Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Linux File-Systems Ubuntu 12.04 LTS bencharks with a stock/clean installs using the Linux 3.2 kernel as found in Precise pangolin and comparing root Linux file-systems of ReiserFS, JFS, EXT2, EXT3, EXT4, Btrfs, and XFS. This Linux file-system benchmarking is for a future article on Phoronix.com.
HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/1203144-BY-UBUNTUFS745&sro&gru .
Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Linux File-Systems Processor Motherboard Chipset Memory Disk Graphics Audio Network OS Kernel Desktop Display Server Display Driver OpenGL Compiler File-System Screen Resolution ReiserFS JFS EXT2 EXT3 EXT4 Btrfs XFS Intel Core i5-2520M @ 2.50GHz (4 Cores) HP 161C Intel 2nd Generation Core Family DRAM 4096MB 160GB INTEL SSDSA2M160 Intel Sandybridge Mobile (GT2+) IDT 92HD81B1X5 Intel 82579LM Gigabit Connection + Intel Centrino Advanced-N 6205 Ubuntu 12.04 3.2.0-18-generic (x86_64) Unity 5.6.0 X Server 1.11.3 intel 2.17.0 3.0 Mesa 8.0.1 GCC 4.6 reiserfs 1600x900 jfs ext2 ext3 ext4 btrfs xfs OpenBenchmarking.org Compiler Details - --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++,go --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-arch-32=i686 --with-tune=generic -v Disk Details - ReiserFS: CFQ / notail,relatime,rw - JFS: CFQ / relatime,rw - EXT2: CFQ / errors=remount-ro,relatime,rw - EXT3: CFQ / acl,barrier=1,data=ordered,errors=remount-ro,relatime,rw,user_xattr - EXT4: CFQ / barrier=1,data=ordered,errors=remount-ro,relatime,rw,user_xattr - Btrfs: CFQ / nospace_cache,relatime,rw,ssd - XFS: CFQ / attr2,delaylog,noquota,relatime,rw System Details - Disk Scheduler: CFQ. Python 2.7.3rc1. Compiz was running on this system.
Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Linux File-Systems fs-mark: 1000 Files, 1MB Size fs-mark: 1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSync fs-mark: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threads fs-mark: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size dbench: 1 iozone: 4Kb - 8GB - Write Performance iozone: 4Kb - 8GB - Read Performance iozone: 64Kb - 8GB - Write Performance iozone: 64Kb - 8GB - Read Performance iozone: 1MB - 8GB - Write Performance iozone: 1MB - 8GB - Read Performance tiobench: Write - 128MB - 8 tiobench: Write - 128MB - 16 tiobench: Rand Write - 128MB - 8 tiobench: Rand Write - 128MB - 16 compilebench: Initial Create compilebench: Compile compilebench: Read Compiled Tree postmark: Disk Transaction Performance fio: Intel IOMeter File Server Access Pattern ReiserFS JFS EXT2 EXT3 EXT4 Btrfs XFS 56.80 122.37 82.63 57.37 111.23 102.12 213.35 102.37 213.20 101.90 213.13 97.84 98.40 80.14 84.77 85.96 103.77 161.43 1770 147.65 77.98 141.53 97.53 91.23 274.81 93.51 247.57 92.80 254.18 89.09 254.24 98.92 101.35 64.78 77.04 54.46 92.08 135.74 1526 161.02 92.00 146.93 92.50 78.90 576.71 101.13 213.60 102.53 211.49 102.45 216.43 88.57 92.82 83.82 87.60 73.68 71.87 242.98 175.00 64.94 134.77 88.50 64.47 126.99 101.13 225.15 99.93 225.00 101.20 224.88 100.10 99.21 81.36 85.68 97.49 105.72 131.66 1882 148.16 75.67 143.80 96.67 77.73 200.87 107.35 254.84 105.41 254.80 104.03 254.84 99.06 98.62 88.77 87.24 97.19 106.50 119.22 117.03 62.17 144.73 92.30 60.70 159.56 98.82 223.21 100.02 224.78 103.13 225.32 99.10 99.12 84.21 89.02 79.21 105.54 409.16 2083 561.12 80.00 152.80 93.63 80.23 162.38 104.74 240.85 104.97 236.11 105.61 235.11 99.84 98.93 85.83 85.09 88.68 104.03 134.29 226.00 OpenBenchmarking.org
FS-Mark Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size OpenBenchmarking.org Files/s, More Is Better FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size Btrfs EXT2 EXT3 EXT4 JFS ReiserFS XFS 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.35, N = 3 SE +/- 1.61, N = 3 SE +/- 1.01, N = 5 SE +/- 2.83, N = 6 SE +/- 6.37, N = 6 SE +/- 1.10, N = 3 SE +/- 1.33, N = 3 62.17 92.00 64.94 75.67 77.98 56.80 80.00 1. (CC) gcc options: -static
FS-Mark Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSync OpenBenchmarking.org Files/s, More Is Better FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSync Btrfs EXT2 EXT3 EXT4 JFS ReiserFS XFS 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 5.61, N = 6 SE +/- 2.32, N = 3 SE +/- 1.45, N = 3 SE +/- 2.95, N = 6 SE +/- 2.52, N = 3 SE +/- 1.65, N = 3 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 144.73 146.93 134.77 143.80 141.53 122.37 152.80 1. (CC) gcc options: -static
FS-Mark Test: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threads OpenBenchmarking.org Files/s, More Is Better FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threads Btrfs EXT2 EXT3 EXT4 JFS ReiserFS XFS 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.35, N = 3 SE +/- 1.54, N = 4 SE +/- 0.55, N = 3 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 SE +/- 0.52, N = 3 SE +/- 0.63, N = 3 SE +/- 0.64, N = 3 92.30 92.50 88.50 96.67 97.53 82.63 93.63 1. (CC) gcc options: -static
FS-Mark Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size OpenBenchmarking.org Files/s, More Is Better FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size Btrfs EXT2 EXT3 EXT4 JFS ReiserFS XFS 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.61, N = 3 SE +/- 1.25, N = 3 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 60.70 78.90 64.47 77.73 91.23 57.37 80.23 1. (CC) gcc options: -static
Dbench Client Count: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Dbench 4.0 Client Count: 1 Btrfs EXT2 EXT3 EXT4 JFS ReiserFS XFS 120 240 360 480 600 SE +/- 2.97, N = 6 SE +/- 16.39, N = 6 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 SE +/- 3.21, N = 6 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 SE +/- 0.44, N = 3 159.56 576.71 126.99 200.87 274.81 111.23 162.38 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpopt
IOzone Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.347 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance Btrfs EXT2 EXT3 EXT4 JFS ReiserFS XFS 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.45, N = 3 SE +/- 0.97, N = 3 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 2.51, N = 6 SE +/- 1.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.36, N = 3 98.82 101.13 101.13 107.35 93.51 102.12 104.74 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
IOzone Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.347 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance Btrfs EXT2 EXT3 EXT4 JFS ReiserFS XFS 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 1.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.32, N = 3 SE +/- 0.29, N = 3 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 SE +/- 3.93, N = 3 SE +/- 2.13, N = 3 SE +/- 3.38, N = 5 223.21 213.60 225.15 254.84 247.57 213.35 240.85 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
IOzone Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.347 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance Btrfs EXT2 EXT3 EXT4 JFS ReiserFS XFS 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.57, N = 3 SE +/- 0.70, N = 3 SE +/- 0.25, N = 3 SE +/- 0.77, N = 3 SE +/- 1.64, N = 6 SE +/- 0.64, N = 3 SE +/- 0.50, N = 3 100.02 102.53 99.93 105.41 92.80 102.37 104.97 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
IOzone Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.347 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance Btrfs EXT2 EXT3 EXT4 JFS ReiserFS XFS 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.66, N = 3 SE +/- 0.59, N = 3 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 SE +/- 2.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.89, N = 3 224.78 211.49 225.00 254.80 254.18 213.20 236.11 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
IOzone Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.347 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance Btrfs EXT2 EXT3 EXT4 JFS ReiserFS XFS 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.24, N = 3 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.52, N = 3 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 SE +/- 0.29, N = 3 SE +/- 0.30, N = 3 103.13 102.45 101.20 104.03 89.09 101.90 105.61 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
IOzone Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.347 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance Btrfs EXT2 EXT3 EXT4 JFS ReiserFS XFS 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 SE +/- 3.43, N = 4 SE +/- 0.22, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 SE +/- 2.19, N = 3 SE +/- 1.87, N = 3 225.32 216.43 224.88 254.84 254.24 213.13 235.11 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
Threaded I/O Tester Test: Write - Size Per Thread: 128MB - Thread Count: 8 OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3 Test: Write - Size Per Thread: 128MB - Thread Count: 8 Btrfs EXT2 EXT3 EXT4 JFS ReiserFS XFS 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.24, N = 4 SE +/- 1.21, N = 6 SE +/- 1.09, N = 4 SE +/- 1.27, N = 8 SE +/- 1.24, N = 8 SE +/- 1.33, N = 4 SE +/- 1.10, N = 4 99.10 88.57 100.10 99.06 98.92 97.84 99.84
Threaded I/O Tester Test: Write - Size Per Thread: 128MB - Thread Count: 16 OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3 Test: Write - Size Per Thread: 128MB - Thread Count: 16 Btrfs EXT2 EXT3 EXT4 JFS ReiserFS XFS 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.36, N = 4 SE +/- 0.91, N = 4 SE +/- 0.88, N = 4 SE +/- 1.28, N = 7 SE +/- 0.65, N = 4 SE +/- 0.45, N = 4 SE +/- 0.42, N = 4 99.12 92.82 99.21 98.62 101.35 98.40 98.93
Threaded I/O Tester Test: Random Write - Size Per Thread: 128MB - Thread Count: 8 OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3 Test: Random Write - Size Per Thread: 128MB - Thread Count: 8 Btrfs EXT2 EXT3 EXT4 JFS ReiserFS XFS 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.60, N = 4 SE +/- 2.53, N = 8 SE +/- 4.96, N = 8 SE +/- 0.49, N = 4 SE +/- 10.64, N = 8 SE +/- 6.58, N = 8 SE +/- 0.35, N = 4 84.21 83.82 81.36 88.77 64.78 80.14 85.83
Threaded I/O Tester Test: Random Write - Size Per Thread: 128MB - Thread Count: 16 OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3 Test: Random Write - Size Per Thread: 128MB - Thread Count: 16 Btrfs EXT2 EXT3 EXT4 JFS ReiserFS XFS 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.33, N = 5 SE +/- 0.33, N = 4 SE +/- 0.64, N = 4 SE +/- 0.09, N = 4 SE +/- 6.90, N = 8 SE +/- 0.29, N = 4 SE +/- 0.59, N = 4 89.02 87.60 85.68 87.24 77.04 84.77 85.09
Compile Bench Test: Initial Create OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Initial Create Btrfs EXT2 EXT3 EXT4 JFS ReiserFS XFS 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 2.01, N = 6 SE +/- 1.08, N = 3 SE +/- 0.98, N = 3 SE +/- 1.42, N = 6 SE +/- 0.34, N = 3 SE +/- 1.50, N = 4 SE +/- 2.36, N = 6 79.21 73.68 97.49 97.19 54.46 85.96 88.68
Compile Bench Test: Compile OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Compile Btrfs EXT2 EXT3 EXT4 JFS ReiserFS XFS 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 SE +/- 5.37, N = 3 SE +/- 0.99, N = 3 SE +/- 0.85, N = 3 SE +/- 0.85, N = 3 SE +/- 1.13, N = 3 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 105.54 71.87 105.72 106.50 92.08 103.77 104.03
Compile Bench Test: Read Compiled Tree OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Read Compiled Tree Btrfs EXT2 EXT3 EXT4 JFS ReiserFS XFS 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 36.14, N = 6 SE +/- 6.23, N = 3 SE +/- 0.63, N = 3 SE +/- 1.22, N = 3 SE +/- 0.27, N = 3 SE +/- 2.13, N = 3 SE +/- 0.28, N = 3 409.16 242.98 131.66 119.22 135.74 161.43 134.29
PostMark Disk Transaction Performance OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostMark 1.51 Disk Transaction Performance Btrfs EXT3 JFS ReiserFS 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 0.00, N = 2 SE +/- 57.17, N = 10 SE +/- 19.55, N = 10 SE +/- 44.77, N = 10 2083 1882 1526 1770
Flexible IO Tester Test: Intel IOMeter File Server Access Pattern OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds (Run Time), Fewer Is Better Flexible IO Tester 1.57 Test: Intel IOMeter File Server Access Pattern Btrfs EXT2 EXT3 EXT4 JFS ReiserFS XFS 120 240 360 480 600 SE +/- 2.30, N = 3 SE +/- 2.65, N = 6 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 SE +/- 2.16, N = 6 SE +/- 3.75, N = 6 SE +/- 1.14, N = 3 SE +/- 0.45, N = 3 561.12 175.00 148.16 117.03 161.02 147.65 226.00
Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.5