File-system benchmarks on the Linux 3.10 kernel. Benchmarks by Michael Larabel for a future article on phoronix.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1308069-SO-LINUX310R69
Linux 3.10 File-System Comparison,
"Flexible IO Tester 1.57 - Test: Intel IOMeter File Server Access Pattern",
Lower Results Are Better
"XFS",228.3453271389,228.34010696411,230.28100180626
"Btrfs",665.33767390251,673.70434689522,674.39961099625
"EXT2",143.98696899414,145.90666103363,145.75576806068
"EXT3",145.31229496002,146.38238501549,147.52179598808
"EXT4",105.1795539856,104.72299313545,105.18744397163
"ReiserFS",147.74300503731,147.30523490906,148.09595298767
"Reiser4",82.623997926712,83.008718013763,83.587395906448
"JFS",144.14792394638,145.72556090355,146.51861000061
"F2FS",380.21459507942,421.75456809998,381.52643489838,382.31845402718,381.55299305916,381.17996287346
"ZFS",119.73678588867,119.79183888435,121.31029510498
"Dbench 4.0 - Client Count: 1",
Higher Results Are Better
"XFS",149.358,149.412,148.849
"Btrfs",225.668,226.382,226.278
"EXT2",529.173,533.152,528.58
"EXT3",119.661,119.553,118.879
"EXT4",184.866,185.088,185.099
"ReiserFS",112.928,113.058,112.999
"Reiser4",112.264,112.445,111.635
"JFS",303.656,303.124,305.71
"F2FS",423.353,424.085,428.811
"ZFS",183.142,184.487,188.874
"FS-Mark 3.3 - Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size",
Higher Results Are Better
"XFS",80.3,80.4,81.7
"Btrfs",81.2,80.3,82.8
"EXT2",92,92.5,92.3
"EXT3",70.4,71,70.3
"EXT4",75.3,75.1,75.3
"ReiserFS",66.3,65.7,63.1
"Reiser4",72.2,73.4,73.3
"JFS",77.3,82.4,83,85.5,84.4,84.8
"F2FS",94.4,95.3,94.9
"ZFS",37.8,39.2,43.2,38.8,37.5,40.5
"FS-Mark 3.3 - Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size",
Higher Results Are Better
"XFS",84.1,79.9,82.8
"Btrfs",86,81.8,82.2
"EXT2",93.5,93.5,95.2
"EXT3",66.9,68.2,70.1
"EXT4",76.9,78.2,76.9
"ReiserFS",67.4,65.3,65.7
"Reiser4",74.3,73.1,75.1
"JFS",87.5,84.8,87.4
"F2FS",93.4,97.8,94
"ZFS",46.3,48.8,48.6
"Compile Bench 0.6 - Test: Compile",
Higher Results Are Better
"XFS",121.47,112.19,113.5,111.92,117.14,121.86
"Btrfs",101.29,102.48,111.3,100.1,116.12,108.81
"EXT2",127.41,131.12,115.48,126.5,129.08,124.8
"EXT3",124.13,111.3,115.46,110.86,110.32,125.59
"EXT4",128.95,127.73,126.06
"ReiserFS",119.88,122.58,120.01
"Reiser4",136.19,140.56,135.06
"JFS",78.95,69.9,74.87,73.52,71.68,77.58
"F2FS",99.66,100.38,99.72
"ZFS",79.36,91.64,90.36,89.77,90.52,89.16
"Compile Bench 0.6 - Test: Initial Create",
Higher Results Are Better
"XFS",94.57,101.97,88.67,95.05,95.37,88.99
"Btrfs",63.02,63.35,64.22
"EXT2",99.07,107.82,109.58,107.3,107.33,105.47
"EXT3",98.46,122.26,130.03,129.92,130.69,122.78
"EXT4",112.24,109.22,111.2
"ReiserFS",65.77,68.64,67.64
"Reiser4",113.48,114.03,113.89
"JFS",53.19,39.89,40.06,38.37,40.09,37.65
"F2FS",70.09,76.6,66.08
"ZFS",57.86,58.45,58.89
"FS-Mark 3.3 - Test: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threads",
Higher Results Are Better
"XFS",96.4,96,94.8
"Btrfs",96.8,97.2,97
"EXT2",97.7,96.4,96
"EXT3",89.2,90.4,90.4
"EXT4",96.8,96.8,96.4
"ReiserFS",79.5,78,77.6
"Reiser4",77.4,75.7,76.1
"JFS",98.1,99.4,72.9,86.1,71.6,72.4
"F2FS",67.1,82,99.2,91,95.1,96.2
"ZFS",48.8,41.2,39.8,40,39.7,42