complex 1

Running pts/apache-1.4.0, pts/c-ray-1.1.0, pts/ramspeed-1.4.0, pts/postmark-1.0.0 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1205062-GR-COMPLEX1914
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

Audio Encoding 2 Tests
Bioinformatics 2 Tests
Chess Test Suite 2 Tests
C/C++ Compiler Tests 14 Tests
Compression Tests 2 Tests
CPU Massive 20 Tests
Creator Workloads 10 Tests
Cryptography 2 Tests
Encoding 4 Tests
HPC - High Performance Computing 3 Tests
Common Kernel Benchmarks 4 Tests
Memory Test Suite 2 Tests
Multi-Core 13 Tests
Raytracing 3 Tests
Renderers 5 Tests
Scientific Computing 2 Tests
Server 3 Tests
Server CPU Tests 10 Tests
Single-Threaded 2 Tests
Video Encoding 2 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Additional Graphs

Show Perf Per Core/Thread Calculation Graphs Where Applicable
Show Perf Per Clock Calculation Graphs Where Applicable

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
complex1a
April 17 2012
 
complexCPUdefault
April 18 2012
 
Apache retest
April 18 2012
 
complex CPU +5
April 18 2012
 
OC 0
April 18 2012
 
OC1 0
April 18 2012
 
0C1 suite 8
April 19 2012
 
complex CPU optimized
April 19 2012
 
complex cpu optimised 1
April 24 2012
 
complex cpu optimised 2
April 24 2012
 
complex cpu optimised 3
April 24 2012
 
complex cpu optomised 4
April 25 2012
 
OC1 suite 8 rerun
April 26 2012
 
complex CPU 2 disabled
April 27 2012
 
complex cpu 2 out + new fan
May 01 2012
 
orig baseline
May 03 2012
 
5200 x2
May 05 2012
 
5200 x2 +5
May 05 2012
 
5200 x2 +5 suite 8
May 05 2012
 
5200 x3 +5
May 06 2012
 
Invert Hiding All Results Option
 

Only show results where is faster than
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


complex 1, "Apache Benchmark 2.2.21 - Static Web Page Serving", Higher Results Are Better "complex1a",17242.28,16639.9,16424.02 "Apache retest",14629.43,14853.86,15467.9 "complex CPU +5",16831.87,16525.03,16197.11 "OC 0",12330.36,10185.25,10407.01,9827.01,10997.73,10818.58 "OC1 0",6965.53,6858.53,6868.14 "0C1 suite 8",6420.64,6370.49,6423.47 "complex CPU optimized",15667.91,15211.68,15147.55 "complex cpu optimised 1",15401.39,15526.96,15181.25 "complex cpu optimised 2",15270.4,14910.61,14730.2 "complex cpu optimised 3",15569.3,15160.18,14908.59 "complex cpu optomised 4",11121.55,14401.11,14798.92,14707.58,15200.17,15482.78 "OC1 suite 8 rerun",12045.03,11882.8,11785.59 "complex CPU 2 disabled",12073.55,11732.49,11766.24 "complex cpu 2 out + new fan",11814.09,11714.49,11774.84 "orig baseline",6583.17,6611.06,6572.43 "5200 x2",7296.72,7142.67,7194.1 "5200 x2 +5",7442.51,7507,7422.65 "5200 x2 +5 suite 8",7753.36,7780.49,7781.39 "5200 x3 +5",7465.85,7460.87,7477.01 "C-Ray 1.1 - Total Time", Lower Results Are Better "complex1a",201.916,207.086,217.27,208.255 "complexCPUdefault",246.855,251.786,258.335 "complex CPU +5",228.882,228.81,228.179 "OC 0",452.968,490.621,479.131,458.738,449.906,465.998 "OC1 0",384.11,383.927,383.61 "0C1 suite 8",393.349,390.915,389.688 "complex CPU optimized",241.899,240.496,239.14 "complex cpu optimised 1",240.541,239.816,239.817 "complex cpu optimised 2",240.089,239.909,238.926 "complex cpu optimised 3",239.834,238.864,239.335 "complex cpu optomised 4",236.304,236.321,236.565 "OC1 suite 8 rerun",323.695,323.556,322.231 "complex CPU 2 disabled",322.045,358.289,334.487,319.95,318.213,317.476 "complex cpu 2 out + new fan",321.03,320.373,319.676 "orig baseline",469.667,530.765,465.918,463.907,463.869,463.874 "5200 x2",384.304,380.189,444.126,382.692,381.711,382.751 "5200 x2 +5",366.815,362.248,361.991 "5200 x2 +5 suite 8",358.655,358.544,358.385 "5200 x3 +5",366.396,365.81,367.289 "RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Type: Average - Benchmark: Integer", Higher Results Are Better "complex1a", "complexCPUdefault", "complex CPU +5", "OC 0", "OC1 0", "complex CPU optimized", "complex cpu optimised 1", "complex cpu optimised 2", "complex cpu optimised 3", "complex cpu optomised 4", "complex CPU 2 disabled", "complex cpu 2 out + new fan", "orig baseline", "5200 x2", "5200 x2 +5", "5200 x3 +5", "RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Type: Average - Benchmark: Floating Point", Higher Results Are Better "complex1a", "complexCPUdefault", "complex CPU +5", "OC 0", "OC1 0", "complex CPU optimized", "complex cpu optimised 1", "complex cpu optimised 2", "complex cpu optimised 3", "complex cpu optomised 4", "complex CPU 2 disabled", "complex cpu 2 out + new fan", "orig baseline", "5200 x2", "5200 x2 +5", "5200 x3 +5", "PostMark 1.51 - Disk Transaction Performance", Higher Results Are Better "complex1a",257,257,255,257,252 "complexCPUdefault",257,255,260,260,255 "complex CPU +5",260,257,257,257,252 "OC 0",257,263,255,263,257 "OC1 0",242,242,245,245,247 "complex CPU optimized",263,255,257,263,255 "complex cpu optimised 1",257,250,260,255,255 "complex cpu optimised 2",265,263,255,252,229,242,245,245,252,245 "complex cpu optimised 3",263,257,255,257,252 "complex cpu optomised 4",255,252,250,252,252 "complex CPU 2 disabled",252,252,257,255,257 "complex cpu 2 out + new fan",250,247,245,247,245 "orig baseline",255,255,252,247,245 "5200 x2",255,257,252,250,257 "5200 x2 +5",260,260,257,252,257 "5200 x3 +5",257,255,250,255,252 "World of Padman 1.2 - 1024 x 768", Higher Results Are Better "0C1 suite 8",41.2,41.2,41.1 "OC1 suite 8 rerun",39.1,38.3,39 "5200 x2 +5 suite 8",35.2,34,35.2 "GraphicsMagick 1.3.12 - HWB Color Space", Higher Results Are Better "0C1 suite 8",53,52,53 "OC1 suite 8 rerun",54,53,53 "5200 x2 +5 suite 8",59,58,59 "GraphicsMagick 1.3.12 - Local Adaptive Thresholding", Higher Results Are Better "0C1 suite 8",18,18,18 "OC1 suite 8 rerun",24,24,23 "5200 x2 +5 suite 8",20,20,20 "GraphicsMagick 1.3.12 - Resizing", Higher Results Are Better "0C1 suite 8",42,42,42 "OC1 suite 8 rerun",35,35,35 "5200 x2 +5 suite 8",51,50,51 "GraphicsMagick 1.3.12 - Sharpen", Higher Results Are Better "0C1 suite 8",28,28,28 "OC1 suite 8 rerun",31,31,31 "5200 x2 +5 suite 8",31,31,31 "John The Ripper 1.7.9 - Traditional DES", Higher Results Are Better "0C1 suite 8",1392000,1392000,1392000 "OC1 suite 8 rerun",1642000,1643000,1646000 "5200 x2 +5 suite 8",1411000,1427000,1416000 "John The Ripper 1.7.9 - Blowfish", Higher Results Are Better "0C1 suite 8",1046,1077,1080 "OC1 suite 8 rerun",1379,1397,1369 "5200 x2 +5 suite 8",1200,1192,1190 "TTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.2w - Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping", Higher Results Are Better "0C1 suite 8",17.2868,17.3022,17.1874 "OC1 suite 8 rerun",17.3559,16.9952,17.3125 "5200 x2 +5 suite 8",20.5843,20.5998,20.5683 "Parallel BZIP2 Compression 1.0.5 - 256MB File Compression", Lower Results Are Better "0C1 suite 8",86.197986125946,77.100549936295,83.955014944077,85.06173491478,87.825990915298,84.148084163666 "OC1 suite 8 rerun",47.70116519928,47.638991832733,48.687855005264 "5200 x2 +5 suite 8",69.621881008148,68.952208995819,67.999516963959 "7-Zip Compression 9.20.1 - Compress Speed Test", Higher Results Are Better "0C1 suite 8",2860,2821,2750 "OC1 suite 8 rerun",2283,2265,2253 "5200 x2 +5 suite 8",3256,3345,3261 "LAME MP3 Encoding 3.99.3 - WAV To MP3", Lower Results Are Better "0C1 suite 8",32.579407930374,32.267465114594,32.25893497467,32.324004173279,32.440003871918 "OC1 suite 8 rerun",35.14593911171,35.120673179626,35.017358064651,34.960369825363,34.980818986893 "5200 x2 +5 suite 8",31.124845981598,30.997144937515,30.990130901337,30.794319152832,31.116326093674 "FLAC Audio Encoding 1.2.1 - WAV To FLAC", Lower Results Are Better "0C1 suite 8",11.423400878906,11.371093988419,11.378588199615,11.374200820923,11.388297080994 "OC1 suite 8 rerun",12.904186964035,12.833452939987,12.890624046326,12.852743864059,12.905123949051 "5200 x2 +5 suite 8",10.986211061478,10.984459877014,10.934756994247,11.016865968704,11.000902891159 "x264 2011-12-06 - H.264 Video Encoding", Higher Results Are Better "0C1 suite 8",16.87,17.19,17.18 "OC1 suite 8 rerun",30.06,30.03,30.37 "5200 x2 +5 suite 8",18.61,19.18,18.98 "FFmpeg 0.10 - AVI To NTSC VCD", Lower Results Are Better "0C1 suite 8",27.85369181633,27.492167949677,27.476051092148 "OC1 suite 8 rerun",25.448658943176,25.083445072174,25.052993059158 "5200 x2 +5 suite 8",26.54394197464,25.984499931335,25.938419818878 "OpenSSL 1.0.0e - RSA 4096-bit Performance", Higher Results Are Better "0C1 suite 8",16.1,16.1,16.1,16.1 "OC1 suite 8 rerun",14.6,14.6,14.6,14.6 "5200 x2 +5 suite 8",16.8,16.8,16.8,16.8 "Himeno Benchmark 3.0 - Poisson Pressure Solver", Higher Results Are Better "0C1 suite 8",239.646218,246.922176,245.841351 "OC1 suite 8 rerun",278.333861,284.500109,291.823849 "5200 x2 +5 suite 8",216.805639,219.993204,220.115669 "PostgreSQL pgbench 8.4.11 - TPC-B Transactions Per Second", Higher Results Are Better "0C1 suite 8",113.378987,113.565373,114.049974 "OC1 suite 8 rerun",140.449419,140.007159,142.472186 "5200 x2 +5 suite 8",110.836977,113.216431,113.180753 "POV-Ray 3.6.1 - Total Time", Lower Results Are Better "0C1 suite 8", "OC1 suite 8 rerun", "5200 x2 +5 suite 8", "Smallpt 1.0 - Global Illumination Renderer; 100 Samples", Lower Results Are Better "0C1 suite 8",696,690,693 "OC1 suite 8 rerun",495,499,494 "5200 x2 +5 suite 8",642,642,641 "Tachyon 0.98.9 - Total Time", Lower Results Are Better "0C1 suite 8",87.4123,87.2004,85.4798 "OC1 suite 8 rerun",58.7007,58.4257,58.9479 "5200 x2 +5 suite 8",77.7262,77.9677,78.3136 "Crafty 23.4 - Elapsed Time", Lower Results Are Better "0C1 suite 8",0.01,0.02,0.01,0.01,0.02,0.02 "OC1 suite 8 rerun",0.02,0.02,0.01,0.02,0.01,0.01 "5200 x2 +5 suite 8",0.04,0.01,0.01,0.01,0.02,0.02 "TSCP 1.81 - AI Chess Performance", Higher Results Are Better "0C1 suite 8",213977,213728,213894,213562,213894 "OC1 suite 8 rerun",211512,211674,211756,211512,211349 "5200 x2 +5 suite 8",223348,223711,223711,223711,223620 "Timed MAFFT Alignment 6.864 - Multiple Sequence Alignment", Lower Results Are Better "0C1 suite 8",35.756366014481,36.238698959351,36.087074041367 "OC1 suite 8 rerun",25.998963117599,27.83019900322,28.605037927628,28.43846487999,25.698689937592,30.984368085861 "5200 x2 +5 suite 8",31.704697847366,29.497559785843,31.467835903168,31.624850034714 "NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 - Test / Class: EP.B", Higher Results Are Better "0C1 suite 8",27.19,27.74,27.6 "OC1 suite 8 rerun",34.37,35.29,35.16 "5200 x2 +5 suite 8",30.31,30.36,30.35 "NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 - Test / Class: IS.C", Higher Results Are Better "0C1 suite 8",55.47,55.03,55.06 "OC1 suite 8 rerun",12.09,12.66,12.58 "5200 x2 +5 suite 8",63.31,63.06,63.59 "NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 - Test / Class: LU.A", Higher Results Are Better "0C1 suite 8",805.02,815.27,837.71 "OC1 suite 8 rerun",2033.39,2075.89,1928.8,1878.64,2016.52,1915.73 "5200 x2 +5 suite 8",1020.58,1045.2,1024.57 "NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 - Test / Class: MG.B", Higher Results Are Better "0C1 suite 8",854.29,842.87,841.14 "OC1 suite 8 rerun",1409.89,1394.6,1375.25 "5200 x2 +5 suite 8",1092.23,1100.5,1083.55 "NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 - Test / Class: UA.A", Higher Results Are Better "0C1 suite 8",5.77,5.8,5.82 "OC1 suite 8 rerun",8.27,8.29,8.3 "5200 x2 +5 suite 8",6.99,6.94,6.98 "Stream 2009-04-11 - Type: Copy", Higher Results Are Better "0C1 suite 8",2100.9841,2098.6214,2097.1288,2100.9792,2100.1578,2102.4916,2103.4525,2100.5493,2101.6659,2096.7185 "OC1 suite 8 rerun",4147.7415,4140.2053,4197.3129,4182.9835,4190.0828,4185.1694,4149.9089,4191.7133,4148.27,4177.5115 "5200 x2 +5 suite 8",2615.6703,2625.9694,2619.0884,2650.0824,2615.0027,2616.926,2622.3268,2627.2427,2633.3088,2624.6614 "Stream 2009-04-11 - Type: Scale", Higher Results Are Better "0C1 suite 8",2098.3753,2096.713,2094.6514,2095.3464,2088.2344,2093.019,2097.938,2093.4166,2089.5934,2087.6687 "OC1 suite 8 rerun",4085.7488,4082.2032,4120.0574,4117.811,4117.8519,4121.5437,4086.9045,4120.5407,4079.6015,4119.5255 "5200 x2 +5 suite 8",2605.2122,2599.5176,2613.7212,2635.2479,2603.9308,2607.9803,2607.9902,2605.0133,2601.83,2616.3019 "Stream 2009-04-11 - Type: Add", Higher Results Are Better "0C1 suite 8",2320.309,2317.8384,2316.8319,2316.4872,2319.4135,2320.2848,2312.3676,2319.3888,2317.7166,2318.4924 "OC1 suite 8 rerun",4473.008,4467.5938,4521.0128,4533.385,4529.1252,4522.3777,4468.4133,4509.5591,4470.9355,4518.921 "5200 x2 +5 suite 8",2943.7187,2955.12,2943.5093,2968.655,2932.0143,2936.1223,2931.2792,2937.7432,2933.4353,2953.6469 "Stream 2009-04-11 - Type: Triad", Higher Results Are Better "0C1 suite 8",2307.5888,2306.8053,2309.6966,2305.464,2305.2617,2302.4823,2304.8154,2303.8089,2297.7451,2305.3761 "OC1 suite 8 rerun",4521.9464,4503.6318,4556.1898,4565.7483,4561.387,4550.647,4453.9679,4552.7627,4510.8152,4545.8427 "5200 x2 +5 suite 8",2956.0459,2949.2945,2955.1248,2912.6114,2956.9352,2971.1997,2955.2872,2935.9628,2954.2016,2952.5558