Windows 10 vs. Fedora 22 vs. Ubuntu Intel Linux Graphics

Intel Linux Windows testing by Michael Larabel for a future article against Fedora 22 and Ubuntu 15.10.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1510142-HA-WINBUNTU178
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Disable Color Branding
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs
No Box Plots
On Line Graphs With Missing Data, Connect The Line Gaps

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
Windows 10 Pro x64
July 30 2015
 
Fedora 22
July 29 2015
 
Fedora 22 + Linux 4.2 + Mesa 10.7-dev
July 30 2015
 
Ubuntu 15.10 - Linux 4.2 + Mesa 11.0.2
October 14 2015
 
Invert Hiding All Results Option
 

Only show results where is faster than
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

Windows 10 vs. Fedora 22 vs. Ubuntu Intel Linux Graphics - Phoronix Test Suite

Windows 10 vs. Fedora 22 vs. Ubuntu Intel Linux Graphics

Intel Linux Windows testing by Michael Larabel for a future article against Fedora 22 and Ubuntu 15.10.

HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/1510142-HA-WINBUNTU178&grs&rdt.

Windows 10 vs. Fedora 22 vs. Ubuntu Intel Linux GraphicsProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsAudioMonitorNetworkOSKernelDesktopOpenGLFile-SystemScreen ResolutionDisplay ServerDisplay DriverCompilerFedora 22Windows 10 Pro x64Fedora 22 + Linux 4.2 + Mesa 10.7-devUbuntu 15.10 - Linux 4.2 + Mesa 11.0.2Intel Core i7-5775C @ 3.70GHz (8 Cores)MSI Z97-G45 GAMING (MS-7821) v1.0Intel Broadwell-U- DMI16384MB120GB Toshiba MKNSSDEC120GBIntel Broadwell-U (1150MHz)Intel Broadwell-U AudioDELL P2210HQualcomm Atheros Killer E220x GigabitFedora 224.1.2-200.fc22.x86_64 (x86_64)GNOME Shell 3.16.33.3 Mesa 10.6.1 (git-6ff3ae8)ext41920x1080Intel Family 6 Model 71 Stepping 1 Intel (8 Cores)112GBWindows NT10.0 (x86_64)Intel Core i7-5775C @ 3.70GHz (8 Cores)MSI Z97-G45 GAMING (MS-7821) v1.0Intel Broadwell-U- DMI16384MB120GB Toshiba MKNSSDEC120GBIntel Broadwell-U (1150MHz)Intel Broadwell-U AudioDELL P2210HQualcomm Atheros Killer E220x GigabitFedora 224.2.0-0.rc4.git1.2.fc24.x86_64 (x86_64) 20150728GNOME Shell 3.16.33.3 Mesa 10.7.0-develext41920x1080120GB CT120BX100SSD1VE228Ubuntu 15.104.2.0-16-generic (x86_64)UnityX Server 1.17.2intel 2.99.9173.3 Mesa 11.0.2GCC 5.2.1 20151010OpenBenchmarking.orgProcessor Details- Fedora 22, Fedora 22 + Linux 4.2 + Mesa 10.7-dev, Ubuntu 15.10 - Linux 4.2 + Mesa 11.0.2: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersaveSystem Details- Fedora 22, Fedora 22 + Linux 4.2 + Mesa 10.7-dev: SELinux: Enabled.Graphics Details- Ubuntu 15.10 - Linux 4.2 + Mesa 11.0.2: SNA

Windows 10 vs. Fedora 22 vs. Ubuntu Intel Linux Graphicsopenarena: 1920 x 1080gputest: Triangle - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreengputest: Pixmark Volplosion - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreenxonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Ultimatenexuiz: 1920 x 1080 - Yes - Offxonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Ultragputest: Plot3D - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreenxonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Lowxonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Highgputest: Pixmark Piano - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreengputest: Furmark - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreengputest: TessMark - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreengputest: GiMark - 1920 x 1080 - FullscreenFedora 22Windows 10 Pro x64Fedora 22 + Linux 4.2 + Mesa 10.7-devUbuntu 15.10 - Linux 4.2 + Mesa 11.0.281.7784518781105.31110.92148.477908312.80187.3526995952.37115344601126.66130.16169.829061346.04203.452569844598162282.5386249785105.35111.58146.717929312.64183.6127095884.7085223785114.39112.37154.417934307.16189.59270958OpenBenchmarking.org

OpenArena

Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Total Frame Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Total Frame TimeFedora 22Windows 10 Pro x64Fedora 22 + Linux 4.2 + Mesa 10.7-dev1224364860Min: 2 / Avg: 12.16 / Max: 29Min: 2 / Avg: 18.79 / Max: 62Min: 1 / Avg: 12.26 / Max: 30

OpenArena

Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Total Frame Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Total Frame TimeUbuntu 15.10 - Linux 4.2 + Mesa 11.0.2714212835Min: 2 / Avg: 11.71 / Max: 30

OpenArena

Resolution: 1920 x 1080

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080Fedora 22Windows 10 Pro x64Fedora 22 + Linux 4.2 + Mesa 10.7-devUbuntu 15.10 - Linux 4.2 + Mesa 11.0.220406080100SE +/- 0.44, N = 3SE +/- 0.32, N = 3SE +/- 0.64, N = 3SE +/- 0.42, N = 381.7752.3782.5384.70MIN: 1MIN: 2 / MAX: 65MIN: 1MIN: 1

GpuTest

Test: Triangle - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Triangle - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenFedora 22Windows 10 Pro x64Fedora 22 + Linux 4.2 + Mesa 10.7-devUbuntu 15.10 - Linux 4.2 + Mesa 11.0.220K40K60K80K100KSE +/- 156.52, N = 3SE +/- 35.92, N = 3SE +/- 304.68, N = 3SE +/- 467.02, N = 3845181153448624985223

GpuTest

Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenFedora 22Windows 10 Pro x64Fedora 22 + Linux 4.2 + Mesa 10.7-devUbuntu 15.10 - Linux 4.2 + Mesa 11.0.22004006008001000SE +/- 0.33, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3781601785785

Xonotic

Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultimate

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: UltimateFedora 22Windows 10 Pro x64Fedora 22 + Linux 4.2 + Mesa 10.7-devUbuntu 15.10 - Linux 4.2 + Mesa 11.0.2306090120150SE +/- 0.18, N = 3SE +/- 0.56, N = 3SE +/- 0.24, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 3105.31126.66105.35114.39MIN: 41 / MAX: 195MIN: 39 / MAX: 210MIN: 41 / MAX: 198MIN: 44 / MAX: 205

Nexuiz

Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - HDR: Yes - Sound: Off

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterNexuiz 2.5.2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - HDR: Yes - Sound: OffFedora 22Windows 10 Pro x64Fedora 22 + Linux 4.2 + Mesa 10.7-devUbuntu 15.10 - Linux 4.2 + Mesa 11.0.2306090120150SE +/- 1.23, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 0.31, N = 3SE +/- 0.51, N = 3110.92130.16111.58112.37MIN: 52 / MAX: 195MIN: 69 / MAX: 253MIN: 52 / MAX: 209MIN: 52 / MAX: 207

Xonotic

Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultra

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: UltraFedora 22Windows 10 Pro x64Fedora 22 + Linux 4.2 + Mesa 10.7-devUbuntu 15.10 - Linux 4.2 + Mesa 11.0.24080120160200SE +/- 0.28, N = 3SE +/- 0.29, N = 3SE +/- 0.21, N = 3SE +/- 1.12, N = 3148.47169.82146.71154.41MIN: 67 / MAX: 250MIN: 60 / MAX: 249MIN: 66 / MAX: 250MIN: 70 / MAX: 252

GpuTest

Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenFedora 22Windows 10 Pro x64Fedora 22 + Linux 4.2 + Mesa 10.7-devUbuntu 15.10 - Linux 4.2 + Mesa 11.0.22K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 1.76, N = 3SE +/- 2.67, N = 3SE +/- 2.60, N = 3SE +/- 1.45, N = 37908906179297934

Xonotic

Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Low

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: LowFedora 22Windows 10 Pro x64Fedora 22 + Linux 4.2 + Mesa 10.7-devUbuntu 15.10 - Linux 4.2 + Mesa 11.0.280160240320400SE +/- 1.24, N = 3SE +/- 0.53, N = 3SE +/- 0.36, N = 3SE +/- 0.40, N = 3312.80346.04312.64307.16MIN: 168 / MAX: 550MIN: 117 / MAX: 672MIN: 167 / MAX: 561MIN: 170 / MAX: 554

Xonotic

Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: High

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: HighFedora 22Windows 10 Pro x64Fedora 22 + Linux 4.2 + Mesa 10.7-devUbuntu 15.10 - Linux 4.2 + Mesa 11.0.24080120160200SE +/- 0.65, N = 3SE +/- 0.75, N = 3SE +/- 2.93, N = 3SE +/- 0.47, N = 3187.35203.45183.61189.59MIN: 107 / MAX: 281MIN: 91 / MAX: 279MIN: 105 / MAX: 277MIN: 110 / MAX: 277

GpuTest

Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenFedora 22Windows 10 Pro x64Fedora 22 + Linux 4.2 + Mesa 10.7-devUbuntu 15.10 - Linux 4.2 + Mesa 11.0.260120180240300SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3269256270270

GpuTest

Test: Furmark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Furmark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenFedora 22Windows 10 Pro x64Fedora 22 + Linux 4.2 + Mesa 10.7-devUbuntu 15.10 - Linux 4.2 + Mesa 11.0.22004006008001000SE +/- 0.67, N = 3SE +/- 11.86, N = 3SE +/- 3.76, N = 3SE +/- 4.73, N = 3959984958958

GpuTest

Test: TessMark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: TessMark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenWindows 10 Pro x6410002000300040005000SE +/- 0.00, N = 34598

GpuTest

Test: GiMark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: GiMark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenWindows 10 Pro x6430060090012001500SE +/- 0.00, N = 31622

Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.4