AMD Ubuntu Linux LTS Comparison

Comparing the Linux performance of Ubuntu 8.04.4 LTS, Ubuntu 10.04.4 LTS, Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS, and an Ubuntu 13.04 development snapshot. Benchmarking by Michael Larabel of Phoronix.com for a future article looking at the Ubuntu Linux performance. These Linux performance benchmarks are from an AMD Phenom 9500 Quad-Core system.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1302130-FO-AMDUBUNTU06
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

C/C++ Compiler Tests 2 Tests
CPU Massive 4 Tests
Creator Workloads 2 Tests
Disk Test Suite 4 Tests
Common Kernel Benchmarks 2 Tests
Multi-Core 3 Tests
Renderers 2 Tests
Server CPU Tests 2 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs
No Box Plots
On Line Graphs With Missing Data, Connect The Line Gaps

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs
Condense Test Profiles With Multiple Version Results Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
Ubuntu 8.04.4 LTS
February 12 2013
 
Ubuntu 10.04.4 LTS
February 11 2013
 
Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS
February 11 2013
 
Ubuntu 13.04
February 09 2013
 
Invert Hiding All Results Option
 

Only show results where is faster than
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


AMD Ubuntu Linux LTS Comparison, "BLAKE2 20121223 - Phoronix Test Suite v4.4.0m2", Lower Results Are Better "Ubuntu 8.04.4 LTS",15.55,15.55,15.62 "Ubuntu 10.04.4 LTS",15.62,15.62,15.63 "Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS",15.61,15.61,15.61 "Ubuntu 13.04",15.77,15.78,15.78 "OpenArena 0.8.5 - Resolution: 1920 x 1080", Higher Results Are Better "Ubuntu 10.04.4 LTS",43,43,43.3 "Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS",77,77.1,76.5 "Ubuntu 13.04",110.2,108.1,106.8 "Dbench 4.0 - Client Count: 1", Higher Results Are Better "Ubuntu 8.04.4 LTS",80.9681,84.7426,84.4141 "Ubuntu 10.04.4 LTS",9.8333,9.85366,9.78534 "Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS",9.35997,9.36054,9.34751 "Ubuntu 13.04",10.37,10.4173,10.472 "FS-Mark 3.3 - Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size", Higher Results Are Better "Ubuntu 8.04.4 LTS",39,45.1,42.9,44.9,43.5,40.6 "Ubuntu 10.04.4 LTS",18.5,18.1,18.2 "Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS",17.9,18.1,17.6 "Ubuntu 13.04",17.7,17.9,17.5 "FS-Mark 3.3 - Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSync", Higher Results Are Better "Ubuntu 8.04.4 LTS",77.8,79.1,68.3,75.2,73.6,75.6 "Ubuntu 10.04.4 LTS",229.3,231.4,226.1 "Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS",78.9,81.4,81.2 "Ubuntu 13.04",129.4,133.6,133.6 "FS-Mark 3.3 - Test: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threads", Higher Results Are Better "Ubuntu 8.04.4 LTS",31.8,32,35.4,31.6,32.2,32 "Ubuntu 10.04.4 LTS",43.6,40.8,37.6,35.2,34.7,43.2 "Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS",41.2,38.4,34.8,32,31.2,37.2 "Ubuntu 13.04",40.8,38,34,32,33.2,34.8 "FS-Mark 3.3 - Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size", Higher Results Are Better "Ubuntu 8.04.4 LTS",38.9,41.4,41.7,38.8,41.5,38.5 "Ubuntu 10.04.4 LTS",16.1,16.3,16.5 "Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS",15.5,15.6,15.7 "Ubuntu 13.04",16.5,16.5,16.7 "IOzone 3.405 - Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance", Higher Results Are Better "Ubuntu 8.04.4 LTS",71.720703125,72.5068359375,71.943359375 "Ubuntu 10.04.4 LTS",95.8701171875,96.115234375,95.52734375 "Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS",94.3623046875,95.009765625,95.7177734375 "Ubuntu 13.04",96.359375,95.099609375,94.91015625 "IOzone 3.405 - Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance", Higher Results Are Better "Ubuntu 8.04.4 LTS",69.515625,63.751953125,65.06640625,62.7216796875,61.640625,61.7841796875 "Ubuntu 10.04.4 LTS",97.6416015625,97.171875,95.69140625 "Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS",96.31640625,95.39453125,93.724609375 "Ubuntu 13.04",96.138671875,94.5859375,91.7861328125 "IOzone 3.405 - Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance", Higher Results Are Better "Ubuntu 8.04.4 LTS",75.5888671875,76.447265625,73.1494140625 "Ubuntu 10.04.4 LTS",92.03125,90.8994140625,89.8251953125 "Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS",90.6884765625,89.25,88.107421875 "Ubuntu 13.04",90.5810546875,88.8447265625,88.2568359375 "IOzone 3.405 - Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance", Higher Results Are Better "Ubuntu 8.04.4 LTS",62.5791015625,62.4501953125,62.2216796875 "Ubuntu 10.04.4 LTS",90.4775390625,89.19921875,87.142578125 "Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS",88.0068359375,86.78125,85.7138671875 "Ubuntu 13.04",87.765625,86.26953125,84.7421875 "NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 - Test / Class: EP.B", Higher Results Are Better "Ubuntu 8.04.4 LTS",63,63.02,63.12 "Ubuntu 10.04.4 LTS",62.26,62.4,61.64 "Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS",60.93,61.24,61.19 "Ubuntu 13.04",60.86,61.21,60.99 "NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 - Test / Class: LU.A", Higher Results Are Better "Ubuntu 8.04.4 LTS",3202.44,3216.16,3201.51 "Ubuntu 10.04.4 LTS",3014.3,3014.2,3016.03 "Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS",2388.1,2148.14,2175.81,2212.12,2313.66,2271.53 "Ubuntu 13.04",3414.27,3321.05,3370.14 "NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 - Test / Class: MG.B", Higher Results Are Better "Ubuntu 8.04.4 LTS",2239.39,2235.78,2237.87 "Ubuntu 10.04.4 LTS",2209.55,2182.77,2207.28 "Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS",2116.75,2117.21,2107.79 "Ubuntu 13.04",2183.02,2191.86,2190.91 "NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 - Test / Class: SP.A", Higher Results Are Better "Ubuntu 8.04.4 LTS",2268.06,2268.55,2263.04 "Ubuntu 10.04.4 LTS",2192.25,2193.23,2194.8 "Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS",2122.18,2100.85,2098.85 "Ubuntu 13.04",2203.87,2209.68,2216.35 "NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 - Test / Class: UA.A", Higher Results Are Better "Ubuntu 8.04.4 LTS",12.42,12.51,12.48 "Ubuntu 10.04.4 LTS",13.04,13.05,13.03 "Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS",13.12,13.14,13.2 "Ubuntu 13.04",12.04,12.03,12.04 "PostMark 1.51 - Disk Transaction Performance", Higher Results Are Better "Ubuntu 8.04.4 LTS",303,295,281,297 "Ubuntu 10.04.4 LTS",1773,1798,1798 "Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS",617,637,625 "Ubuntu 13.04",822,801,798 "C-Ray 1.1 - Total Time", Lower Results Are Better "Ubuntu 8.04.4 LTS",145.307,145.242,144.914 "Ubuntu 10.04.4 LTS",140.635,140.55,140.668 "Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS",134.724,135.659,133.675 "Ubuntu 13.04",92.638,92.715,92.668 "Smallpt 1.0 - Global Illumination Renderer; 100 Samples", Lower Results Are Better "Ubuntu 8.04.4 LTS",289,289,288 "Ubuntu 10.04.4 LTS",275,276,275 "Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS",263,263,263 "Ubuntu 13.04",327,328,326 "Apache Benchmark 2.4.3 - Static Web Page Serving", Higher Results Are Better "Ubuntu 8.04.4 LTS",5370.35,5362.67,5383.66 "Ubuntu 10.04.4 LTS",8219.48,6543.84,6529.99,6666.36,6654.89,6674.89 "Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS",11417.88,11378.94,11410.36 "Ubuntu 13.04",9243.14,9303.15,9285.59 "OpenArena 0.8.5 - Resolution: 1920 x 1080", Higher Results Are Better "Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS", "Ubuntu 13.04", "OpenArena 0.8.5 - System Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS", "Ubuntu 13.04", "C-Ray 1.1 - Total Time", Higher Results Are Better "Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS", "Ubuntu 13.04", "C-Ray 1.1 - System Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS", "Ubuntu 13.04", "Smallpt 1.0 - Global Illumination Renderer; 100 Samples", Higher Results Are Better "Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS", "Ubuntu 13.04", "Smallpt 1.0 - System Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS", "Ubuntu 13.04", "Apache Benchmark 2.4.3 - Static Web Page Serving", Higher Results Are Better "Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS", "Ubuntu 13.04", "Apache Benchmark 2.4.3 - System Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS", "Ubuntu 13.04", "PostMark 1.51 - Disk Transaction Performance", Higher Results Are Better "Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS", "Ubuntu 13.04", "PostMark 1.51 - System Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS", "Ubuntu 13.04", "Dbench 4.0 - Client Count: 1", Higher Results Are Better "Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS", "Ubuntu 13.04", "Dbench 4.0 - System Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS", "Ubuntu 13.04", "IOzone 3.405 - Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance", Higher Results Are Better "Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS", "Ubuntu 13.04", "IOzone 3.405 - System Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS", "Ubuntu 13.04", "IOzone 3.405 - Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance", Higher Results Are Better "Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS", "Ubuntu 13.04", "IOzone 3.405 - System Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS", "Ubuntu 13.04", "IOzone 3.405 - Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance", Higher Results Are Better "Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS", "Ubuntu 13.04", "IOzone 3.405 - System Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS", "Ubuntu 13.04", "IOzone 3.405 - Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance", Higher Results Are Better "Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS", "Ubuntu 13.04", "IOzone 3.405 - System Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS", "Ubuntu 13.04", "FS-Mark 3.3 - Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size", Higher Results Are Better "Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS", "Ubuntu 13.04", "FS-Mark 3.3 - System Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS", "Ubuntu 13.04", "FS-Mark 3.3 - Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSync", Higher Results Are Better "Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS", "Ubuntu 13.04", "FS-Mark 3.3 - System Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS", "Ubuntu 13.04", "FS-Mark 3.3 - Test: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threads", Higher Results Are Better "Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS", "Ubuntu 13.04", "FS-Mark 3.3 - System Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS", "Ubuntu 13.04", "FS-Mark 3.3 - Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size", Higher Results Are Better "Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS", "Ubuntu 13.04", "FS-Mark 3.3 - System Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS", "Ubuntu 13.04", "NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 - Test / Class: EP.B", Higher Results Are Better "Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS", "Ubuntu 13.04", "NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 - System Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS", "Ubuntu 13.04", "NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 - Test / Class: LU.A", Higher Results Are Better "Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS", "Ubuntu 13.04", "NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 - System Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS", "Ubuntu 13.04", "NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 - Test / Class: MG.B", Higher Results Are Better "Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS", "Ubuntu 13.04", "NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 - System Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS", "Ubuntu 13.04", "NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 - Test / Class: SP.A", Higher Results Are Better "Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS", "Ubuntu 13.04", "NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 - System Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS", "Ubuntu 13.04", "NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 - Test / Class: UA.A", Higher Results Are Better "Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS", "Ubuntu 13.04", "NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 - System Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS", "Ubuntu 13.04", "System Power Consumption Monitor - Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring", "Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS", "Ubuntu 13.04",