Running pts/fs-mark-1.0.0.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1103034-IV-1103029IV85
r5-e3,
"FS-Mark 3.3 - Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5-e3",10.2,10.2,10.3
"pilulka",160.1,147.3,161,165.1,162.6,147.3
"r5-e3-withoutSE",10.2,10.4,10.5
"r5-e3-with-cache",59.5,90.2,93.3,93,85.9,98.7
"r5-e4-with-cache",304.5,318.3,328.9,319.2
"FS-Mark 3.3 - Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSync",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5-e3",849.7,807.5,858.2
"pilulka",919.4,922,915.9
"r5-e3-withoutSE",950.2,964,967.2
"r5-e3-with-cache",899.6,527.9,914.4,924.9,906.4,925.9
"r5-e4-with-cache",1382.6,1336.6,1374.7
"FS-Mark 3.3 - Test: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threads",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5-e3",15.2,15.2,16
"pilulka",128.3,122,128
"r5-e3-withoutSE",15.2,14.8,15.6
"r5-e3-with-cache",75.3,74.1,74.7
"r5-e4-with-cache",310.6,304.1,302.1
"FS-Mark 3.3 - Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5-e3",10.4,10.6,12.9,12.2,10.3,10.3
"pilulka",133.7,139.1,144.3,135.8
"r5-e3-withoutSE",10.5,10.8,10.6
"r5-e3-with-cache",71.5,76.4,72.4,78.4,39.8,72.5
"r5-e4-with-cache",290.9,285.8,290.6