Linaro 12.08 benchmarks from a PandaBoard ES with Texas Instruments OMAP4460 ARM SoC. Linaro 12.08 performance compared to various Ubuntu Linux OMAP4 releases. Benchmarking by Michael Larabel for a future article on Phoronix.com.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1208239-SU-LINAROPAN09
Linaro 12.08 OMAP4 PandaBoard ES Performance,
"VP8 libvpx Encoding 0.9.7-p1 - vpxenc",
Higher Results Are Better
"Ubuntu 12.04 LTS",1.01,1.01,1.01
"Ubuntu 12.10 20120821",1.02,1.01,1.02
"Linaro 12.08",1.01,1.01,1.01
"x264 2011-12-06 - H.264 Video Encoding",
Higher Results Are Better
"Ubuntu 12.04 LTS",4.06,4.03,4
"Ubuntu 12.10 20120821",4.69,4.71,4.71
"CacheBench - Test: Read",
Higher Results Are Better
"Ubuntu 11.10",1009.072844,1006.93551,1012.594107
"Ubuntu 12.04 LTS",1705.965047,1651.486323,1672.319313
"Ubuntu 12.10 20120821",1805.191846,1722.630225,1756.135602
"Linaro 12.08",1728.704297,1681.554688,1677.498127
"CacheBench - Test: Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"Ubuntu 11.10",2043.114686,2049.401857,2047.759892
"Ubuntu 12.04 LTS",2442.990903,2446.871713,2302.36709
"Ubuntu 12.10 20120821",4338.579346,4225.522998,4070.869884
"Linaro 12.08",1699.620166,1643.838024,1616.863757
"CacheBench - Test: Read / Modify / Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"Ubuntu 11.10",1485.283383,1487.975635,1487.572654
"Ubuntu 12.04 LTS",2551.642697,2440.423664,2146.190297,2440.471552,2296.390207,2382.212988
"Ubuntu 12.10 20120821",3503.600586,3377.000684,3230.184961,3376.97654
"Linaro 12.08",2547.536035,2453.00459,2439.0602
"FFTE 5.0 - Test: N=64, 1D Complex FFT Routine",
Higher Results Are Better
"Ubuntu 11.10",242.161835762,251.27865394225,249.89657932023
"Ubuntu 12.04 LTS",466.8310569273,467.42643632543,467.90383560713
"Ubuntu 12.10 20120821",548.90501120052,548.91414543787,548.53076184368
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Composite",
Higher Results Are Better
"Ubuntu 11.10",61.65,61.86,61.52,61
"Ubuntu 12.04 LTS",101.94,101.72,101.53,102.69
"Ubuntu 12.10 20120821",81.34,81.28,81.19,81.25
"Linaro 12.08",79.95,79.95,80.02,80.35
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Monte Carlo",
Higher Results Are Better
"Ubuntu 11.10",34.5,34.68,34.59,34.24
"Ubuntu 12.04 LTS",76.7,77.14,76.48,76.92
"Ubuntu 12.10 20120821",75.4,75.4,75.4,73.95
"Linaro 12.08",76.7,76.48,76.26,76.92
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform",
Higher Results Are Better
"Ubuntu 11.10",15.5,15.26,15.46,14.92
"Ubuntu 12.04 LTS",16.45,15.41,15.48,15.32
"Ubuntu 12.10 20120821",20.45,20.14,20.1,20.26
"Linaro 12.08",15.96,16.16,16.3,16.06
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply",
Higher Results Are Better
"Ubuntu 11.10",69.19,68.82,67.02
"Ubuntu 12.04 LTS",104.07,103.23,103.64,108.02
"Ubuntu 12.10 20120821",72.52,72.52,72.52,72.73
"Linaro 12.08",73.14,73.14,73.14,73.14
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization",
Higher Results Are Better
"Ubuntu 11.10",75.67,76.28,75.67,75.76
"Ubuntu 12.04 LTS",107.53,107.87,108.23,107.7
"Ubuntu 12.10 20120821",74.57,74.57,74.82,74.82
"Linaro 12.08",72.94,72.94,72.7,73.26
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation",
Higher Results Are Better
"Ubuntu 11.10",113.38,114.06,113.05,113.05
"Ubuntu 12.04 LTS",204.94,204.94,203.85,205.49
"Ubuntu 12.10 20120821",163.77,163.77,163.08,164.48
"Linaro 12.08",161.02,161.02,161.7,162.39
"7-Zip Compression 9.20.1 - Compress Speed Test",
Higher Results Are Better
"Ubuntu 11.10",535,552,527
"Ubuntu 12.04 LTS",841,877,858
"Ubuntu 12.10 20120821",893,865,899
"Linaro 12.08",934,934,937
"TSCP 1.81 - AI Chess Performance",
Higher Results Are Better
"Ubuntu 11.10",43778,43799,43848,43802,43792
"Ubuntu 12.04 LTS",75356,75109,75325,75376,75562
"Ubuntu 12.10 20120821",74168,74029,74188,72863,74278
"Linaro 12.08",75201,75160,75160,75129,75212
"OpenSSL 1.0.0e - RSA 4096-bit Performance",
Higher Results Are Better
"Ubuntu 11.10",2.7,2.7,2.7,2.7
"Ubuntu 12.04 LTS",4.6,4.6,4.6,4.6
"Ubuntu 12.10 20120821",4.6,4.6,4.6,4.6
"Linaro 12.08",4.6,4.6,4.6,4.6
"NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 - Test / Class: BT.A",
Higher Results Are Better
"Ubuntu 11.10",255.64,255.93,253.59
"Ubuntu 12.04 LTS",388.47,366.66,360.49,353.81,355.01,351.98
"Ubuntu 12.10 20120821",436.6,442.06,406.43,417.99,443,442.55
"NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 - Test / Class: LU.A",
Higher Results Are Better
"Ubuntu 11.10",203.62,210.64,210.41
"Ubuntu 12.04 LTS",244.45,245.1,246.33
"Ubuntu 12.10 20120821",269.26,269.13,268.6
"NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 - Test / Class: MG.B",
Higher Results Are Better
"Ubuntu 11.10",194.14,192.03,191.97
"Ubuntu 12.04 LTS",245.05,240.18,240.3
"Ubuntu 12.10 20120821",264.51,265.64,265.77
"NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 - Test / Class: SP.A",
Higher Results Are Better
"Ubuntu 11.10",156.48,156.37,156.11
"Ubuntu 12.04 LTS",175.96,176.2,176.94
"Ubuntu 12.10 20120821",215.93,217.71,216.77
"NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 - Test / Class: UA.A",
Higher Results Are Better
"Ubuntu 11.10",1.44,1.44,1.44
"Ubuntu 12.04 LTS",1.79,1.78,1.77
"Ubuntu 12.10 20120821",2.05,2.04,2.04
"Timed MAFFT Alignment 6.864 - Multiple Sequence Alignment",
Lower Results Are Better
"Ubuntu 11.10",156.79543995857,155.72741508484,156.17605686188
"Ubuntu 12.10 20120821",94.019954919815,92.261229991913,91.313971042633
"Linaro 12.08",96.536930084229,95.300145149231,94.467895030975
"N-Queens 1.0 - Elapsed Time",
Lower Results Are Better
"Ubuntu 11.10",1372.891,1372.086
"Ubuntu 12.04 LTS",822.772,820.8
"Ubuntu 12.10 20120821",743.497,743.306
"Linaro 12.08",823.501,823.423
"Smallpt 1.0 - Global Illumination Renderer; 100 Samples",
Lower Results Are Better
"Ubuntu 12.04 LTS",591,591,592
"Ubuntu 12.10 20120821",2422,2418,2417
"Linaro 12.08",2482,2481,2484