Fresh Mesa 11.3-dev Tests vs. NVIDIA Linux

Benchmarks by Michael Larabel for a future article on Phoronix.com.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1604287-HA-FRESHMESA06
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Disable Color Branding
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
GeForce GTX 680
April 27 2016
 
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
April 27 2016
 
GeForce GTX 960
April 27 2016
 
GeForce GTX 970
April 27 2016
 
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
April 27 2016
 
Radeon R7 370
April 27 2016
 
Radeon R9 285
April 28 2016
 
Radeon R9 290
April 27 2016
 
Radeon R9 Fury
April 27 2016
 
Invert Hiding All Results Option
 

Only show results where is faster than
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

Fresh Mesa 11.3-dev Tests vs. NVIDIA Linux - Phoronix Test Suite

Fresh Mesa 11.3-dev Tests vs. NVIDIA Linux

Benchmarks by Michael Larabel for a future article on Phoronix.com.

HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/1604287-HA-FRESHMESA06&export=txt&sor&grt.

Fresh Mesa 11.3-dev Tests vs. NVIDIA LinuxProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsAudioNetworkMonitorOSKernelDesktopDisplay ServerDisplay DriverOpenGLOpenCLVulkanCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionGeForce GTX 680GeForce GTX 780 TiGeForce GTX 960GeForce GTX 970GeForce GTX 980 TiRadeon R7 370Radeon R9 285Radeon R9 290Radeon R9 FuryIntel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores)MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1.0Intel Sky Lake16384MB120GB Samsung SSD 850NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 2048MB (1006/3004MHz)Realtek ALC1150Intel ConnectionUbuntu 16.044.4.0-21-generic (x86_64)Unity 7.4.0X Server 1.18.3NVIDIA 364.194.5.0OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 8.0.0 + OpenCL 1.1 MESA 11.3.0-devel (padoka PPA)1.0.8GCC 5.3.1 20160413ext43840x2160NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti 3072MB (875/3500MHz)eVGA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 2048MB (1202/3304MHz)eVGA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4096MB (1163/3505MHz)NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6144MB (999/3505MHz)MSI AMD Radeon R7 370 / R9 270/370 OEM 4096MBDELL P2415Q4.2 Mesa 11.3.0-devel (padoka PPA) Gallium 0.4OpenCL 1.1 MESA 11.3.0-devel (padoka PPA)XFX AMD Radeon R9 285/380 2048MBXFX AMD Radeon R9 290 4096MBSapphire AMD Radeon R9 FURY / NANO 4096MBOpenBenchmarking.orgProcessor Details- Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performanceGraphics Details- Radeon R7 370, Radeon R9 285, Radeon R9 290, Radeon R9 Fury: GLAMOR

Fresh Mesa 11.3-dev Tests vs. NVIDIA Linuxbioshock-infinite: 3840 x 2160 - Ultragputest: Furmark - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreentesseract: 3840 x 2160unigine-valley: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreenxonotic: 3840 x 2160 - Highxonotic: 3840 x 2160 - Ultraxonotic: 3840 x 2160 - UltimateGeForce GTX 680GeForce GTX 780 TiGeForce GTX 960GeForce GTX 970GeForce GTX 980 TiRadeon R7 370Radeon R9 285Radeon R9 290Radeon R9 Fury1281113.1664.82213.60156.25110.792022176.7092.28312.74239.49170.011067104.0854.12155.23102.5870.401758170.3989.38268.98186.47128.652624220.63107.99325.74237.20164.8439.14105770.2134.98145.37111.4780.6441.10139961.7246.35171.26134.52101.0842.481716107.5364.19211.81172.75131.9355.823087155.0478.63236.89195.46149.88OpenBenchmarking.org

BioShock Infinite

Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultra

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterBioShock InfiniteResolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltraRadeon R9 FuryRadeon R9 290Radeon R9 285Radeon R7 3701326395265SE +/- 0.39, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 355.8242.4841.1039.14MIN: 9.71 / MAX: 81.68MIN: 7.27 / MAX: 81.93MIN: 8.73 / MAX: 82.07MIN: 9.36 / MAX: 81.83

GpuTest

Test: Furmark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Furmark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenRadeon R9 FuryGeForce GTX 980 TiGeForce GTX 780 TiGeForce GTX 970Radeon R9 290Radeon R9 285GeForce GTX 680GeForce GTX 960Radeon R7 3707001400210028003500SE +/- 3.38, N = 3SE +/- 0.58, N = 3SE +/- 3.67, N = 3SE +/- 0.58, N = 3SE +/- 1.33, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 1.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3308726242022175817161399128110671057

Tesseract

Resolution: 3840 x 2160

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 3840 x 2160GeForce GTX 980 TiGeForce GTX 780 TiGeForce GTX 970Radeon R9 FuryGeForce GTX 680Radeon R9 290GeForce GTX 960Radeon R7 370Radeon R9 28550100150200250SE +/- 3.32, N = 3SE +/- 0.97, N = 3SE +/- 0.58, N = 3SE +/- 2.13, N = 3SE +/- 0.24, N = 3SE +/- 1.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.33, N = 3SE +/- 0.36, N = 3SE +/- 0.63, N = 3220.63176.70170.39155.04113.16107.53104.0870.2161.72

Unigine Valley

Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenGeForce GTX 980 TiGeForce GTX 780 TiGeForce GTX 970Radeon R9 FuryGeForce GTX 680Radeon R9 290GeForce GTX 960Radeon R9 285Radeon R7 37020406080100SE +/- 0.18, N = 3SE +/- 0.20, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.42, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3107.9992.2889.3878.6364.8264.1954.1246.3534.98

Xonotic

Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: High

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: HighGeForce GTX 980 TiGeForce GTX 780 TiGeForce GTX 970Radeon R9 FuryGeForce GTX 680Radeon R9 290Radeon R9 285GeForce GTX 960Radeon R7 37070140210280350SE +/- 0.62, N = 3SE +/- 0.67, N = 3SE +/- 0.70, N = 3SE +/- 0.52, N = 3SE +/- 0.21, N = 3SE +/- 0.57, N = 3SE +/- 2.88, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.93, N = 3325.74312.74268.98236.89213.60211.81171.26155.23145.37MIN: 212 / MAX: 465MIN: 189 / MAX: 430MIN: 169 / MAX: 332MIN: 127 / MAX: 505MIN: 128 / MAX: 264MIN: 111 / MAX: 334MIN: 85 / MAX: 240MIN: 97 / MAX: 183MIN: 66 / MAX: 205

Xonotic

Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultra

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltraGeForce GTX 780 TiGeForce GTX 980 TiRadeon R9 FuryGeForce GTX 970Radeon R9 290GeForce GTX 680Radeon R9 285Radeon R7 370GeForce GTX 96050100150200250SE +/- 0.33, N = 3SE +/- 0.74, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 0.23, N = 3SE +/- 1.22, N = 3SE +/- 0.25, N = 3SE +/- 1.15, N = 3SE +/- 0.56, N = 3SE +/- 0.10, N = 3239.49237.20195.46186.47172.75156.25134.52111.47102.58MIN: 121 / MAX: 347MIN: 129 / MAX: 344MIN: 86 / MAX: 438MIN: 97 / MAX: 257MIN: 78 / MAX: 291MIN: 81 / MAX: 215MIN: 48 / MAX: 210MIN: 45 / MAX: 177MIN: 54 / MAX: 139

Xonotic

Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultimate

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltimateGeForce GTX 780 TiGeForce GTX 980 TiRadeon R9 FuryRadeon R9 290GeForce GTX 970GeForce GTX 680Radeon R9 285Radeon R7 370GeForce GTX 9604080120160200SE +/- 0.15, N = 3SE +/- 0.28, N = 3SE +/- 0.39, N = 3SE +/- 0.25, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.28, N = 3SE +/- 0.44, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3170.01164.84149.88131.93128.65110.79101.0880.6470.40MIN: 61 / MAX: 287MIN: 46 / MAX: 275MIN: 34 / MAX: 385MIN: 47 / MAX: 246MIN: 62 / MAX: 206MIN: 53 / MAX: 180MIN: 39 / MAX: 180MIN: 35 / MAX: 147MIN: 35 / MAX: 112

Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.4