Running pts/scimark2-1.2.0 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1405060-PL-SCIMARK2A47
scimark2alltests,
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Composite",
Higher Results Are Better
"first_run",29.69,29.7,29.7,29.7
"second_run",29.68,29.69,29.7,29.67
"run_with_tor",29.65,29.67,29.67,29.66
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Monte Carlo",
Higher Results Are Better
"first_run",23.44,23.45,23.45,23.45
"second_run",23.45,23.45,23.45,23.45
"run_with_tor",23.44,23.44,23.44,23.45
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform",
Higher Results Are Better
"first_run",14.88,14.94,14.96,14.97
"second_run",14.84,14.91,14.95,14.81
"run_with_tor",14.75,14.84,14.87,14.86
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply",
Higher Results Are Better
"first_run",38.01,38.01
"second_run",38.02,38.01,38.01,38.01
"run_with_tor",37.97,37.99,37.98,37.98
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization",
Higher Results Are Better
"first_run",25.09,25.09,25.09,25.09
"second_run",25.09,25.09,25.09,25.09
"run_with_tor",25.07,25.07,25.07,25.07
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation",
Higher Results Are Better
"first_run",47.01,47.01
"second_run",47.02,47.01,47.01
"run_with_tor",46.99,46.99,46.98,46.96