625,726.720703125 "Nasha - 1.2T",126.14453125,233.537109375,133.380859375,119.3994140625,128.4541015625,135.537109375 "IOzone 3.405 - Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance", Higher Results Are Better "Gluster - RAID1/1m/6b - Disperse",163.8798828125,164.0947265625,163.8759765625 "Gluster - RAID10/10m/6b - Distributed + Replicated",595.2470703125,594.9462890625,598.123046875 "BackupStorage",112.177734375,112.1240234375,112.068359375 "Nasha - 2.4T",321.21484375,332.8115234375,330.6845703125 "Linux - RAID10¯4m - LV1 - zfs",492.0029296875,564.9560546875,509.0546875,467.158203125,670.5263671875,718.080078125 "Nasha - 1.2T",133.7578125,133.1845703125,200.1708984375,186.01953125,143.6474609375,156.3310546875 "IOzone 3.405 - Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance", Higher Results Are Better "Gluster - RAID1/1m/6b - Disperse",99.6435546875,108.3681640625,102.1064453125,99.8125,102.708984375 "Gluster - RAID10/10m/6b - Distributed + Replicated",165.9140625,157.7841796875,145.1220703125,170.1171875,142.9677734375,172.5654296875 "BackupStorage",110.142578125,110.2998046875,110.3095703125 "Nasha - 2.4T",336.57421875,352.9619140625,352.6142578125 "Linux - RAID10¯4m - LV1 - zfs",192.8046875,196.291015625,178.9794921875,186.779296875,187.2548828125,203.4599609375 "Nasha - 1.2T",203.091796875,201.630859375,198.62109375 "IOzone 3.405 - Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance", Higher Results Are Better "Gluster - RAID1/1m/6b - Disperse",100.5517578125,105.541015625,103.23046875 "Gluster - RAID10/10m/6b - Distributed + Replicated",161.5751953125,174.5234375,171.0087890625,160.5615234375,156.216796875,156.3388671875 "BackupStorage",110.111328125,110.2109375,110.359375 "Nasha - 2.4T",336.3916015625,356.25390625,329.6572265625,359.404296875,365.1396484375,371.171875 "Linux - RAID10¯4m - LV1 - zfs",220.1513671875,185.0888671875,181.2666015625,184.0625,184.064453125,206.46484375 "Nasha - 1.2T",201.8662109375,200.34375,206.623046875 "IOzone 3.405 - Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance", Higher Results Are Better "Gluster - RAID1/1m/6b - Disperse",164.5166015625,166.1416015625,168.2255859375 "Gluster - RAID10/10m/6b - Distributed + Replicated",583.4619140625,602.7109375,591.9873046875 "BackupStorage",112.1875,112.2109375,112.185546875 "Nasha - 2.4T",330.11328125,348.330078125,365.7578125,355.2724609375,349.173828125,365.0166015625 "Linux - RAID10¯4m - LV1 - zfs",759.501953125,829.80859375,564.4375,585.587890625,535.2509765625,524.6416015625 "Nasha - 1.2T",151.017578125,134.1533203125,175.42578125,165.6669921875,195.1220703125,152.09375 "IOzone 3.405 - Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance", Higher Results Are Better "Gluster - RAID1/1m/6b - Disperse",99.0634765625,104.369140625,104.2421875 "Gluster - RAID10/10m/6b - Distributed + Replicated",178.56640625,174.6025390625,160.1640625,158.9267578125,166.6376953125,164.2998046875 "BackupStorage",110.2841796875,110.3837890625,110.3759765625 "Nasha - 2.4T",339.75,333.7431640625,333.2021484375 "Linux - RAID10¯4m - LV1 - zfs",193.6123046875,199.6767578125,183.0087890625,186.3876953125,184.7294921875,189.6806640625 "Nasha - 1.2T",204.24609375,194.658203125,205.5009765625