Comparativa RAID 1 vs 10

Running pts/aio-stress-1.1.1, pts/sqlite-1.9.0, pts/fs-mark-1.0.1, pts/dbench-1.0.0, pts/iozone-1.8.0, pts/tiobench-1.2.0, pts/unpack-linux-1.0.0, pts/postmark-1.1.0, pts/compress-gzip-1.1.0, pts/apache-1.6.1 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1512034-BE-1512026BE93
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

Disk Test Suite 5 Tests
Common Kernel Benchmarks 2 Tests
Server 2 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
RAID 1
December 01 2015
 
RAID 10
December 01 2015
 
RAID 1 2 best disks
December 02 2015
 
RAID 1 2 worst disks
December 02 2015
 
Invert Hiding All Results Option
 

Only show results where is faster than
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

Comparativa RAID 1 vs 10, "Apache Benchmark 2.4.7 - Static Web Page Serving", Higher Results Are Better "RAID 1",29216.57,28433.42,29769.81 "RAID 10",16551.27,16802.16,16757.35 "RAID 1 2 best disks",16683.2,17119.8,17333.39 "RAID 1 2 worst disks",16057.82,16388.62,16192.16 "Gzip Compression - 2GB File Compression", Lower Results Are Better "RAID 1",12.173202991486,12.571327209473,12.385226964951 "RAID 10",12.065156936646,12.194154024124,12.615257978439 "RAID 1 2 best disks",12.108637094498,12.313814163208,12.121881008148 "RAID 1 2 worst disks",12.075092077255,11.989766120911,12.124399900436 "PostMark 1.51 - Disk Transaction Performance", Higher Results Are Better "RAID 1",4098,4166,4310 "RAID 10",3787,3731,3731 "RAID 1 2 best disks",4098,3731,3731,3906,3623,4098 "RAID 1 2 worst disks",3571,3846,3731,3906,3968,3787 "Unpacking The Linux Kernel - linux-2.6.32.tar.bz2", Lower Results Are Better "RAID 1",8.8530991077423,8.8035099506378,9.3016271591187,9.2120161056519 "RAID 10",9.0055911540985,9.1309931278229,8.9668400287628,8.8534269332886 "RAID 1 2 best disks",9.6241099834442,8.7952179908752,9.0832781791687,8.9755218029022,8.8540480136871,8.9770309925079 "RAID 1 2 worst disks",9.0398828983307,9.4148550033569,9.0773029327393,8.6756558418274 "Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3 - 64MB Random Write - 32 Threads", Higher Results Are Better "RAID 1",3.277,3.384,3.221 "RAID 10",1.819,1.786,1.772 "RAID 1 2 best disks",1.12,1.154,1.145 "RAID 1 2 worst disks",0.883,0.885,0.839 "Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3 - 64MB Random Read - 32 Threads", Higher Results Are Better "RAID 1",10260.199,9770.205,9497.759,9895.503 "RAID 10",9597.666,9022.665,9900.206,9352.087,9239.412,9801.615 "RAID 1 2 best disks",10464.63,10168.389,10469.889 "RAID 1 2 worst disks",10433.186,9960.953,9576.343,9024.619,9828.589,10120.638 "IOzone 3.405 - 8GB Write Performance", Higher Results Are Better "RAID 1",122.6689453125,120.134765625,120.9912109375 "RAID 10",115.1181640625,114.1201171875,113.1640625 "RAID 1 2 best disks",74.8076171875,74.830078125,74.85546875 "RAID 1 2 worst disks",70.837890625,71.0517578125,70.3515625 "IOzone 3.405 - 8GB Read Performance", Higher Results Are Better "RAID 1",2756.67578125,4500.826171875,4215.0693359375,4380.4638671875,4232.744140625,4492.404296875 "RAID 10",4232.486328125,4175.1982421875,4171.4677734375 "RAID 1 2 best disks",4177.142578125,4153.45703125,4146.2099609375 "RAID 1 2 worst disks",4218.23046875,4165.2958984375,4158.9072265625 "Dbench 4.0 - 1 Clients", Higher Results Are Better "RAID 1",1001.78,465.203,473.446,474.594,477.679,1041.57 "RAID 10",215.135,216.369,244.278,216.992,217.4,217.185 "RAID 1 2 best disks",246.813,247.622,247.164 "RAID 1 2 worst disks",187.535,192.351,195.295 "Dbench 4.0 - 128 Clients", Higher Results Are Better "RAID 1",2357.25,2306.27,2339.09 "RAID 10",89.2757,90.302,85.8584 "RAID 1 2 best disks",59.9907,61.9384,63.0131 "RAID 1 2 worst disks",29.6186,30.6556,29.595 "Dbench 4.0 - 48 Clients", Higher Results Are Better "RAID 1",5737.62,5719.63,5739.58 "RAID 10",392.452,382.571,396.587 "RAID 1 2 best disks",342.545,324.731,333.392 "RAID 1 2 worst disks",210.072,205.007,197.712 "Dbench 4.0 - 12 Clients", Higher Results Are Better "RAID 1",6662.76,6728.65,6726.75 "RAID 10",678.068,710.513,694.948 "RAID 1 2 best disks",1379.88,1324.4,1347.51 "RAID 1 2 worst disks",415.784,444.92,449.491,441.931 "FS-Mark 3.3 - 1000 Files, 1MB Size", Higher Results Are Better "RAID 1",94.1,82.7,79.9,84.6,87.2,85.1 "RAID 10",64.7,64.2,65.9 "RAID 1 2 best disks",61.2,60.2,60.6 "RAID 1 2 worst disks",56.3,56.7,56.1 "SQLite 3.8.10.2 - Timed SQLite Insertions", Lower Results Are Better "RAID 1",3.1594820022583,4.7450819015503,5.3828320503235,4.6411471366882,4.7039420604706,5.3013980388641 "RAID 10",16.721709012985,21.452909946442,13.941773176193,14.692291021347,17.461246013641,14.432727813721 "RAID 1 2 best disks",11.229552984238,9.7361750602722,9.528373003006,9.5692019462585,9.6727681159973,9.680890083313 "RAID 1 2 worst disks",19.784486055374,19.290069818497,21.410343885422,22.032284021378,21.680478096008,21.462368011475 "AIO-Stress 0.21 - Random Write", Higher Results Are Better "RAID 1",1548.67,1917.54,1929.53,1936.16,1941.54,1924.69 "RAID 10",1859.96,1937.61,1907.61 "RAID 1 2 best disks",1951.8,1916.38,1935.84 "RAID 1 2 worst disks",2949.68,1936.8,1934.99,1940.76,1932.91,1940.88