t1ub

2 x Intel Xeon X5355 testing with a Dell 0NR282 and ATI ES1000 on Ubuntu 10.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1110073-LI-T1UB7627797
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

Bioinformatics 3 Tests
C/C++ Compiler Tests 9 Tests
Compression Tests 3 Tests
CPU Massive 12 Tests
Creator Workloads 2 Tests
Cryptography 2 Tests
Disk Test Suite 4 Tests
HPC - High Performance Computing 4 Tests
Common Kernel Benchmarks 3 Tests
Multi-Core 5 Tests
Scientific Computing 3 Tests
Server 4 Tests
Server CPU Tests 6 Tests
Single-Threaded 5 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
t1ub
October 06 2011
 
2011-10-06 13:47
October 06 2011
 
Invert Hiding All Results Option
 
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

t1ub 2 x Intel Xeon X5355 testing with a Dell 0NR282 and ATI ES1000 on Ubuntu 10.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. t1ub: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon X5355 @ 2.67GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: Dell 0NR282, Chipset: Intel 5000X MCH, Memory: 8 x 1024 MB DDR2-667MHz, Disk: 731GB PERC 5/i, Graphics: ATI ES1000, Network: Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5708 Gigabit OS: Ubuntu 10.04, Kernel: 2.6.32-33-server (x86_64), Display Driver: ati, Compiler: GCC 4.4.3, File-System: ext4 2011-10-06 13:47: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon X5355 @ 2.67GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: Dell 0NR282, Chipset: Intel 5000X MCH, Memory: 8 x 1024 MB DDR2-667MHz, Disk: 731GB PERC 5/i, Graphics: ATI ES1000, Network: Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5708 Gigabit OS: Ubuntu 10.04, Kernel: 2.6.32-33-server (x86_64), Display Driver: ati, Compiler: GCC 4.4.3, File-System: ext4 FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size Files/s > Higher Is Better t1ub . 225.27 |================================================================ FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSync Files/s > Higher Is Better t1ub . 819.17 |================================================================ FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threads Files/s > Higher Is Better t1ub . 159.45 |================================================================ GraphicsMagick 1.3.12 Operation: HWB Color Space Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better 2011-10-06 13:47 . 108 |======================================================= IOzone 3.347 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better t1ub . 795.59 |================================================================ IOzone 3.347 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better t1ub . 2592.30 |=============================================================== IOzone 3.347 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better t1ub . 911.20 |================================================================ IOzone 3.347 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better t1ub . 2918.63 |=============================================================== IOzone 3.347 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better t1ub . 889.43 |================================================================ IOzone 3.347 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better t1ub . 2875.25 |=============================================================== IOzone 3.347 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better t1ub . 488.99 |================================================================ IOzone 3.347 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better t1ub . 2616.15 |=============================================================== IOzone 3.347 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better t1ub . 462.24 |================================================================ IOzone 3.347 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better t1ub . 2942.98 |=============================================================== IOzone 3.347 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better t1ub . 540.58 |================================================================ IOzone 3.347 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better t1ub . 2918.61 |=============================================================== AIO-Stress 0.21 Test: Random Write MB/s > Higher Is Better t1ub . 696.25 |================================================================ Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3 Test: Read - Size Per Thread: 32MB - Thread Count: 4 MB/s > Higher Is Better t1ub . 3088.43 |=============================================================== Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3 Test: Read - Size Per Thread: 32MB - Thread Count: 8 MB/s > Higher Is Better t1ub . 1541.35 |=============================================================== Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3 Test: Read - Size Per Thread: 32MB - Thread Count: 16 MB/s > Higher Is Better t1ub . 1558.05 |=============================================================== Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3 Test: Read - Size Per Thread: 32MB - Thread Count: 32 MB/s > Higher Is Better t1ub . 1588.88 |=============================================================== Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3 Test: Write - Size Per Thread: 64MB - Thread Count: 4 MB/s > Higher Is Better t1ub . 252.65 |================================================================ Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3 Test: Write - Size Per Thread: 64MB - Thread Count: 8 MB/s > Higher Is Better t1ub . 181.47 |================================================================ Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3 Test: Write - Size Per Thread: 64MB - Thread Count: 16 MB/s > Higher Is Better t1ub . 157.96 |================================================================ Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3 Test: Write - Size Per Thread: 64MB - Thread Count: 32 MB/s > Higher Is Better t1ub . 154.13 |================================================================ Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3 Test: Write - Size Per Thread: 32MB - Thread Count: 4 MB/s > Higher Is Better t1ub . 308.55 |================================================================ Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3 Test: Write - Size Per Thread: 32MB - Thread Count: 8 MB/s > Higher Is Better t1ub . 280.53 |================================================================ Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3 Test: Write - Size Per Thread: 32MB - Thread Count: 16 MB/s > Higher Is Better t1ub . 185.79 |================================================================ Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3 Test: Write - Size Per Thread: 32MB - Thread Count: 32 MB/s > Higher Is Better t1ub . 158.69 |================================================================ Himeno Benchmark 3.0 Poisson Pressure Solver MFLOPS > Higher Is Better t1ub . 179.87 |================================================================ t1ub . 179.82 |================================================================ SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better t1ub . 458.54 |================================================================ SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better t1ub . 48.57 |================================================================= SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better t1ub . 783.11 |================================================================ SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better t1ub . 158.02 |================================================================ SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better t1ub . 507.56 |================================================================ SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better t1ub . 795.43 |================================================================ 7-Zip Compression 9.13 Compress Speed Test MIPS > Higher Is Better t1ub . 13903 |================================================================= Apache Benchmark 2.2.17 Static Web Page Serving Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better t1ub . 11358.80 |============================================================== PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite Score > Higher Is Better t1ub . 50891 |================================================================= OpenSSL 1.0.0a RSA 4096-bit Performance Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better t1ub . 39.10 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 Test / Class: BT.A Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better t1ub . 9577.30 |=============================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 Test / Class: CG.B Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better t1ub . 1015.09 |=============================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 Test / Class: EP.B Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better t1ub . 161.00 |================================================================ NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 Test / Class: FT.B Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better t1ub . 4465.23 |=============================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 Test / Class: IS.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better t1ub . 59.50 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 Test / Class: LU.A Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better t1ub . 7517.39 |=============================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 Test / Class: MG.B Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better t1ub . 2107.06 |=============================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 Test / Class: SP.A Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better t1ub . 3386.31 |=============================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 Test / Class: UA.A Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better t1ub . 28.16 |================================================================= PostMark 1.51 Disk Transaction Performance TPS > Higher Is Better t1ub . 2241 |================================================================== Gcrypt Library 1.4.4 CAMELLIA256-ECB Cipher Microseconds < Lower Is Better t1ub . 3320 |================================================================== SQLite 3.7.3 Test Target: Default Test Directory Seconds < Lower Is Better t1ub . 8.83 |================================================================== Parallel BZIP2 Compression 1.0.5 256MB File Compression Seconds < Lower Is Better t1ub . 8.37 |================================================================== C-Ray 1.1 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better t1ub . 48.30 |================================================================= Gzip Compression 2GB File Compression Seconds < Lower Is Better t1ub . 16.76 |================================================================= Minion 0.9 Benchmark: Solitaire Seconds < Lower Is Better t1ub . 198.41 |================================================================ Sudokut 0.4 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better t1ub . 33.23 |================================================================= Timed MAFFT Alignment 6.706 Multiple Sequence Alignment Seconds < Lower Is Better t1ub . 34.69 |================================================================= Timed HMMer Search 2.3.2 Pfam Database Search Seconds < Lower Is Better t1ub . 17.47 |=================================================================