Running pts/cachebench-1.0.0, pts/scimark2-1.2.0, pts/x264-1.9.0, pts/compress-7zip-1.6.1, pts/c-ray-1.1.0, pts/compress-pbzip2-1.4.1, pts/compress-gzip-1.1.0 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1510298-PAUL-151029295
Processor Tests,
"x264 2014-08-30 - H.264 Video Encoding",
Higher Results Are Better
"FX8320",137.82,140.98,139.94,141.22,138.48
"A10-7800",84.36,84.58,85.03,84.64,84.45
"A10-7800-cpufreq-performance",84.84,84.28,85.17,84.91,84.88
"CacheBench - Test: Read",
Higher Results Are Better
"FX8320",1733.845322,1731.857154,1734.768565
"A10-7800",1552.697707,1553.957861,1552.911902
"A10-7800-cpufreq-performance",1552.979909,1555.360645,1552.940356
"CacheBench - Test: Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"FX8320",7898.835946,7979.772294,8094.63656
"A10-7800",11134.681471,11243.096935,11193.40991
"A10-7800-cpufreq-performance",11286.834441,11163.578592,11174.824321
"CacheBench - Test: Read / Modify / Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"FX8320",15093.787415,14967.426094,15060.207812
"A10-7800",22593.814808,22554.94668,22634.617549
"A10-7800-cpufreq-performance",22630.674501,22650.25352,22624.182352
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Composite",
Higher Results Are Better
"FX8320",784.85,771.88,779.77,781.65
"A10-7800",563.8,564.98,566.4,565.45
"A10-7800-cpufreq-performance",563.96,563.44,564.23,562.26
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Monte Carlo",
Higher Results Are Better
"FX8320",419.3,417.93,420.47
"A10-7800",353.19,354.08,354.03,354.84
"A10-7800-cpufreq-performance",352.75,353.39,354.91,353.47
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform",
Higher Results Are Better
"FX8320",65.91,65.87,65.26,65.19
"A10-7800",89.7,89.59,89.83,90.45
"A10-7800-cpufreq-performance",89.14,89.08,89.24,88.65
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply",
Higher Results Are Better
"FX8320",981.38,981.74,982.66,982.78
"A10-7800",769.39,770.73,773.46,772.31
"A10-7800-cpufreq-performance",769.57,774.63,769.11
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization",
Higher Results Are Better
"FX8320",1710.97,1646.51,1687.2,1693.81
"A10-7800",955.78,959.43,963.43,958.64
"A10-7800-cpufreq-performance",957.15,953.58,951.3,949.02
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation",
Higher Results Are Better
"FX8320",746.01,746.01,745.8,746.02
"A10-7800",650.94,651.05,651.26,651.02
"A10-7800-cpufreq-performance",651.19,651.13,651.04,651.04
"7-Zip Compression 9.20.1 - Compress Speed Test",
Higher Results Are Better
"FX8320",18338,18601,18562
"A10-7800",9304,9299,9389
"A10-7800-cpufreq-performance",9370,9414,9343
"C-Ray 1.1 - Total Time",
Lower Results Are Better
"FX8320",28.428,28.429,28.431
"A10-7800",55.992,55.998,56.022
"A10-7800-cpufreq-performance",56.072,55.989,56.259
"Parallel BZIP2 Compression 1.1.6 - 256MB File Compression",
Lower Results Are Better
"FX8320",7.4963760375977,7.4510111808777,7.5570681095123
"A10-7800",18.42281293869,18.004918813705,18.370718955994
"A10-7800-cpufreq-performance",17.462384939194,18.053421974182,16.936247825623
"Gzip Compression - 2GB File Compression",
Lower Results Are Better
"FX8320",14.741966962814,14.414757966995,14.617825031281
"A10-7800",15.441691875458,15.609308004379,15.558572053909
"A10-7800-cpufreq-performance",15.196721076965,15.284107923508,15.316354990005