Testing by Michael Larabel of Phoronix of the different CompuLab devices... More benchmarks coming this is just a teaser.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1401249-PL-ATOMARM5943
CompuLab Utilite Quad-Core ARM vs. Fit-PC2 Atom
Testing by Michael Larabel of Phoronix of the different CompuLab devices... More benchmarks coming this is just a teaser.
CompuLab Utilite:
Processor: ARMv7 rev 10 @ 1.00GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: Compulab CM-FX6, Memory: 2048MB, Disk: 32GB SanDisk SSD U100, Graphics: GC2000 Engine, Network: Intel I211 Gigabit Connection
OS: Ubuntu 12.04, Kernel: 3.0.35-cm-fx6-5.1 (armv7l), Desktop: GNOME 3.2.1, Display Server: X Server 1.11.3, OpenGL: 2.1, Compiler: GCC 4.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
CompuLab Fit-PC2:
Processor: Intel Atom Z530 @ 1.60GHz (2 Cores), Motherboard: Intel SBC-FITPC2, Chipset: Intel Hub + SCH, Memory: 1024MB, Disk: 160GB Hitachi HTS54501, Graphics: Intel Hub (SCH Poulsbo), Audio: Realtek ALC260, Monitor: DELL S2409W, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168B + Ralink RT3090 Wireless 802.11n 1T/1R
OS: Ubuntu 12.04, Kernel: 3.8.0-29-generic (i686), Display Driver: modesetting 0.7.0, Compiler: GCC 4.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
x264 2014-01-09
H.264 Video Encoding
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
CompuLab Utilite . 9.06 |======================================================
HPC Challenge 1.4.3
Test / Class: G-Ptrans
GB/s > Higher Is Better
CompuLab Utilite . 0.08971 |========================================
CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 0.11404 |===================================================
HPC Challenge 1.4.3
Test / Class: EP-STREAM Triad
GB/s > Higher Is Better
CompuLab Utilite . 0.51484 |===============================
CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 0.85012 |===================================================
HPC Challenge 1.4.3
Test / Class: Random Ring Bandwidth
GB/s > Higher Is Better
CompuLab Utilite . 0.14196 |================================
CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 0.22299 |===================================================
HPC Challenge 1.4.3
Test / Class: G-HPL
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
CompuLab Utilite . 2.01655 |===================================================
CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 0.82762 |=====================
HPC Challenge 1.4.3
Test / Class: G-Ffte
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
CompuLab Utilite . 0.24977 |===================================================
CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 0.18720 |======================================
HPC Challenge 1.4.3
Test / Class: EP-DGEMM
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
CompuLab Utilite . 0.56971 |===================================================
CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 0.44101 |=======================================
HPC Challenge 1.4.3
Test / Class: G-Random Access
GUP/s > Higher Is Better
CompuLab Utilite . 0.00162 |===================================================
CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 0.00043 |==============
Stream 2013-01-17
Type: Copy
MB/s > Higher Is Better
CompuLab Utilite . 1486.55 |===================================================
CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 1447.70 |==================================================
Stream 2013-01-17
Type: Scale
MB/s > Higher Is Better
CompuLab Utilite . 1438.23 |=================================================
CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 1506.41 |===================================================
Stream 2013-01-17
Type: Triad
MB/s > Higher Is Better
CompuLab Utilite . 1652.73 |==================================================
CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 1672.49 |===================================================
Stream 2013-01-17
Type: Add
MB/s > Higher Is Better
CompuLab Utilite . 1678.17 |===================================================
CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 1670.97 |===================================================
HPC Challenge 1.4.3
Test / Class: Max Ping Pong Bandwidth
MB/s > Higher Is Better
CompuLab Utilite . 711.96 |====================================================
CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 521.51 |======================================
FFTE 5.0
Test: N=64, 1D Complex FFT Routine
MFLOPS > Higher Is Better
CompuLab Utilite . 387.34 |====================================================
CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 287.68 |=======================================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Composite
Mflops > Higher Is Better
CompuLab Utilite . 62.15 |=========================
CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 128.86 |====================================================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Monte Carlo
Mflops > Higher Is Better
CompuLab Utilite . 49.80 |=====================================================
CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 48.11 |===================================================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform
Mflops > Higher Is Better
CompuLab Utilite . 16.57 |=====================================================
CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 16.15 |====================================================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply
Mflops > Higher Is Better
CompuLab Utilite . 52.73 |==================
CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 156.46 |====================================================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization
Mflops > Higher Is Better
CompuLab Utilite . 67.53 |=======================
CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 153.00 |====================================================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation
Mflops > Higher Is Better
CompuLab Utilite . 124.12 |========================
CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 270.60 |====================================================
Himeno Benchmark 3.0
Poisson Pressure Solver
MFLOPS > Higher Is Better
CompuLab Utilite . 109.12 |====================================================
CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 104.05 |==================================================
TSCP 1.81
AI Chess Performance
Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better
CompuLab Utilite . 127979 |==================================
CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 197936 |====================================================
Apache Benchmark 2.4.7
Static Web Page Serving
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
CompuLab Utilite . 2512.24 |===================================================
OpenSSL 1.0.1f
RSA 4096-bit Performance
Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better
CompuLab Utilite . 16.60 |=====================================================
CLOMP 3.3
Static OMP Speedup
Speedup > Higher Is Better
CompuLab Utilite . 4.63 |======================================================
Dolfyn 0.527
Computational Fluid Dynamics
Seconds < Lower Is Better
CompuLab Utilite . 578.60 |====================================================
CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 325.91 |=============================
PolyBench-C 3.2
Test: Covariance Computation
Seconds < Lower Is Better
CompuLab Utilite . 24.53 |==========================================
CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 30.88 |=====================================================
PolyBench-C 3.2
Test: Correlation Computation
Seconds < Lower Is Better
CompuLab Utilite . 24.59 |==========================================
CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 31.22 |=====================================================
PolyBench-C 3.2
Test: 3 Matrix Multiplications
Seconds < Lower Is Better
CompuLab Utilite . 571.48 |====================================================
CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 485.77 |============================================
Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.7
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
CompuLab Utilite . 390.00 |===========================================
CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 473.04 |====================================================
C-Ray 1.1
Total Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
CompuLab Utilite . 630.47 |==================
CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 1823.45 |===================================================
Primesieve 4.2
1e12 Prime Number Generation
Seconds < Lower Is Better
CompuLab Utilite . 1382.41 |===============================
CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 2264.13 |===================================================
Smallpt 1.0
Global Illumination Renderer; 100 Samples
Seconds < Lower Is Better
CompuLab Utilite . 1419 |==============================
CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 2559 |======================================================
Gzip Compression
2GB File Compression
Seconds < Lower Is Better
CompuLab Utilite . 102.70 |====================================================
CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 86.34 |============================================
Crafty 23.4
Elapsed Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
CompuLab Utilite . 0.11 |======================================================
CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 0.03 |===============
FLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.0
WAV To FLAC
Seconds < Lower Is Better
CompuLab Utilite . 56.82 |=====================================================
CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 56.70 |=====================================================
LAME MP3 Encoding 3.99.3
WAV To MP3
Seconds < Lower Is Better
CompuLab Utilite . 128.79 |=================================================
CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 135.49 |====================================================
FFmpeg 2.1.1
H.264 HD To NTSC DV
Seconds < Lower Is Better
CompuLab Utilite . 357.63 |====================================================
N-Queens 1.0
Elapsed Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
CompuLab Utilite . 246.59 |====================================================
HPC Challenge 1.4.3
Test / Class: Random Ring Latency
usecs < Lower Is Better
CompuLab Utilite . 4.32837 |=========================
CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 8.75824 |===================================================