Running pts/clomp-1.0.0.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1111041-GR-1111048IV45
tgui,
"NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 - Test / Class: BT.A",
Higher Results Are Better
"i5 2400",10827.3,10729.45,10681.51
"phenom 2 vs i5 2400",5037.14,4963.75,4978.31
"NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 - Test / Class: SP.A",
Higher Results Are Better
"i5 2400",5404.22,5386.16,5398.29
"phenom 2 vs i5 2400",2621.9,2650.64,2702.08
"NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 - Test / Class: IS.C",
Higher Results Are Better
"i5 2400",168.11,167.57,168.07
"phenom 2 vs i5 2400",83.31,82.8,82.86
"NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 - Test / Class: MG.B",
Higher Results Are Better
"i5 2400",5585.37,5600.88,5563.41
"phenom 2 vs i5 2400",2862.92,2764.72,2843.84
"NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 - Test / Class: LU.A",
Higher Results Are Better
"i5 2400",8927.9,9028.6,8980.45
"phenom 2 vs i5 2400",4739.04,4774.1,4626.63
"John The Ripper 1.7.8 - Test: Traditional DES",
Higher Results Are Better
"i5 2400",4273000,4281000,4284000
"phenom 2 vs i5 2400",2410000,2422000,2459000
"Parallel BZIP2 Compression 1.0.5 - 256MB File Compression",
Lower Results Are Better
"i5 2400",11.841279983521,11.59129691124,11.740104913712
"phenom 2 vs i5 2400",19.673520803452,19.2867000103,19.728830099106
"Stream 2009-04-11 - Type: Triad",
Higher Results Are Better
"i5 2400",13933.6004,13908.5728,13908.5728,13941.3193,13937.4588,13945.182,13941.3193,13941.3193,13921.0754,13928.7804
"phenom 2 vs i5 2400",8539.1098,8495.5098,8880.7495,8659.5807,8664.4255,8811.9487,8639.5139,8501.6085,8759.0425,8636.1784
"Stream 2009-04-11 - Type: Add",
Higher Results Are Better
"i5 2400",13764.9796,13702.2114,13710.6096,13702.2114,13683.5854,13678.9368,13710.6096,13687.3065,13721.8233,13725.5653
"phenom 2 vs i5 2400",8480.4799,8792.7061,8768.5798,8579.1363,8420.8881,8474.7681,8602.23,8614.3764,8546.7224,8498.7375
"NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 - Test / Class: CG.B",
Higher Results Are Better
"i5 2400",2273.12,2243.55,2276.51
"phenom 2 vs i5 2400",1422.2,1320.04,1428.18,1435.1,1478.96,1469.41
"Stream 2009-04-11 - Type: Copy",
Higher Results Are Better
"i5 2400",12794.8263,12800.9278,12794.8263,12805.8132,12799.707,12769.2634,12836.4315,12789.9493,12789.9493,12794.8263
"phenom 2 vs i5 2400",7924.5278,8042.287,8103.4672,7942.8174,7952.2294,7889.5913,8217.5796,8126.0355,8060.1566,8379.1814
"Stream 2009-04-11 - Type: Scale",
Higher Results Are Better
"i5 2400",12499.3228,12514.4735,12491.1799,12503.9806,12509.8078,12529.6609,12494.6684,12509.8078,12490.0175,12491.1799
"phenom 2 vs i5 2400",7841.6527,7763.6354,7876.165,7910.9824,7789.7695,8288.1146,7889.5913,7833.4147,7866.01,7964.0259
"NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 - Test / Class: UA.A",
Higher Results Are Better
"i5 2400",33.72,33.59,33.67
"phenom 2 vs i5 2400",21.65,21.83,21.84
"NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 - Test / Class: FT.B",
Higher Results Are Better
"i5 2400",5609.47,5614.41,5628.98
"phenom 2 vs i5 2400",3884.58,3894.3,3885.39
"LAME MP3 Encoding 3.98.2 - WAV To MP3",
Lower Results Are Better
"i5 2400",21.011072874069,20.992677927017,21.003066062927,21.000128030777,20.979985952377
"phenom 2 vs i5 2400",29.162820100784,28.993195056915,29.005567073822,29.073124885559,29.125819921494
"NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 - Test / Class: EP.B",
Higher Results Are Better
"i5 2400",127.2,126.8,126.77
"phenom 2 vs i5 2400",92.48,91.69,92.61
"Timed MAFFT Alignment 6.706 - Multiple Sequence Alignment",
Lower Results Are Better
"i5 2400",21.534080028534,21.52672791481,21.547638893127
"phenom 2 vs i5 2400",29.349233865738,29.337521076202,29.378144979477
"7-Zip Compression 9.13 - Compress Speed Test",
Higher Results Are Better
"2011-11-04 02:14",11780,11847,11758
"phenom 2 vs i5 2400",8872,8866,8870
"BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6 - Computational Test: Dhrystone 2",
Higher Results Are Better
"i5 2400",22778751,22770742.3,22785767.3
"phenom 2 vs i5 2400",17789433.9,17414346.5,17749071.9
"Timed Apache Compilation 2.2.17 - Time To Compile",
Lower Results Are Better
"i5 2400",29.156825065613,29.376720905304,29.371559858322
"phenom 2 vs i5 2400",37.698713064194,37.674939870834,38.055229902267
"OpenSSL 1.0.0a - RSA 4096-bit Performance",
Higher Results Are Better
"i5 2400",79.6,78.8,78.9,79.1
"phenom 2 vs i5 2400",62.2,62.3,62.2,62.5
"John The Ripper 1.7.8 - Test: Blowfish",
Higher Results Are Better
"i5 2400",814,814,814
"phenom 2 vs i5 2400",988,988,988
"FLAC Audio Encoding 1.2.1 - WAV To FLAC",
Lower Results Are Better
"i5 2400",6.8060810565948,6.8005509376526,6.7978031635284,6.8014919757843,6.7967569828033
"phenom 2 vs i5 2400",8.2022931575775,8.1893191337585,8.1904158592224,8.2496428489685,8.1828849315643
"FFmpeg 0.8.2 - AVI To NTSC VCD",
Lower Results Are Better
"i5 2400",15.122580051422,15.060129165649,14.746226072311
"phenom 2 vs i5 2400",12.634876966476,12.757199048996,12.663231134415
"John The Ripper 1.7.8 - Test: MD5",
Higher Results Are Better
"i5 2400",13020,12999,12994
"phenom 2 vs i5 2400",15006,14966,14994
"Crafty 23.3 - Elapsed Time",
Lower Results Are Better
"i5 2400",363.45,363.61,361.35
"CLOMP 3.3 - Static OMP Speedup",
Higher Results Are Better
"i5 2400",3.26,3.3,3.3,3.26,3.25
"i5 2400",3.24,3.25,3.25,3.26,3.24
"phenom 2 vs i5 2400",0.39,0.2,0.32,0.35,0.39,0.45,0.41,0.4,0.34,0.32