2 x Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 testing with a Intel S2600CW and Matrox s MGA G200e [Pilot] (SEP1) on Ubuntu 14.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1508124-BE-MERGE439513
normal
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 testing with a Intel S2600CW and Matrox s MGA G200e [Pilot] (SEP1) on Ubuntu 14.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Under applicative load 20:
Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 @ 2.60GHz (48 Cores), Motherboard: Intel S2600CW, Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v3/Xeon, Memory: 258048MB, Disk: 2 x 300GB INTEL SSDSC2BB30, Graphics: Matrox s MGA G200e [Pilot] (SEP1), Network: Intel 10-Gigabit X540-AT2
OS: Ubuntu 14.04, Kernel: 3.13.0-61-generic (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 4.8.4, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 640x480
normal:
Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 @ 2.60GHz (48 Cores), Motherboard: Intel S2600CW, Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v3/Xeon, Memory: 258048MB, Disk: 2 x 300GB INTEL SSDSC2BB30, Graphics: Matrox s MGA G200e [Pilot] (SEP1), Network: Intel 10-Gigabit X540-AT2
OS: Ubuntu 14.04, Kernel: 3.13.0-61-generic (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 4.8.4, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 640x480
Crafty 23.4
Elapsed Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
normal . 77.25 |===============================================================
Sunflow Rendering System 0.07.2
Global Illumination + Image Synthesis
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 1.36 |=============================================
normal .................... 0.99 |=================================
PHPBench 0.8.1
PHP Benchmark Suite
Score > Higher Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 116558 |=====================================
normal .................... 134126 |===========================================
Apache Benchmark 2.4.7
Static Web Page Serving
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 24287.84 |========================================
normal .................... 24603.97 |=========================================
NGINX Benchmark 1.0.11
Static Web Page Serving
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 25898.38 |===================================
normal .................... 29970.67 |=========================================
PyBench 2008-08-14
Total For Average Test Times
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 1743 |=============================================
normal .................... 1555 |========================================
OpenSSL 1.0.1g
RSA 4096-bit Performance
Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 2702.13 |=====================================
normal .................... 3101.27 |==========================================
Tachyon 0.98.9
Total Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 3.30 |=============================================
normal .................... 2.59 |===================================
Sudokut 0.4
Total Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 20.51 |============================================
normal .................... 16.43 |===================================
Open FMM Nero2D 2.0.2
Total Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 631.13 |===========================================
normal .................... 547.11 |=====================================
Minion 0.15
Solitaire
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 106.74 |===========================================
normal .................... 92.27 |=====================================
GnuPG 1.4.10
1GB File Encryption
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 10.07 |============================================
normal .................... 8.53 |=====================================
FFmpeg 2.6.2
H.264 HD To NTSC DV
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 22.11 |===========================================
normal .................... 22.60 |============================================
Ogg Encoding 1.3.0
WAV To Ogg
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 9.95 |=============================================
normal .................... 8.18 |=====================================
LAME MP3 Encoding 3.99.3
WAV To MP3
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 16.55 |============================================
normal .................... 14.32 |======================================
FLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.1
WAV To FLAC
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 10.87 |============================================
normal .................... 8.40 |==================================
dcraw
RAW To PPM Image Conversion
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 61.73 |============================================
normal .................... 55.57 |========================================
LZMA Compression
256MB File Compression
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 181.86 |===========================================
normal .................... 163.31 |=======================================
Gzip Compression
2GB File Compression
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 13.62 |============================================
normal .................... 12.95 |==========================================
Bullet Physics Engine 2.81
Test: Convex Trimesh
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 1.81 |=============================================
normal .................... 1.51 |======================================
Bullet Physics Engine 2.81
Test: 3000 Fall
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 7.29 |=============================================
normal .................... 5.74 |===================================
Smallpt 1.0
Global Illumination Renderer; 100 Samples
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 19 |===============================================
normal .................... 17 |==========================================
C-Ray 1.1
Total Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 5.45 |=============================================
normal .................... 4.72 |=======================================
7-Zip Compression 9.20.1
Compress Speed Test
MIPS > Higher Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 64635 |===================================
normal .................... 82012 |============================================
Himeno Benchmark 3.0
Poisson Pressure Solver
MFLOPS > Higher Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 1438.04 |=====================================
normal .................... 1649.70 |==========================================
GraphicsMagick 1.3.19
Resizing
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 133 |=======================================
normal .................... 157 |==============================================
GraphicsMagick 1.3.19
Sharpen
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 126 |=======================================
normal .................... 148 |==============================================
GraphicsMagick 1.3.19
Local Adaptive Thresholding
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 73 |==========================================
normal .................... 81 |===============================================
GraphicsMagick 1.3.19
Operation: HWB Color Space
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 164 |=========================================
normal .................... 184 |==============================================
GraphicsMagick 1.3.19
HWB Color Space
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 167 |==========================================
normal .................... 184 |==============================================
x264 2014-08-30
H.264 Video Encoding
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 283.72 |==========================================
normal .................... 292.79 |===========================================
TTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.2z
Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping
FPS > Higher Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 131.61 |=============
normal .................... 451.23 |===========================================
John The Ripper 1.8.0
Blowfish
Real C/S > Higher Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 10704 |================
normal .................... 29721 |============================================
John The Ripper 1.8.0
Traditional DES
Real C/S > Higher Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 12831667 |===========
normal .................... 48379667 |=========================================
Gcrypt Library 1.4.4
CAMELLIA256-ECB Cipher
Microseconds < Lower Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 2770 |=============================================
normal .................... 2163 |===================================
CacheBench
Write Cache
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 12580.79 |=================================
normal .................... 15673.16 |=========================================
CacheBench
Read Cache
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 2391.72 |===================================
normal .................... 2872.88 |==========================================
GMPbench 0.2
Total Time
GMPbench Score > Higher Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 3101.90 |=====================================
normal .................... 3514.40 |==========================================
Timed MAFFT Alignment 6.864
Multiple Sequence Alignment
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 6.14 |=============================================
normal .................... 6.15 |=============================================
Timed HMMer Search 2.3.2
Pfam Database Search
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 12.24 |============================================
normal .................... 11.47 |=========================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: LU.A
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 18103.08 |===============
normal .................... 49764.67 |=========================================
Loopback TCP Network Performance
Time To Transfer 10GB Via Loopback
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 3.01 |=============================================
normal .................... 3.01 |=============================================
Stream 2013-01-17
Type: Add
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 33165.42 |===================
normal .................... 72943.13 |=========================================
Stream 2013-01-17
Scale
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 27233.49 |=================
normal .................... 64959.31 |=========================================
Stream 2013-01-17
Copy
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 27607.04 |=================
normal .................... 67599.68 |=========================================
Stream 2013-01-17
Add
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 33165.42 |===================
normal .................... 72943.13 |=========================================
Stream 2013-01-17
Type: Triad
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 33419.40 |===================
normal .................... 73291.53 |=========================================
Stream 2013-01-17
Type: Scale
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 27233.49 |=================
normal .................... 64959.31 |=========================================
Stream 2013-01-17
Type: Copy
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 26568.91 |================
normal .................... 68543.86 |=========================================
RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Floating-Point Add
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 18967.36 |======================================
normal .................... 20688.54 |=========================================
RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Integer Scale
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 21297.40 |======================================
normal .................... 23196.58 |=========================================
RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Integer Copy
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 21263.78 |=========================================
normal .................... 21394.57 |=========================================
RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Integer Add
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 21847.92 |=====================================
normal .................... 23932.86 |=========================================
PostMark 1.51
Disk Transaction Performance
TPS > Higher Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 3884 |========================================
normal .................... 4385 |=============================================
Unpacking The Linux Kernel
linux-2.6.32.tar.bz2
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 12.68 |============================================
normal .................... 9.94 |==================================
Compile Bench 0.6
Test: Read Compiled Tree
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 1772.37 |========================================
normal .................... 1853.02 |==========================================
Compile Bench 0.6
Test: Initial Create
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 248.47 |====================================
normal .................... 294.68 |===========================================
Compile Bench 0.6
Test: Compile
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 1185.17 |======================================
normal .................... 1296.71 |==========================================
Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3
64MB Random Write - 32 Threads
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 113.90 |===========================================
normal .................... 110.90 |==========================================
Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3
64MB Random Read - 32 Threads
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 10899.39 |=====================================
normal .................... 12067.78 |=========================================
Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3
64MB Write - 32 Threads
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 60.23 |==========================================
normal .................... 63.47 |============================================
Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3
64MB Read - 32 Threads
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 19170.38 |===================================
normal .................... 22638.30 |=========================================
IOzone 3.405
Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 230.85 |=========================================
normal .................... 243.31 |===========================================
IOzone 3.405
Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 5204.27 |==========================================
normal .................... 5163.80 |==========================================
IOzone 3.405
8GB Write Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 238.99 |==========================================
normal .................... 242.94 |===========================================
IOzone 3.405
8GB Read Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 5783.54 |==========================================
normal .................... 5210.05 |======================================
Dbench 4.0
1 Clients
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 210.10 |===========================================
normal .................... 207.73 |===========================================
Dbench 4.0
128 Clients
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 527.14 |===========================================
normal .................... 507.31 |=========================================
Dbench 4.0
48 Clients
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 587.70 |===========================================
normal .................... 574.58 |==========================================
Dbench 4.0
12 Clients
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 614.61 |==========================================
normal .................... 623.81 |===========================================
FS-Mark 3.3
1000 Files, 1MB Size
Files/s > Higher Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 217.33 |===========================================
normal .................... 200.77 |========================================
SQLite 3.8.10.2
Timed SQLite Insertions
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 27.11 |==========================================
normal .................... 28.31 |============================================
AIO-Stress 0.21
Random Write
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Under applicative load 20 . 1496.40 |=====================================
normal .................... 1692.51 |==========================================