Windows 8.1 vs. Ubuntu 14.04 Intel Bay Trail NUC

Benchmarks by Michael Larabel for a future article on Phoronix.com looking at the Intel Bay Trail NUC performance of Windows 8.1 updated against Ubuntu 14.04 Linux....

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1405271-KH-NUCBAYTRA11
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

Desktop Graphics 2 Tests
OpenGL Demos Test Suite 2 Tests
Unigine Test Suite 2 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Disable Color Branding
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs
No Box Plots
On Line Graphs With Missing Data, Connect The Line Gaps

Additional Graphs

Show Perf Per Clock Calculation Graphs Where Applicable

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs
Condense Test Profiles With Multiple Version Results Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
Windows 8.1 Pro x64 Updated
May 27 2014
 
Ubuntu 14.04 + Mesa 10.3-devel
May 27 2014
 
Mesa 10.3-devel + Linux 3.15
May 27 2014
 
Invert Hiding All Results Option
 

Only show results where is faster than
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

Windows 8.1 vs. Ubuntu 14.04 Intel Bay Trail NUC - Phoronix Test Suite

Windows 8.1 vs. Ubuntu 14.04 Intel Bay Trail NUC

Benchmarks by Michael Larabel for a future article on Phoronix.com looking at the Intel Bay Trail NUC performance of Windows 8.1 updated against Ubuntu 14.04 Linux....

HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/1405271-KH-NUCBAYTRA11&sor&gru.

Windows 8.1 vs. Ubuntu 14.04 Intel Bay Trail NUCProcessorDiskMotherboardChipsetMemoryGraphicsAudioNetworkOSKernelDesktopDisplay ServerDisplay DriverOpenGLCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionWindows 8.1 Pro x64 UpdatedUbuntu 14.04 + Mesa 10.3-develMesa 10.3-devel + Linux 3.15Intel Family 6 Model 55 Stepping 3 Intel (2 Cores)931GBWindows NT6.2 (x86_64)Intel Celeron N2820 @ 2.13GHz (2 Cores)Intel DN2820FYKIntel ValleyView SSA-CUnit3584MB1000GB HGST HTS721010A9Intel ValleyView Gen7 (749MHz)Realtek ALC283Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 + Intel Wireless 7260Ubuntu 14.043.13.0-27-generic (x86_64)Unity 7.2.0X Server 1.15.1intel 2.99.9113.3 Mesa 10.3.0-devel (git-57730d6 trusty-oibaf-ppa)GCC 4.8.2ext41920x1080Intel Celeron N2820 @ 1.80GHz (2 Cores)Intel ValleyView Gen7 (755MHz)Intel ValleyView HD Audio3.15.0-999-generic (x86_64)OpenBenchmarking.orgProcessor Details- Ubuntu 14.04 + Mesa 10.3-devel: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq ondemand- Mesa 10.3-devel + Linux 3.15: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performanceGraphics Details- Ubuntu 14.04 + Mesa 10.3-devel, Mesa 10.3-devel + Linux 3.15: SNA

Windows 8.1 vs. Ubuntu 14.04 Intel Bay Trail NUCnexuiz: 1920 x 1080 - Yes - Offopenarena: 1920 x 1080openarena: 1920 x 1080unigine-sanctuary: 1280 x 1024unigine-sanctuary: 1920 x 1080unigine-tropics: 1280 x 1024unigine-tropics: 1920 x 1080xonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Lowxonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Highxonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Ultraxonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Ultimategputest: GiMark - 1920 x 1080gputest: Plot3D - 1920 x 1080gputest: Furmark - 1920 x 1080gputest: TessMark - 1920 x 1080gputest: Triangle - 1920 x 1080gputest: Pixmark Piano - 1920 x 1080Windows 8.1 Pro x64 UpdatedUbuntu 14.04 + Mesa 10.3-develMesa 10.3-devel + Linux 3.1510.3161.6312.135.934.086.144.4658.0223.0415.059.63141229189314320843151819.4750.8311.205.593.835.694.0548.5018.8912.628.28206480119759.4450.3311.235.593.835.694.0549.0018.8912.608.2720578012071OpenBenchmarking.org

Nexuiz

Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - HDR: Yes - Sound: Off

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterNexuiz 2.5.2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - HDR: Yes - Sound: OffWindows 8.1 Pro x64 UpdatedUbuntu 14.04 + Mesa 10.3-develMesa 10.3-devel + Linux 3.153691215SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 310.319.479.44MIN: 6 / MAX: 17MIN: 5 / MAX: 15MIN: 5 / MAX: 14

OpenArena

Resolution: 1920 x 1080

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.5Resolution: 1920 x 1080Windows 8.1 Pro x64 UpdatedUbuntu 14.04 + Mesa 10.3-develMesa 10.3-devel + Linux 3.151428425670SE +/- 0.22, N = 3SE +/- 0.43, N = 3SE +/- 0.19, N = 361.6350.8350.33

OpenArena

Resolution: 1920 x 1080

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080Windows 8.1 Pro x64 UpdatedMesa 10.3-devel + Linux 3.15Ubuntu 14.04 + Mesa 10.3-devel3691215SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 312.1311.2311.20MIN: 9 / MAX: 287MAX: 129MAX: 128

Unigine Sanctuary

Resolution: 1280 x 1024

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Sanctuary 2.3Resolution: 1280 x 1024Windows 8.1 Pro x64 UpdatedMesa 10.3-devel + Linux 3.15Ubuntu 14.04 + Mesa 10.3-devel1.33432.66864.00295.33726.6715SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 35.935.595.59

Unigine Sanctuary

Resolution: 1920 x 1080

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Sanctuary 2.3Resolution: 1920 x 1080Windows 8.1 Pro x64 UpdatedMesa 10.3-devel + Linux 3.15Ubuntu 14.04 + Mesa 10.3-devel0.9181.8362.7543.6724.59SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 34.083.833.83

Unigine Tropics

Resolution: 1280 x 1024

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Tropics 1.3Resolution: 1280 x 1024Windows 8.1 Pro x64 UpdatedMesa 10.3-devel + Linux 3.15Ubuntu 14.04 + Mesa 10.3-devel246810SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 36.145.695.69

Unigine Tropics

Resolution: 1920 x 1080

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Tropics 1.3Resolution: 1920 x 1080Windows 8.1 Pro x64 UpdatedMesa 10.3-devel + Linux 3.15Ubuntu 14.04 + Mesa 10.3-devel1.00352.0073.01054.0145.0175SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 34.464.054.05

Xonotic

Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Low

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.7Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: LowWindows 8.1 Pro x64 UpdatedMesa 10.3-devel + Linux 3.15Ubuntu 14.04 + Mesa 10.3-devel1326395265SE +/- 0.21, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.08, N = 358.0249.0048.50MIN: 31 / MAX: 101MIN: 25 / MAX: 68MIN: 26 / MAX: 68

Xonotic

Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: High

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.7Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: HighWindows 8.1 Pro x64 UpdatedMesa 10.3-devel + Linux 3.15Ubuntu 14.04 + Mesa 10.3-devel612182430SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 323.0418.8918.89MIN: 10 / MAX: 33MIN: 10 / MAX: 24MIN: 10 / MAX: 25

Xonotic

Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultra

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.7Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: UltraWindows 8.1 Pro x64 UpdatedUbuntu 14.04 + Mesa 10.3-develMesa 10.3-devel + Linux 3.1548121620SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 315.0512.6212.60MIN: 6 / MAX: 26MIN: 6 / MAX: 19MIN: 6 / MAX: 19

Xonotic

Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultimate

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.7Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: UltimateWindows 8.1 Pro x64 UpdatedUbuntu 14.04 + Mesa 10.3-develMesa 10.3-devel + Linux 3.153691215SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 39.638.288.27MIN: 4 / MAX: 19MIN: 4 / MAX: 14MIN: 4 / MAX: 14

GpuTest

Test: GiMark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: GiMark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Windows 8.1 Pro x64 Updated306090120150SE +/- 0.00, N = 3141

GpuTest

Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 1920 x 1080

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Windows 8.1 Pro x64 UpdatedUbuntu 14.04 + Mesa 10.3-develMesa 10.3-devel + Linux 3.155001000150020002500SE +/- 0.33, N = 3SE +/- 0.33, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3229120642057

GpuTest

Test: Furmark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Furmark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Windows 8.1 Pro x64 UpdatedMesa 10.3-devel + Linux 3.15Ubuntu 14.04 + Mesa 10.3-devel20406080100SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3898080

GpuTest

Test: TessMark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: TessMark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Windows 8.1 Pro x64 Updated70140210280350SE +/- 0.58, N = 3314

GpuTest

Test: Triangle - Resolution: 1920 x 1080

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Triangle - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Windows 8.1 Pro x64 UpdatedMesa 10.3-devel + Linux 3.15Ubuntu 14.04 + Mesa 10.3-devel7K14K21K28K35KSE +/- 89.45, N = 3SE +/- 8.01, N = 3SE +/- 159.88, N = 6320841207111975

GpuTest

Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 1920 x 1080

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Windows 8.1 Pro x64 Updated70K140K210K280K350KSE +/- 6217.32, N = 3315181

OpenArena

Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Total Frame Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Total Frame TimeWindows 8.1 Pro x64 UpdatedUbuntu 14.04 + Mesa 10.3-develMesa 10.3-devel + Linux 3.1520406080100Min: 19 / Avg: 79.72 / Max: 99Min: 54 / Avg: 87.48 / Max: 99Min: 54 / Avg: 87.63 / Max: 99

Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.4