Linux NILFS2 file-system benchmarks on the Linux 3.8 kernel. NILFS2 file-system testing from an Intel X25 SSD with an Intel Core i5 Sandy Bridge CPU. Benchmarks by Michael Larabel for a future article on Phoronix.com.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1302231-FO-NILFS2LIN24
Linux 3.8 NILFS2 File-System Benchmarks,
"PostMark 1.51 - Disk Transaction Performance",
Higher Results Are Better
"F2FS",1724,1712,1712
"Btrfs",1157,1152,1152
"EXT3",1250,1219,1219
"EXT4",1689,1655,1677
"XFS",1724,1700,1689
"JFS",1785,1655,1592,1543,1436,1428
"ReiserFS",1054,1024,1046
"NILFS2",410,403
"Compile Bench 0.6 - Test: Initial Create",
Higher Results Are Better
"F2FS",58.11,58.81,58.15
"Btrfs",72.29,75.21,72.69
"EXT3",97.34,94.16,104.31
"EXT4",107.83,110.97,109.76
"XFS",107.81,117.55,107.35
"JFS",55.45,55.8,55.79
"ReiserFS",53.18,46.06,40.77
"NILFS2",50.69,50.63
"Compile Bench 0.6 - Test: Compile",
Higher Results Are Better
"F2FS",94.67,96.15,96.23
"Btrfs",106.92,105.41,108.56
"EXT3",100.54,100.41,102.05
"EXT4",104.67,107.41,109.3
"XFS",102.06,100.35,102.79
"JFS",92.33,92.5,92.57
"ReiserFS",76.77,73.2,77.59
"NILFS2",76.51,76.57,76.8
"IOzone 3.405 - Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance",
Higher Results Are Better
"F2FS",101.2646484375,102.0185546875,101.9873046875
"Btrfs",101.4541015625,100.17578125,101.5234375
"EXT3",101.013671875,101.279296875,101.20703125
"EXT4",102.0439453125,101.236328125,101.6982421875
"XFS",103.267578125,102.0029296875,102.51953125
"JFS",88.7958984375,92.9638671875,92.7548828125
"ReiserFS",94.8623046875,94.8154296875,95.3935546875
"NILFS2",86.7919921875,82.2216796875,81.8779296875
"Dbench 4.0 - Client Count: 1",
Higher Results Are Better
"F2FS",566.045,569.387,571.597
"Btrfs",164.904,166.034,165.166
"EXT3",124.574,124.883,124.818
"EXT4",196.243,196.509,192.957
"XFS",158.467,158.266,156.769
"JFS",302.737,301.91,302.384
"ReiserFS",109.57,110.229,110.086
"NILFS2",86.1259,84.7856
"FS-Mark 3.3 - Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size",
Higher Results Are Better
"F2FS",95,92.9,93.1
"Btrfs",65.1,65.1,65.3
"EXT3",68.1,67.1,67.5
"EXT4",78.6,78.9,78.9
"XFS",80.2,79.2,80
"JFS",90.4,90.2,90.6
"ReiserFS",51,49.2,52.8,48.7,48.7,50.7
"NILFS2",56,55.7,55.5
"FS-Mark 3.3 - Test: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threads",
Higher Results Are Better
"F2FS",100.5,101.4,100.8
"Btrfs",95.2,94.7,94
"EXT3",94.8,94.8,94
"EXT4",100,99.6,99.2
"XFS",97.2,94.8,94.7
"JFS",99.4,100.7,100.6
"ReiserFS",77.2,83.6,78,77.2,74.4,71.6
"NILFS2",62,61.2,61
"FS-Mark 3.3 - Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size",
Higher Results Are Better
"F2FS",96.2,94.1,97.4
"Btrfs",66,65.8,67.3
"EXT3",67.6,67.9,70.7
"EXT4",77.9,79.8,78.3
"XFS",80.6,82.5,80.1
"JFS",90.6,92.7,91.3
"ReiserFS",52.7,48.8,51.3,51.5
"NILFS2",52.1,55.4,56.5,55
"Flexible IO Tester 1.57 - Test: Intel IOMeter File Server Access Pattern",
Lower Results Are Better
"F2FS",363.3687069416,365.74953889847,364.522783041
"Btrfs",583.89296889305,591.728910923,600.5856359005
"EXT3",143.24605894089,142.57083487511,144.35774493217
"EXT4",101.73947691917,102.10918402672,101.7408490181
"XFS",227.6023478508,227.91184902191,229.29258012772
"JFS",142.952023983,143.91396594048,143.97901701927
"ReiserFS",155.9648168087,154.77402806282,154.42899513245
"NILFS2",701.80709004402,706.1530020237,721.42912697792