Seagate ST1000DX001-1CM1 SSHD review on Phoronix.com for a future article. The Seagate SSHD hybrid drive compared to different SATA SSD and HDD drives.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1402207-SO-1402193SO21
SSHD SSD HDD Linux Disk Benchmarks,
"Compile Bench 0.6 - Test: Initial Create",
Higher Results Are Better
"WD WD1600JS-00M 160GB",189.65,201.14,204.25
"Seagate ST3320620AS 320GB",214.88,186.43,210.79
"Seagate ST1000DX001-1CM1 1000GB",251.77,272.19,273.11
"OCZ Vertex 2 60GB",266.99,278.06,266.38
"OCZ Vertex 3 240GB",392.99,434.62,432.76
"2014-02-20 11:20",111.03,135.86,160.43,120.25,136.74,154.53
"Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3 - Test: Random Write - Size Per Thread: 64MB - Thread Count: 8",
Higher Results Are Better
"WD WD1600JS-00M 160GB",3.449,3.437,3.379,3.379
"Seagate ST3320620AS 320GB",2.267,2.277,2.31,2.421
"Seagate ST1000DX001-1CM1 1000GB",5.223,2.795,2.931,2.935,3.048,3.123,3.092,2.994
"OCZ Vertex 2 60GB",108.069,108.697,104.651,109.101
"OCZ Vertex 3 240GB",226.992,224.954,225.599,225.425
"Seagate ST1000DX001-1CM1 1000GB btrfs",22.774,13.788,21.916,20.995,20.467,18.54,22.476,20.814
"2014-02-20 11:20",118.121,60.855,117.312,107.716,112.141,35.119,114.539,99.169
"IOzone 3.405 - Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance",
Higher Results Are Better
"WD WD1600JS-00M 160GB",51.5927734375,59.865234375,59.3740234375,59.0068359375,58.64453125,57.990234375
"Seagate ST3320620AS 320GB",65.607421875,64.3134765625,64.087890625
"Seagate ST1000DX001-1CM1 1000GB",201.333984375,198.3212890625,198.798828125
"OCZ Vertex 2 60GB",130.4404296875,130.4931640625,130.482421875
"OCZ Vertex 3 240GB",374.513671875,374.98046875,374.40625
"Hitachi HDS72101",35.275390625,35.2822265625,35.5771484375
"Seagate ST1000DX001-1CM1 1000GB btrfs",130.9765625,133.0888671875,133.9580078125
"2014-02-20 11:20",64.17578125,57.6064453125,58.685546875,65.2880859375,83.8896484375,58.3359375
"Dbench 4.0 - Client Count: 1",
Higher Results Are Better
"WD WD1600JS-00M 160GB",10.976,10.9584,10.9912
"Seagate ST3320620AS 320GB",16.1134,16.3897,16.2417
"Seagate ST1000DX001-1CM1 1000GB",25.178,24.5151,41.2033,47.896,44.0348,45.6749
"Hitachi HDS72101",8.6293,6.76625,7.08975,8.56954,6.69065,7.22517
"Seagate ST1000DX001-1CM1 1000GB btrfs",8.23196,9.80473,11.6512,8.52681,8.17766,10.2338
"2014-02-20 11:20",51.5173,52.7509,51.6278
"FS-Mark 3.3 - Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size",
Higher Results Are Better
"WD WD1600JS-00M 160GB",15.1,14.7,14.3
"Seagate ST3320620AS 320GB",17,17.1,17.1
"Seagate ST1000DX001-1CM1 1000GB",62.6,62.5,62.5
"OCZ Vertex 2 60GB",105.8,104,105.5
"OCZ Vertex 3 240GB",259.1,261.5,260.4
"Hitachi HDS72101",8.6,9.1,8.2,7.7,8.9,7.7
"Seagate ST1000DX001-1CM1 1000GB btrfs",14.6,14.7,14.2
"2014-02-20 11:20",38.9,37.1,37.9
"FS-Mark 3.3 - Test: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threads",
Higher Results Are Better
"WD WD1600JS-00M 160GB",34.4,37.2,38,37.2,33.6,29.6
"Seagate ST3320620AS 320GB",33.2,33.2,33.2
"Seagate ST1000DX001-1CM1 1000GB",92,90.8,89.6
"OCZ Vertex 2 60GB",122.4,122.4,122.4
"OCZ Vertex 3 240GB",329.2,329.6,330.8
"Hitachi HDS72101",9.6,10,9.6
"Seagate ST1000DX001-1CM1 1000GB btrfs",19.6,19.2,19.6
"2014-02-20 11:20",52.8,62.2,62.8,62,61.6,56.4
"FS-Mark 3.3 - Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size",
Higher Results Are Better
"WD WD1600JS-00M 160GB",15.7,15.8,15.9
"Seagate ST3320620AS 320GB",16.2,16.2,16.2
"Seagate ST1000DX001-1CM1 1000GB",67.6,67.3,67.5
"OCZ Vertex 2 60GB",105.5,106.1,105.7
"OCZ Vertex 3 240GB",261.8,262.9,264.9
"Hitachi HDS72101",10,9.9,8.7,8.8,9.3,9.3
"Seagate ST1000DX001-1CM1 1000GB btrfs",30.6,30.5,20.8,13.9,14.3,14.7
"2014-02-20 11:20",72.9,83,87,72.2,62.8,59