normal

2 x Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 testing with a Intel S2600CW and Matrox s MGA G200e [Pilot] (SEP1) on Ubuntu 14.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1508124-BE-MERGE439513
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

Audio Encoding 3 Tests
Bioinformatics 3 Tests
C/C++ Compiler Tests 15 Tests
Compression Tests 2 Tests
CPU Massive 24 Tests
Creator Workloads 11 Tests
Cryptography 4 Tests
Disk Test Suite 6 Tests
Encoding 5 Tests
HPC - High Performance Computing 4 Tests
Imaging 2 Tests
Common Kernel Benchmarks 3 Tests
Memory Test Suite 3 Tests
MPI Benchmarks 2 Tests
Multi-Core 11 Tests
Python Tests 2 Tests
Raytracing 2 Tests
Renderers 4 Tests
Scientific Computing 3 Tests
Server 5 Tests
Server CPU Tests 11 Tests
Single-Threaded 13 Tests
Video Encoding 2 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
Under applicative load 20
August 11 2015
 
normal
August 12 2015
 
Invert Hiding All Results Option
 
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

normal 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 testing with a Intel S2600CW and Matrox s MGA G200e [Pilot] (SEP1) on Ubuntu 14.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. Under applicative load 20: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 @ 2.60GHz (48 Cores), Motherboard: Intel S2600CW, Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v3/Xeon, Memory: 258048MB, Disk: 2 x 300GB INTEL SSDSC2BB30, Graphics: Matrox s MGA G200e [Pilot] (SEP1), Network: Intel 10-Gigabit X540-AT2 OS: Ubuntu 14.04, Kernel: 3.13.0-61-generic (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 4.8.4, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 640x480 normal: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 @ 2.60GHz (48 Cores), Motherboard: Intel S2600CW, Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v3/Xeon, Memory: 258048MB, Disk: 2 x 300GB INTEL SSDSC2BB30, Graphics: Matrox s MGA G200e [Pilot] (SEP1), Network: Intel 10-Gigabit X540-AT2 OS: Ubuntu 14.04, Kernel: 3.13.0-61-generic (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 4.8.4, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 640x480 7-Zip Compression 9.20.1 Compress Speed Test MIPS > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 64635 |=================================== normal .................... 82012 |============================================ AIO-Stress 0.21 Random Write MB/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 1496.40 |===================================== normal .................... 1692.51 |========================================== Apache Benchmark 2.4.7 Static Web Page Serving Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 24287.84 |======================================== normal .................... 24603.97 |========================================= Bullet Physics Engine 2.81 Test: 3000 Fall Seconds < Lower Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 7.29 |============================================= normal .................... 5.74 |=================================== Bullet Physics Engine 2.81 Test: Convex Trimesh Seconds < Lower Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 1.81 |============================================= normal .................... 1.51 |====================================== C-Ray 1.1 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 5.45 |============================================= normal .................... 4.72 |======================================= CacheBench Read Cache MB/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 2391.72 |=================================== normal .................... 2872.88 |========================================== CacheBench Write Cache MB/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 12580.79 |================================= normal .................... 15673.16 |========================================= Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Compile MB/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 1185.17 |====================================== normal .................... 1296.71 |========================================== Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Initial Create MB/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 248.47 |==================================== normal .................... 294.68 |=========================================== Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Read Compiled Tree MB/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 1772.37 |======================================== normal .................... 1853.02 |========================================== Crafty 23.4 Elapsed Time Seconds < Lower Is Better normal . 77.25 |=============================================================== Dbench 4.0 12 Clients MB/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 614.61 |========================================== normal .................... 623.81 |=========================================== Dbench 4.0 48 Clients MB/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 587.70 |=========================================== normal .................... 574.58 |========================================== Dbench 4.0 128 Clients MB/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 527.14 |=========================================== normal .................... 507.31 |========================================= Dbench 4.0 1 Clients MB/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 210.10 |=========================================== normal .................... 207.73 |=========================================== dcraw RAW To PPM Image Conversion Seconds < Lower Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 61.73 |============================================ normal .................... 55.57 |======================================== FFmpeg 2.6.2 H.264 HD To NTSC DV Seconds < Lower Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 22.11 |=========================================== normal .................... 22.60 |============================================ FLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.1 WAV To FLAC Seconds < Lower Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 10.87 |============================================ normal .................... 8.40 |================================== FS-Mark 3.3 1000 Files, 1MB Size Files/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 217.33 |=========================================== normal .................... 200.77 |======================================== Gcrypt Library 1.4.4 CAMELLIA256-ECB Cipher Microseconds < Lower Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 2770 |============================================= normal .................... 2163 |=================================== GMPbench 0.2 Total Time GMPbench Score > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 3101.90 |===================================== normal .................... 3514.40 |========================================== GnuPG 1.4.10 1GB File Encryption Seconds < Lower Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 10.07 |============================================ normal .................... 8.53 |===================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.19 HWB Color Space Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 167 |========================================== normal .................... 184 |============================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.19 Operation: HWB Color Space Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 164 |========================================= normal .................... 184 |============================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.19 Local Adaptive Thresholding Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 73 |========================================== normal .................... 81 |=============================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.19 Sharpen Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 126 |======================================= normal .................... 148 |============================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.19 Resizing Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 133 |======================================= normal .................... 157 |============================================== Gzip Compression 2GB File Compression Seconds < Lower Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 13.62 |============================================ normal .................... 12.95 |========================================== Himeno Benchmark 3.0 Poisson Pressure Solver MFLOPS > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 1438.04 |===================================== normal .................... 1649.70 |========================================== IOzone 3.405 8GB Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 5783.54 |========================================== normal .................... 5210.05 |====================================== IOzone 3.405 8GB Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 238.99 |========================================== normal .................... 242.94 |=========================================== IOzone 3.405 Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 5204.27 |========================================== normal .................... 5163.80 |========================================== IOzone 3.405 Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 230.85 |========================================= normal .................... 243.31 |=========================================== John The Ripper 1.8.0 Traditional DES Real C/S > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 12831667 |=========== normal .................... 48379667 |========================================= John The Ripper 1.8.0 Blowfish Real C/S > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 10704 |================ normal .................... 29721 |============================================ LAME MP3 Encoding 3.99.3 WAV To MP3 Seconds < Lower Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 16.55 |============================================ normal .................... 14.32 |====================================== Loopback TCP Network Performance Time To Transfer 10GB Via Loopback Seconds < Lower Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 3.01 |============================================= normal .................... 3.01 |============================================= LZMA Compression 256MB File Compression Seconds < Lower Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 181.86 |=========================================== normal .................... 163.31 |======================================= Minion 0.15 Solitaire Seconds < Lower Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 106.74 |=========================================== normal .................... 92.27 |===================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 Test / Class: LU.A Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 18103.08 |=============== normal .................... 49764.67 |========================================= NGINX Benchmark 1.0.11 Static Web Page Serving Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 25898.38 |=================================== normal .................... 29970.67 |========================================= Ogg Encoding 1.3.0 WAV To Ogg Seconds < Lower Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 9.95 |============================================= normal .................... 8.18 |===================================== Open FMM Nero2D 2.0.2 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 631.13 |=========================================== normal .................... 547.11 |===================================== OpenSSL 1.0.1g RSA 4096-bit Performance Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 2702.13 |===================================== normal .................... 3101.27 |========================================== PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite Score > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 116558 |===================================== normal .................... 134126 |=========================================== PostMark 1.51 Disk Transaction Performance TPS > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 3884 |======================================== normal .................... 4385 |============================================= PyBench 2008-08-14 Total For Average Test Times Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 1743 |============================================= normal .................... 1555 |======================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Integer Add MB/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 21847.92 |===================================== normal .................... 23932.86 |========================================= RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Integer Copy MB/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 21263.78 |========================================= normal .................... 21394.57 |========================================= RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Integer Scale MB/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 21297.40 |====================================== normal .................... 23196.58 |========================================= RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Floating-Point Add MB/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 18967.36 |====================================== normal .................... 20688.54 |========================================= Smallpt 1.0 Global Illumination Renderer; 100 Samples Seconds < Lower Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 19 |=============================================== normal .................... 17 |========================================== SQLite 3.8.10.2 Timed SQLite Insertions Seconds < Lower Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 27.11 |========================================== normal .................... 28.31 |============================================ Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Copy MB/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 26568.91 |================ normal .................... 68543.86 |========================================= Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Scale MB/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 27233.49 |================= normal .................... 64959.31 |========================================= Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Triad MB/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 33419.40 |=================== normal .................... 73291.53 |========================================= Stream 2013-01-17 Add MB/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 33165.42 |=================== normal .................... 72943.13 |========================================= Stream 2013-01-17 Copy MB/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 27607.04 |================= normal .................... 67599.68 |========================================= Stream 2013-01-17 Scale MB/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 27233.49 |================= normal .................... 64959.31 |========================================= Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Add MB/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 33165.42 |=================== normal .................... 72943.13 |========================================= Sudokut 0.4 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 20.51 |============================================ normal .................... 16.43 |=================================== Sunflow Rendering System 0.07.2 Global Illumination + Image Synthesis Seconds < Lower Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 1.36 |============================================= normal .................... 0.99 |================================= Tachyon 0.98.9 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 3.30 |============================================= normal .................... 2.59 |=================================== Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3 64MB Read - 32 Threads MB/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 19170.38 |=================================== normal .................... 22638.30 |========================================= Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3 64MB Write - 32 Threads MB/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 60.23 |========================================== normal .................... 63.47 |============================================ Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3 64MB Random Read - 32 Threads MB/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 10899.39 |===================================== normal .................... 12067.78 |========================================= Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3 64MB Random Write - 32 Threads MB/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 113.90 |=========================================== normal .................... 110.90 |========================================== Timed HMMer Search 2.3.2 Pfam Database Search Seconds < Lower Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 12.24 |============================================ normal .................... 11.47 |========================================= Timed MAFFT Alignment 6.864 Multiple Sequence Alignment Seconds < Lower Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 6.14 |============================================= normal .................... 6.15 |============================================= TTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.2z Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping FPS > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 131.61 |============= normal .................... 451.23 |=========================================== Unpacking The Linux Kernel linux-2.6.32.tar.bz2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 12.68 |============================================ normal .................... 9.94 |================================== x264 2014-08-30 H.264 Video Encoding Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 283.72 |========================================== normal .................... 292.79 |===========================================