Intel Core i5-3330 testing with a ASRock H61M-ITX and Intel HD 2500 on openSUSE 13.1 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1403180-SO-1403183SO15
glamor vs x-server glamor,
"x11perf 1.5 - Test: Fill 300 x 300px AA Trapezoid",
Higher Results Are Better
"intel glamor",564000,565000,565000
"\radeon glamor",6110,6110,6110
"QGears2 - Rendering: OpenGL - Test: Image Scaling",
Higher Results Are Better
"intel glamor",602.24555,592.616725,591.776175
"\radeon glamor",151.58815,151.390075,151.604075
"QGears2 - Rendering: OpenGL - Test: Gears",
Higher Results Are Better
"intel glamor",233.344875,231.25215,234.0188
"\radeon glamor",60.5801,60.45405,60.6175
"QGears2 - Rendering: OpenGL - Test: Text",
Higher Results Are Better
"intel glamor",161.270275,161.889325,161.440275
"\radeon glamor",50.17055,50.51415,50.439525
"x11perf 1.5 - Test: Char in 80-char aa line",
Higher Results Are Better
"intel glamor",8990000,8980000,8980000
"\radeon glamor",3530000,3530000,3570000
"x11perf 1.5 - Test: PutImage XY 500x500 Square",
Higher Results Are Better
"intel glamor",143,143,143
"\radeon glamor",62.1,62,62.1
"x11perf 1.5 - Test: Scrolling 500 x 500 px",
Higher Results Are Better
"intel glamor",5300,5300,5300
"\radeon glamor",12200,12000,12200
"x11perf 1.5 - Test: Copy 500x500 From Pixmap To Pixmap",
Higher Results Are Better
"intel glamor",6080,6080,6080
"\radeon glamor",13600,13600,13600
"x11perf 1.5 - Test: 500px Compositing From Window To Window",
Higher Results Are Better
"intel glamor",5280,5280,5280
"\radeon glamor",10800,11100,11100
"x11perf 1.5 - Test: 500px PutImage Square",
Higher Results Are Better
"intel glamor",5630,5620,5650
"\radeon glamor",328,329,329
"x11perf 1.5 - Test: 500px Compositing From Pixmap To Window",
Higher Results Are Better
"intel glamor",6050,6050,6050
"\radeon glamor",10600,10400,10700
"QGears2 - Rendering: CPU-based Raster - Test: Image Scaling",
Higher Results Are Better
"intel glamor",213.49465,213.06115,215.881425
"\radeon glamor",341.404125,343.270675,337.515075
"QGears2 - Rendering: XRender Extension - Test: Image Scaling",
Higher Results Are Better
"intel glamor",224.20885,223.83815,223.643
"\radeon glamor",339.65025,344.04175,344.325925
"x11perf 1.5 - Test: 500px Copy From Window To Window",
Higher Results Are Better
"intel glamor",5280,5280,5280
"\radeon glamor",6320,6590,6700
"QGears2 - Rendering: XRender Extension - Test: Gears",
Higher Results Are Better
"intel glamor",121.4662,107.381825,135.424075,138.399975,137.3992,111.580525
"\radeon glamor",123.385875,126.283175,147.479775,123.139575,127.8491,124.222125
"QGears2 - Rendering: XRender Extension - Test: Text",
Higher Results Are Better
"intel glamor",120.2456,167.2351,181.5147,128.44605,108.254325,167.7182
"\radeon glamor",141.088775,176.637675,149.538575,176.76685,141.0759,143.130875
"QGears2 - Rendering: CPU-based Raster - Test: Gears",
Higher Results Are Better
"intel glamor",157.839975,112.655625,109.758975,154.83305,148.844175,133.716375
"\radeon glamor",157.224525,137.523325,160.418525,121.23805,133.01635,146.886625
"QGears2 - Rendering: CPU-based Raster - Test: Text",
Higher Results Are Better
"intel glamor",104.3841,149.351575,161.081,124.6989,122.219275,153.19875
"\radeon glamor",134.75155,141.0382,135.077025