SSD and HDD disk drive benchmarks from Ubuntu 13.10 for a future article on Phoronix.com...
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1308309-AR-1308286SO06
Linux 3.11 Disk Testing,
"AIO-Stress 0.21 - Test: Random Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"160GB Western Digital WD1600JS-00M",3378.58,3645.51,3608.15,3648.9,3673.46
"64GB OCZ AGILITY",3647.33,3569.18,3662.4
"60GB OCZ VERTEX2",3660.46,3660.84,3612.74
"240GB OCZ VERTEX3",3621.67,3631.44,3639.3
"120GB INTEL SSDSC2CW12",3604.9,3629,3620.33
"run 1",34.65,41.49,44.78,45.43,44.97,46.34
"no USB HDD attached",40.29,44.68,44.92,44.91,43.19,47.19
"PostMark 1.51 - Disk Transaction Performance",
Higher Results Are Better
"160GB Western Digital WD1600JS-00M",5208,5208,5102
"64GB OCZ AGILITY",5208,5208,5208
"60GB OCZ VERTEX2",5208,5102,5208
"240GB OCZ VERTEX3",5102,5208,5208
"120GB INTEL SSDSC2CW12",5208,5208,5208
"run 1",700,704,702
"no USB HDD attached",702,704,704
"IOzone 3.405 - Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance",
Higher Results Are Better
"160GB Western Digital WD1600JS-00M",8266.982421875,8336.7939453125,8337.76953125
"64GB OCZ AGILITY",8353.158203125,8417.57421875,8288.97265625
"60GB OCZ VERTEX2",8463.3876953125,8416.017578125,8437.3408203125
"240GB OCZ VERTEX3",8510.4423828125,8502.7412109375,8453.5615234375
"120GB INTEL SSDSC2CW12",8412.189453125,8507.05078125,8504.8076171875
"run 1",188.25390625,188.2451171875,188.203125
"no USB HDD attached",189.7802734375,189.2119140625,190.375
"Flexible IO Tester 1.57 - Test: Intel IOMeter File Server Access Pattern",
Lower Results Are Better
"160GB Western Digital WD1600JS-00M",5077.6165060997,4.7561819553375,70.073514938354,9.2081429958344,69.999284029007,8.9758818149567
"64GB OCZ AGILITY",260.89412403107,260.76399898529,260.4181599617
"60GB OCZ VERTEX2",76.530364990234,76.564675807953,77.238408088684
"240GB OCZ VERTEX3",47.537758111954,48.047935009003,49.819000959396
"120GB INTEL SSDSC2CW12",69.234939098358,67.021738052368,67.738161087036
"run 1",100.441229105,101.33709096909,103.08328104019
"no USB HDD attached",100.65483212471,104.01191616058,102.0352768898
"IOzone 3.405 - Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance",
Higher Results Are Better
"160GB Western Digital WD1600JS-00M",38.3134765625,55.251953125,52.2880859375,31.001953125,37.0078125,45.88671875
"64GB OCZ AGILITY",96.8037109375,67.6923828125,68.427734375,77.6611328125,89.720703125,95.830078125
"60GB OCZ VERTEX2",254.2412109375,254.7724609375,254.740234375
"240GB OCZ VERTEX3",486.5009765625,486.2841796875,485.037109375
"120GB INTEL SSDSC2CW12",365.3896484375,365.3740234375,365.1767578125
"run 1",138.021484375,137.947265625,139.5166015625
"no USB HDD attached",140.13671875,138.5068359375,138.6279296875
"FS-Mark 3.3 - Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size",
Higher Results Are Better
"160GB Western Digital WD1600JS-00M",16.6,16,15.6
"64GB OCZ AGILITY",41.2,40.6,37.4,34.6,36.3,34
"60GB OCZ VERTEX2",163.4,161.5,163.1
"240GB OCZ VERTEX3",210.2,255.6,228.4,232.7,225.2,212.9
"120GB INTEL SSDSC2CW12",200.9,217.8,189.6,207.3,226.4,213.1
"run 1",16.6,39.6,40.4,39.5,39.4,39.7
"no USB HDD attached",17.6,39.4,39.4,39.6,39.5,39.7
"FS-Mark 3.3 - Test: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threads",
Higher Results Are Better
"160GB Western Digital WD1600JS-00M",26,32,24.8,29.6,25.6,34.1
"64GB OCZ AGILITY",103.6,68.4,46.8,76.8,50,67.2
"60GB OCZ VERTEX2",228.8,228.8,225.6
"240GB OCZ VERTEX3",422.8,422,421.6
"120GB INTEL SSDSC2CW12",327.6,327.6,328.8
"run 1",78.7,60.1,58.9,46.6,63.5,46.6
"no USB HDD attached",55.1,49.9,37.7,56.7,65.6,65.5
"FS-Mark 3.3 - Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size",
Higher Results Are Better
"160GB Western Digital WD1600JS-00M",15.5,15.5,15.2
"64GB OCZ AGILITY",60.9,56.4,55.7,57.8,55.6,56
"60GB OCZ VERTEX2",169.8,154.8,156.9,171.7,168.1,153.8
"240GB OCZ VERTEX3",220.1,282.7,274.6,259.4,215.8,226.7
"120GB INTEL SSDSC2CW12",215.9,198.3,221.2,190.7,190.8,188.4
"run 1",58.5,39.3,39.3,39.4,40.8,39.7
"no USB HDD attached",60.1,38.8,38.6,38.8,38.8,39.8