Linux Software RAID (mdadm, raid1 and raid10) vs. ZFS on Linux (mirror, compression=lzjb and compression=no) on the two disks WDC WD15EADS-00S and SAMSUNG HD154UI
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1401024-BLAZ-RAIDCOM71
RAIDComparison,
"Compile Bench 0.6 - Test: Compile",
Higher Results Are Better
"Raid1Ext4",73.19,67.93,67.68,66.7,68.17,64.86
"Raid10Ext4",67.11,63.71,65.88
"ZFSMirrorCompression",386.09,357.45,375.91,366.06
"ZFSMirror",66.73,71.59,70.52,72.19
"SQLite 3.7.3 - 12,500 INSERTs",
Lower Results Are Better
"Raid1Ext4",2045.9594891071,1938.2392969131,1930.8130600452
"Raid10Ext4",1920.3980050087,1959.6084661484,1920.6571650505
"ZFSMirrorCompression",513.74393582344,508.19681310654,506.54290604591
"ZFSMirror",548.68989801407,546.55257296562,513.42979097366,513.77637410164,506.13814091682,507.10297393799
"IOzone 3.405 - 8GB Write Performance",
Higher Results Are Better
"Raid1Ext4",96.15234375,95.9912109375,97.201171875
"Raid10Ext4",98.126953125,96.8701171875,91.67578125,93.28515625
"ZFSMirrorCompression",213.544921875,207.302734375,202.236328125
"ZFSMirror",86.1630859375,76.701171875,87.421875,87,86.4970703125,85.8818359375
"FS-Mark 3.3 - 1000 Files, 1MB Size",
Higher Results Are Better
"Raid1Ext4",16.2,16,16.7
"Raid10Ext4",16.4,16.4,16.2
"ZFSMirrorCompression",34.4,34.7,35.6
"ZFSMirror",20.6,21.3,21.9
"Compile Bench 0.6 - Test: Read Compiled Tree",
Higher Results Are Better
"Raid1Ext4",432.15,424.34,429.83
"Raid10Ext4",412.61,379.42,423.6
"ZFSMirrorCompression",265.37,265.29,286.28
"ZFSMirror",216.32,239.2,241.13
"Compile Bench 0.6 - Test: Initial Create",
Higher Results Are Better
"Raid1Ext4",80.51,80.23,72.53
"Raid10Ext4",80.24,75.34,76.24
"ZFSMirrorCompression",69.24,71.31,71.91
"ZFSMirror",64.34,67.52,67.75
"Unpacking The Linux Kernel - linux-2.6.32.tar.bz2",
Lower Results Are Better
"Raid1Ext4",18.012063026428,16.101074934006,16.488499879837,16.945544958115,16.346000909805,17.869813919067,16.338052988052,16.278877019882
"Raid10Ext4",15.719955921173,16.611066102982,17.426194906235,17.419275999069,18.353605985641,17.251668930054,17.276609182358,17.234989881516
"ZFSMirrorCompression",18.454275846481,18.131776094437,17.501413106918,17.758128881454
"ZFSMirror",17.932486057281,18.625585079193,19.051674842834,17.796526908875
"Apache Benchmark 2.4.7 - Static Web Page Serving",
Higher Results Are Better
"Raid10Ext4",12649.62,12136.93,12172.56
"ZFSMirrorCompression",11853.51,11811.01,11998.35
"ZFSMirror",11559.61,11823.82,11792.55
"Gzip Compression - 2GB File Compression",
Lower Results Are Better
"Raid1Ext4",25.014554023743,23.310451984406,24.321620941162,24.186891078949
"Raid10Ext4",24.845575094223,24.205372095108,24.201359987259
"ZFSMirrorCompression",24.282905101776,25.269232988358,24.488445997238
"ZFSMirror",24.017683982849,24.137933015823,24.989432096481
"IOzone 3.405 - 8GB Read Performance",
Higher Results Are Better
"Raid1Ext4",102.6064453125,105.7646484375,106.3056640625
"Raid10Ext4",108.84375,108.8212890625,110.2763671875
"ZFSMirrorCompression",576.130859375,545.4150390625,516.7548828125,549.9267578125,559.1748046875,546.703125
"ZFSMirror",196.65625,198.787109375,177.8876953125,169.9013671875,119.5517578125,178.5791015625
"AIO-Stress 0.21 - Random Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"Raid1Ext4",62.39,62.95,59.37
"Raid10Ext4",75.6,66.01,60.56,65.18,66.14,68.87