Ubuntu 12.04 LTS JFS Ubuntu 12.04 LTS bencharks with a stock/clean install but with the EXT3 file-system on Linux 3.2 kernel as found in Precise pangolin versus ReiserFS and XFS. This Linux file-system benchmarking is for a future article on Phoronix.com.
HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/1203149-BY-JFSUBUNTU07 .
Ubuntu 12.04 LTS JFS Processor Motherboard Chipset Memory Disk Graphics Audio Network OS Kernel Desktop Display Server Display Driver OpenGL Compiler File-System Screen Resolution ReiserFS XFS EXT3 JFS Intel Core i5-2520M @ 2.50GHz (4 Cores) HP 161C Intel 2nd Generation Core Family DRAM 4096MB 160GB INTEL SSDSA2M160 Intel Sandybridge Mobile (GT2+) IDT 92HD81B1X5 Intel 82579LM Gigabit Connection + Intel Centrino Advanced-N 6205 Ubuntu 12.04 3.2.0-18-generic (x86_64) Unity 5.6.0 X Server 1.11.3 intel 2.17.0 3.0 Mesa 8.0.1 GCC 4.6 reiserfs 1600x900 xfs ext3 jfs OpenBenchmarking.org Compiler Details - --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++,go --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-arch-32=i686 --with-tune=generic -v Disk Details - ReiserFS: CFQ / notail,relatime,rw - XFS: CFQ / attr2,delaylog,noquota,relatime,rw - EXT3: CFQ / acl,barrier=1,data=ordered,errors=remount-ro,relatime,rw,user_xattr - JFS: CFQ / relatime,rw System Details - Disk Scheduler: CFQ. Python 2.7.3rc1. Compiz was running on this system.
Ubuntu 12.04 LTS JFS postmark: Disk Transaction Performance dbench: 1 fs-mark: 1000 Files, 1MB Size fs-mark: 1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSync fs-mark: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threads fs-mark: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size iozone: 4Kb - 8GB - Write Performance iozone: 4Kb - 8GB - Read Performance iozone: 64Kb - 8GB - Write Performance iozone: 64Kb - 8GB - Read Performance iozone: 1MB - 8GB - Write Performance iozone: 1MB - 8GB - Read Performance tiobench: Write - 128MB - 8 tiobench: Write - 128MB - 16 tiobench: Rand Write - 128MB - 8 tiobench: Rand Write - 128MB - 16 compilebench: Initial Create compilebench: Compile compilebench: Read Compiled Tree fio: Intel IOMeter File Server Access Pattern ReiserFS XFS EXT3 JFS 1770 111.23 56.80 122.37 82.63 57.37 102.12 213.35 102.37 213.20 101.90 213.13 97.84 98.40 80.14 84.77 85.96 103.77 161.43 147.65 162.38 80.00 152.80 93.63 80.23 104.74 240.85 104.97 236.11 105.61 235.11 99.84 98.93 85.83 85.09 88.68 104.03 134.29 226.00 1882 126.99 64.94 134.77 88.50 64.47 101.13 225.15 99.93 225.00 101.20 224.88 100.10 99.21 81.36 85.68 97.49 105.72 131.66 148.16 1526 274.81 77.98 141.53 97.53 91.23 93.51 247.57 92.80 254.18 89.09 254.24 98.92 101.35 64.78 77.04 54.46 92.08 135.74 161.02 OpenBenchmarking.org
PostMark Disk Transaction Performance OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostMark 1.51 Disk Transaction Performance ReiserFS EXT3 JFS 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 44.77, N = 10 SE +/- 57.17, N = 10 SE +/- 19.55, N = 10 1770 1882 1526
Dbench Client Count: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Dbench 4.0 Client Count: 1 ReiserFS XFS EXT3 JFS 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 SE +/- 0.44, N = 3 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 111.23 162.38 126.99 274.81 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpopt
FS-Mark Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size OpenBenchmarking.org Files/s, More Is Better FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size ReiserFS XFS EXT3 JFS 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.10, N = 3 SE +/- 1.33, N = 3 SE +/- 1.01, N = 5 SE +/- 6.37, N = 6 56.80 80.00 64.94 77.98 1. (CC) gcc options: -static
FS-Mark Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSync OpenBenchmarking.org Files/s, More Is Better FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSync ReiserFS XFS EXT3 JFS 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.65, N = 3 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 SE +/- 1.45, N = 3 SE +/- 2.52, N = 3 122.37 152.80 134.77 141.53 1. (CC) gcc options: -static
FS-Mark Test: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threads OpenBenchmarking.org Files/s, More Is Better FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threads ReiserFS XFS EXT3 JFS 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.63, N = 3 SE +/- 0.64, N = 3 SE +/- 0.55, N = 3 SE +/- 0.52, N = 3 82.63 93.63 88.50 97.53 1. (CC) gcc options: -static
FS-Mark Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size OpenBenchmarking.org Files/s, More Is Better FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size ReiserFS XFS EXT3 JFS 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 57.37 80.23 64.47 91.23 1. (CC) gcc options: -static
IOzone Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.347 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance ReiserFS XFS EXT3 JFS 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.36, N = 3 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 SE +/- 2.51, N = 6 102.12 104.74 101.13 93.51 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
IOzone Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.347 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance ReiserFS XFS EXT3 JFS 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 2.13, N = 3 SE +/- 3.38, N = 5 SE +/- 0.29, N = 3 SE +/- 3.93, N = 3 213.35 240.85 225.15 247.57 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
IOzone Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.347 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance ReiserFS XFS EXT3 JFS 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.64, N = 3 SE +/- 0.50, N = 3 SE +/- 0.25, N = 3 SE +/- 1.64, N = 6 102.37 104.97 99.93 92.80 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
IOzone Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.347 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance ReiserFS XFS EXT3 JFS 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 2.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.89, N = 3 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 213.20 236.11 225.00 254.18 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
IOzone Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.347 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance ReiserFS XFS EXT3 JFS 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.29, N = 3 SE +/- 0.30, N = 3 SE +/- 0.52, N = 3 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 101.90 105.61 101.20 89.09 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
IOzone Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.347 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance ReiserFS XFS EXT3 JFS 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 2.19, N = 3 SE +/- 1.87, N = 3 SE +/- 0.22, N = 3 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 213.13 235.11 224.88 254.24 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
Threaded I/O Tester Test: Write - Size Per Thread: 128MB - Thread Count: 8 OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3 Test: Write - Size Per Thread: 128MB - Thread Count: 8 ReiserFS XFS EXT3 JFS 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.33, N = 4 SE +/- 1.10, N = 4 SE +/- 1.09, N = 4 SE +/- 1.24, N = 8 97.84 99.84 100.10 98.92
Threaded I/O Tester Test: Write - Size Per Thread: 128MB - Thread Count: 16 OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3 Test: Write - Size Per Thread: 128MB - Thread Count: 16 ReiserFS XFS EXT3 JFS 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.45, N = 4 SE +/- 0.42, N = 4 SE +/- 0.88, N = 4 SE +/- 0.65, N = 4 98.40 98.93 99.21 101.35
Threaded I/O Tester Test: Random Write - Size Per Thread: 128MB - Thread Count: 8 OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3 Test: Random Write - Size Per Thread: 128MB - Thread Count: 8 ReiserFS XFS EXT3 JFS 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 6.58, N = 8 SE +/- 0.35, N = 4 SE +/- 4.96, N = 8 SE +/- 10.64, N = 8 80.14 85.83 81.36 64.78
Threaded I/O Tester Test: Random Write - Size Per Thread: 128MB - Thread Count: 16 OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3 Test: Random Write - Size Per Thread: 128MB - Thread Count: 16 ReiserFS XFS EXT3 JFS 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.29, N = 4 SE +/- 0.59, N = 4 SE +/- 0.64, N = 4 SE +/- 6.90, N = 8 84.77 85.09 85.68 77.04
Compile Bench Test: Initial Create OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Initial Create ReiserFS XFS EXT3 JFS 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.50, N = 4 SE +/- 2.36, N = 6 SE +/- 0.98, N = 3 SE +/- 0.34, N = 3 85.96 88.68 97.49 54.46
Compile Bench Test: Compile OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Compile ReiserFS XFS EXT3 JFS 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.13, N = 3 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 SE +/- 0.99, N = 3 SE +/- 0.85, N = 3 103.77 104.03 105.72 92.08
Compile Bench Test: Read Compiled Tree OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Read Compiled Tree ReiserFS XFS EXT3 JFS 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 2.13, N = 3 SE +/- 0.28, N = 3 SE +/- 0.63, N = 3 SE +/- 0.27, N = 3 161.43 134.29 131.66 135.74
Flexible IO Tester Test: Intel IOMeter File Server Access Pattern OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds (Run Time), Fewer Is Better Flexible IO Tester 1.57 Test: Intel IOMeter File Server Access Pattern ReiserFS XFS EXT3 JFS 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 1.14, N = 3 SE +/- 0.45, N = 3 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 SE +/- 3.75, N = 6 147.65 226.00 148.16 161.02
Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.4