FS transaction performance comparison, cheapo Kingston 120GB SSD

All filesystems were tested on the same partition with offset 1MiB and size 4GiB, mounted with noatime and discard, except tmpfs. The two btrfs tests additionally tries out autodefrag vs nodatacow, in an attempt to isolate the impact of copy-on-write. I really had hoped to run the sqlite benchmark too, but PTS said it «failed to produce a result». More overwhelming than these results, is a real sqlite workload I have that takes tens of minutes on a rotating hdd (and slows down the machine) or a split second on tmpfs.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1509207-BE-CHEAPOKIN75

Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

Disk Test Suite ^{2 Tests}
Common Kernel Benchmarks ^{2 Tests}

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Only show results where is faster than

Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

FS transaction performance comparison, cheapo Kingston 120GB SSD All filesystems were tested on the same partition with offset 1MiB and size 4GiB, mounted with noatime and discard, except tmpfs. The two btrfs tests additionally tries out autodefrag vs nodatacow, in an attempt to isolate the impact of copy-on-write. I really had hoped to run the sqlite benchmark too, but PTS said it «failed to produce a result». More overwhelming than these results, is a real sqlite workload I have that takes tens of minutes on a rotating hdd (and slows down the machine) or a split second on tmpfs. ,,"tmpfs","f2fs","xfs","ext4","btrfs autodefrag","btrfs nodatacow" Processor,,AMD A6-3670 APU @ 2.70GHz (4 Cores),AMD A6-3670 APU @ 2.70GHz (4 Cores),AMD A6-3670 APU @ 2.70GHz (4 Cores),AMD A6-3670 APU @ 2.70GHz (4 Cores),AMD A6-3670 APU @ 2.70GHz (4 Cores),AMD A6-3670 APU @ 2.70GHz (4 Cores) Motherboard,,ASUS F1A75-V PRO,ASUS F1A75-V PRO,ASUS F1A75-V PRO,ASUS F1A75-V PRO,ASUS F1A75-V PRO,ASUS F1A75-V PRO Chipset,,AMD Family 12h Root Complex,AMD Family 12h Root Complex,AMD Family 12h Root Complex,AMD Family 12h Root Complex,AMD Family 12h Root Complex,AMD Family 12h Root Complex Memory,,8192MB,8192MB,8192MB,8192MB,8192MB,8192MB Disk,,120GB KINGSTON SV300S3 + 3001GB Western Digital WD30EFRX-68E + 128GB Crucial_CT128MX1 + 80GB Western Digital WD800BB-00FJ + 160GB Western Digital WD1600JB-00G,120GB KINGSTON SV300S3 + 3001GB Western Digital WD30EFRX-68E + 128GB Crucial_CT128MX1 + 80GB Western Digital WD800BB-00FJ + 160GB Western Digital WD1600JB-00G,120GB KINGSTON SV300S3 + 3001GB Western Digital WD30EFRX-68E + 128GB Crucial_CT128MX1 + 80GB Western Digital WD800BB-00FJ + 160GB Western Digital WD1600JB-00G,120GB KINGSTON SV300S3 + 3001GB Western Digital WD30EFRX-68E + 128GB Crucial_CT128MX1 + 80GB Western Digital WD800BB-00FJ + 160GB Western Digital WD1600JB-00G,120GB KINGSTON SV300S3 + 3001GB Western Digital WD30EFRX-68E + 128GB Crucial_CT128MX1 + 80GB Western Digital WD800BB-00FJ + 160GB Western Digital WD1600JB-00G,120GB KINGSTON SV300S3 + 3001GB Western Digital WD30EFRX-68E + 128GB Crucial_CT128MX1 + 80GB Western Digital WD800BB-00FJ + 160GB Western Digital WD1600JB-00G Graphics,,AMD Radeon HD 6530D 512MB,AMD Radeon HD 6530D 512MB,AMD Radeon HD 6530D 512MB,AMD Radeon HD 6530D 512MB,AMD Radeon HD 6530D 512MB,AMD Radeon HD 6530D 512MB Audio,,AMD BeaverCreek HDMI Audio,AMD BeaverCreek HDMI Audio,AMD BeaverCreek HDMI Audio,AMD BeaverCreek HDMI Audio,AMD BeaverCreek HDMI Audio,AMD BeaverCreek HDMI Audio Monitor,,COMPAQ 1825,COMPAQ 1825,COMPAQ 1825,COMPAQ 1825,COMPAQ 1825,COMPAQ 1825 Network,,Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411,Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411,Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411,Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411,Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411,Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 OS,,openSUSE 20150909,openSUSE 20150909,openSUSE 20150909,openSUSE 20150909,openSUSE 20150909,openSUSE 20150909 Kernel,,4.1.6-3-desktop (x86_64),4.1.6-3-desktop (x86_64),4.1.6-3-desktop (x86_64),4.1.6-3-desktop (x86_64),4.1.6-3-desktop (x86_64),4.1.6-3-desktop (x86_64) Desktop,,KDE Frameworks 5,KDE Frameworks 5,KDE Frameworks 5,KDE Frameworks 5,KDE Frameworks 5,KDE Frameworks 5 Display Server,,X Server 1.17.2,X Server 1.17.2,X Server 1.17.2,X Server 1.17.2,X Server 1.17.2,X Server 1.17.2 Display Driver,,radeon 7.5.0,radeon 7.5.0,radeon 7.5.0,radeon 7.5.0,radeon 7.5.0,radeon 7.5.0 OpenGL,,3.3 Mesa 10.6.5 Gallium 0.4,3.3 Mesa 10.6.5 Gallium 0.4,3.3 Mesa 10.6.5 Gallium 0.4,3.3 Mesa 10.6.5 Gallium 0.4,3.3 Mesa 10.6.5 Gallium 0.4,3.3 Mesa 10.6.5 Gallium 0.4 File-System,,tmpfs,f2fs,xfs,ext4,btrfs,btrfs Screen Resolution,,1280x1024,1280x1024,1280x1024,1280x1024,1280x1024,1280x1024 ,,"tmpfs","f2fs","xfs","ext4","btrfs autodefrag","btrfs nodatacow" "IOzone - Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance (MB/s)",HIB,3020.86,3098.21,2941.04,3060.14,3138.02,2994.46 "IOzone - Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance (MB/s)",HIB,1860.07,343.61,285.54,337.85,362.02,363.68 "PostgreSQL pgbench - Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Write (TPS)",HIB,215.50,195.92,185.26,196.35,167.38,184.91 "PostMark - Disk Transaction Performance (TPS)",HIB,3750,2798,2435,2517,444,623