Running all of the tested processors at 3.2GHz with just quad-core (four cores exposed, no HT on any CPU) and no Turbo Boost so that all of the CPUs are runnining in a like manner to just try to compare the pure graphics performance. Benchmarking by Michael Larabel for a future article on Phoronix.com looking at Ivy Bridge HD 2500 graphics.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1208206-SU-32GHZQUAD69
3.2GHz Quad-Core Intel HD Graphics,
"Xonotic 0.6 - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: High",
Higher Results Are Better
"Intel HD 2500",39.9990781,40.0141568,40.0015376
"Intel HD 4000",61.8983288,61.9497115,61.9118591
"Intel HD 3000",43.4406251,43.3114465,43.3385477
"Xonotic 0.6 - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Low",
Higher Results Are Better
"Intel HD 2500",106.3724926,106.773505,106.2477651
"Intel HD 4000",127.2902495,126.7511971,126.9665528
"Intel HD 3000",107.4013279,107.3188856,107.0941323
"Warsow 1.0 - Resolution: 1920 x 1080",
Higher Results Are Better
"Intel HD 2500",27.7,27.5,27.6
"Intel HD 4000",44.2,44.3,44.1
"Intel HD 3000",29.4,29.2,29.4
"Prey 1.4.119 - Resolution: 1920 x 1080",
Higher Results Are Better
"Intel HD 2500",19,19,19
"Intel HD 4000",30.3,30.3,30.4
"Intel HD 3000",21.9,21.9,21.9
"OpenArena 0.8.8 - Resolution: 1920 x 1080",
Higher Results Are Better
"Intel HD 2500",28.1,28.1,28.1
"Intel HD 4000",31.4,31.4,31.4
"Intel HD 3000",28.1,27.9,28
"Lightsmark 2008 - Resolution: 1920 x 1080",
Higher Results Are Better
"Intel HD 2500",38.4,41.18,41.17,41.15
"Intel HD 4000",73.88,79.68,79.62,79.56,79.58
"Intel HD 3000",41.11,41.12,41.09
"Doom 3 1.3.1 - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Quality: Low",
Higher Results Are Better
"Intel HD 2500",23.1,23.1,23.1
"Intel HD 4000",37.9,38,38.3
"Intel HD 3000",24.6,24.6,24.6