Ubuntu 12.04 LTS JFS Ubuntu 12.04 LTS bencharks with a stock/clean install but with the EXT3 file-system on Linux 3.2 kernel as found in Precise pangolin versus ReiserFS and XFS. This Linux file-system benchmarking is for a future article on Phoronix.com.
HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/1203149-BY-JFSUBUNTU07&grs&sro .
Ubuntu 12.04 LTS JFS Processor Motherboard Chipset Memory Disk Graphics Audio Network OS Kernel Desktop Display Server Display Driver OpenGL Compiler File-System Screen Resolution ReiserFS XFS EXT3 JFS Intel Core i5-2520M @ 2.50GHz (4 Cores) HP 161C Intel 2nd Generation Core Family DRAM 4096MB 160GB INTEL SSDSA2M160 Intel Sandybridge Mobile (GT2+) IDT 92HD81B1X5 Intel 82579LM Gigabit Connection + Intel Centrino Advanced-N 6205 Ubuntu 12.04 3.2.0-18-generic (x86_64) Unity 5.6.0 X Server 1.11.3 intel 2.17.0 3.0 Mesa 8.0.1 GCC 4.6 reiserfs 1600x900 xfs ext3 jfs OpenBenchmarking.org Compiler Details - --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++,go --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-arch-32=i686 --with-tune=generic -v Disk Details - ReiserFS: CFQ / notail,relatime,rw - XFS: CFQ / attr2,delaylog,noquota,relatime,rw - EXT3: CFQ / acl,barrier=1,data=ordered,errors=remount-ro,relatime,rw,user_xattr - JFS: CFQ / relatime,rw System Details - Disk Scheduler: CFQ. Python 2.7.3rc1. Compiz was running on this system.
Ubuntu 12.04 LTS JFS dbench: 1 fs-mark: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size fio: Intel IOMeter File Server Access Pattern fs-mark: 1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSync compilebench: Read Compiled Tree iozone: 1MB - 8GB - Read Performance iozone: 64Kb - 8GB - Read Performance iozone: 1MB - 8GB - Write Performance fs-mark: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threads iozone: 4Kb - 8GB - Read Performance compilebench: Compile iozone: 64Kb - 8GB - Write Performance tiobench: Write - 128MB - 16 tiobench: Write - 128MB - 8 compilebench: Initial Create tiobench: Rand Write - 128MB - 16 tiobench: Rand Write - 128MB - 8 iozone: 4Kb - 8GB - Write Performance fs-mark: 1000 Files, 1MB Size postmark: Disk Transaction Performance ReiserFS XFS EXT3 JFS 111.23 57.37 147.65 122.37 161.43 213.13 213.20 101.90 82.63 213.35 103.77 102.37 98.40 97.84 85.96 84.77 80.14 102.12 56.80 1770 162.38 80.23 226.00 152.80 134.29 235.11 236.11 105.61 93.63 240.85 104.03 104.97 98.93 99.84 88.68 85.09 85.83 104.74 80.00 126.99 64.47 148.16 134.77 131.66 224.88 225.00 101.20 88.50 225.15 105.72 99.93 99.21 100.10 97.49 85.68 81.36 101.13 64.94 1882 274.81 91.23 161.02 141.53 135.74 254.24 254.18 89.09 97.53 247.57 92.08 92.80 101.35 98.92 54.46 77.04 64.78 93.51 77.98 1526 OpenBenchmarking.org
Dbench Client Count: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Dbench 4.0 Client Count: 1 EXT3 JFS ReiserFS XFS 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 SE +/- 0.44, N = 3 126.99 274.81 111.23 162.38 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpopt
FS-Mark Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size OpenBenchmarking.org Files/s, More Is Better FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size EXT3 JFS ReiserFS XFS 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 64.47 91.23 57.37 80.23 1. (CC) gcc options: -static
Flexible IO Tester Test: Intel IOMeter File Server Access Pattern OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds (Run Time), Fewer Is Better Flexible IO Tester 1.57 Test: Intel IOMeter File Server Access Pattern EXT3 JFS ReiserFS XFS 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 SE +/- 3.75, N = 6 SE +/- 1.14, N = 3 SE +/- 0.45, N = 3 148.16 161.02 147.65 226.00
FS-Mark Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSync OpenBenchmarking.org Files/s, More Is Better FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSync EXT3 JFS ReiserFS XFS 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.45, N = 3 SE +/- 2.52, N = 3 SE +/- 1.65, N = 3 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 134.77 141.53 122.37 152.80 1. (CC) gcc options: -static
Compile Bench Test: Read Compiled Tree OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Read Compiled Tree EXT3 JFS ReiserFS XFS 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.63, N = 3 SE +/- 0.27, N = 3 SE +/- 2.13, N = 3 SE +/- 0.28, N = 3 131.66 135.74 161.43 134.29
IOzone Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.347 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance EXT3 JFS ReiserFS XFS 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.22, N = 3 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 SE +/- 2.19, N = 3 SE +/- 1.87, N = 3 224.88 254.24 213.13 235.11 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
IOzone Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.347 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance EXT3 JFS ReiserFS XFS 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 SE +/- 2.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.89, N = 3 225.00 254.18 213.20 236.11 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
IOzone Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.347 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance EXT3 JFS ReiserFS XFS 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.52, N = 3 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 SE +/- 0.29, N = 3 SE +/- 0.30, N = 3 101.20 89.09 101.90 105.61 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
FS-Mark Test: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threads OpenBenchmarking.org Files/s, More Is Better FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threads EXT3 JFS ReiserFS XFS 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.55, N = 3 SE +/- 0.52, N = 3 SE +/- 0.63, N = 3 SE +/- 0.64, N = 3 88.50 97.53 82.63 93.63 1. (CC) gcc options: -static
IOzone Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.347 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance EXT3 JFS ReiserFS XFS 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.29, N = 3 SE +/- 3.93, N = 3 SE +/- 2.13, N = 3 SE +/- 3.38, N = 5 225.15 247.57 213.35 240.85 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
Compile Bench Test: Compile OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Compile EXT3 JFS ReiserFS XFS 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.99, N = 3 SE +/- 0.85, N = 3 SE +/- 1.13, N = 3 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 105.72 92.08 103.77 104.03
IOzone Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.347 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance EXT3 JFS ReiserFS XFS 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.25, N = 3 SE +/- 1.64, N = 6 SE +/- 0.64, N = 3 SE +/- 0.50, N = 3 99.93 92.80 102.37 104.97 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
Threaded I/O Tester Test: Write - Size Per Thread: 128MB - Thread Count: 16 OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3 Test: Write - Size Per Thread: 128MB - Thread Count: 16 EXT3 JFS ReiserFS XFS 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.88, N = 4 SE +/- 0.65, N = 4 SE +/- 0.45, N = 4 SE +/- 0.42, N = 4 99.21 101.35 98.40 98.93
Threaded I/O Tester Test: Write - Size Per Thread: 128MB - Thread Count: 8 OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3 Test: Write - Size Per Thread: 128MB - Thread Count: 8 EXT3 JFS ReiserFS XFS 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.09, N = 4 SE +/- 1.24, N = 8 SE +/- 1.33, N = 4 SE +/- 1.10, N = 4 100.10 98.92 97.84 99.84
Compile Bench Test: Initial Create OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Initial Create EXT3 JFS ReiserFS XFS 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.98, N = 3 SE +/- 0.34, N = 3 SE +/- 1.50, N = 4 SE +/- 2.36, N = 6 97.49 54.46 85.96 88.68
Threaded I/O Tester Test: Random Write - Size Per Thread: 128MB - Thread Count: 16 OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3 Test: Random Write - Size Per Thread: 128MB - Thread Count: 16 EXT3 JFS ReiserFS XFS 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.64, N = 4 SE +/- 6.90, N = 8 SE +/- 0.29, N = 4 SE +/- 0.59, N = 4 85.68 77.04 84.77 85.09
Threaded I/O Tester Test: Random Write - Size Per Thread: 128MB - Thread Count: 8 OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3 Test: Random Write - Size Per Thread: 128MB - Thread Count: 8 EXT3 JFS ReiserFS XFS 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 4.96, N = 8 SE +/- 10.64, N = 8 SE +/- 6.58, N = 8 SE +/- 0.35, N = 4 81.36 64.78 80.14 85.83
IOzone Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.347 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance EXT3 JFS ReiserFS XFS 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 SE +/- 2.51, N = 6 SE +/- 1.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.36, N = 3 101.13 93.51 102.12 104.74 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
FS-Mark Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size OpenBenchmarking.org Files/s, More Is Better FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size EXT3 JFS ReiserFS XFS 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.01, N = 5 SE +/- 6.37, N = 6 SE +/- 1.10, N = 3 SE +/- 1.33, N = 3 64.94 77.98 56.80 80.00 1. (CC) gcc options: -static
PostMark Disk Transaction Performance OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostMark 1.51 Disk Transaction Performance EXT3 JFS ReiserFS 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 57.17, N = 10 SE +/- 19.55, N = 10 SE +/- 44.77, N = 10 1882 1526 1770
Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.4