Intel Xeon E5-2648L v4 testing with a Intel S2600CWR and NVIDIA GeForce 7300 GS 252MB on Ubuntu 15.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1609075-LO-1609072LO81
dtech,
"x264 2015-11-02 - H.264 Video Encoding",
Higher Results Are Better
"drafthorse",174.66,177.72,175.47,171.42,175.46
"drafthorse+3",268.95,263.71,271.28,272.87,268.61
"drafthorse16",270.87,274.94,272.97,277.56,272.02
"Intel Xeon E5-2648L v4",266.81,274.93,273.63,272.01,270.76
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Composite",
Higher Results Are Better
"vsan",1232.63,1241.25,1225.72,1240.2
"app3",536.99,539.5,539.32,531.06
"drafthorse",686.47,686.72,685.13,680.94
"drafthorse+",1006.87,1006.04,995.28,1008.36
"Intel Xeon E5-2648L v4",1002.15,996.24,1001.29,1001.15
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Monte Carlo",
Higher Results Are Better
"vsan",609.03,608.91,564.68,609.14
"app3",229.13,229.13,229.04,229.1
"drafthorse",305.01,305.01,305,305.02
"drafthorse+",448.36,448.34,448.36,448.32
"Intel Xeon E5-2648L v4",441.38,444.97,444.32,436.67
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform",
Higher Results Are Better
"vsan",242.57,241.25,240.31,242.48
"app3",143.45,155.45,155.79,153.91
"drafthorse",200.66,199.34,200.1,199.16
"drafthorse+",275.12,276.18,274.95,275.13
"Intel Xeon E5-2648L v4",274.02,276.17,292.97,270.93
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply",
Higher Results Are Better
"vsan",1854.92,1852.45,1849.17,1848.74
"app3",907.79,906.11,904.59,864.2
"drafthorse",1054.02,1041.2,1053.61,1040.09
"drafthorse+",1551.99,1539.38,1553.93,1533.48
"Intel Xeon E5-2648L v4",1524.26,1526.08,1520.59,1536.37
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization",
Higher Results Are Better
"vsan",2329.4,2376.94,2347.33,2374.76
"app3",923.72,926.6,926.27,927.1
"drafthorse",1301.81,1317.24,1296.16,1289.6
"drafthorse+",1919.84,1927.46,1860.3,1946.1
"Intel Xeon E5-2648L v4",1937.14,1924.12,1929.82,1940.4
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation",
Higher Results Are Better
"vsan",1127.21,1126.72,1127.1,1125.88
"app3",480.86,480.19,480.91,481
"drafthorse",570.83,570.81,570.79,570.81
"drafthorse+",839.05,838.87,838.84,838.77
"Intel Xeon E5-2648L v4",833.94,809.85,818.74,821.38
"NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 - Test / Class: BT.A",
Higher Results Are Better
"vsan",2374.09,2375.49,2376.36
"app3",1112.26,1105.64,1109.54
"drafthorse",1454.63,1454.95,1452.06
"drafthorse+",1769.83,1761.51,1754.1
"Intel Xeon E5-2648L v4",1749.81,1763,1754.76
"NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 - Test / Class: EP.C",
Higher Results Are Better
"vsan",272.12,269.15,270.92
"app3",59.42,49.35,57.96,57.98,58.39,57.26
"drafthorse",293.32,295.09,296.76
"drafthorse+",625.7,632.24,630.44
"Intel Xeon E5-2648L v4",633.02,625.09,624.38
"NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 - Test / Class: FT.A",
Higher Results Are Better
"vsan",3628.33,3612.12,3631.67
"app3",1835.87,1847.83,1858.81
"drafthorse",3466.31,3480.62,3467.94
"drafthorse+",3012.62,3006.82,3010.77
"Intel Xeon E5-2648L v4",3014.71,3009.18,3009.28
"NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 - Test / Class: LU.A",
Higher Results Are Better
"vsan",8406.15,8831.33,8329.46
"app3",3395.09,3357.47,3416.9
"drafthorse",11878.41,11859.07,11941.73
"drafthorse+",17452.66,17479.27,17466.57
"Intel Xeon E5-2648L v4",17527.26,17539.87,17500.34
"NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 - Test / Class: SP.A",
Higher Results Are Better
"vsan",1921.06,1949.74,1935.94
"app3",931.89,930.23,934.45
"drafthorse",1324.98,1325.23,1322.18
"drafthorse+",1609.59,1607.51,1622.93
"Intel Xeon E5-2648L v4",1609.81,1612.22,1615.84
"Tachyon 0.98.9 - Total Time",
Lower Results Are Better
"drafthorse",12.7051,12.6342,12.6539
"drafthorse+2",5.9659,6.0201,5.9929
"drafthorse16",5.9557,5.9903,6.0856
"Intel Xeon E5-2648L v4",5.9713,5.9087,5.9801
"N-Queens 1.0 - Elapsed Time",
Lower Results Are Better
"drafthorse16",18.822,18.815,18.809
"Intel Xeon E5-2648L v4",18.826,18.817,18.828