Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 testing with a MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1.0 and eVGA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 2043MB on Ubuntu 16.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1606119-PTS-CUDATEST14
cuda-testing,
"SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 - Target: CUDA - Benchmark: Max SP Flops",
Higher Results Are Better
"GeForce GTX 1080",9572.74,9329.48,9290.02
"GeForce GTX 980",5021.77,4990.79,4986.99
"GeForce GTX 960",2960.28,2936.86,2937.68
"SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 - Target: CUDA - Benchmark: MD5 Hash",
Higher Results Are Better
"GeForce GTX 1080",11.9897,11.9971,11.9681
"GeForce GTX 980",6.5203,6.5386,6.5341
"GeForce GTX 960",3.8803,3.8815,3.8795
"CUDA Mini-Nbody 2015-11-10 - Test: SOA Data Layout",
Lower Results Are Better
"GeForce GTX 1080",28.509932994843,28.566956043243,28.666648864746
"GeForce GTX 980",50.839596033096,51.283789157867,50.940237998962
"GeForce GTX 960",81.303153991699,81.08985209465,81.42197394371
"CUDA Mini-Nbody 2015-11-10 - Test: Flush Denormals To Zero",
Lower Results Are Better
"GeForce GTX 1080",28.456586122513,28.630582809448,28.648227930069
"GeForce GTX 980",50.084820985794,50.83738899231,50.38506603241
"GeForce GTX 960",81.325188875198,81.119276046753,81.123033046722
"CUDA Mini-Nbody 2015-11-10 - Test: Original",
Lower Results Are Better
"GeForce GTX 1080",30.675858020782,30.425515890121,30.424746990204
"GeForce GTX 980",46.200767993927,46.635661125183,46.688926935196
"GeForce GTX 960",82.806338071823,82.19430398941,81.875292062759
"CUDA Mini-Nbody 2015-11-10 - Test: Cache Blocking",
Lower Results Are Better
"GeForce GTX 1080",13.995523929596,14.013799905777,14.0365691185
"GeForce GTX 980",24.585560083389,25.041120052338,25.095456123352
"GeForce GTX 960",36.273160934448,36.308077096939,36.307587862015
"CUDA Mini-Nbody 2015-11-10 - Test: Loop Unrolling",
Lower Results Are Better
"GeForce GTX 1080",14.571068048477,14.506175994873,14.497438907623
"GeForce GTX 980",24.225751876831,24.745451211929,24.904649019241
"GeForce GTX 960",35.661318063736,35.725579977036,35.75727891922
"SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 - Target: CUDA - Benchmark: FFT SP",
Higher Results Are Better
"GeForce GTX 1080",457.547,466.781,459.508
"GeForce GTX 980",291.573,293.328,293.43
"GeForce GTX 960",187.365,191.203,188.84
"Caffe AlexNet 2016-06-11 - Build: CUDA",
Lower Results Are Better
"Xeon E3-1280 v5 - CPU Only",1794620,1786110,1780890
"GeForce GTX 1080",8962.15,8953,8964.15
"GeForce GTX 980",15469.2,15517.6,15526.8
"GeForce GTX 960",28138.1,28128.9,28135.2
"SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 - Target: CUDA - Benchmark: Texture Read Bandwidth",
Higher Results Are Better
"GeForce GTX 1080",529.821,529.441,525.975
"GeForce GTX 980",332.914,332.268,331.289
"GeForce GTX 960",380.862,380.954,381.347
"SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 - Target: CUDA - Benchmark: Triad",
Higher Results Are Better
"GeForce GTX 1080",14.909,14.9029,14.7712
"GeForce GTX 980",14.7609,14.729,14.734
"GeForce GTX 960",14.3848,14.3331,14.3602
"SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 - Target: CUDA - Benchmark: Bus Speed Readback",
Higher Results Are Better
"GeForce GTX 1080",13.2222,13.2196,13.2217
"GeForce GTX 980",13.2188,13.216,13.2182
"GeForce GTX 960",13.2124,13.2122,13.2123
"SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 - Target: CUDA - Benchmark: Bus Speed Download",
Higher Results Are Better
"GeForce GTX 1080",12.5294,12.5278,12.5281
"GeForce GTX 980",12.5314,12.53,12.5319
"GeForce GTX 960",12.53,12.5305,12.5292