Running pts/scimark2-1.1.1.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1103051-IV-1101231IV86
2600K Scimark,
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation",
Higher Results Are Better
"4.4ghz",1387.27,1381.02,1387.27,1387.27
"3.4ghz",1288.18,1288.18,1288.18,1288.18
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Monte Carlo",
Higher Results Are Better
"4.4ghz",639.13,637.24,637.24,637.24
"3.4ghz",593.23,593.23,593.23,593.23
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization",
Higher Results Are Better
"4.4ghz",2653.4,2686.82,2700.42,2686.82
"3.4ghz",2515.72,2539.68,2527.65,2564.1
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Composite",
Higher Results Are Better
"4.4ghz",1424.35,1431.88,1435.89,1435.33
"3.4ghz",1361.59,1366.59,1364.38,1371.47
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply",
Higher Results Are Better
"4.4ghz",2155.79,2167.2,2161.48,2167.2
"3.4ghz",2116.8,2116.8,2116.8,2116.8
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform",
Higher Results Are Better
"4.4ghz",286.17,287.13,293.03,298.13
"3.4ghz",294.03,295.05,296.07,295.05